Saturday, June 24, 2017

War on Drugs

Mayhem creates a lot of tempting opportunities for well-placed people in the nexus between human vices for sex-drugs-violence.  
Our CIA in Laos used Air America to help launder drugs to pay for anti-communism activities.  Our leaders had also used Batista to funnel drug money to fund the CIA.  Then trained Cuban exiles to try to topple Castro at the Bay of Pigs.  When those exiles returned to Miami, they had skills for trafficking in drugs.   That set up the Medellin, Cali, and Noriega drug lords in South America.  Add the Contras and Oliver North. 
The Cold War, funded for the CIA with drug trafficking, led to the War on Drugs.  Which led us to godless cynicism, whereby CIA agents, Border Patrol personnel, and likely persons at highest levels in our government, promoted the drug trade even as they postured against it.  Perhaps this carries over also to the sex, violence, and arms trades.  How many have been to Lolita Island?  How much of this Skull and Bones thuggery goes unmolested, because the participants on all sides know too much about where the bones are closeted, the bodies are buried, and the teenyboppers are being molested?
I think most Americans are somewhat innocent.  But our leaders have not been innocent.  And most Americans who have dumbly empowered our leaders are not innocent, merely because of their ignorance.  IAE, the consequence of the corruptive nexus with sex-drugs-arms has been to put much of the world on fire.  Alas, Babylon.

Friday, June 23, 2017

Soros

Popper's idea of openness and tolerance did not entail tolerance for every culture.  Popper was quite concerned about not poisoning the idea of tolerance with tolerance for the kind of totalitarianism that would destroy tolerance.

The process of replacing one model of morality and governance with another is not a process of science or betterment, but a process of choice that entails innate empathy versus enmity.

The idea of moral betterment is not enhanced by substituting an idea of diktat by knowitall fake scientists of morality, i.e., Nazis, Feminazis, Muslims, and Soros-nauts.  To substitute weknowbetter moral scientism for the freedom and dignity of individuals is to poison the very free exchange of ideas that Soros pretends to champion.  To see the consequence, just look at the anti-Republican shout downers, pretending victims, manufactured outrages, and vile name calling and violence of the hate filled Left, through its stoolies acting as hammers for their Kool-Aid dispensers.

The idea of open borders, without regard to boundaries of republics, is mind-grease for converting from rule of law to rule of international thugs of oligarchism.  It is an idea of a worldwide plantation to be run by despots for farming herds of people.  It is monstrously disrespectful of the assimilative will of people, families, groups, cultures, and nations.  By importing massive numbers of blood suckers, liberty-illiterates, and thuggish people-farmers, it would kill every decent representative republic.

The so-called supremacist ideology of good Americans is not one based on race, gender, age, or origin.  It is based on a fundamental choice to honor the freedom and dignity of individual, liberty-loving, freedom-competent Americans over the people-farming ideologies of phony moral scientisimists.  If the rainbow coalition of codependent wussie people and their armies of corrupti and ignoranti do not like that, they can sulk, rage, loot, and act out.  But they will be punished for it.  They will either be defeated by Americans, or they will be defeated by killing the very host whose blood they wish to suck dry.

Soros knows as much about morality as he knows about common decency.  Which is to say, he knows nothing.



The Left is a flim flam party among soul-dead pedophiles, drug lords, arms merchants, felons, rapists, murderers, kidnappers, pimps, groomers, thieves, con artists, child marry-ers, dopers, welfare agitators, entitlement mindsets, illegal aliens, irresponsible parents, race baiters, Nazis, socialists, communists, law droolers, people who conflate taxes with charity, people who encourage children to engage in sexual experimentation of all types, people who vote for a living, shills for oligarchs, people who believe a NWO of benign oligarchs would provide the best worldwide scientific management of the human herd, anti-Americans, and tolerant apologists for all the corruption and ignorance of the above.


*********

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Oligarchic Corruption


The Oligarchy is using our universities to shape foreign students to become evangelists not for representative republicanism but for the NWO. They get Americans to go along with this by using crocodile tears to appeal to our sympathy and charity. Then, the newly trained foreign students go home to teach their cronies how to siphon wealth by calling it charity.
"So much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot." -- George Orwell

I agree that we need to switch from income taxation to consumption taxation.  The only problem I have with the Fair Tax is that it is too linear.  It would do nothing to address the biggest challenge today to the representative republic:  The fact that most representatives work more for the oligarchy than for the citizenry. 
That is a fact to which the SJWs, Dinos, and Rinos are oblivious, as they seek to give ever more power to the central apparatus (media-academia-banking) --- even though it is controlled by oligarchic moochers. The fact is that oligarchic wealth tends to snowball and agglomerate as it acquires control over all the institutions of politics.  That is what is feeding and powering the NWO putsch to worldwide enserfment.

I am not anti-consumption. I am pro-responsible-budgeting.

I agree that we need to switch from income taxation to consumption taxation. The only problem I have with the Fair Tax is that it is too linear. It would do nothing to address the biggest challenge today to the representative republic: The fact that most representatives work more for the oligarchy than for the citizenry.
That is a fact to which the SJWs, Dinos, and Rinos are oblivious, as they seek to give ever more power to the central apparatus (media-academia-banking) --- even though it is controlled by oligarchic moochers. The fact is that oligarchic wealth tends to snowball and agglomerate as it acquires control over all the institutions of politics. That is what is feeding and powering the NWO putsch to worldwide enserfment.

Whatever the oligarchy pays for in taxes, it tends more than to make up for in extractions of political favors. Whatever the poor extract from the gov, the oligarchy tends to pass on to the producing workers. In effect, the various gangs of parasitical SJWs mean to redistribute poverty to the middle class in exchange for despotic power to the oligarchy.
Because this produces little and drags a lot, it tends to the social detriment of everyone. The need is this: To privatize productive work by freeing industriousness, without freeing crony oligarchs to protect their perch by shackling the masses. This requires insight into phase shifts, beyond linear thinking. Ever more linear agglomeration of wealth into the hands of a few self-selecting self-godding political-moochers is not always a good thing.

Might it make more sense, ideally, not to tax domestic businesses on income or profits, and instead to tax the individuals to whom salaries or withdrawals are paid, but only on their personal consumption (broadly defined to include personal purchases, personal investments, personal charitable and political contributions)?
If we want individuals to save more, then tax consumption, not income. If we want more production to come from businesses instead of gov, then don't tax businesses on their productive operations. if we want a more productive society generally, then don't turn a welfare safety net into a hammock. If we generally want less gov, more production, and less consumption, then don't tax productive work, but do tax personal consumption.
If we don't want an oligarchy to be able to consume gov and destroy representative republicanism, then tax the oligarchy on its use of wealth to consume political influence by treating all lobbying expenses as if they were the taxable consumption of the agent who authorized it. If necessary to bring the oligarchy under control, make the tax on consumption progressive.
The oligarchy loves the tax on income, since it pulls up the ladders on potential competitors. Replace the income tax with a tax that reaches wealth by taxing consumption.

****************

The road to becoming an oligarch tends to be self-selective of those who are inclined not to wind through the path of human decency, but through the path of crony mooching and abuse of the political system. This is why most oligarchs are Ainos (bi-oriented and system-hedging Rinos and Dinos).

It is very hard to set up a republic with sufficient safeguards against the rise of an aristocratic/oligarchic/corrupt class that inclines to make its bones by cannibalizing its own country.

It is also very hard to eliminate the need for lawyers. No matter who writes a law, it will be subject in practice to interpretation --- by a judge who will be trained as a lawyer.
Keeping a legal framework lean and decentralized is a constant struggle that requires eternal vigilance. When the culture allows itself to become filled with whiny, able-bodied codependents and corrupt moochers, it tends to get the system of law drool that it deserves --- piled ever higher and deeper.
No new central manmade law should be crafted except in respect of how to eliminate other laws. People who lobby for special legal favors that are designed only to enrich a few or some special new minority of snowflakes should be reviled and taxed out the wazoo.
People who get rich by special pleading should be taxed on their personal consumption, progressively. Otherwise, it is an iron law that they will launder their ill gotten lucre by buying favors from politicians and governments, and they will eventually in effect own and operate the government.
Then they will find ways to widen the gulf between the masses and their power and wealth, even without increasing the net production of the society. They will do this simply by finagling with the institutions that control the fiat money. No republic that fails adequately to defend itself against such natural corruption can long survive.

