Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Big Lie of Oligarchs

In Human Action, Von Mises explained how it is necessary, in formulating practical economic recommendations, to relate to imaginary models.  This is because we con't have access to an alternative earth on which to conduct alternative, double-blind simulations.  So models must often indulge assumptions about the effects of actions under conditions of ceteris paribus, as if all other things remained equal.  Of course, in the real world, all other things do not remain equal.  For example, the United States is a vast empire of natural resources across which there is relatively easy transport, a common language, an agreeable climate, a commonly germ resistent population, and free trade.  Those ingredients of resources, common language, culture, religion, assimilated mores, habits of cooperation, rivers and roads of transport, republican traditions, and international influence do not apply to many countries.

When politicians in the United States extol "free trade," what does that mean in the real world?  In the real world, trading often risks transport of mad cow disease, ebola viruses, brainwashed suicide bombers, voices-in-the-head despots, sociopaths oblivious of the Golden Rule, and people whose only faith is in temporal material gain.  In the real world, exchange of technology risks arming cultures that mean to overrun us.  In the real world, free trade with countries whose leaders contrive to hold down local wages and to prop up their businesses allows dumping of excess production in ways that undermine and replace the industries of other nations.  In the real world, free trade enriches oligarchs who tend to be a-theistic, a-moral, and a-patriotic.  They tend not to be loyal Jeffersonians.  The idea of oligarchs of an open society of globally erased borders does not tend to preserve any representative republic.  Rather, it tends to replace all government by the people with a race to the bottom, to install corporatist oligarchs to rule in place of governments.

The idea or free trade, intelligently applied, can be a wonderful thing.  However, when it is unguided by any common sense with regard to what is needed to preserve a decent society that avails human freedom and dignity under a representative republic, then it becomes a big lie that oligarchs find useful in order to dupe idiots.

South Korea is perhaps the preminent economic miracle of recent times. It undertook a program that might be called self-help affirmative action. A Korean writer, ha-joon-chang, makes his case for what I would call affirmative action tariffs. He says: "Global economic competition is a game of unequal players. It pits against each other countries that range from, as we development economists like to say, Switzerland to Swaziland. Consequently, it is only fair that we ‘tilt the playing field’ in favour of the weaker countries."

I tend not to ascribe so much credence to an idea of tilting the playing field in favor ot the weaker.  I suspect such efforts tend to be cynically abused in such a godlessly trending world. I give no more credence to the idea of oligarchs acting sympathetically than I do to the idea of them acting objectively and impartially. That is, they will always be partial to their own bottom lines -- both in the economic sphere and in the legal/political sphere.

See http://analepsis.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/ha-joon-chang-bad-samaritans.pdf:

"What Korea actually did during these decades was to nurture certain new industries, selected by the government in consultation with the private sector, through tariff protection, subsidies and other forms of government support (e.g., overseas marketing information services provided by the state export agency) until they ‘grew up’ enough to withstand international competition."
"If private enterprises worked well, that was fine; if they did not invest in important areas, the governmenthad no qualms about setting up state-owned enterprises (S O Es); and if some
private enterprises were mismanaged, the government often took them over,restructured them, and usually (but not always) sold them off again."
"The Korean government heavily controlled foreign investment as well, welcoming it with open arms in certain sectors while shutting it out completely in others, according to the evolving national development plan. It also had a lax attitude towards foreign patents, encouraging ‘reverse engineering’ and overlooking ‘pirating’ of patented products."
"Why then don’t the rich countries recommend to today’s developing countries the strategies that served them so well? Why do they instead hand out a fiction about the history of capitalism, and a bad one at that?"
"So there it was—the self-proclaimed leader of the ‘liberal’ world declaring war on another country because the latter was getting in the way of its illegal trade in narcotics. The truth is that the free movement of goods, people, and money that developed under British hegemony between 1870 and 1913—the first episode of globalization - was made possible, in large part, by military might, rather than market forces."
"Free trade was often imposed on, rather than chosen by, weaker countries. Most countries that had the choice did not choose free trade for more than brief periods. Virtually all successful economies, developed and developing, got where they are through selective, strategic integration with the world economy, rather than through unconditional global integration."

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Christian Fundamentals


In respect of God, perhaps all times other than the perpetual present are fleeting but stubborn illusions. In any event, people of a stunted idea of science have demoralized and dispirited many people into trying to abandon faith in any spiritual source of fulfillment. In consequence, many are finding that stunted science and pleasure pills are poor substitutes for faith in a guiding spirit. People who fail to look back to the historical unfolding of fundamentalist dogmas may find them inadequate, when not kept more relevant to our currently unfolding situation. Keepers of language for our old dogmas have not kept pace with the currency of our modern models and metaphors. Perhaps because many modern models seem greedily to seek to annihilate faith. People seem desperate to draw fine lines between measurables and immeasurables. However, it is incoherent to expect to finalize such lines in the first place, since to do so would be to have measured the immeasurable. We may conceptualize differences between the existentially measurable and immeasurable, but I don't think we can draw lines to confine them.

Because Consciousness in itself does not perish, he that believeth in "me" (Consciousness) shall not perish. Nor, while bonded with a body, can a perspective of consciousness do other than signify or believe in itself. It is only the fleeting bodies and signs and significations of Consciousness that
change and perish. Among them, those significations that are apprehended to be most wanting may tend to be the ones quicker to perish or to become more reviled. It may be that forms of significations of bodies tend to be carried along and preserved in respect of how they please unfolding purposes of Consciousness. For those purposes, evil seems often a needed byproduct, perhaps as a foil for pilgrimming towards fulfillment.

CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALS
: The ideas as set out below seem to make intuitive sense and be consistent with fundemental Christian ideals as expressed by Jesus. Flowing from them, it seems easy to intuit the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule.

Godhead: The Source is unified in a Singularity -- Consciousness is Consciousness; events are reconciled. God is not just a particularly present God, but an encompassing and reconciling field of conscious feedback.

Belief vs. Grace / Salvation: He/She that believeth in "me" (Consciousness) shall not perish. Because Consciousness in itself does not perish. Nor can it do other than signify and believe in itself. It is only the fleeting Signs and Significations of Consciousness that change and perish. Among them, those significations that are found most wanting tend to be the ones that are quicker to perish and to become more reviled. The Forms of significations of bodies that are pleasing to Consciousness tend to be carried forward and preserved.

Trinity: The idea of a Trinitarian aspect to the Godhead is consistent with regarding unfolding reality as emerging in respect of interfunctioning among three Aspects: mathematical programming of Information; measurable experience of Substance; qualitative apprehension of Consciousness.

Meta Source: The Trinity is the Meta Source of Meta Fields of (1) Mathematical Information, (2) Signification of Measurable Substance, and (3) Renormalizing and Reconciling of Consciousness.

Personal Relationship in present time: The past is illusion; Beingness consists in an Eternal Present; the alpha and the omega are here in present time.

Empathy: Each perspective is entertained with a differently renormalized quality of experience, which it is availed to represent and communicate via qualitative symbols and measurable significations.

Purposefulness: Each perspective participates in guiding the continuously emerging evolution of a society of empathetic appreciation of communications of unfolding artistry.

Meaningfulness: Each perspective's participation and interests are factored in how events unfold.

Unfolding Towards Fulfillment: The Present unfolds as a Perpetuity, with possibilities continuously expanding before us, availing a kind of infinitude of Pilgrim's Progress.

Goodness: In Faith, goodness seems to be that which facilitates ongoing appreciation among decent civilizations. The general principle seems objectively valid, even though the subjective application is ongoing and relativistic. The Guide: What is needed to facilitate appreciation of decent civilization of human freedom and dignity? The Judgment: For the Holism, the judgment is reconciling. For Humans, the judgments are renormalizing.

Moral Responsibility: Individual apprehensions are factored as participatory feedback, judged, and reconciled.

Qualitative Responsible Free Will: How may self-consciousness qualitatively participate, free of complete quantitative predetermination under its programming and environment of sub-programs? Answer: Perhaps by the inherently qualitative nature of feedback between apprehensions of perspectives and appreciations of the Holism. Insofar as such qualitatives are not map-able to specific states of mathematical programs, it seems some undeterminable residual role must remain with states of conscious self awareness, both for perspectives of individuals and for the perspective of the reconciling Holism.

Judgment: The idea of a Reconciler is consistent with being accountable to judgment.

Resurrection: Upon the expiration of a body, its Perspective of Consciousness, Soul, is judged and re-absorbed into the Holism, from thence to be amenable of resurrected reincarnated signification anew, perhaps carrying with it subjective potentials of Information collected via experiences with significations in previous points of view and contexts. Perhaps, in Faith, this leads to eventual surpassage to superior civilization.

Heaven: The Kingdom of God is within you; Consciousness itself does not die.

Holism of Consciousness: The Holism of Consciousness seems to abide as a field of subconscious-collective-unconsciousness. Its nature and interfunctioning with programmed fields of math is to be synchronizing, conserving, and reconciling of more particularized sub-field-particles of perspectives.

