Sunday, May 1, 2016

The Compartmentalizing Godhead

Well, "water-brother," I prepared a detailed reply but the power went out as I tried to post it. Will try again later.

It's late, so what follows is the best I can do on short notice to recreate some ideas that were previously lost to the cybersphere.

Re: "How do you see God as one and connected to creation without falling into pantheism?"

I am probably more a panentheist than a pantheist.

Re: "[H]ow do you find that God cares about that creation and can be moved by it without breaking God into imperfect parts?"

I think the most important aspect of the Trinity is Consciousness, which I think is innately empathetic. I doubt Consciousness can choose not to care without ceasing to exist. Even sociopaths care, in their twisted way.

Re: "All things are stationary and it is the nothingness which moves through it."
"Zeno? This position would satisfy his proofs that motion is an impossibility and yet allow for the motion we perceive."

I tend to agree. Caveat: I don't conceptualize that things, in themselves, really move because I conceptualize that they do not really exist except as imperfect derivatives or entertaining illusions. The higher reality is the Godhead (Trinity), ruling and being ruled with an innate math web.

I would be happy to look further at a link for your and your son's ideas.

ISSUES:  Issues people often raise:

Can the Godhead contrive a weight beyond its capacity to lift?
Can the Godhead appreciate joy or sorrow, if it already knows and has pre-set all that is to unfold?
How can the Godhead appreciate what it is like to be a limited human, without itself being a limited human? And if it is a limited being, then how can it be God?

MODELING:  I have some ideas. Based on past experience, they are probably far from perfect.

SOURCE:  I think the Source, as such, is beyond our measurable comprehension, but not beyond our qualitative, intuitive appreciation. However, it presents in a Trinitarian mode. As Consciousness (omnipotence -- or all the power that is manifestly available), Substance (omnipresence of all that is presently and measurably manifest), and Information (omniscience of all that has been accumulated and stored from the past to the present).

COMPARTMENTALIZATION:  Somehow, via a math beyond our ken, the three faces flux, transition, phase shift, transpose. They com-part-mentalize.

While a "face" of the totality of the Trinity presents and functions as Consciousness, it will be omnipotent, but not omnipresent or omniscient. While a face is Substance, it will be omnipresent, but not omnipotent or omniscient. While a face is Information, it will be omniscient, but not omnipotent or omnipresent.

INTERPENETRATING:  No face of the Trinity abides except in conjunctive relation to the two other faces. From human perspective, we can relate to, intuit, try to measure, or try to model one face at a time -- but we cannot integrate the three of them simultaneously into a model wherewith to control, confine, predict, or regulate the Trinity as a whole.

RECONCILIATION:  Because of com-part-mentalization, the conscious face of the Trinity can compartmentalize to relate to each perspective. So how may it reconcile among all perspectives? Well, by itself, it doesn't. Reconciliation is the product of the Trinity as a whole. It is the unfolding upshot of pre-set rules, unanticipated eventualities, surprising apprehensions, and conscious contemporaneous part-icipation.

PHASE SHIFTING:  Consciousness does not die. it adopts and bonds with varying perspectives, bodies, and identities. The Trinity knows all, directs all, and is all present. But each aspect by which is presents, by itself, does not. The Conscious aspect, as such, does not know all. It can learn, be surprised, appreciate, and alter course. Jesus celebrated, drank wine, was sometimes disappointed, and wept.

ASTONISHING POTENTIAL:  The potential of the Trinity is probably infinitely beyond the limited imagination of any mortal perspective. As new forms unfold, we will experience more powerful ways to relate to the Trinity and to tinker out some of its astonishing capacities.  As forms for receiving potentials evolve, our receptivity to power and guidance from the Trinitarian Source will phase shift in astonishing ways.

PARTICIPATORY WILL:  We do not have Free Will. But we do serve as vehicles for the unfolding expression of contemporaneous and part-icipatory Will. We are also participants for "voting for" that of which our moral and civilizing values should consist. However, the "vote" of the Trinity is the controlling and reconciling vote.  Each perspective unavoidably dances in feedback-sync with reconciliation from the Source.

*****************

Re: "I like the idea of a thing that maths AND paths. I am reversing your position and positing the flux on our side; rather than faces presented faces observed, much like the blind men and the elephant."