90% of bureaucrats tend to support blood sucking Dems. They should never be allowed to unionize.



For the powers that run the gov, it's far less important to enrich the general society than it is to preserve their perch.

As I watch Marxists, Muslims, and Money Muckers make Americans angry with their antics, I wonder why they persist. What do they know that we don't? How can their constant antics for making Americans angry be a profitable tactic?

Well, they know it's more important to inspire and fire up a few extra-motivated losers and diversionarys than it is to avoid angering the general masses. Keep the losers inspired and feeling aggrieved, with diversionary news constantly devoted to that purpose. Keep the grievances in the news. Little by little, the masses will give in to try to buy the peace.

Ferguson may not convict innocent police, but it will pay blood money. Ditto across the land. Most people will want to enforce the borders, but a few specially placed federal judges will work, little by little, to allow third-world liberty-illiterates, wholly unsuited to become responsible citizens of a representative republic, to flood the nation and water down its lifeblood.

Little by little, an aggrieved loser class of 2% can hold an entire nation for ransom, until the entire apparatus tips and they can turn the reins over to drooling despots.

Why don't the majority of angry Americans impose righteous discipline against thugs, illegals, cheats. and moochers? Well, the system makes them feel powerless, so they give in and try to buy the peace --- while their very souls die a little more day by day.

All the while, the wuss-class tells them to turn the other cheek and work harder to give more "charitably" in taxes ... for the poor little transsexuals who just want to raise up their own trans-sexualized children, for the poor little drug addicts who just want a chance at happiness, for the poor little illegals who just want to bring their families and convert the republic to the kind of socialistic paradise they emigrated from, for the peace loving Muslims who just want their rights, and for the moral scientists who just want to help the oligarchy to install a benign NWO of "fairness and equality."

Without discipline and vision, a people are easily diverted and lost.

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Leftist Violence




THE DEM RAINBOW BASE: Were a study done, I suspect it would show that the following tend typically to vote for Dems:

Felons, rapists, murderers, kidnappers, pimps, groomers, thieves, con artists, child marry-ers, dopers, welfare agitators, entitlement mindsets, illegal aliens, irresponsible parents, race baiters, Nazis, socialists, communists, law droolers, people who conflate taxes with charity, people who encourage children to engage in sexual experimentation of all types, people who vote for a living, shills for oligarchs, people who believe a NWO of benign oligarchs would provide the best worldwide scientific management of the human herd, anti-Americans, and tolerant apologists for all of the above.



THE RINO BASE: Those who help oligarchs sucker Dems to vote to destroy the republic in order to produce their own enserfment.



DEM VIOLENCE: Were a study done, I suspect it would astonish every reader to learn of the worldwide extent of leftist depredations and totalitarianism. Quick list of lefties with delusions of central gov solutions: Mohammad, Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Idi Amin, Pol Pot, Kim Il Sung, Castro, Chavez. When I consider a list of believers in a central framework that defends the freedom and dignity of individuals (i.e., Conservers of Liberty), I find people like Franklin, Madison, Lincoln, Eisenhower, Reagan, and Trump. No reasonable person can compare those lists and say the Conservers of Liberty have been as violent or depraved as the Lefties. Were lists compiled of those murdered, killed, and maimed, I suspect the number to be attributed to Lefties would far exceed any number that could reasonably be attributed to Conservers of Liberty.



Recent exemplars and expressions of Dem violence, rationalization of evil, and anti-American depravities: BLM, OWS, ACORN, BLT, CAIR, LA RAZA. Polar bear hunts, lootings, cop killings, traffic blockages, fake victim stagings, university shout downs.



RADICAL GENITAL HEADS: Conservers of Liberty tend to look to God and ask what is needed to sustain a decent representative republic. Lefties tend to look to their genitals and dope and ask who and how to rationalize their immediate gratifications and the grooming of their children to all manner of deviancy. Then, they construct tax and regulatory schemes in support of their fellow gang-bangers, and they call that "morality" and/or "godly."



JESUS WAS NOT A BIG GOV LIB: I doubt any fair-minded person could read the New Testament and rationalize indecencies and depravities the way Leftists do. I am not an expert, but I have read the Old and New Testaments and the Koran. I have not seen anywhere in them where Jesus, for charity, is said to have instructed that we concoct central governments, turn them over to oligarchs and their so-called moral scientists, and then tax and regulate the people to pursue max pleasure for the greatest number.



ANECDOTES: Everyone has their anecdotes. I have seen what gov supervisors do to young children. My 14 year old nephew was shotgunned to death in the back by a "gay" loving, gov supervisor in a boy's home. The central gov has been filled with authoritarian perverts -- in the FBI, CIA, ATF. Their central so-called war on drugs has been largely an alliance with narc dealers. The Dino and Rino tools that carried this out have not been what any sane person would call Conservers of Liberty. Rather, they have been servants of the same oligarchy that the deluded, dumas Lefties imagine looks out for them. J. Edgar Hoover was a flaming Democrat.



GUITEAU: Charles Guiteau was a member of a group-marriage Utopian sect, whose members generally rejected him. He embarrassed his father and was considered insane by the community's founder. His wife considered him dishonest, and he left Boston under suspicion of theft. A psychologist diagnosed him many years later as a psychopath. To argue that he was in any way a principled Republican would be the height of nuttiness.



The man Guiteau shot, Garfield, was, a bit like Trump, an anti-boss-oligarch. Guiteau's mindset, if alive today, would be of the sort to try to eliminate Trump. Given the "big rainbow tent" tactics of the modern Left, led as it is by the nose by oligarchic owners of the media-academia apparatus, I have little doubt that Guiteau , if alive today, would have voted for Hillary.



HIS TESTIMONY:

An interesting part of Guiteau's testimony (from http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/guiteau/guiteautranscriptguiteaucrossx.html):



Q: Do you feel under great obligation to the American people?
A: I think the American people may some time consider themselves under great obligations to me, sir.
Q: My question was not whether they were under great obligations to you, but whether you were to them?
A: I do not know why I should be, sir.
Q: Were you under great obligations to the Republican party?
A: Not that I know of.



************************

The Left is a flim flam party among soul-dead pedophiles, drug lords, arms merchants, felons, rapists, murderers, kidnappers, pimps, groomers, thieves, con artists, child marry-ers, dopers, welfare agitators, entitlement mindsets, illegal aliens, irresponsible parents, race baiters, Nazis, socialists, communists, law droolers, people who conflate taxes with charity, people who encourage children to engage in sexual experimentation of all types, people who vote for a living, shills for oligarchs, people who believe a NWO of benign oligarchs would provide the best worldwide scientific management of the human herd, anti-Americans, and tolerant apologists for all the corruption and ignorance of the above.








Monday, June 19, 2017

Reverse Racism


In the case of so-called secular or atheistic "Jews," it is a concern to learn how top heavy they are in Scotus, Law, Banking, Wall Street, Lobbying, Media, Academia, Hollywood, and the NWO Open Society.  I suspect the extent of that has more to do with tribe-indoctrinated favoritism than with merit.  (If Jews can claim not to be white, they can assert inoculation from white privilege --- even as they saddle others with it.  Sort of how Blacks often get free passes for being racists.)

People don't pay for an Ivy League education because it is necessarily better.  They pay for the connections.  Many choose a church for the same reason.  Children tend not to seek out what makes sense, but simply to adopt the religion of their parents or profs and then to rationalize it after the fact.

***************

Most (atheistic) "Jews" are of the Left.  The Left is a loose coalition of convenience to take down the big game.  Once the republic is bled out, the various race-based groupings of the Left will bleed each other.  Like the Muslms do.  Lefties always gotta hate.  Hate is all that unites them.  They are not united by any vision of a decent republic that avails freedom and dignity for all good faith members.  Rather, they are united only by selfish blood lust, envy, and material jealousy.