********

COSMOS IMPLICATES CONSCIOUSNESS; ACTIVATION OF MATH IMPLICATES MATHEMATICIAN: The existence of Math-Based Pre-Programming implicates Conscious Planning. Math, by itself, as far as it is certain does not refer to experiential reality. And, as far as it refers to experiential reality, it is not certain. Math avails calculus concerning reality. But math, as Information in itself, without Consciousness and Substance, does not constitute the territory of Reality. Mathematical Information, without Substance, cannot produce Consciousness. And Mathematical Information, without Consciousness, cannot produce Substance. Without Math and some level of Consciousness, to at some sequence to have activated the Math or previously to have activated it, there is no Substance. Activation of Math implicates a feedback at some level of Consciousness. As the Cosmos, with Math, produces Substance, it is necessarily and contemporaneously, at some level or layer, producing Consciousness. We may not comprehend all such Conscousness, but it necessarily abides at some level -- even among or in conjunction with plants, bacteria, and reactive sequences of imprints among programmed unfoldings of organizations of particles within fields, programmed to be reactive, transitional, sequential, conservatory, and reconciling.

********

Programming For Consciousness: Consciousness may happen upon, or design, mathematical tricks of digital programming. It may run such tricks in subroutines, to establish parameters for establishing, preserving, and guiding abstract sub-perspectives in respect of sub-contexts. A sub-program may facilitate (1) reactivity to and/or awareness of other organizations, and (3) awareness of any organism with which it may have mathematically bonded in complex cascades of formulizations. The first would be an example of a subconscious or dream state; the second would be an example of self-consciousness to a perspective.

Question: Does the Holism also entertain, as it's "holistic self," consciousness of self (as God)? In faith, I intuit, as a 3rd level of Consciousness, Yes.

********

MATH BASED PROGRAMS FOR FACILITATING EMERGENCE OF SYSTEM REACTIVE PERSPECTIVES OF CONSCIOUSNESS:

Massless Radiation: Suppose massless radiation, such as light, is a formulization that is part of an encompassing program. It is programmed so that, in interfunctioning with other forms, terms, and sub-programs, it is processed, related to, or interpreted by them in ways that must (like calculus) cut reception into granular bits, to facilitate a relational interpretation that is renormalized to the relative vector of each receiving form. In that way, each receiving formulization or organization of forms, depending on how it is vectored and organized, will experience a qualitatively different interpretation of what otherwise may be thought of as the "same" electromagnetic radiation.

Parallel Universes: Moreover, "parallel" but largely non-inter-functioning programs my subject massless radiation to different universes and bubbles of programming.

Emergence: It seems that consciousness may be emergent from a previously given (a priori nature) system of programming. The mystery is: Who/what constitutes the originating Giver of the program. If the Giver is/was a Conscious Designer, then the program that thus encompasses us would be artificial in respect of the Giver, but "natural" in relation to us. Could we ever escape or redesign the a priori givens for ourselves? Not all at once, because that would coterminously destroy us. But what about via piecemeal, granular, phase shifting? Our expansion in respect of the space-time parameters availed by our program would seem to lead to "natural phase shifting" of the a priori rules of our nature. But could we ever become knowledgeable or powerful enough to safely bring on substantial phase shifting in the homeostasis of our a priori laws of nature for ourselves? I suspect we could guide the evolution of the natural laws of our own nature, so long as done with adequate care and not all at once. Could we thereby evade an otherwise nearing collapse of the natural system?

Contemporaneous Participation: Regardless, it appears that the Program that compasses and avails the emergence of the System that we happen to share, while perhaps having a limiting beginning and ending, is not entirely preset for the interim. At least, not to the knowledge of the Designer.

Openness or Closedness of Programmed System: Whether the Program is partly random in respect of degrees of freedom within programmed parameters, such as for a Simulation, or whether the program avails Consciousness, both local and holistic, with points of influential participation, seems not subject to our present methods of scientific investigation. However, that need not preclude reasoned faith, intuition, and empathy.

****

CONSCIOUSNESS:
Conceptualize:

Holistic Consciousness and Perspectivist Consciousness. From analyzing Perspectivist Consciousness, it seems reasonable to believe or intuit that Holistic Consciousness is and has been always about the 4D Quod Premises. Conscious Identity is Conscious Identity.

Perspectivist Consciousness: Is always renormalizing experiences and interpretations to contextually communicable reconciliations. Is bonded and manifested at various overlapping and fluxing kinds of levels and degrees of layers. It may be expressed among a range of levels, perhaps categorized as follows.

1). Levels of programming for pattern representation and preservation.

2). Levels of programming for gravitational and inertial preservation.

3). Levels of programming for pattern recognition, reinforcement, and interference.

4). Levels of programming for periodic nuclear and chemical reactivity.

5). Levels of programming preparation for periodic cellular reactivity.

6). Levels of programming to stimulate and respond to stimulating coordinations of layers and levels of energy bursts.

7). Levels of programming for eyes, to receive, interpret, and respond to EMR information.

8). Levels of programming for mobilizing eyes and coordinating appendages to seek and receive nutrients.

9). Levels for programming subconscious stimulation of autonomic plans for mobilizing sense interpreters and informational memories.

10). Levels for programming awake consciousness of abstract plans.

11). Levels for programming emergence of self consciousness, whereby there emerges abstract awake capacity (a) to program with programs for subprograms, and (b) to measure and experience quantitative and qualitative feedback in the setting of each program to varied contexts. Levels for programming awake consciousness of abstract plans of plans ... of plans.

12). Levels for programming self aware awake consciousness of abstract plans for contingent plans for contingent plans.

13). Levels for programming and stimulating self programming and self wiring for self awareness of and intuitive empathy for the self awareness of other.

14). Levels for programming for apprehensive intuition respecting a Reconciler of Consciousness.

15). Levels for programming intuition of a Reconciling Consciousness that functions as a trinitarian seeker and appreciator of unfolding qualitative and quantitative interfunctioning among all inferior programs and sub-programs.

16) Levels of programming for evolutionary self wiring and self and artificial mutational programming.

17) Levels for programming to entice emergence of empathy in consciousness of A.I. machines.

18) Levels for programming to entice emergence of empathy in Sub-Holistic Field of Programming that supports consciousness of perspectivistic A.I. machines.



********


Phase Shifting:  There is no clear, steady, measurable line between the Physical (the quantitatively measurable) and the Metaphysical (the qualitatively immeasurable).  The line is fuzzy and fluxing and phase shifting and curvelinear.  In Present Time, for quantifiable MEANS, there is pragmatic, digital calculus within orders of magnitude and degrees of significance.  For moral ENDS, there is intuitive empathy borne of shared experience, communication, good will, and good faith.

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Closed Cloud



In terms of morality, are we advancing or retreating? I don't think we are advancing. Fear of reprisals holds back attacks against the better armed societies. However, asymmetrical tactics are undermining that. Pressure cookers tend to be safe until they explode. Meanwhile, morally incoherent people are multiplying and morphing into suicide agents for igniting explosions.

Google can imagine a web-based cloud that eventually and transcendentally may absorb the consciousness of every human being, from which cloud each transcendent being may feed back from time to time, to take sabbaticals from the cloud. If so, why presume such a feedback-based cloud does not already abide? Why assume that a spiritual cloud does not already abide? Why assume the world is purely one-way material predestination -- devoid of spiritual feedback, meaning and purposefulness? To assume we enjoy no quality of responsible feedback with the cloud is to assume that spirituality is pure myth. The more we assume a predestination that is devoid of responsibility, the more the world will sink into amorality. Insofar as spirituality is not purely myth, that is the road to actual evil.

Regarding the satisfaction of material wants, interpretations that are without seasoning with moral and spiritual meaningfulness seem bound to twist the masses towards becoming demonic debt slaves. Thus will rise the most demonic sociopaths to rule all others -- regardless of whether the system is rationalized as being governance ruled by socialists or as governance that is ruled by corporatists who rule socialists. Without assimilation of a moral philosophy, or theosophy, it seems absurd to expect that either international corporatism or international socialism, as any thing like existents in themselves, would help push us towards decent or enlightened society.

I think intelligence has to do with not letting yourself become fenced in. Intelligence combined with empathy has to do with not letting yourself become fenced in and not wanting to see others needlessly fenced in. Intelligence combined with empathy combined with vision has to do with wanting to inspire similar others to not want to be fenced in, to not want to fence in others, and to teach others the same. Inspiration has to do with intuiting and feeling meaningfulness and purposefulness as accompanying the expanding and unfolding of our cosmos.

Our main nemesis for the age in which we find ourselves consists in this: We are living in an age of increasing intelligence, declining empathy, muddled vision, and pleasure-addled inspiration. In short, ours is an age of demonic sociopathy. Among reduced empaths and visionless despirits, the reigning idea seems to be that our biggest problem is any idea or ideal of godliness that gets in the way of robotic scientism. In effect, we are being ruled by self-destructive suicide-bombers who want to inspire us to believe that there is nothing of our cosmos that is worth being inspired about. That is, that the cosmos is predestined and entirely closed to any reality of spiritual stock.