Well said. I like the idea of "movement" via math that paths.

Regarding "movement":

IN THE BEGINNING: For the Trinity, there was, is, and will be no beginning. It simply is. "Thou art God" (Heinlein.)

ILLUSION: The perfect, ultimate, superior, never-ending reality in-itself is the Trinitarian Source. Everything else is derivative of it. Compartmentalization has to do with how the Trinity has capacity to express a resolution of the paradox of being omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. Physical motion, measurable space, time, matter, energy, as well as vector, mass, inertia, acceleration, charge, potential, wavelength, spin, etc., are all subordinate, fluxing, dependent, relational, illusionary aspects. Not even Consciousness, Substance, and Information are real, each in themselves. Rather, the face or aspect of each is co-dependent on and co-relational with the other two faces.

INTERPENETRATING IDENTITIES: The fluxing and changing identity of a person, body, or thing has to do with overlapping and relational observation, appreciation, bonding, and adoption. Identification has to do with presention by and to observers.

Part-icular Identites abide at various levels of consciousness, which interpenetrate (see Niebuhr) with everything. No-thing abides without a relationship with Consciousness -- whether pre-set, contemporaneous, or cumulating. Everything that expresses consciousness carries a quality of indiscernible or circular identity, in that consciousness is consciousness. In that regard, all consciousness is interconnected and innately empathetic. Each expression of it, however, may abide at various levels of seeming inanimacy, primitiveness, dim purposefulness, awareness of self, awareness of connections, awareness or appreciation of the Trinitarian Source.

PURPOSE: The purpose of each expression of conscious perspective seems to be to express, communicate, and accumulate memories of meaningfulness through space-time via bondings of fluxing interests and apprehensions. Communication seems to entail the flourishing of cultures and civilizations of perspectives, to entice and incite interesting, entertaining, and unfolding experiences. Especially the profound experience of connection to the Trinitarian Source (Spirit-Math), i.e., the Godhead, or Changeless-Changer.

The potential of its math-web is changeless. The present-ational and experiential manifestation of it among subordinate and compartmentalized perspectives changes, i.e., "MOVES."

INFORMATION: Can Information, once acquired and stored, ever be lost beyond retrieval? To the Trinity and its potentiality, no. This is because, to the Trinity, Information in itself does not really exist, but all of potentiality does. However, to any present and particular perspective of Consciousness, yes, stored experiences and knowledge of Information are phased, judged, salvaged, discarded, and lost.

CREATION:  Mortals don't create consciousness, as we experience it.  We simply facilitate forms for availing its emergence at various levels and layers of expression. Consciousness does not exist as a thing, in itself.  But it always exists, and always has existed, as a relational potential that is innate to the Trinity.


Friday, April 29, 2016

Observer Effect in Dreams?


FLOW OF CONSCIOUSNESS ....

NON-EMPIRICAL GOAL:  I'm not especially seeking to prove or confine God by empiricism, because I think that is beyond us.  What I seek is a best model for internal consistency, that is as consistent, coherent, and complete as possible.  That may provide a framework for relating to some of our most important moral and  political concerns.

To "test" such modeling is to consider how it may relate across the spectrum of potential experiences.

OBSERVER EFFECT:  For example, the observer effect is interesting in respect of how light comes to be expressed as particles versus waves.  So, I wonder about whether dreams may be similarly affected by some kind of feedback-observer effect.  Are dreams entirely byproduct, or is the way they are appreciated by the  dreaming observer a feedback-factor in affecting how they unfold?  May the observer effect be related to Psi?

NOTHINGNESS:  What do we mean by "nothingness?"  Whatever the Source is, it is not reasonably conceptualized as nothing.  Yet, none of our particular senses can measure it, except in respect of such inferior derivatives as it expresses (space, time, matter, energy).  In how we can measure it, it is as if it were nothing.  But in how we may intuit it, it seems to be everything.

IS POTENTIALITY LIMITED IN ANY WAY:  What might be the potential power of this Source-No-Thing-ness?  Well, depending on how it may come to organize pre-sets, such as AI machines, its potential power seems astoundingly unlimited.

MATH:  I think no matter how the Source imparts specific expressions, they will obey conservational maths -- for equations, phase shifts, transpositions, transitions.