I say this as someone whose basic stance, sans the diet-dress-ceremony hoopla and believerism-fetishness, tends to be not incompatible with the Old (and New) Testaments. That is, I believe that the way and the truth and the light are found in the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule.

*****************

A person can believe as he wishes.  I tend not to care, so long as he does not deploy factually false or socially asinine beliefs for the purpose of oppressing other people or gang-banging with those who do. 
A person may attend temple, church, synagogue, or mosque services because he is a true believer, or he may attend primarily for the advantage of networking with a power group.  People don't pay for an Ivy League education because it is necessarily better.  They pay for the connections.  Many choose a church for the same reason.
The negative side of networking is that it is often exclusionary and oppressive.  When a person chooses a network, label, mark, or propaganda system for the purpose of oppressing others, that is a concern.  It is a concern when I see the nonsense in university shout downers, BLM traffic blockers, Minority nation dividers, Islamic no-go zoners. 
In the case of so-called secular or atheistic "Jews," it is a concern to learn how top heavy they are in Scotus, Law, Banking, Wall Street, Lobbying, Media, Academia, Hollywood, and the NWO Open Society.
For whatever reason, all groups except Conservers of Liberty seem to be hyphenating themselves, to discriminate against ordinary Americans.  This is reverse racism!!!  Hello!!!  And it needs to be called out, unless we want to acquiesce in the bleeding out, weighing down, and replacement of the representative republic. 
I do not accept that it is permissible for persons who choose to unite --- and call themselves by a label in order to engage in race-based gang-banging --- should be given a free pass to complain when there is blowback against their racism and their group-based efforts to undermine the republic.

I put most of the blame for divisive rhetoric on those who want to replace the American republic with a borderless NWO under the rule of oligarchs. That tends to include the following: Race baiters, the Black Caucus, BLM, La Raza, Acorn, CAIR, Islamic supremacists, those who want to divide and rule, the ADL, the ACLU, the media oligarchy, the critical studies professoriate, Marxist agitators, the University shout-downers and safe space cadets, and those who worship the idea of a sex-dope-sadomasochistic god.
What I see coming from Conservers of Liberty is defensive blowback against utter rot.

Where crony capitalism flourishes (which is now nearly everywhere), free markets are dying. Linear thinkers believe you can never have too much capitalism. Crony capitalism proves them wrong.

By the time Obama left, he had imported a lot of liberty illiterates. That may have artificially inflated his popularity, especially among the zombie wusses. As Trump deports more of them, his popularity will go up. No one but a zombie wuss would prefer the guy who appeals most to liberty illiterates. Have you grabbed a wuss today?

If Conservers of Liberty are against it, Proggies think they must be for it. Two ways to ruin a child: Brainless violence, and brainless tolerance.

Of course there is an American Ideal. It is obvious to anyone who can see and think. There are millions of Americans --- of whatever color, gender, age, origin --- who value human freedom, dignity, and decency. Who value responsible parents and the Declaration of Independence. Who value the Great Commandment (good faith) and the Golden Rule (good will). Moreover, that kind of empathy is spiritually innate to the cosmos, available to all who have not allowed themselves to become blinded by rot.
Moreover, those Americans are waking up to the warped corrupti and trained ignoranti who walk among us, who want to destroy the last vestiges of representative republicanism to replace it with dystopian NWO tribalism under absolutely corrupt oligarchs, liars, perverts, child abusers, race baiters, and dividers. They are recognizing the necessity of stopping the insanity of all who are intolerant of the American Ideal. And they are waking up to the nightmare of the alternative -- which is unjust tribalism on behalf of selfish people farmers and their whiny tools.

Absent responsible judgment among individual moral agents, every so-called scientific (liberal) pursuit of max pleasure will tend to neglect to factor the opportunity-investment cost. This is because science cannot very well factor that which was not selected. That is the job of moral judgment. As an organizing "principle," so-called "scientific" group hedonism (fake enlightenment) neglects what is necessary to raise children to become the next generation of responsible citizens. Somehow, no-harm-no-foul Libs seem always to forget about (or forfeit) the children, i.e., the generation that will be taxed to clean up their mess. Indeed, they are hardly willing to procreate. In Patton's patois, they know no more about philosophy than they know about forn i cat ion.

There is nothing in being black (or any other skin color), per se, that disallows a person from becoming superior in intellect, physicality, and virtue. Rather, the problem is with how the gene pool has been generally filtered. (To consider how rapidly this can alter a human gene pool, compare the history of dog breeds.)
Nor is there anything, per se, that disallows any immigrant from becoming a valued, free-thinking, competent American. Rather, the problem is with how our controllers are generally filtering the applicants.
When poor filtering of genetic and immigration pools is not sufficiently and generally opposed, every representative republic is endangered. (Note: Lest linear, one-dimensional, wussie-cretins get their panties in a bunch, I am not talking about specific or invasive genetic design. I am talking about general programs for factoring immigration and job applicants, so as to avoid the enserfing destruction of a republic.)
There is nothing morally superior or enlightening about allowing oligarchs and their Brooksian tools to swamp a republic with easily enserfed liberty-illiterates.

**************


If the essence of Jesus is The Word, what then is The Word? Is it in the context, writing, symbol, sound from vibrations forced through the air, synapse jump, electromagnetic exchange? Is it conscious thought, communicated from the Expresser-Transmitter to the Expressee-Receiver? The spiritual exchange of good faith/good will?  Is it the conscious choice of Empathy over Enmity?

To the Atheistic Entitled, their perversion of the purpose of The Word is neither to serve nor to sustain, but to suck. And to network and swarm to enhance the sucking. Not empathy, but enmity. Not to serve The Word, but to profane it.  Not to receive for service, but to mass to take.  To be entitled by massing.  And all who resist are called racists.

Muslims who choose to propagate Islam have been responsible for most of the war killing.

Atheism is a faith-based stance that there can be higher (meta) mindedness without a spiritual (meta) connection. Every choice made by a perspective of consciousness is based in some aspect on a leap of faith under higher axioms.
Science, for its axioms, depends on measurable replicability. It depends on faith in what has been evident in measurements. Moral purposefulness is not so availed. It depends on what is evident to its self intuition and moral judgment. Which unavoidably entails leaps of faith.

Self-godded Evildoers usually find it helpful to rationalize what they do in terms of higher mindedness. That tends to come after the fact.
Their real motivation was lust, envy, jealousy. After the fact, they rationalize it, by forcing people to call them god or by arguing that they were in the service of a god.
The people who blame religion are just allowing the Evildoers to hide behind a cloak, perhaps to rationalize the continuation of their own evil. But the real cause was in the badly-churched, poorly-parented hearts of the Evildoers.

Mueller and what he is tasked to investigate are creations of the oligarchy that wants to kill the republic. Mueller's job is to serve his creator.
In effect, the oligarchy that controls the media-academia-news-lobbying apparatus is making itself the prosecutor, jury, and judge in its own cause.

We need a Special Investigator to investigate the Special Investigator.

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Model of CSI



That which we model as EMR carries quantum level, math-based, fuzz-programs of potentiality for all manner of possible patterns, forms, and in-form-ation.

However, in each case of sequential reconciliatory manifestation, only one comes into manifestation, thereafter to be representationally preserved as part of the chronological record of Information.

Whatever the pattern that emerges from potentiality into manifestation, its representation will, of necessity, happen to be amenable to the sensory reception of every potential perspective of consciousness that abides within its field of broadcast and re-normal-ative reference.

Only those patterns that are potentially observed by or implicated to a perspective of consciousness will be brought into manifestation and assimilated into the chronological record of Information.

The manifestation of any pattern implicates that a perspective of consciousness can observe its representation -- at least in potential.

Wheresoever there are manifestations-representations of pattern-forms, there are potentialities of perspectives of consciousness associated therewith.