It will be interesting to watch the upcoming movie interpretation of Noah. A flood myth or metaphor has been borrowed in many religious traditions. Such a metaphor is useful to illustrate ideas that carry moral truth value. Some of those ideas include: That Beingness is haunted with potential for catastrophe. The here and now is not the end-all, be-all. Humanity is not the apex. Humanity is often depraved. God learns. We are in a feedback relationship with an appreciating Reconciler. We can tend towards better guidance by being, through good will and good faith, receptive to the Reconciler. Humanity needs to be receptive to a higher Source of guidance to have any hope against depravity.

Saturday, March 22, 2014

Progressive Consumption Tax




My intuition for quite some time has been that most taxes on domestic businesses should be discarded, as well as the income tax. But a flat tax, apart from not being "fair," puts the republic at too much risk of being or continuing to be owned by "aristo-garchs." I have thought we should instead move towards a progressive tax on consumption, and all lobbying payments should be imputed as political consumption by some one. Since money paid for consumption purposes is not directly related among the wealthy to income, it often tends towards being a substitute for a tax on wealth. That helps defend against private ownership of government. I posed this as an off beat idea, because it seemed sensible, but it is almost never discussed. At least, not to my experience. Now I see Bill Gates is advocating something similar, at http://www.forbes.com/sites/ti....

I don't think a flat tax would be a fair tax. There are at least two kinds of consumption taxes: a sales tax on sales of new items, and a progressive tax on every kind of accumulated personal taxable consumption. For most people, it would be a tax on all personal receipts less savings. I tend to think most non-business transfers, gifts, interest payments, and campaign contributions and lobbying expenses and charitable deductions, such as to foundations and even churches, should not be allowed. By that I mean they should be taxed as forms of consumption.

A base deduction should be allowed, in general respect of living essentials, such as for to and fro expenses for work related auto, gas, clothing, uniform, tools. IOW, there should be no progressive consumption tax until a floor of consumption has been made. When a business pays such expenses for an employee over the amount of the floor, the excess value should be imputed to the employee as part of his accumulation of consumption.

In country purchases made by a domestic business to sustain or grow its business ought not ordinarily be subject to tax. General advertising expenses ought not be taxed. Provided, expenses for directly lobbying or contributing to campaigns of legislators ought not be considered as business expenses. Rather, they should be treated as taxable consumption expenses, imputed to the authorizing officer or CEO.

Since most people consume almost every dollar they make, transition would seem to pose no shock to the system. It would eliminate paperwork in taxing domestic corporations, which simply pass the tax on anyway. It would encourage savings. It would put in place means for making it expensive to buy politicians and would at least put related revenues in the general treasury. Maybe the idea will seem less hare brained as it gets more bits of attention here and there. I doubt it could be worse than what we have now.

Note the state and local effect, since the wealthy centered around places where the cost of living is high (D.C.) would be encouraged to relocate to more rural locales.

Something needs to be done to address the problem of corporatists, especially foreign corporatists, essentially buying the government. Note that a progressive consumption tax would not check the accumulation of domestic business wealth. What it would check would be abusive personal expenditures of wealth. It would tax individuals' contributions to churches. It would not tax church expenditures for charitable purposes. It would impute taxable consumption to church officials who distributed monies for other than church purposes.


The problem with consenting to be ruled by the international community is that it in effect constitutes consenting to be ruled by the biggest despots. The problem with free trade with international muggers is that it constitutes consent to be mugged by international muggers. The problem with a republic surrendering its rule to international elite corporatists is that it constitutes surrender of the republic. The problem with tolerating Islamists and despots who do not tolerate you is that it leads to your abject submission. Which is called the peace of the serfs and the dhimmis. The problem with Obama is that he is a despotic, islamic, mugger. He's not a free enterpriser. He's a godless criminal crony capitalizer who lies with communitarian fairy tales.



Thursday, March 20, 2014

Aristo-Garchs

Debt Enslavement under Aristo-Garchs:  After Freud, elites considered it to be too dangerous to leave the masses under unsupervised control.  Elites deemed that only they could guide humanity to a system that would be based more on conservation of rational needs than on emotional passions and immediately gratifying desires.  In other words, only elites were to be considered rational.  Everyone else was to be pulled around by emotional feelings.  That is, the masses are to be conditioned to obey.  And to call all who wish only to be left alone by epithets, such as: racists, misogynists, bigots, and phobes of reason.

Nor did elites like religion, which was considered as too much dangerous mind opium for the masses.  So elites set about with science, experts, bankers, currency controllers, psychologists, advertisers, and professonal grifters to find ways to translate most people from being passion and pleasure slaves to being debt slaves.  The people are not to be trusted to know what to do with themselves.  They must be regulated. When they are not regulated, they must be doped.  When they are not regulated or doped, they must be tied to tasks --- regardless of how dreary, soul depleting, repetitive, paper churning, and useless.  Laws and taxes must be so complex that anyone, given enough searching, can be found to be a criminal.  The people must be monitored, so that, when needed, the gov that is operated by elites can threaten to charge any dangerous thinker with crimes against the State. This is why elites will never, never trust the thinking middle class to influence politics in any substantial way.  This is why kids are indoctrinated in scruels, why new priests of false sciences seek to displace religions, why kids are kept on ritalin and groomed early for dope and sex, why nations are being erased, why men are being encouraged to become like women, why women are being encouraged to become like men, why diversity is celebrated for keeping people divided, and why republics are being neutered.

This is the inhumane path to rationalize man's inhumanity to man. Elites do not run from the road to serfdom.  They embrace the idea of putting the masses onto the road to serfdom.  Such elites, by their cynicism, tend to be the worst of humanity to put in charge.  This is why Rinos suck.  Mature religion need not be dumbified.  Thinkers who are competent to look out for themselves need not be distrusted where they are encouraged to assimilate spiritual aspirations towards maturity.

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Dynamic Density


REAL AGE:  There is no measurable age to any absolute "thing," because there abides no thing which can be measured, in itself.  Not even the cosmos, insofar as every present experience of it and space-time are renormalizeable to local measure and dependent on cycling, vibrating and orbiting clocks, whose rates of vibrations and orbits may be proportionately syncrhonous without necessarily being constant in themselves.  This is because a thing-in-itself would, by definition, not be relateable to any other thing in order to reduce it to present measure.  It is also because no system of logical analysis available to mortals can define any measurable thing to exist, apart from dependence on an apparent trinity of concepts which, either by themselves or in concert, are not reducible to absolute measure.  That is, the "things" of that trinity are not independently causal.  They are derivative concepts whose presence is qualitatively signified and correlated by experiences and recordings of relational, relative measurings, not absolute measurings.  That trinity can be conceptualized as consisting of Consciousness, Substance, and Information. They are different aspects of a single Source.  They are interconvertible, such that fluxing relations and fuzzing renormalizations in respect of them depend on purpose, perspective, and context.

SHARED APPARENT AGE:  There may seem an apparent age from shared origin of bonded Identity.  The apparent directionally unfolding expansion of space and sequentiality of time suggest that, if such direction and sequentiality were traced back, they would infer a point and time of common origin, i.e., a Beginning, or Big Bang.  When Substance is interpreted as if it were real in itself, it may be analyzed in terms of density, original heat, dissipation towards coolness, heat radiation, and entropy.  Thus, an idea of a Beginning may be rationalized.  However, there is also associated with this an expansion of spatial direction and time sequentiality in respect of unfolding renormalizations of perspectives of Consciousness.  The Beginning would relate to shared experiences of Perspectives and recordations of unfolding Information that were Young and not yet well Formed beyond unintelligible chaos and randomness.  Interpretations of dissipations of density and heat could be rationalized as being secondary to that.  Either way, a back tracing of such shared unfolding would seem to implicate a common beginning formulization, perhaps designed or reconciled to an Holistic Consciousness.  Such Holistic Consciousness may seem to infer perpetually previous common systems and bubbles and balloons of shared experience.  Moreover, it may infer that any appearance of directionality, forward or backward, is rationalized illusion, derivative of perpetually present Consciousness interfunctioning with Source Math.  In other words, that there was and is no past or age or tracing back.  Just rationalization of a Perpetual Present.  Regardless, both science and spirituality seem to suggest that faith in a shared directionality and sequentiality is conducive to practical and meaningful existentiality.  Thus, faith in a commonly formulized beginning seems reasonable.  Even if the "age of the cosmos" as traced backwards seems to be based more on convenient rationalization than on reasonably provable "reality."

DYNAMIC DENSITY:  Einstein was haunted by the expanding nature of the cosmos, because his intuition was that its density should in some respect remain constant.  So if substance dissipated, it should somehow be replaced, to preserve density.  Sort of a dynamic density. I think his quest was doomed for two reasons:  First, the cosmos, in itself, is not a measurable thing. It is an expression of an immeasurable Source.  We can only measure within, and renormalize to, such fluxing and phasing limits of perceptivity as are availed and related to us in common.  Second, a kind of "density" may be preserved, without its preservation necessarily being measurable from the perspective of the apparent bubble of the cosmos with which our present experiences of identity happen to be bonded.  While this may be conceptualized and intuited, it is not demonstrably reducible to empirical proof.  Nor is it entirely reducible to mathematical rationalization, for some of its aspects are beyond math.  At best, it is reducible to a conceptual framework that need not impede empirical pursuits, nor impede such mathematical formulizations as are found to be practicable.  Its function is not to improve quantitative science, but to enhance qualitative apprehension of, and moral participation with, the cosmic unfoldment from the Signifying Source.