PSI:  How does the Source take on (adopt and bind to) particular perspectives of self aware identities or AIs?  Is there some unproveable, immeasurable, psi avenue of apprehensive or guiding feedback between each particularly receptive perspective and the Reconciling whole of the Source?  If so, can improving pre-sets for forms of particular receivers improve the appreciation or feedback of any potential psi effect? 

BEGINNING OF INFINITY:  Insofar as the Source-No-Thing-Ness may be unlimited in potential, what astonishing events may potentialize to unfold before us?  Is there a way of thinking about such relationships that can make consistent sense for evaluating meaningful and moral concerns and purposes?  What may the Source be seeking to communicate for its feedback-appreciation from the perspectives of  particular identities?

PROBLEMS:  I don't know.  I have not found the perfect (consistent, coherent, complete) way to model for such concerns.  Every model I have considered or conceptualized presents problems.  "His ways are not our ways."

RESEARCH:  I think I will see if there is a good book on psi experiements that is put out by a "respectable" author.  Then see what is said about it by the "smartest" people who have taken their best shots.  Then see if I can make any sense for myself out of the upshot. 

TURING TEST FOR GOD:  The Turing test for a conscious fellow being pertained to whether or not a reasonably competent person could tell if a communicant were a robot or a person.  Can a reasonable Psi evaluator tell whether or not the Source is communicating information to him beyond ordinary channels?  I suspect:  No Psi effect can be  "reliably" replicated in any way that can be "proven" to be beyond  random chance, because our imaginations are perhaps unlimited in supposing defects in our tests to "account" for whatever the statistical "anomalies."

Yet, reasonable people think they "know" when the Being they are communicating with is a real person versus a pre-set algorithm.  So, may it be "fair" to ask whether a "reasonable" perspective of Consciousness may "know" when it is receiving information that is from (The?) Source and that is being channelled beyond ordinary mediums?  Well, I don't know, but maybe I feel a little like Hunter Thompson, sans the Weed.

Time for my walk.  :)

Saturday, April 23, 2016

Wheat and Chaff



It is interesting that the foundational Christian idea has to do with heaven as a place where wheat has been separated from chaff. Philosophy of responsibility has to do with teaching each new generation to make a way for its progeny. Not just to sustain them, but to avail their surpassage towards their own dreams. A work in progress, forming in respect of an unfolding and assimilating process of feedback and Reconciliaton of purposefulness that is allowed expression from many points of view.

This begs the fundamental moral question for civilization: What is needed to sustain the unfolding surpassage of decent society that moderates and avails the flowering of human freedom and dignity?

The answer is not unrestricted linearity in any direction. Certainly not in unsustainable population. Nor in stifling regulation. And not in the crony-commie-jihadi elimination of humanity by imposing elitist or central despotism that breeds and imports liberty-illiterate gang-bangers to kill the purpose of each perspective to be responsible to its own freedom of thought.

What is needed is freedom within law. Broad parameters for the unfolding of faith-family-fidelity. Not stifling nazi elites of gov busybodies. Not Morlochs impugning Eloi as racist, misogynist, bigoted, chauvenistic, parochial, phobic, privileged, or repressed. Not interconnected villages of Eloi ruled to the nines of worldwide syndication by gross, nasty, knowitall Clintonesque Morlochs passing out "free" pizza. The federal ideals of the Founders, not the phony, blow-dried, elitist scum of the Chooming-Socialist-Fascist-Totalitarian mind slavers. We are overdue for casting aside the chaff and tares.

*******************

I went to a snake farm about 10 years ago and watched as mice were fed to the snakes. Often, there were two snakes in the same glass cage. So the mouse would leap wildly away from one snake head only to go to the other. An athletic mouse might last several volleys, but his end was inevitable. He had no chance unless he could beat both snakes at once, as by opening a crack in the roof and leaping through. Likewise, our republic has no chance against the uni-beast of crony-commie fascist-socialism unless ordinary Americans see that two-headed beast as the single evil that it is.