*******************

Are you attracted to trying to straighten out rabbit holes?  If not, stop now.

ROBOTIC A.I.:

What may be implied about consciousness from the nature of A.I.?

A passive, receiving pattern or happenstance or even a designed machine could happen to occur or be set up to record all light and sound coming within its field of view and recording.  It could be set up first to receive and store such Information, then, after lapse of some set time, to interpret and act on it, depending on whether it constituted a preset signal.  In the process of acting on the Information, it may determine whether to transmit the Information, who to transmit it to, and in what ways to segment or bundle the Information, or even whether or when to tamper with, alter, or destroy the transmission, information, or itself.  Or whether and when to turn itself on or off.

Notice:  The robot need not be conscious of itself to do most of the above.  And the Information it received would have existed, regardless of how the robot acted on it.  Consciousness in the machine would not be needed for the Information to be processed to have existed.

How, then, can it reasonably be said that Consciousness is an innate, requisite component or aspect of existentiality?

ANSWERS:

- Before the existentiality of the Information and/or the recording Machine, patterns had to be coordinated and deployed that would avail their interactive relations.  They would have to arise in respect of math conserving relationships.  The math would have to be activated.  By itself, math would have nothing to fuel its activation.  What, then, activated/activates the math?  Not anything measurable, because, without the activation, no-thing measurable would abide.

- When the machine is called upon to sort the Information it receives, based on either/or determinations, it will necessarily sometimes encounter situations of fuzzy ambiguity.  Yet, its programming may require it to "make a decisive choice."  At some fuzzy level, that choice making will implicate something more than a predetermining algorithm.

- As the machine becomes more complex, and capable of adding additional functions and responsibilities, and making decisions regarding which new responsibilities to undertake, its aspect of exhibiting consciousness will emerge ever more clearly.

- Such emergent consciousness would not be in the machine-in-itself, but would be an expression of the contextual situation ... as a fluxing holism.  Such would make clear that the potential for such expression of consciousness existed all along.  That some Immeasurable was entailed in a feedback process that affected and therefore guided its unfolding.

Perhaps Consciousness may reasonably be conceptualized as that which facilitates the choosing and bringing forth of math-based potentialities into present manifestation, then to allow such potentialities to become accumulated as Information.

Regardless, there will always abide complex choices in how to process Information and choose which patterns to preserve and reconcile.  As patterns become more complex, the emergence of various iterations of self-aware point-of-view (mortal) identities would seem to become unavoidable.

But, how does Information FORM any pattern that is sticky enough to receive, consume, replicate, represent, or move itself ... to manifest, express, or become an Identity that chooses to sustain any correlate for its particular pattern?  Somehow, it would seem that, in the choosing of which fluxes to reconcile, Consciousness must always entail that perspectives be reconciled.

ABSURDITY:  An alternative model, to suppose consciousness to be non-innate, would foster a many-manifested-worlds absurdity.

*******************

MULTIVERSE:  Under my model, no multiverse is taken to be populated in existential manifestation, because no single universe is taken, in itself, to be in existential manifestation.  Rather, all that is in manifestation is a present apparitional upshot of meta-Consciousness, as it inter-functions with math to conceptualize among various potentialities for expression ... while choosing at any present time-place to make manifest and present only one unfolding, cosmically reconciling, manifestation.  Whatever the reconciling Consciousness makes manifest in its unfolding use of math, it is singly reconciled.  Under my model, Consciousness is Consciousness is One.


*******************

CENTER OF COSMOS:  We are unable in space to discern any spatial point of origin for an hypothesized Big Bang.  And it seems unlikely that there could abide any brick wall at the edge-ceiling of the cosmic sphere.  Nor any bubble-film ... to confine, separate, or define our cosmos.  Rather, every point of view seems to experience the cosmos as if it were at the center of the apparent curvature of the cosmos.

Perhaps Dark Substance is what avails the mass of Substance in all directions to be rationalized as a same meta-value, so that no locus can be identified as the point of origin for the hypothesized Big Bang.  Might Dark Substance reasonably be modeled the trail of a fractal pattern of math lenses, wherewith, regardless of point of view, every perspective of consciousness must be renormalized ... to measure the cosmos as if it stretched out from him in all directions and with no apparent or discernible end?  In any  event, Black Holes would not seem to avail any passage for us to different universes.  Perhaps gods can traverse through them, but not mortals?

If what defines the apparent limits to our universe is only based in curvature functions in meta-math, and there is no wall or film at the end, then that would seem to be because there is no real Substance-in-itself.  Rather, all appearances of measurable Substance seem best modeled as derivatives of meta-Consciousness as it inter-functions with no-real-thing ... other than math. Thus, while math avails all measuring, math-in-itself, as any complete holism, is not measurable.


*******************

MATH: Apart from Consciousness, the only thing that is perpetually present, regardless of context, is math itself. Every appearance/representation seems to be a derivative of no thing other than Consciousness and Math. The modern model for the Big Bang envisions the cosmos arising out of an asymmetry between matter and anti-matter, without which there would be no-thing expressed. Within the eternal re-Present-ation, the asymmetric image-ination of Consciousness is conserved and filtered in math -- back and forth, from Reconciler/Conserver to Perspective/Fluxer.

- Of the receding Rainbow of Appearances:

To mortal measure, all that is expressed consists not of things in themselves, but only of appearances (re-presentations) --- of which there abides no apparent limit to the size or potential of the Cosmos. There is no good reason to believe any spherical ceiling delimits the experience-able light cones of the Cosmos.

Particular expressions of Consciousness are always behind such apparent expansions of Substance as appear to them. Substance does not appear to Consciousness except in appearance of receding beyond the sensing limits of Consciousness to measure. That which can measurably appear to senses of Consciousness is always arranged so that the limits of any contextual field with which it is expressed cannot be completely sensed or confined. This is because the meta determinants -- Consciousness and Math -- are not themselves limited in space or time, because they do not themselves occupy space or time.

Appearances do not exist in themselves. As they come into appearance, Consciousness at some level must be present or in potential to sense the appearance. As appearances of what is measurable seem to expand, the experience of Consciousness seems to expand with each such appearance.

Nothing in itself "really" lies beyond the sensory limits of Consciousness, because there is no such a thing as any particular measurable-in-itself. There is no particle-in-itself. All appearances of Substance flux, phase, and shift, in coordination with a contextualizing flux of CSI.

Appearances to be found may contemporaneously lie beyond the senses of a particular expression of Consciousness. But such appearances cannot lie beyond the potential and contemporaneous sense of all expressions of Consciousness. As potentials for senses of Consciousness expand, so also do potentials for appearances to their senses --- coordinately.

Because all that is measurable consists of what is apparent, and what is apparent depends on senses evolving for perspectives of Consciousness, no-thing (no Substance of space, time, matter, energy) that is measurable to any mortal can come into presently existential expression without a correlating expression of, or potential for, Consciousness for it to be presented to or recorded for.

It is not unreasonable to believe that, without Consciousness, the cosmos of appearances and re-presentations could not be expressed.

- Of Renormalization:

With what are our senses, sensations, and sense of beingness coordinated and renormalized?

Our participatory expressions of Will are renormalized and coordinated with a feedback flux among CSI, i.e., Conscioiusness, Substance, and Information. As we observe, interpret, appreciate, pray, and apprehend, so also is our existential contextualizaton renormalized.

CAUSATION: So, what is the Causal Agent? Is it us, a natural law of appearances, or a flux that responds to, and feeds back with, our experiences of apprehensions?  What we desire affects how we perceive and appreciate, which affects what thereafter presents to our experience.  There is no thing-in-itself causal agent for what appears before us, apart from a systemic feedback loop between perspectives or potentials of consciousness and that which reconciles them. We do not have free will. But we do give expression to Participatory Will.