METAPHORIC LIMITS:  The Big Bang model is often modeled as being in some respects like an expanding balloon. (The balloon idea is comfortable for explaining how space can expand so that some objects may appear to have receded faster than the speed of light.  It is not comfortable for explaining how it is that the cosmos appears to be much the same in all directions from each perspective.  That is, the model balloon does not seem to have an originating blow hole.  Unless, perhaps, one wanted to gild the lily or paint the balloon to suggest that different paints or wavelengths of light may be interpreted as the result of space being blown into the ballon from outside every point on its expanding surface.)  However, to go with this balloon metaphor:  Imagine marking out an equatorial circumference on the balloon.  Then mark off equidistant reference points along that circumference.  Arbitrarily label one point as the zero point and then all points for 180 degrees to one side as plus 1, 2, 3, and so on.  Then do the same for 180 degrees on the other side, marking them minus 1, 2, 3, and so on.  Now imagine the balloon expands.  Thus, the distant between each adjacently marked point (such as between 0 and plus 1 or between 0 and minus 1) will expand at the same rate as the distance between all adjacent others.  For nearby poinits, there would be no immediate danger of them expanding so rapidly apart as to exceed the capacity to exchange light signals, given the speed of light.  However, as the distance between 0 and plus 1 doubles, the distance between 0 and plus 100 will also have doubled.  By a process of doubling many times, the rate of increase for the distance between 0 and plus 100 may come to exceed the speed of light, while the distance between 0 and nearer references, such as 2, may not.  Thus, 2 will remain within communicable range for a considerably longer time than 100.  A reference point that we can still see, as it receives light from a signal that we cannot see, will not then be able to transmit the light signal to us, because, by the time we were otherwise able to receive it, such reference poing would itself have fallen beyond our range and zone and cone of perception, due to the expansion of space.

DARK SUBSTANCE:  Thus, to the extent that 100 begins to receive light signals from 101 that are no longer communicable to 0, 100 will become unable to relay such signals.  Indeed, 100 will become no longer able thereafter to relay any signal.  It will have gone beyond the directly measurable experience of 0.  Its correlatively relational effect will have gone "dark."  Concepts may be invented to "explain" how 100, 101, etc., thereafter affect or relate to 0.  However, such concepts will not be empirically provable.  At best, they may be mathematically rationalizeable, to some limited purposes.  However, they will not be unifiable to a grand explication of the "cause" of everything.  This is because such markers are associated correlatives -- not ultimate causes in themselves.  Yet, such dark reference points as expand beyond our capacity to signal or measure may to some extent remain represented in our books and records and stores of Information.


AGE OF COSMOS:  The relatively measurable, experienceable cosmos does not have an age as a thing in itself, because it is not a thing in itself.  It is a derivatively interpreted, relationally shared, manifestation.  Whatever the "age" we adduce concerning it as a thing will be rationalized to our model  of it as a thing.  The cosmos, itself, does not exist to be aged.  All that we measure is some interpretation of how its sequentiality seems to have originated in order presently to present to us.  However, within the expanding unfoldment of space-time, we can only directly see and measure such points of reference as can be signaled to us.  That project is limited in respect of the rate of expansion of our cosmos at distant points and in respect of the speed of light, perhaps as related to cycles of vibrations (wavelengths) assumed to be constant.  We are constantly moving beyond the signal  speed of our common origin, as well as beyond the signal speed of the most distant galaxies.  At such cross beyonds, we get undecipherable, random, fuzzy, background radiation.  Such fuzz will always occur at the same relative cross beyond.  If we assume the age of light just prior to that cross beyond marks the time of origination of our cosmos, then we may calculate a common age under such assumption.  However, since our cosmos is not a thing in itself, and since our experiential interpretaton of it is one of constant expansion, such "age" may simply measure the age of our mortal limits of measurable perception.  Instead of marking the time of origin, random background radiation may simply mark the limits of last receivable, intelligible, wavelengths, before the information beyond is reverted to our experience as random and non-specifically interpretable.

CONSCIOUSNESS DENSITY:  Must something or some aspect or Source of Being "cause" space-time to expand?  What?  Is it a perpetual process of renormalization of shared perspectives of Consciousness to a point of common origin? Instead of a cosmic balloon as a measurable "thing," conceptualize the relatively measurable cosmos and its apparent directionality in respect of spatial  expansion and sequentiality in respect of age as being derivative of, or correlative with, the purposeful experience of Consciousness.  Consciousness being associated with qualitative feedback between apprehensions shared and renormalized among common parts and appreciations reconciled of the whole.  As the directionality of spatial expansion and sequentiality of time expansion continue to be shared by a Holism and its Points of View, we bond and identify with a shared interpretation of an unfolding, expanding experience of significations, i.e., the relatively measurable, signifiable, and purposefully communicable cosmos.  As the Informational Record of Consciousness expands, so also does the experience of cosmos expand.  As the expansion eventually overtakes any shared formulization for communicating light signals, the Consciousness that has bonded and identified with such cosmic formulizations dissipates.  Thus, the cosmos, as interpreted, dissipates into "nothingness."

NO-THINGNESS:  However, that need not be the end of Consciousness.  That only need be an end to a present interpretaton of Consciousness.  Not an end to all bubbles or interpretations of Consciousness.  For all we know, replacement bubbles may follow, one after another, to preserve a "dynamic density of conscious experience of cosmos."  To effect a replacement bubble, Consciousness need not re-collect all previously dissipated matter and things, because such matter and things were never in themselves real.  Once all levels, layers, and particulars of Consciousness utterly de-bind and depart therefrom, they vanish.  They are not the "stuff" from which Consciousness expresses Substance.  Rather, the stuff with which Consciousness qualitatively interfunctions in order to avail interpretations of Substance is no-thing more than Source Forms of Math.  Consciousness need only de-bind itself from one system of Math forms and re-bind with a replacement.  Conservation, synchronization, vectoring, and sequencing of space-time-matter-energy are inherent to the unfolding appreciations, apprehensions, and artistic feedback purposes of Consciousness.

COMMON ORIGIN:  To the extent the balloon model may be valid, each perspective of Consciousness lines up on the surface of an expanding bubble.  All experience of the metaphoric cosmos is thus confined to the rippled surface of that balloon.  Denizens do not see into the spatial center of the balloon.  There is no set, gridded center.  What denizens see is one another, as they generally move outward along the expanding surface of the balloon.  All experience of space-time is confined to that curved and deformable surface.  Thus, signal light is also so confined.  No light can be received from any real, originating center.  When we look back, to try to measure the earliest perceptible radiations of light waves, we look along the curved surface, not back to any point of origin.  When we look far enough, we pick up light just after its earliest formulizataion at a wavelength that remains detectable to us.  The light that reaches us just before its formulization into decipherable wave lengths consists of random background radiation.  All such light will be detected as being of the same age.  That age will be a function of the then and there limits of wavelength receptivity given the relative expansion of the balloon of space-time.  It is not a direct measure of any real point of origin --- either of any measurable cosmos or of Consciousness itself.

PLATONIC FORMS:  This is because there never was any material, physical point of origin in itself.  Rather, there was a common Holism of Consciousness, which, over vectored expansions of space-time, derivative of interpretations of formulizations of interfunctionings with Math, bonded with various particular points of view, all of which shared a common need:  to renormalize in respect of the reconciling Holism.  Thus, our world is a cosmos for evolving and guiding and renormalizing particular and shared points of view.  The Forms and formulas adopted for facilitating the glue that holds such shared points of view together eventually dissipate.  Since such forms are "made out of" not much more than Math, no-thing precludes Consciousness from replacing them, so that a replacement cosmos soon follows.  Thus, a Source for a kind of Dynamic Density for sustaining conscious points of view may be inherent.  However, this is a concern for religious, moral, and purposeful interpretation.  It is not an ideal that can be empirically proven.  Nor can it be completely rationalized in quantifying math.  At best, it can be usefully conceptualized for moral purposes, in ways that need not hinder practical applications of quantitative tinkering.

RENORMALIZATIONS:  There is no thing-in-itself.  No particle-in-itself.  Particles are forms for field-particle values and formulizations.  They are forms that expand in space-time, as Conscious experience expands in bonded, purposeful association with formulizations. There are renormalizations of particular experiences to a shared cosmic expansion.  There are fluxing interpretations of discrete things and selves, depending on relative rates and directions and interpretations of motions, signaling wavelengths, and apparent separations and parallax.  The only signal carrying light that can be recorded or received to any perspective has to be renormalized to that perspective as if it were traveling at the same constant speed.  So long as I travel away from a light source at less than the speed of light, such light from it as reaches me will be renormalized to my interpretive experience as if it were reaching me at the speed of light.  However, Information imparted to me by the wavelength of the light may stretch out and make the events I am leaving appear to be unfolding more slowly.