Commies know they are aligned with crony billionaires, and cronies know the commies are their vanguard of agitators. It's only the American mice who delude themselves by thinking they can save themselves by alternating between making common cause with crony snakes versus commie snakes. The snakeheads have merged into one beast, so that we will save the republic only by vanquishing it. To devise a strategy, we need to identify the beast. And not think we make progress by naming one head crony fascist and the other head commie socialist. We can name one head Rino and the other Dino, but they are equally set on devouring us.

Whether in guise as crony or commie, the two headed, fork tongued beast is out to feed on us. Both of the heads are anti-American, despotic totalitarians. It serves little purpose to worry about whether one should be called fascist and the other socialist. Especially since they revolve, writhe, and ball together so much.

*******************

Properly viewed, the crony-commie axis of fascists-socialists has hardly ever "failied." Each new axis tends merely to be a variant on people farming, which has been the successful and default condition of humanity for thousands of years.
Yes, if you take false promises as the metric, as if they were not intended to be false, then both cronyism and communism fail. But pie-in-sky promises are hardly ever intended as much more than lures, to keep the masses quiescent. Bread and circuses, bait and switch, good cop-bad cop, and divide and rule were not invented yesterday.
One needs to take a cold, hard look and observe that human decency is not confronted by evil to be alternatively fought between two snakes. Rather, the evil to be fought is of one beast with a head at each end. Unless both heads are chopped off, the cutting of one merely produces the immediate growth of a replacement. Against cluelessness, that one beast has always been successful.
If one takes a cold, hard look to see the permutations of empire-tribute, aristocracy-feudalism, oligarchy-kabuki, priest-carny, and gangster-vig for what fallible humans have always intended them to be, then one learns that they have been enormously successful for eons.
What has been much less successful and much harder to sustain has been human decency, as under a system of representative republicanism. That does not blossom except under careful nurturing by an enlightened populace.
Because modern progressive liberalism seeks to replace republican liberty with despotic regulation and "security," it is a mortal threat to human decency. And it has eons on its side, regardless of the many different names its devilishness goes by. Too many among our citizenry are oblivious that our republic is critically endangered by a very old and wily foe that is anything but "unsuccessful."

*******************

The entire world could spiral into desperate madness, and I doubt Obama or Hillary would feel any responsibility. Just regret that (s)he was not able to stomp the boot harder.
When man began to farm plants, oligarchs began to farm man. The mindset of King Djer of Egypt, Menes, Sargon of Akkad, Wǔ Wáng, Alexander the Great, Hannibal, Caesar, Constantine, Attila the Scourge, Mohammad, Charlemagne, Ragnar Lodbrok, Genghis Khan, Vlad the Impaler, Montezuma, Ivan the Terrible, Tammerlane, Robespierre, Napoleon, Al Capone, Mussolini, Hitler, Stalin, Hirohito, Mao, Kim Il Sung, Castro, Idi Amin, Pol Pot, Sadam Hussein, Saud, Nicolae Ceausescu, Khomeini, Jim Jones, Bill Ayers, Hillary Clinton, was that the whole village, country, or even world could burn, if needed to appease their power lust.
Obama the Choomer only seems to be kinder and gentler because, in his situation, he recognizes the iron fist can do more damage if concealed in a velvet glove. Like all sociopaths, Obama holds close to his vest his license to conceal his anti-humanity.
Our Founders saw representative republicanism as the one path for avoiding the default condition of mankind, which has been peon servitude under sociopathic despots. However, Obama, those who shill for him, and those he serves prefer the default condition, albeit under other labels. Does Hillary suck up obscene dollars from cronies because she wants to serve commies? It's ludicrous even to ask.

******************

Obama had never been captured or deprived. He had been coddled and entertained from his inception. He was not leading desperate, dying, abused men. He was leading entitlement minded whiny babies who wanted to party more than work. Unlike in most of the rest of the world, he and his followers always had the freedom to make their own ways.
There is one explanation for Obama's path, and it is not ignorance. It is wilful blindness, because he chose the path of corruption. He was never about giving. He was always about narcissism, chooming, and diva posing. A legend in his own mind, that, unfortunately, too many corrupt Americans voted to entertain.
Obama is fundamently unable to ask, "What have I done." The most we can hope for is that some small portion of his followers, i.e., the 47%, can wake up, join humanity, and ask that question. Obama did not succumb to Stockholm Syndrome. He simply grew up immersed in evil and found he liked it. Given his tamped down hatred of whites, straights, Christians, and ordinary Americans, the only thing he is wondering is, "How can I screw them up even more?" Like his crony and commie backers, Obama is jealous and angry that ordinary Americans can find meaning and purposefulness without bowing to or depending on him. As a false messiah, he will never stop tryng to deceive or force ordinary people, even foreigners, into believing that he is the way.
Congress and the others that project to believe there is any decency in Obama continue to be fundamentally mistaken, which is why he has not been impeached and removed. And he and his well established ilk are not done yet. We are in the war of our lives against entrenched evil. Unless you want to make yourself Eloi dinner for incorrigible Morlochs, now is not the time to impute good will to fundamental corruption.