- Why the Moon remains even when not being looked at:

The reason that which accounts for the appearance of the Moon continues even when you are no longer looking to receive the appearance is because you are not the only perspective of Consciousness that is viewing or potentially viewing the appearance. You are not the only observer who is about in the quod. Rather, the appearance remains renormalized and reconciled to every perspective of Consciousness that potentially looks at what we refer to as re-presenting the Moon. Such perspectives are spread out among various maths, levels, layers and fractals, far beyond that of any particular personage. So the Moon remains reliably measurable as a Substance to every viewer who may in potentiality look at it.

It is that reconciling renormalization that fluxes with CSI which infuses measurable physicality throughout the Cosmos. So, chronological interrelations are preserved for every perspective that happens to share the same In-form-ational accumulating and conveying frame of reference (light cone). The body and brain for each mind-perspective is part of a math-based system of reconciling and fluxing fractals within fractals within fractals.

Evidently, the math is continuously activated in the perpetual-present by an ongoing feedback process of apprehension and appreciation, between each perspective of Consciousness and its reconciling context within the fluxing holism of CSI.

**************

There was a young man who said, "God
Must think it exceedingly odd
If he finds that this tree
Continues to be
When there's no one about in the Quad."

REPLY
Dear Sir:
Your astonishment's odd:
I am always about in the Quad.
And that's why the tree
Will continue to be,
Since observed by
Yours faithfully,
GOD.

**************

To deny a conserving reconciler, one must first presuppose it. To deny a thing is true is to affirm that one’s denial is true. To deny a thing is just (that it ought to be a certain way) is to affirm that the thing should be a different way. To deny a thing is beautiful is to affirm that it is not beautiful, which is to presuppose a sense of beauty. To deny a particular responsibility is to affirm a responsibility to do otherwise. Consequently, the sense of truth, justice, beauty, responsibility, is self-evident and known from within. To consciously deny the existence of these qualities is to affirm conscious appreciation for what they are.  To rationalize the lack of a meta a priori, one must invoke an a priori. Thus, no one can proceed in this life without a leap of faith of some kind.

I do not think general truth, beauty, and morality are the objective specific same to every subjective perspective of consciousness. However, I do think they represent a general truth that applies to each subject perspective, as he/she seeks after them in his/her context of experience.

IOW, the objective Source is in a state of feedback with each of its perspectives, as it guides them towards enlightenment.

*************

********************************************************



*******************
*******************


A quote from a commenter, Weingarten: "Consider the analytic a-priori which includes logic and mathematics. In order to deny it, one must presuppose it. For example, to deny logic (e.g., 22), it is necessary to demonstrate the opposite (for example to show that 3 isn’t >2). Yet this constitutes the very logic that one sought to deny. Similarly, to deny the synthetic a-priori, we must show that man lacks intention (or causality, choice, etc.). Yet doing so exhibits that very intention (or causality, choice, etc.) that one sought to deny. By the ‘moral a-priori’ I mean that which is an undeniable aspiration, such as respecting truth, justice, beauty, responsibility. Note that the denial of truth is an affirmation that one’s denial is true; the denial of justice (that things ought to be a certain way) is an affirmation that things should be a different way; the denial of beauty affirms that something is not beautiful, which presupposes a sense of beauty; the denial of responsibility is an affirmation of the responsibility to do otherwise. Consequently, the sense of truth, justice, beauty, responsibility, is self-evident and known from within, for one knows whereof he speaks. Most pertinent is that to deny the existence of these qualities is to affirm an appreciation for what they are."

That is worth the contemplation. How do we rationalize the lack of a meta a priori, without invoking an a priori? Well, we can't. No one can proceed in this life without a leap of faith of some kind. This is why the militant faithless seem to me to be so fundamentally and morally blind!

That said, I do not think the general truth, beauty, and morality are the objective specific same to every subjective perspective of consciousness. Rather, I think they represent general truths that apply to each subject perspective, as he/she seeks after them in his/her context of experience. IOW, the objective source is in a state of feedback with each of its perspectives, as it guides them towards enlightenment.

***********
************

People don't pay for an Ivy League education because it is necessarily better. They pay for the connections. Many choose a church for the same reason. Children tend not to seek out what makes sense, but simply to adopt the religion of their parents or profs and then to rationalize it after the fact.


**************

The left has turned the sin of envy into a virtue by pretending it is fighting greed.

Like Mohammad, Progs have gradually molded a clergy that reflects their so-called values.

Too many people think Reality abides only in that which is observed by their perspective of consciousness, rather than in what is experienced by a reconciliation of consciousness, generally.

Their leap of faith is that the entire cosmos revolves around their feelings and pleasures. Outside their calculus of pleasure, they have stunted themselves to have little regard for the freedom and dignity of others. So, they make their own pleasure their own god.

In this way, they rationalize their pursuit of power to subjugate the will of others to their so-called "principle" of moral scientism. For that purpose, they often find it convenient to align and gang-bang with other self-pleasuring self-gods, in order to take what they have not worked to produce --- even as they tell those they steal from that "you did not build that."

In effect, they find what gives them immediate pleasure, and then they invent a religious-like meta-faith justification for it --- while they tell others they should forego meta-faith. Their alchemy of corruption and ignorance is breath taking. When they can, they make all producing people into cattle, "privileged" to be farmed by a corrupt axis of people farmers and their useful tools.



It's a matter of readiness more so than goodliness. People who have been trained all their lives to think themselves entitled to support from others cannot in their generation be made ready for life in a representative republic. Rather, they tend to come only to suck the blood of the republic and ultimately to despoil it to the condition they left.

This is especially so, as dumas apologists reinforce unearned self esteem and decline to discipline liberty-illiterates ever to become independent adults.


The American Revolution was based largely on respect for the freedom and dignity of the individual, under a framework of checks and balances and an assimilative respect for the deity.

The French Revolution was based largely on internal cannibalization by gang-banging, while calling it liberté, égalité, fraternité.

Americans had been forged in individual competence. The French had been largely reduced to desperate servants. A representative republic can be the best form of government for a ready society, but it is not best for every society.

This is why oligarchic people-farmers want to import more liberty-illiterates: To submerge the U.S. into the servile condition of the lowest common denominator. This is why the media-academia apparatus of the oligarchy promotes and propagandizes so many "progressive" tools.


*****************

A quote from a commenter, Weingarten: "Consider the analytic a-priori which includes logic and mathematics. In order to deny it, one must presuppose it. For example, to deny logic (e.g., 22), it is necessary to demonstrate the opposite (for example to show that 3 isn’t >2). Yet this constitutes the very logic that one sought to deny. Similarly, to deny the synthetic a-priori, we must show that man lacks intention (or causality, choice, etc.). Yet doing so exhibits that very intention (or causality, choice, etc.) that one sought to deny. By the ‘moral a-priori’ I mean that which is an undeniable aspiration, such as respecting truth, justice, beauty, responsibility. Note that the denial of truth is an affirmation that one’s denial is true; the denial of justice (that things ought to be a certain way) is an affirmation that things should be a different way; the denial of beauty affirms that something is not beautiful, which presupposes a sense of beauty; the denial of responsibility is an affirmation of the responsibility to do otherwise. Consequently, the sense of truth, justice, beauty, responsibility, is self-evident and known from within, for one knows whereof he speaks. Most pertinent is that to deny the existence of these qualities is to affirm an appreciation for what they are."


That is worth the contemplation. How do we rationalize the lack of a meta a priori, without invoking an a priori? Well, we can't. No one can proceed in this life without a leap of faith of some kind. This is why the militant faithless seem to me to be so fundamentally and morally blind!

That said, I do not think the general truth, beauty, and morality are the objective specific same to every subjective perspective of consciousness. Rather, I think they represent general truths that apply to each subject perspective, as he/she seeks after them in his/her context of experience. IOW, the objective source is in a state of feedback with each of its perspectives, as it guides them towards enlightenment.

************

In the Christian tradition, Jesus invites us to the light, but does not command us to the light. Nor does Jesus commission oligarchic scientists to rule our sense of morality "for our own best interest." In that sense, the NWO oligarchy would push us to a kind of hell on earth. But Jesus would respect our innate participatory freedom and moral dignity.

This is the basis of the experiment with the American republic. And it is what the godless oligarchy and its faux-progressive tools seek to destroy.