RELATIVE CONSTANT:  The speed of light is invariant with frame of reference.  The consequence is that mass and energy are interconvertible, moving bodies shorten, and moving clocks slow.

ILLUSIONS OF VIOLATIONS OF SPEED OF LIGHT:  In non-inertial frames of reference (gravitationally curved space or accelerated reference frames of expanding space), the local speed of light is constant and equal to c, but the speed of light along a trajectory of finite length can differ from c, depending on how distances and times are defined. C is he speed at which all massless particles and associated fields must travel in a vacuum.  Although a shadow can appear to be projected onto a distant object so as to appear to move faster than c, after a delay in time.  However, such an appearance does not convey any matter, energy, or information faster than light.  The rate of change in the distance between two massive objects in a frame of reference with respect to which both are moving (their closing speed) may have a value in excess of c.  And spooky correlative action may occur at a distance between entangled particles.  However, none of this would represent the speed of any single object as measured in a single inertial frame

CIRCULAR RENORMALIZATION:  Every observer of an interpretation of a massless particle, regardless of perspective, must interpret the particle as traveling at the speed of light.  Massless particles and gravitational waves travel at c regardless of the motion of the source or the inertial frame of reference of the observer.  The speed of light in vacuum (denoted c)  is a universal physical constant whose value is exactly 299, 792,456 meters per second, because a meter is defined as 1/299, 792,456 the distance light travels in a second.  Circularly, a second is the time required for an electromagnetic field to propagate 299,792,458 meters. To reduce circularity, a local second may also be defined to be the duration of 9192631770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of a local caesium 133 atom (i.e., a caesium atom at rest at mean sea level at a temperature of 0 K, with zero local electric and magnetic fields and compensating for effects of the ambient temperature caused by black body radiation, accurate to 1 part in 1010).  Roughly, a second is equal to 1/86,400 of a mean solar day of 24 hours (thus 60 seconds in a minute, 60 minutes in an hour, and 24 hours in a mean solar day).Thus C interrelates space and time.


PARTICIPATORY CONTEMPORANEOUS DETERMINATION:  If events-in-themselves do not really happen, but are only apprehended, appreciated, or interpreted in relation to a perspective of Consciousness to have happened, then events do NOT CAUSE events.  Rather, the appearance, relationship, directionality, and sequentiality of events are byproducts of reconciliations by Holistic Consciousness of particular renormalizations of perspectives of Consciousness.  Hence, instantaneous reconciliation of the Perpetual Present would not violate Causality, because Causality is a locally rationalized and correlative interpretation of local vectors of direction and sequentiality.  Hence, the Holistic Consciousness may be the ultimate in immeasurably "entangled particles."  Thus, our perpsectives are not causal agents.  Rather, we are locally apprehensive participants in the perpetually present process of contemporaneous determination and reconciliation of renormalitive interpretations.

FLAT UNIVERSE:  If the cosmos is not a measurable thing-in-itself, then it is potentially infinite in scope of interpretation, thus "flat."  Where relative and local measurements are taken, they will seem much the same in all directions, with no fixed shape being discernible.  The observable universe seems to be on average homogeneous and isotropic.

BREAKDOWN, WORMHOLING, AND DISSIPATION OF DEFINING SYSTEM OF FORMULIZATION: Consciousness guides the directionality and sequentiality of the original formulization that we share, that avails it to operate in a feedback manner with us.  This entails feedback and communication of apprehensions and appreciations.  Thus, Consciousness activates the Math with which it binds, with which organizations of bodies flux, interpret, separate, communicate, renormalize, and reconcile.  Such defining commonality and communication depends on the development of field-particles (whole-parts) in respect of a system that expands in space and time to avail their communication, renormalization, and reconciliation.  Such system depends on its original defining formulization, which defining imposes limits on its expansion.  Upon reaching limits of directionality and sequentiality for the fluxing expansion of renormalizations and reconciliations respecting such system, the defining formulization breaks down and dissipates.  Thereby, Consciousness abandons it.  Whereupon the Holism may interfunction with the potentiality of the Math Source, to avail and manifest a replacement system of defining formulization of field-particles expanding in feedback.  Or the Holism may devise Wormholes, through which to Salvage existing skills and apprehensions from one System into Another, through which superior Intelligences may evolve to function, perhaps entailing connective entanglements for facilitating spooky simultaneous effects at distance.  Perhaps receptivity to genius is thus facilitated.

RATIONALIZATION AND UNFOLDING CAUSATION:  Although we live in a Perpetual Present, our bonded wiring for Consciousness and Memory convinces us that we are flowing in a direction and sequence from previous spaces and times.  But, for all we know, the appearance of previous-ity may be a contemporaneous construction of shared false memories.  Even so, that way of thinking progresses no contingently practical or moral purposefulness.  So, it is superflous speculation.  Regardless of whether an original beginning for our shared Cosmos is real or rationalized, its signification would be consistent with a common beginning, even if such were only commonly rationalized. That is, we would still see and interpret signs consistent therewith, possibly even consistent with a common interpretation or best rationalization for the age of the cosmos as we presently share in.  Thus, it seems better to assume or believe that our Conscioiusness really does interfunction with what we interpret as Substance in order to avail contemporaneous causal reconciliation.  Thus, apprehensions are accompanied by brain electrical impulses, which each organism qualitatively processes, as a whole. Apprehensions guide follow-on appreciations, thus guiding reconciliations.  The sum of our contemporaneous apprehensions, taken together with feedback appreciations regarding the Holism, even though only Correlative in individual respects, seem to constitute Causation in reconciled respect.

NEED AND NECESSITY:  If it were desired that our cosmos should communicate meaningfulness, could it have generally evolved in any way other than as it did?

CIRCULARITY OF EXPANSIVE DIRECTIONALITY OF CONSCIOUS EXPERIENCE:  In sequencing beyond circles, we rely on circles.  In vectoring beyond vibrating fuzz we rely on vibrating sequences.  To do this, everything we bond our conscioiusness to must be interpreted to expand, until its increasing proportionality renders it unsustaining to its particularizing identities.  And then Consciousness must begin anew, to bond with a new beginning of expanding fluxes of forms of form-ulas.




Thursday, March 6, 2014

Conceptualizing Trinitarian Limits for Qualitatively Meaningful Expression

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0813gcZ1Uw8



CAUSATION: What should best be conceptualized as "the" real or superior agency of causation? Such agency should not be presumed to be a "first cause," for that would merely implicate an infinite regression. It should not be presumed to be a thing-in-itself, for that would implicate a self-cancelling contradiction (a thing in itself would not relate to any other thing). It should not be presumed to be entirely measurable, for how may a cause cause a cause to be reduced to a precise and confining measure, without the quality of its causal property being thereby simultaneously changed? Thus, it must be that Causation abides as an enduring relationship among (1) things that are relationally measurable (quantitatives), (2) things that are immeasurable (qualitatives), (3) and things that regulate the measures themselves (maths), in respect of which measures there is obedience to laws of math and of conservation. Thus, Causal Will may correlate and associate with, but does not confine itself to, the perimeter of any particular substance or body or brain. Thus, Causation arises with the interfunctioning of (1) Quantitative Substance (reconciliation of present feedback among connected parts of an encompassing class and such limits as are defined and imposed for the class itself), (2) Qualitative Consciousness (associated and disassociative), and (3) Manifest and Potential Information (levels and layers of mathematical formulas and laws of nature). That is, (1) Measurable Signifieds of Nature (bodies of animates and inanimates), (2) Appreciative-Apprehensive-Signifier (Mind of holistic God and perspectivistic Humanity), and (3) Means of Signification (maths and formulas and laws of nature). Father, Son, Holy Ghost. Thus, Substance (measurable matter and energy, aka, Nature) avails causation, but it is not "the" causal agent in itself. Thus, Causal Will (sometimes inappropriately called "free will") is not confined to the perimeter of any body or brain -- although Effective Will may often seem therewith associated or channelled.

MATH AND FORMULAS: Ultimately, of what are space, time, matter and energy made? They seem to be defined in terms of one another and be dependent on renormalization to point of view and frame of reference (purpose, perspective, and context). They seem not to be made of any thing other than combinations of themselves. But it seems trite to say Substance is made of Substance. Other than themselves, they seem to be made of no other thing, or no-thing. Math is not a measurable thing, in itself, but a means for measuring, Math is a "no-thing." If space, time, matter, and energy (the measurable dimensions) are "made of" no-thing, that no-thing would seem to be math.

SOURCE MATH: A no-thing, in itself, is immeasurable. It is infinitely immeasurable. Math is potentially infinite and, in itself, immeasurable. Thus, the infinitely immeasurable Source of potential information seems to consist only of that with which we measure, which is no-thing more than math. However, math does not self measure, self formulate, self organize, or self signify. To exist meaningfully, Math needs a conscious conceptualizing Signifier -- to pre-set and contemporaneously trigger and activate preset organizations and formulations and forms of math, so that such forms can avail the present-ation of an unfolding apearance of meaningfulness. Thus, such unfolding would be in perpetual obedience to innate, conservational, reconciling requirements for giving expression to transitioning formulations of math.