The dumbest of the dumb think they should be in charge of educating everyone else. To entertain this is to watch humanity slide to a lowest common denominator, as surely as water flows downhill.

This will not be corrected until it becomes safe again not to encourage people to esteem themselves beyond their limits. The easiest people to lead to esteem themselves beyond their limits tend to be the dumbest and most corrupt of people. This is how a corrupt society winds up rewarding audacity (rap blast, shout down, traffic block, and flash mob) merely for the sake of audacity.

What Obama really lamented was that the Bill of Rights did not expressly give power brokers the rights to do more stuff to you.

************

Too many people think Reality abides only in that which is observed by their perspective of Consciousness, rather than in what is experienced by a reconciliation of consciousness, generally.

Their leap of faith is that the entire cosmos revolves around their feelings and pleasures. Outside their calculus of pleasure, they have stunted themselves to have little regard for the freedom and dignity of others. So, they make their own pleasure their own god.

In this way, they rationalize their pursuit of power to subjugate the will of others to their so-called "principle" of moral scientism. For that purpose, they often find it convenient to align and gang-bang with other self-pleasuring self-gods, in order to take what they have not worked to produce --- even as they tell those they steal from that "you did not build that."

In effect, they find what gives them immediate pleasure, and then they invent a religious-like meta-faith justification for it --- while they tell others they should forego meta-faith. Their alchemy of corruption and ignorance is breath taking. When they can, they make all producing people into cattle, "privileged" to be farmed by a corrupt axis of people farmers and their useful tools.


*************

Absent responsible judgment among individual moral agents, every so-called scientific (liberal) pursuit of max pleasure will tend to neglect to factor the opportunity-investment cost. This is because science cannot very well factor that which was not selected. That is the job of moral judgment. As an organizing "principle," so-called "scientific" group hedonism (fake enlightenment) neglects what is necessary to raise children to become the next generation of responsible citizens. Somehow, no-harm-no-foul Libs seem always to forget about (or forfeit) the children, i.e., the generation that will be taxed to clean up their mess. Indeed, they are hardly willing to procreate. In Patton's patois, they know no more about philosophy than they know about forn ifi cat ion.



Thursday, June 15, 2017

A Theory of Evil

Much of modern mayhem and disorder is a consequence of mass confusion regarding the nature of evil.  And of fascist despots and oligarchs who seek to profit from such division and confusion.
A theory of evil does not consist in a scientific sense of measurables, as for quantifying evil scientifically.  Rather, it relates to as consistent, coherent, and complete an explanatory framework as possible for evaluating the choices, values, acts, and character of individual persons and groups.
 An individual can choose, do, and act in an evil way.  If such overshadows his character, he may be meaningfully described as an evil personage.  A group, organization, or pattern, that is not a person, cannot in its character be evil, for it has no personal character.  However, it may represent the upshot of evil choices or failings by persons who should have more responsibly tended their societies.
A good person does not lead other people into evil.  He does not subjugate other adults to a subhuman status. (He may defend himself from others who already have chosen a subhuman status.)  For the most part, he does not remove freedom of thought, communication, association, speech, or enterprise from another.  He does not shout down invited speakers.  He does not seek to hire or promote waves of demented profs or talking heads to brainwash students and citizens, so as to remove their capacities to reason for themselves.

A good person accords respect to other adults who present themselves in good faith and good will, and tries for persuasion to rely on reason.  That is not to say that he fails to take into account the interests, feelings, and passions of others.  Nor is it to say that he so coddles young people as to raise them to be wussies.  Nor is it to say he is unwilling, when necessary, to be rude to persons who do not incline to present themselves in good faith or good will.
A good person does not, upon finding his own society, culture, or country to be a basket case, emigrate to another, to seek to turn his chosen better society into the same kind of basket case he left.
If evil is an absence of goodness, then it is evil to invade another country to plunder and waste it, as in the case of the country that was left.  If evil relates to a lack of moral responsibility in individuals, then it is evil to subjugate the freedom of another to exercise his own good faith and good will.  If evil relates to disrespect for a reconciling spirituality of interconnecting good faith, then a so-called religion that advocates killing people, for being apostate to its word-formulas for expressing faith, is an upshot of evil.
Dots connect to make it reasonable to inquire:  Are not the following the sponsors or upshots of Evil?  Communists, NWO Oligarchs, destroyers of families, destroyers of representative republics, Muslims, organized looters, organized proponents of terrorism for the sake of overthrowing a representative republic, race-baiters who divide and antagonize peoples and communities based on race, gender, or origin, and purveyors of fake moral scientism as a basis for replacing freedom with rule under fake scientists and asinine despots.
 IOW, is not the Uniparty of Rinos and Dinos in fact, an upshot of Evil?

***************

I think the subjective and the objective are inextricably mixed, rather than completely one or the other.  To my intuition, there abides a holism whose existentiality is objective, but beyond the measure of its part-icular perspectives, i.e., subjects.  My perspective of the (objective) holism is subject (subjective) to my perspective. 

I think the Reconciling Principler is real, but its application is personal (subjective) to each perspective.  I think an interconnecting empathy is innate to every perspective of consciousness.  Consciousness is consciousness, but each of our limited perspectives of it is subjective. 

Consciousness measures what is objective, but aspects of itself defy objective measure that is apart from qualitative appreciation.  This is why the good faith and good will of each subjective perspective, in feedback with a reconciling holism,  is a vital aspect for any model about morality.  Otherwise, how can "higher mindedness" mean anything?

************

I don't think mortal prophets have any innate advantage over me in making sense out of what is fundamentally paradoxical.  I consult the Good Book, but I also consult the Book of the Cosmos and the Book of Innate Good Faith.  I am just an egg.  Like you. 

I doubt the Almighty cares about word-sound-formula-incantations we try to interpose to ensure some kind of unknowable eternal relationship.  What I don't doubt is Jesus' teaching about the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule.  And that is what is essential to establish and preserve a decent representative republic.

Otoh, I don't think gov-forced incantation of John 3:16 is conducive to a decent representative republic.  On that, I am with the Founders.

***********

The ideas of identity, belief, and eternity are so paradoxical that, when mixed, I simply do not grok how any reasonable mortal can intelligently claim to fathom them. However, I am just an egg.

***********

Leftism is intolerance of individualism. Intolerance of individuals deciding what to think, communicate, and do. Intolerance of individuals taking responsibility for themselves or their associations. Subjugating everyone to believe, think, and do as some charismatic, pretending mouthpieces for God or science presume to require. Replacing responsible humans with subhuman tools for despots, while pretending to be pursuing the greater good.
Leftist totalitarianism comes in various flavors, such as Mohammadism, Marxism, Masochism, Munchausenism, Minorityism, and Motherism. It infantalizes monsters so they can never grow up to become decent human beings or to be able to sustain a representative republic.
Leftism is Evil operating under a mask of good intentions. It is Evil because it denies the moral authority and responsibility of individuals by inventing myths about the moral authority and responsibility of non-human organizations and pagan patterns. It reviles human morality while it imagines unicorn moral "science."

****************

When people (phony proggies) do not believe in a principle of higher minded reconciliation, they tend to default to personal pleasure.  They seek pleasure only for themselves and perhaps those with whom they identify.  Depending on fluxes in six degrees of Kevin Bacon, those connections in identification may or may not result in a decent society, nation, or civilization. 

More likely, they will result in conflict among contending tribes of decadent pleasure seekers.  Their purposes will tend to be directed to the biggest orgasm, the highest high, the most powerful of the powerful, and the grooming, abuse, dhimmification, and enserfment of all who stand in their way.  And they will pursue such things "scientifically."  A recipe for decent civilization, this is not.