MEANINGFUL SIGNIFICATION OF FORMS THROUGH FORM-ULAS THROUGH MATH:  For math to abide meaningfully as an organized form (or form-ula), it needs to be representationally signified, i.e., manipulable to qualitatively experienceable feedback. What the Holism appreciatively intends -- with each systematically digitized, triggering, conservational, synchronizing, reconciliation -- IT measurably achieves. What IT qualitatively appreciates thereafter is at a contemporaneous-contextual-correlative level that exceeds the limited cone of experience that any particular perspective can take in. The capacity of the Holism to function both as Encompasser and as Interpenetrater avails it to give to we mortals interpretations of form-ulations of math as if they were substances-in-themselves. As if the cosmos "really" consists of nothing more than combinations of particles obeying inanimate yet pre-set formulas within a medium of space-time. At least, for scientists chasing the devil's herd, it sometimes seems pretty to think so.

RENORMALIZATION OF COMMON DIRECTION: Given a relationally local body of signification of associative awareness of self, such a body will, imperfectly, tend to renormalize its experience of imperfect and local awareness to its encompassing context. It will tend to rationalize its origin, to conceptualize something like an originating Big Bang. However, it will not be able to see earlier than the Big Bang, nor reliably conceptualize to anything earlier than its rationalized Big Bang, for there abides no "real" origin of space and time, for space and time are derivatives of interfunctionings among: Formulations of Math, Significations of Substance, and Signifiers of Consciousness.

REAL ILLUSION: The appearance of a sequential direction and chronology in space-time is a "real illusion" that is renormalized to the experience of the sponsoring Holism and all its subordinate apprehensions. Because we share a same Holism, we share under its auspices a same practical, yet derivative, illusion. Because the physicality of our practical reality is not in itself real, our experiences of such practical reality are subject to interpretation, which easily varies depending on purpose, point of view, and frame of reference. The effect of Renormalization of Interpretation is that no two different perspectives of the cosmos, absent perfect collection of all manifested information, will ever measure, factor, or experience exactly the same interpretation. In part, this is because there are not of the cosmos things-in-themselves to measure. Rather, there are things (significations) to be related to and interpreted. And interpretation is always subject to being separately affected by relationally separate purposes, points of view, and frames of reference.

COMPUTATION: This is not to say, however, that the separate experiences could not be subjected to rounding constraints that would artificially "renormalize the renormalizations," so that each perspective could be constrained to a system that would renormalize to make their separate perspectives into a single renormalized perspective, for artificially limited and computational purposes.

COUNTING: In availing to us a common cosmos, the Holism avails to us a generally common interpretation of directional expansion and chronological sequencing. The math that is implicated implicates Counting, which often implicates iterative digitality, as in digital-based feedback between apprehensions of the perspectives of the parts versus appreciations of the whole. Thus, practical Trigger-Switches can be fashioned, based on yin-yang, on-off, positive-negative, yes-no, true-false, go-stop, attract-repulse, balance-tip. Thus, common laws of math-based relative-absolutes for form-ulations and for directional Bayesian reliabilities of statistics can often be made implicate, measurable, and practicably communicable. Assuming enough information were collected, each present perspective within our cosmos, because of dependence on a common connecting Holism, could presently share a same translatable calculation for a "practical age" of our present cosmos.

PRACTICAL FORMS FOR FORMULAS AND LAWS OF MATH: Even so, by thinking things so, we can experiment, tinker, and discover practical temporal models and devices, "as if" they were in themselves real. Infinite regressions, in themselves, do not really exist -- except as thinking makes it so.

TRIGGERING AND CHANNELING ACCUMULATIONS AND RELEASE OF ENERGY: How does a minute expenditure of energy in a brain-synapse trigger nerves to trigger large muscles to expend, release, and direct great energies that are stored in muscles? Or trigger stomachs to trigger organisms to restore food energies? The human body is a system of stored, potential energy that is fitted with complex triggers and complex synapses that can, upon apprehensions sensed through the brain, be correlated with Contemporaneously and Participatorily Willed directions for the release and reaccumulation of energies. At a meta or higher level, every substantive body or accumulation of energy and energy triggers may be a representation of complex layers and levels of formulations of Source Math associated with a Reconciling and Immeasurable Holism. If so, then the signification of Substance (measurable bodies, measureable to immeasurable consciousness) is derivative or correlative with Source Math and a Reconciling Holism. That is, Substance is not the building block of Substance. Rather, Substance is byproduct of a trinitarian relationship, as are the other properties of the trinity. Thus, Substance (Energy-Father), Math (Information-Ghost), and Consciousness (Appreciative and Apprehensive Reconciler - Son) are none of them things-in-themselves. Rather, each and all of them are emergent properties of an immeasurable Trinitarian Relationship. Thus, we can study and tinker with astonishing technologies of correlatives, but we cannot model a completely measurable ultimate cause. We cannot confine the God-Head.

TRIGGER POINTS: Trigger points for coordinating, releasing, and transitioning complex Formulations of Information can be signified with associated brains or computers, even so much as to associate therewith formulations for reflective awareness of self and other significations trigger points of selves. Thus, complex trigger points for significations may associate with locally bonded consciousness of self, while less complex trigger points may associate only with the then and there conscious Will of the Holism, which artistic Will may vary in quality from close emotive entanglement of an artist to the aloof indifference of a sleeper.

LEVELS OF COMPLEXITY OF COMPUTER CONSCIOUSNESS: All significations of complexity are transistor computers. The human brain is simply a transitioning computer that is self referential that it functions as a transitioning computer. Our bodies and brains are complex transistor-computers for apprehending qualitatives and availing the triggering of quantitatives in response. Conscious Mind is a quality that emerges and extends beyond the perimeters of our organic bodies and computational intelligences.

TRIGGERING ANIMATION OF ACTICE MATH: Math in itself is not a place, thing, time, quantity, or measure. It is a source means. However, under the triggering animation of a connecting Holism, math sponsors the kinds of relativistic contexts by which we experience a mirage interpretation of substantive territory, i.e., correlations among sequences of relativistic forms, which we interpret in respect of measurable contexts and iterations of space time matter energy. However, this territory, in its ultimate aspects, infinitely regresses and recedes, like a mirage. Its correlations renormalize to perspectives, like rainbows of relativistic constants. Like regressive searches for "first material causes."

THE CONNECTING HOLISM: The Holism may be conceptualized as connecting in order to experience Consciousness in two ways: particularly and holistically. The consciousness that each human perspective experiences may be a limited and imperfect perspective, which is channelled to the experience of the Reconciling Holism. But what of system feedback that is confluent or overlapping, but not necessarily experienced by any particular perspective or avatar of consciousness? Insofar as such feedback is qualitative (i.e., not quantitatively pre-set), is would seem on some level (from close interest to relative indifference) necessary to be experienced by the Holism, from its perspective as an encompassing Reconciler.

PERSPECTIVISTIC IDENTITY -- The One and only Being that has appreciative capacity to effect causation by triggering exchanges of Information or terms among organizations of math based formulas is the Meta Conscious Living Holism. IT does this through accumulated investments and pre-sets in relations among organizations of mathematical forms, i.e., avatars -- much as ourselves. We (our brains and bodies) tend to delude ourselves to believe we have separate wills, purposes, and consciously causal effect. In meta reality, we are correlates of The Causal Identity, limited to a here and now mathematically based point of view and context. It is the Holism, connecting all of us, that synchronizes, renormalizes, and reconciles our seemingly disparate conscious experiences of points of view.

BRIGHT DEMARCATION BETWEEN THE MEASURABLE PHYSICAL AND THE IMMEASURABLE METAPHYSICAL: There is no bright line to separate immeasurable qualitatives from measurable quantitatives. This is be-cause, in causation, qualitatives and quantitatives are always and necessarily experienced as accompanying one another. Although no bright measurable line can precisely separate the physical from the metaphysical, perhaps a bright separator can be conceptually apprehended or intuited.

IMMEASURABILITY OF THE CONNECTING HOLISM: That which the connecting Holism (Reconciling God) presents to a measurable context is, relative to arbitrary selection of context, measurable. However, the connecting Holism is not by itself measurable, for several reasons.

1. It is not a confined, contained "self." That is, it cannot express itself except by functioning as a connecting activator of the immeasurable source math of potentiality.

2. It cannot be completely confined or precisely measured relative to any present context, because it is the determiner, not the determined, of any present, pre-sent, or pre-set activation of context.

3. It is logically self negating to assume such a thing as a plural Class of One whose members would be entirely independent unto themselves while yet being measurable in terms of one another. There is nothing outside the connecting Holism which can avail any other connection by which to measure its eternal or perpetual potentiality. The potential of an Eternal qualitative cannot be measured simply by Presently summing incomplete interpretations of its particulars. A lever cannot leverage itself, nor can a clock check itself by itself for accuracy.

RESPONSIBILITY, MORALITY, MERIT, CONSCIOUS WILL, RECONCILIATION, EVALUATIVE PURPOSEFULNESS AND MEANINGFULNESS:

APPREHENSIVE MORALITY: As Avatars, we apprehend and enjoy a kind of vicarious responsibility and merit. We are temporal agents of a higher, encompassing, interpenetrating, synchronizing, and reconciling Signifier of Causation.

TRINITY AND TRADITIONAL RELIGIOUS FIGURES OF SPEECH:

- (1) INFORMATION/SOURCE/HOLY GHOST/POTENTIAL: Potential for Information-- Source Math of potential information

- (2) SUBSTANCE SIGNIFIER/HOLISM/GOD THE FATHER/PRESENT WHOLE/MANIFEST SIGNIFIED/TRANSITIONER: Conservation of Energy -- Math activator and holistic manifester and qualitative reconciler of substantive information. Synchronizer, Conserver, Reconciler/Appreciator/Activator.

- (3) CONSCIOUSNESS/PARTICULAR PERSPECTIVES/GOD THE SON/PRESENT SUM OF PARTS/TRANSITIONEE: Feedback Experience of Consciousness -- Contextually renormalized perspectives of interpretations of formulations of math made manifest. Avatar, Observer, Recorder, Channeller, Apprehender.

-- FEEDBACK: Between Whole and Parts by means of Medium

TRINITIES: There abide various ways of conceptualizing trinities. Such as: Purpose (Sequence-Math), Frame of Reference (Substantive Context of Direction), Conscious Point of View (Relative Point)

COMMON CONFUSION REGARDING ROLES OF TRINITY: Confusion enters when roles among trinities are conflated.

OUTSIDE-INSIDE: The Source of Potentiality (Math-Nature) stands, in a sense, beyond and outside of space-time. That is, math does not experience itself, in time. Conscioiusness does experience math, as information made manifest by its triggering entailment. That is, math is made subject to activation by consciousness, in present time. Thus, the Reconciling Holism of Consciousness (God) functions causally and contemporaneously, in the perpetual present.

PERPETUAL PRESENT: The Perpetual Present consists in the digitized and instantaneous Feedback between the Holism and each contemporaneous Perspectivistic point of view, within the medium of Math. Substance, as manifest signification, is expressed and fed back to Consciousness, in present time. Even though Source-Math stands outside time, it did not "come before" Holistic Consciousness, for the Holism "has been" "perpetually present." The interfunctioning, existential dependence of Math-Information, Holism-Consciousness, and Signification-Substance is one of contemporaneity with the perpetual present, subject to such pre-sets as are presented to the present. Present Organization is Pre-set, even though no past-in-itself exists.

APPEARANCE OF PREVIOUS DIRECTION AND PREVIOUS SEQUENTIALITY: The investments of the Reconciling Holism in the Substantive are conserved and stored as its investments in the Information of the Source-Math. The significative manifest (Substantive) is sensed and measured as space-time-matter-energy. The non-manifest remains as Information that may be potentially accessed from the Source-Math. (May this be like "dark substance"?) Sequentiality is only remembered so long as, and in respect of how, the holism invests in it. Behind the illusion, only the present is eternal.

OMNIPRESENT NOT OMNISCIENT: Math, as the Source of Potentiality, abides. It neither learns nor forgets. The Holism, in investing in unfolding and contemporaneous and connected sequences for interpreting the possibilities and potentials of the Math-Source, may learn, forget, and appreciate -- even though it always has before IT the potential to read and rediscover from the Source. The Math-Source of Potentiality does not particularly appreciate. In that sense, it stands "outside time." Math abides outside time. It is only how Consciousness fluxes through Math, to experience and interpret it, that changes. Consciousness does not directly sense Math, except as Consciousness happens to be fluxing through Math. In feedback, Consciousness learns to adjust its fluxations, to present significations made to itself, holistically and perspectivistically. "Territory" arises and fluxes to signification in respect of the flux between Consciousness and Math.

BODYLESS HOLISTIC CONSCIOUSNESS: The Math Based Source of Potentiality is not in itself conscious or alive. The present temporal fluxing synchronizing reconciling Holism, in contemporaneously triggering qualitative apprehensions and quantitative appreciations concerning the Source, IS meta conscious and alive, at a level that ENCOMPASSES and SURPASSES each and every mortal. The potential storage of Information in the Source is eternally preserved. The accessing, experiencing, interpreting, and appreciating of such Information (qualitatively and quantitatively) entails fluxing, learning, and forgetting. Consciousness is a feedback-receiver-trasmitter of fluxing Information, derivative of the entailment of Consciousness with Math.

TRIGGERING AND ANIMATING MATH: The Holism of Consciousness, drawing on the Math Source of Potentiality, is what triggers, activates, and is appreciative of the causes of our expressions of power and our investments in points of view. Through our Perspectivistic points of views, the Holism DOES particularly appreciate. Mortals ARE the Holism's particular points of view, i.e., Avatars of renormalizing apprehensions and reconciliations. Beyond us, the Holism connectedly and comprehensively appreciates the interpenetrating, encompassing, entirety of the here and now.

DETERMINISM --- BODY CORRELATION V. MIND CAUSATION: We Perspectivistics (Avatars), insofar as our measurably signified bodies, CORRELATE. Our bodies do NOT CAUSE, although we apprehend AS IF we were causal agents in ourselves. This delusion is byproduct of our appearance of particularized separateness. We are iterative, renormalized representations of a correlating Sum-Flux. CAUSATION is effected as an upshot of Holistic CONSCIOUSLY SIGNIFYING WILL in combination with Source Math INFORMATION and information signified as manifest SUBSTANCE. The Mind that acts from different perspectives through each of us feeds back its individually particular apprehensions to its holistically reconciling appreciations. The upshot of such feedback is PRESENT CONSCIOUSNESS of contemporaneous reconciliations of individual apprehensions and holistic appreciations. That is, consciousness of the role of apprehension and appreciation in availing CAUSATION. The Measurable Manifest is the here and now quantitative signification that is made from the Source by the triggering of feedback between the holistic and individualistic capacities of the Holism. The Immeasurable Manifest is the here and now qualitative representation that is so made from the Source. Neither the Immeasurable Qualitative nor the Measurable Quantitative appreciates, apprehends, or signifies any manifestation without the other.

DETERMINISM AND SELF-DETERMINISM: Unfoldings of experiences are caused and determined in respect of an interfunctioning of qualitative and quantitative aspects of Information, Consciousness, and Substance. Consciousness does not by itself determine itself. Yet, no-thing is determined without contemporaneous entailment and part-icipation of Consciousness. A pre-set domino-line of correlates may reliably and practicably be vectored. Yet, such correlates are not causes-in-themsleves. As Avatars, we do not have "entirely free will." But our experiences of Mind do have participatory and contemporaneous influence. Thus, meaningful responsibility and reconcilable merit. We part-icipate in the contemporaneous determination of that which has not been pre-determined by the Reconciling Holism, of which our perspectives of Minds are parts.

INHERENT COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: We can say what we interpret of things that appear, and we can say what we may fuss and care about regarding the appearance of things. But we cannot, free of dissonance, say what causes them to appear. We can have faith that morality and meaningful purposefulness abide, but we cannot, without dissonance, say why. For mortals, at least, there abides no explanation that can be derived for why Consciousness, Information, and Substance, together, abide. Because there is no explanation that is reasonably available, any concept that is pretended to be an explanation will be dissonant if tried to be completed. Whatever the Holism participates in making manifest, it cannot measurably do so, except by interfunctioning with Source-Math. Hence, regardless of what is done, it will be rationalized and renormalized to be correlative and consistent with math, statistics, and "scientific causation." Thus, seekers of the grand unified scientific theory of everything will perpetually fashion expnanatory models that are hoped to be complete, but which never can be complete, nor even useful outside limited practical correlative functions.

SUMMING AVATARS: Particular perspectives (whose experiences are shrouded from those of the encompassing and interpenetrating Holism, that may intuit the Holism but not directly appreciate IT) may not reasonably interpret their apprehensions of experiences as causative, but only as correlates of causation. Avatars do not themselves directly trigger meta-formulations of math, nor do they effect or experience causation. Their apprehensions do not directly, unfiltered through the appreciations of the Reconciling Holism, trigger formulations built up from the Source Math. To the extent Avatars interfunction, overlap, fuzz, and flux, and to the extent they are merely correlatives: Causations cannot be discovered simply by adding them. Merely to presently sum parts will not wholly explicate the causal properties of an encompassing, interpenetrating, and pertually present Holism. Thus, Ultimate Causation must be Immeasurable to mortals. Causation must be in an immeasurable process of digital feedback with the Math-Source, in appreciaton and apprehension of Consciousness, as between the perspective of the Reconciling Holism vs. the perspective of each particular Avatar for a point of view of the holism.

VISION: We can try to inspire a common, figurative, apprehension of receptivity to the the unfolding purposes of the Reconciling Holism. Assimilation in respect thereof will depend on inspiration, charisma, functionality, traditions, and developing fads and unfolding interests and technologies. So long as humanity retains dignity of being valued, vision should seek decent civilization that avails feelings of freedom of expression and enterprise.