*****************

Rinos and Dinos both represent Olds. Old Establishment, but always finding new ways to divide and farm the masses. The mass farm is their idea of progress. Insofar as that progress is made at the cost of the freedom and dignity of the people at large, it is evil. Regardless of whether that "progress" is by oligarchs while wearing their Dem hats or by oligarchs while wearing their Repub hats. The "progress" of Rinos and Dinos is based on people-farming, all the way down.
Olds do not teach people how to think for themselves. Fundamentalist Christians rely on authoritarianism, revelation, and fear. Fundamentalist Libs rely on Rules for Radicals. Neither think for themselves.
To say Dinos are not evil because Rinos do it too ... is fallacious. Because the Rinos who do it are also evil. Any adult who sets out to lord his will in order to subjugate the freedom of another is evil --- unless the other has already surrendered his freedom to an opposing tyrant. It is evil to farm people who are not subhumans as if they were subhumans. The oligarchs who fund Dinos tend to be the same oligarchs who hedge-fund Rinos.

*************

I think consciousness (sense of beingness) is an innate aspect of the cosmos, and that qualitative aspects of it defy measurement by any of the usual senses. I think that consciousness is the same everywhere. What makes it seem different is that it is experienced through different patterns of bodies, with differently limiting senses for measuring what presents as the measurable substance around us. I don't think presently measurable Substance could exist without two other fundaments: Accumulating Information, and immeasurable Consciousness. Fundamentally, something about existentiality requires observers.
IAE, I don't think a society that is unable to assimilate an idea of Higher Mindedness can either establish or sustain a representative republic. Rather, I think the default condition of any such society is one of despotism.

I think consciousness (sense of beingness) is an innate aspect of the cosmos, and that qualitative aspects of it defy measurement by any of the usual senses. I think that consciousness is the same everywhere. What makes it seem different is that it is experienced through different patterns of bodies, with differently limiting senses for measuring what presents as the measurable substance around us. I don't think presently measurable Substance could exist without two other fundaments: Accumulating Information, and immeasurable Consciousness. Fundamentally, something about existentiality requires observers.
IAE, I don't think a society that is unable to assimilate an idea of Higher Mindedness can either establish or sustain a representative republic. Rather, I think the default condition of any such society is one of despotism.

I think our experiences of separate consciousness are a consequence of differently evolving ways for limiting the consciousness of the holism. Each of us is temporally defined by how our blinders temporally evolve. Our eternal definition is something quite unlimited and paradoxical.
IAE, the main issue I am here concerned with is not what is essential to eternal salvation.
Rather, my main concern here is what is essential to sustain a decent republic under Higher Mindedness. If you don't believe in Higher Mindedness, you can't very well devote yourself to that issue.

*****************

What is your measurable proof of what you take to be your own conscious identity?  Can that be rigorously defined or tested?  You say "you" require empirical proof, yet you have no empirical proof of what your you-ness is. 
So I say you are, in a way, relying on a faith-based stance:  That you -- whatever you are -- will always require empirical proof.  Yet, many human transactions are one of a kind, perhaps never to be exactly repeated.  So, except on judgment based in part on intuition and insight, how do you test or prove whether you should trust a person, seek to rule over another person, vote for a politician, or advocate for a public cause?
Note:  I am not advocating for a testable theory of beingness.  I am only advocating for a model, a way of thinking, that I try to make as internally consistent, coherent, and complete as possible.  I do not claim it is testable truth.  Only that it seems to support morality, empathy, freedom, and representative republicanism.  Which I, in whatever moral authority "I" have,  say is good.  And seek to make it so.  :)
I agree that the best part of religious faith, or faith of any kind, seems often to get lost in the minutiae.  I am not one to stand on ceremony, diets, dress, or incantations.  Although I can appreciate metaphoric beauty and inspiring passion that often accompany such things.

******************

Yet, so long as we live, we have no choice but to make choices.  Failing to make a choice or to take a stand is itself a kind of choice.  And to be correct, that "all is subjective," would necessitate an objective standard.  How do you know that all is subjective?  How do you know that there abides no Reconciler, which is not subject, but in respect of which we mortals are subjects (subjectives)?

So long as I am tasked to make choices, my stand is that I prefer that my choices be reasoned, empathetic, purposeful, principled, consistent, coherent.   That necessitates a leap of faith.  I don't think anyone can live very long without making some leaps of faith.  Then, the concern becomes, what leaps of faith are most reasonable? 

For that, my chosen test is to ask:  What is needed to assimilate and sustain a decent representative republic?  Whatever it is that Ainos think they are doing, I do not believe it is conducive to a representative republic.

**************

I do hate mind zombies.  They tend to be tools of the people-farm.  The people-farm, being collectivist, is a thing of the Left. 
I don't hate confused Lefties who have not entirely forsaken reason.  But I do hate mind zombies, left or right.  However, by definition, almost all zombie collectors are violent Lefties.
Colleges seem to be zeroing in on the ultimate people-farming quest.  That is, many of the social studies colleges don't just burn away students' capacities or desires to think for themselves.  They actually produce the ultimate product:  Mind zombies. 
The infestation seems to be as great and nearly as horrific as in any zombie sci-fi flick.  Yet, they call these products "educated."  They are like Muslim suicide bombers, except they kill minds without killing the bodies.

Obama sold out every representative republic to an ugly NWO. As an individual American, Obama is a spiteful, hateful, race-baiting, incompetent, perpetual infant. And he paved the way for a majority of his ilk to invade and swamp the republic.
Being nice will not fix this. Appealing to reason will not fix this. Most of Obama-ilk are beyond niceties or reason. They, like the oligarchy that funds them, want to destroy every independent republic, to reduce them all to a lowest common denominator of corrupti and ignoranti.
Most of Obama's supporters would rather be equal in hell than to aspire to become individually competent or responsible. Most of Obama's funders are content to rule in hell, because there is nothing higher in their mindedness than hell.
When you understand Obama, you will suddenly sense the invisible, startling vomit that spews from him. Now that Obama-ilk have sold us out, they tell us we must be pleasant to them -- even as they continue to shout down all dissent and attempts to MAGA.

*************

The Reconciler will guide us as we become receptive. Then, nothing can stop our cause. The godless NWO Oligarchy holds the money and the institutions. They cling to their willies and their goosey shillies, but not to faith. They send pretended holy men among us, but their conflation of taxes for charity marks them as fakers. They are puffed up, but hollow.

You forgot Joan of Arc. And Laura Loomer and Pamela Geller. Conservers of Liberty are here, and more are coming.
************
"You know, by God, I actually pity those poor bastards we're going up against." https://youtu.be/NDAWaYu-YCo
https://youtu.be/uYjnWXFTQkM
Beginning at 4:54 -- https://youtu.be/1ZKS1t1KEl8

I do not support abortion. But I think, under our Constitution as written, pending Amendment, it should be a matter for the States. I think the States would soon curtail it.
During our worldly sojourn, we have to keep our eyes on the prize if we want to re-inspire, re-establish, and then preserve a decent representative republic. We can't make the perfect the enemy of the good. We can make headway with people who have not entirely forsaken capacity to take responsibility for reasoning for themselves --- even as they do some things we think evil. We need their alliance against those that have fallen completely under the spell of mindless enserfment to the godless Oligarchy. But we must not import them in such numbers as to undermine our own republic. If we keep our eyes on the prize, we will make Pilgrim's Progress --- even on Earth.
How do we inoculate people against zombie brain poisoning? In many cases, homeschool! Yay!

I agree that freedom requires a framework of law, but only a framework. A free market requires a framework to protect against oligarchic, nation-owning abusers. The buck that tries to engage in a free market when among lions and wolves only makes himself a free lunch. Freedom requires effective checks and balances, and, often, the spiritual and intestinal fortitude to impose T for Tat. That leaves out the femimen.

Impeachment could never work against Obama so long as the oligarchy that fronted him opposed it. Impeachment only works when the Oligarchy wants it to. When the Oligarchy cannot impeach as it would like, it simply uses its media-academia apparatus to neuter the Executive. When the Executive seeks to neuter the Oligarchy, the Oligarchy's purchased Rinos step in. Our institutions were inadequate to prevent the rise and empowerment of a new, worldwide class of aristocratic oligarchs, so now we reap the consequence.