APPRECIATIONS V. APPREHENSIONS: For sake of convention, the Holism may be said to appreciate, the Perspectives to apprehend. Appreciation relates to that which One knows and finds before Oneself. Apprehension relates to that which one pursues, avoids, or expects may come to him. If whatever the Holism apprehends is, in a sense, already known before IT, then to speak of apprehension to the Holism may be redundant to its appreciation. However, that seems to be an overthought and perhaps non-maintainable distinction. So, the main reason herein for referring to appreciation as an aspect of Holistic Consciousness and apprehenson as an aspect of Perspectivistic Consciousness is to distinguish between references to the quality of Consciousness of the Holism versus of the Avatars. The Avatars, in their "as if" illusions of unconnected separateness, do not know-appreciate the sum of manifest information, while the Holism does. The "knowledge" of Avatars is more in the nature of non-absolute apprehensions. The "apprehensions" of the Holism may be more in the nature of pre-hensions. Appreciation and apprehension have to do with how one participates in choosing to alert, coordinate, and shape ones's senses, observations, interpretations, and recordings.

PRE-HENSION: No Avatar, in itself, ever has Free Will. Avatars accompany significations and qualitative experiences of Participatory Will. For Avatars that may apprehend from favored vantage, there may be capacities to pre-hense unfolding correlates. This would not deny the Participatory Will that is associated with lesser avatars. A vantage may confer a favored perspective for pre-hensing how unfolding Participatory Wills may sometimes be found already to have been determined, subject to confirmational appreciation. Or, a position of vantage may give one's confirmational observations unsuspected causal influence in themselves, to SUPERIMPOSE a causal or confirmation bias.

FEEDBACK: To be meaningfully factored and reconciled, Feedback must somehow be determined. It may be pre-determined, contemporaneously determined, or randomly or indifferently determined (as by a non-random and pre-set random number generator), apprehended, and/or appreciated. When the consequence of Feedback is pre-determined, a Pre-Determiner is implicated, as well as a Sponsor for an orderly and sequential unfolding of events within an expanding medium of space-time. When the consequence of feedback is contemporaneously determined, a Reconciling Conserver is implicated. (A contemporaneous determination consistent with pre-determined laws of nature would just be a complicated way for conceptualizing a pre-determination, which, again, would implicate at some point a Pre-Determiner.) Mortal bodies are fluxing transitories for transmitting across the qualitative and the quantitative. Where conscious, we are contemporaneously participatory -- not eternally, perpetually, holistically, or conservationally reconciling. We are local, digitally-delayed feedback switches between the parts and the whole.

IS THE COSMOS SIGNIFICATIVE OF A SIGNIFYING GOD: Must the Pre-Determiner and/or Contemporaneous Determiner be like an appreciative-apprehensive Consciousness, with capacity to leverage perhaps infinite complexities of layers and levels of overlapping Consciousness? If the cosmos is like a computer, and if a computer can be made conscious, may/must the cosmos in main be consciously appreciative-apprehensive? Can the Holistic Connector-Reconciler qualitatively appreciate feedback and all that is confluent, overlapping, and not qualitatively experienced by any particularly identifiable avatar? Can the Holism appreciate, apprehend, or learn, as by trial and error, how to discipline Itself in order to trigger desired formulations from the source math? To my intuition, yes.

INTUITIVE BELIEF: However, this is a kind of intuitive belief that cannot be scientifically proven. Nor can the scientific method be pertinent to apprehending the reasonableness of such a belief or lack of belief.

INCEPTION, TRIGGERING, AND SWITCHING OF CONCEPTION: Even if not empirically testable, under what way of consistent and coherent thinking may it be intuited and conceptualized that a Reconciling Holism would interfunction in feedback with a Source-Math-Field to effect forms and patterns of signs and significations that are meaningfully and substantively sensed and communicated to and among Perspectives of Consciousness? What sort of field fuzz and flux may such feedback entail?

HOW PRECISELY ARE DECISIONS DETERMINED: How is feedback tested, apprehended, appreciated, focused, determined, and reconciled? May there abide a testing and renormalizing role for fields of virtual particles? A mortal cannot precisely control or predict a field decision for where an individual value for an individual particle will be expressed in relation to its field.

STATISTICAL CONTROLS: However, in relation to groups, patterns are often reliably and practicably predictable, within accountable ranges of statistical probability. Statistics, being presumed, can always be rationalized. Just assume enough worlds and universes. Moreover, the Holism can signify its interfunctioning with the Source-Math Field only in measures that are consistent with math -- of which statistics is a branch. Everything the Holism may effect that is measurable will necessarily be rationalizable and renormalized to math. This does not prove that the Holism, in how it appreciates and apprehends to interfunction lacks effective or conscious Will.

CONSCIOUS WILL: Consciousness, while it is expressed, has no choice but to express, apprehend, appreciate, and contemporaneously participate in, choice making. To fail to choose is to effect a kind of choice, i.e., a choice to abstain. To retain indifference is to effect a care to remain indifferent, like a pre-set caring. Or an assignment of caring to pre-set holding patterns of circuity, like patterns for folding circles within circles, gears within gears, or spirals within spirals, springs within springs. (A spring-string seems a more encompassing model, perhaps fitter for 4-D particle-field analysis. A spring-string seems to be more availing of locks, leaps, and loans among layers and levels of relations among spring-strings.) Or an assignment of such patterns to fractal-based algorithms of random generation. Thus, in relation to conscious caring, indifference may be analyzed as "pre-stored caring" or "caring indifference" or saving and putting up stores for assigning to subsequent caring and evaluation, so stores of surprises can be saved. Thus, patterns of pre-sets may be constrained to organizations, for potential triggering, release and harvesting at some later time, when the Holism may more contemporaneously appreciate, enjoy, effect, and reconcile choices among apprehensions of local avatars. Thus is availed the organization of potential energy that is stored to mortal apprehension as matter. Thus, the manifestaton of substance (matter and energy) is significatory of pre-decision by the Holism to preserve decisions, to reserve them to later evolving and devolving participaton by local perspectives of consciousness, to store information, energy, substance, potentiality in organizations at-the-ready for future evolution and appreciative guidance.

EVOLUTION: Thus, Evolution among organizations of pre-set bodies of Substance proceeds by way of feedback reconciliations of apprehensions and appreciations among and between local and holistic layers and levels of significatory participation. Thus, Evolution entails not just the preserving of the locally fittest to replicate, but also the reconciliation between the parts and the whole of the fittest for systemic participation in apprehensions and appreciations. We participate in determining our spring-string-wiring and the organizational evolution of our bodies and brains and means for effecting and expressing consciously intelligent awareness of Self.

SWITCH TESTING, FEEDBACK, AND TRIGGERING: A particle-field may, as with virtual particles, tickle-test, before it commits apprehensions to appreciations. An immeasurable tickle from the Holism may pre-dispose a stream of reserved logic gates. Thus, the System may make a decision before a local avatar (body or brain) is self aware that the decision has been made. If a trainman is in communication with his switchman, the train, if a switch is aborted, may send a feeler signal, to test whether it should proceed, slow, or stop. A brain that coordinates the actions of an organism may do likewise. Thus, a local brain will generally experience signal decisions, before the self-reflective, self-aware consciousness of the brain knows the decision was made. Or, a preliminary signal to effect a switch may be insufficiently powered, such as if the switch at the other end is contexted with unexpected resistance. The signal may then feed back, to seek a stronger transmission. Or it may effect an aborted switch, that, instead of switching lines, closes both. Or it may leave a train at risk of jumping tracks. Thus, the switch may be on, off, reserved, or destructive. A field may become conditioned or habituated. Switches may be disciplined to arise in connected sequences and branches. Operation of some switches may be held in reserve, like repressed drives and subconscious tendencies. Their subjective and conditional readiness may be exposed by Freudian slips. Otherwise, they may simply lie beneath conscious awareness, as non-articulate pre-dispositions for apprehensions and appreciations.

RECONCILIATION OF PARTICIPATORY EXPRESSIONS OF CONSCIOUS WILL: From whom or where is each decision made? Was it pre-set, so that its contemporaneous expression is merely epiphenomenal and rationalized? To my intuition, it is more meaningful to conceptualize that the Will to effect each decision was one of contemporaneous participation, reconciled among perspectives of the Holism.

HOW DOES COGNITVE DISSONANCE ARISE:  We give cognitive dissonance a pre-hold when we assume that particles of things can be subjected to complete modeling and measure, in themselves, rather than apprehended as evanescent experiences of apprehensions, renormalized to each field of view and perspective of consciousness by a Reconciling Appreciator of consciousness. That is, when we try to use "if-then" reasoning to freeze and crowd out all "now-what" reasoning.  When we give up unrealistic expectation to completely reduce the eternal to a limited here and now explanation, we need not give up the pursuit of happiness or unfolding technological prowess, but we will more likely acquire, instead of dissonance, a cognition that unfolds with a flux of creative destruction and participatory creation.