Trump is likely evaluating whether enough of a remnant remains to turn the NWO corruption around. Whether, once he is gone, there will remain anyone who can continue the restoration of the republic. Trump is game, but not foolish enough to play for a lost cause. The forces that created a treasonous oligarchy, a purchased Congress, and a zombie electorate remain.
Something is missing, without which that cannot be reversed. What is missing is not a matter of mere form. A COS and the Liberty Amendments would be a start. But they will not fix all the mechanisms by which the oligarchy continues to agglomerate wealth and power enough to buy politicians and entire governments.
Something more is needed to re-assimilate a society that can be deserving of a representative republic. Something more is needed to convince the Reconciler that we are deserving of being led out of the worldwide bondage we are allowing and often greasing. We have to re-assimilate the Will to follow the Reconciler and to re-assimilate our sense of individual responsibility. Otherwise, neither Trump nor the Reconciler would likely deem the time right to lead us to a restoration of human freedom, dignity, and decency.
So long as so many have so little faith in Higher Mindedness, there is little point among them for arguing for Higher Mindedness. If our only organizing "scientific moral principle" remains the most pleasure for the most people, we will become the perpetually warring worldwide people-farms, scientifically.

If the Zombie Ainos will foster the murder of a President, what will they foster against the masses? I shudder to think of it. Laura has shown us how to man up against the Nazi NWO. Despite all the depredations of Obama, I never sought his murder.

I am not sure DJT can lead us out of this. But I am sure that none of the other contenders could have. The evil in the oligarchy and its media-academia apparatus is breath taking.

Being nice will not fix this. Appealing to reason will not fix this. Most of Obama-ilk are beyond niceties or reason. They, like the oligarchy that funds them, want to destroy every independent republic, to reduce them all to a lowest common denominator of corrupti and ignoranti.

Social engineering pertains to the scientism of people farming. Canada welcomes you, cow-people --- femi-bulls and heifers, alike.

Obama sold out every representative republic to an ugly NWO. As an individual American, Obama is a spiteful, hateful, race-baiting, incompetent, perpetual infant. And he paved the way for a majority of his ilk to invade and swamp the republic.
Being nice will not fix this. Appealing to reason will not fix this. Most of Obama-ilk are beyond niceties or reason. They, like the oligarchy that funds them, want to destroy every independent republic, to reduce them all to a lowest common denominator of corrupti and ignoranti.
Most of Obama's supporters would rather be equal in hell than to aspire to become individually competent or responsible. Most of Obama's funders are content to rule in hell, because there is nothing higher in their mindedness than hell.
When you understand Obama, you will suddenly sense the invisible, startling vomit that spews from him. Now that Obama-ilk have sold us out, they tell us we must be pleasant to them -- even as they continue to shout down all dissent and attempts to MAGA.

***************

I think we will lose only if we believe we are going to lose. If we become disgusted, rally in faith, and fight back, we will not lose.
We need more American preachers to step up to champion the fight to restore responsible representative republicanism. We need for them to stop being apologists for the wussification of faith, the undermining of family, and the destruction of borders and patriotic fidelity.

*************

The classification of who is Jewish or Jew-like seems to vary considerably, depending on who is doing the classifying and for what purpose.  But, on what basis other than nonsense should God be thought to favor those born of mixed marriages and Jewish mothers over those born of mixed marriages and Jewish fathers? 
It is also a mystery why the eternal Godhead should be thought to be burdened with an eternal fetish over a myriad of dietary, dress, and ceremonial minutiae.  Or why any such a classification should be thought specially blessed or chosen to rule over all others.  When you look at the Muslim justification for imposing dhimmitude, it becomes tempting to consider this predilection a Semite thing.
However, I think it is more like a natural gang-banging thing.  Like how Blacks use skin color to decide who is appropriate to gang-bang with.  Most successful clan or culture leaders find or deploy marks or patches by which to identify their chosen.  Even when they seek to tear down older cultures, as so-called neo-minorities do to Anglo cultures, they tend to continue to use gang-banging favoritism.
I don't think there is anything supernaturally special about any particular color or ancestry.  But, such aspects do seem to avail convenience for wannabe gang-bangers.
I wish an enlightened culture could move past such devices.  However, the putsch to move past Anglo republics is no such an enlightenment.  Rather, it has been operating merely as a putsch to install new gang-bangers.  Ultimately, oligarchic gang-bangers.  The default quest seems to be to devise ways for the fewest of us to farm the most of us.  Our religious and spiritual leaders have so far done a poor job of inspiring us to move past that.

Absent responsible judgment among individual moral agents, every so-called scientific (liberal) pursuit of max pleasure will tend to neglect to factor the opportunity-investment cost. This is because science cannot very well factor that which was not selected. That is the job of moral judgment. As an organizing "principle," so-called "scientific" group hedonism (fake enlightenment) neglects what is necessary to raise children to become the next generation of responsible citizens. Somehow, no-harm-no-foul Libs seem always to forget about (or forfeit) the children, i.e., the generation that will be taxed to clean up their mess. Indeed, they are hardly willing to procreate. In Patton's patois, they know no more about philosophy than they know about forn ifi cat ion.

There is nothing in being black (or any other skin color), per se, that disallows a person from becoming superior in intellect, physicality, and virtue. Rather, the problem is with how the gene pool has been generally filtered. (To consider how rapidly this can alter a human gene pool, compare the history of dog breeds.)
Nor is there anything, per se, that disallows any immigrant from becoming a valued, free-thinking, competent American. Rather, the problem is with how our controllers are generally filtering the applicants.
When poor filtering of genetic and immigration pools is not sufficiently and generally opposed, every representative republic is endangered. (Note: Lest linear, one-dimensional, wussie-cretins get their panties in a bunch, I am not talking about specific or invasive genetic design. I am talking about general programs for factoring immigration and job applicants, so as to avoid the enserfing destruction of a republic.)
There is nothing morally superior or enlightening about allowing oligarchs and their Brooksian tools to swamp a republic with easily enserfed liberty-illiterates.


***************

Of course there is an American Ideal.  It is obvious to anyone who can see and think.  There are millions of Americans --- of whatever color, gender, age, origin --- who value human freedom, dignity, and decency.  Who value responsible parents and the Declaration of Independence.  Who value the Great Commandment (good faith) and the Golden Rule (good will).  Moreover, that kind of empathy is spiritually innate to the cosmos, available to all who have not allowed themselves to become blinded by rot. 
Moreover, those Americans are waking up to the warped corrupti and trained ignoranti who walk among us, who want to destroy the last vestiges of representative republicanism to replace it with dystopian NWO tribalism under absolutely corrupt oligarchs, liars, perverts, child abusers, race baiters, and dividers.  They are recognizing the necessity of stopping the insanity of all who are intolerant of the American Ideal.  And they are waking up to the nightmare of the alternative  -- which is unjust tribalism on behalf of selfish people farmers and their whiny tools.

***********

On a meta level, consciousness is consciousness.  On a mortal level, "all people should be equal before the law" is something a proponent of a decent and representative republic should say.  It has to do with rule under a framework of law, as opposed to rule under despots over minutiae.
In that respect, I believe in the Golden Rule and the Veil of Ignorance.  But I apply them differently from most Proggies.  To love your child as yourself is not to give him everything you have, but to help him learn how to become responsible for himself. 
I believe in tough love.  I don't believe entitlement-teaching is "love."   I do not believe in trying to impose perfect equality in results, but I do believe each person should try to respect what seems to him/her be the unfolding concerns of the Reconciler. 
I think human freedom and dignity necessitates that each and every subject adult learn to take subjective responsibility for his/her own pursuits, raising his/her own family, and preserving his/her own values, culture, and republic. 
I believe the existence of a Source of Higher Mindedness is a Reality, under which all mortals are subject.  But I believe the last thing that Source seeks is to make every human being an equal replica of every other human being.  Or to dictate minutiae of diets, dress, and ceremonies.   I loath the tendency towards hive-mindedness of incompetents, losers, perpetual infants, wussie-people, and conning parasites and moochers.