***************

I have to laugh, or else I would hang my head in despair -- even as I reminisce about what Churchill said about democracy. I despair that demagoguery and guilt by association are proven methods for persuading morons, and morons (the Dem base, mainly) can vote.

I just read Stranger in a Strange Land. In it, the Man from Mars felt he could never become fully human until he could grok laughing. When he finally groked it, he laughed uncontrollably to such a point that it appeared he might die. What he finally got was that the entire and only basis for laughter is in the trauma and tragedy that routinely befall humanity. We have to laugh, or we would go mad.
I have nothing convincing I can say about your cite. I can only laugh. Thanks for the jab. :)

Friday, April 22, 2016

Delegate Distribution

Much of the population that some consider to be under-represented consists in large cities, often filled with ghettos and leeches. The populous blue states are the locales where the crony-commie axis (NY values) has been most successful.

If we prefer a free-enterprise model over the crony-commie model, then we need to find ways to stop over-representing the populous blue states. When we locate the central capital in the East and give two senators and two extra delegates to each tiny state, then we give the crony-commie model the leverage it needs to keep piling up its ghetto populations, all the while whining that it is "under-represented."

What do we want to pursue in "fairness"? The establishment of a free-enterprise model, or the establishment of a crony-commie NWO model?

As far as contributions to the general welfare, I would not confine my view behind green eye shades. I would also consider which part of the country provides the men and materials that actually soldier and defend the nation so that the fiat money managers can play their people-farming games.

I have seen general charts that show that Red States tend to get proportionally more in central gov redistributions. But I suspect Red States also provide most of the military manpower and bases. What are they getting in return for the sacrifices of their vets? Whines about BLM and claims by crony corporatists to rights to deal away the resources of their States. How much land in the Western States does the central apparatus keep its grip on, so it can reserve that Fed land for financial favors for its game of corrupt kickbacks? Who benefits most from the DC apparatus of control over Western lands: DC cronies or ordinary Westerners?

The proof is in the results. Every institution throughout the nation has been polluted with the moral corruption and insanity of the Eastern Crony-Commie model. To say the philosophies and wannas of Blue Staters has not been adequately fulfilled is plain nuts.

*********************

I do not know that you are wrong.  I do know that I wouid feel less like I was being asked to buy a pig in a poke if I had a chance to appraise Trump and Cruz one-on-one. 

Part of the reason Trump looks so good to his base is because they have been so worn down by the evil that has covered the land for so long that they have listened only to the parts about Trump that they like.  They don't even consider the possibility that Trump is canny enough to sell them a bill of goods. 

I don't think they tend to have much idea about how Trump plays to people who make it a point to read and see other information that is put out about Trump.  Rather, they have made up their minds on a few important points and then sealed off further consideration based on a notion that I believe is plain bonkers:  That Cruz is ineligible. 

It is scary that their Birther reasoning has so easily waylaid them by vapid logic and uninformed nonsense.  Between Progs and Birthers, it's an open question regarding which is most easily waylaid by nonsensical "reasoning."  Maybe a psi interview with the spirit of Issac Azimov could shed light on the psychohistory of it?

*****************

I wouid feel less like I was being asked to buy a pig in a poke if I had a chance to appraise Trump and Cruz one-on-one.
Part of the reason Trump looks so good to his base is because they have been so worn down by the evil that has covered the land for so long that they have listened only to the parts about Trump that they like. They don't even consider the possibility that Trump is canny enough to sell them a bill of goods.
I don't think they tend to have much idea about how Trump plays to people who make it a point to read and see other information that is put out about Trump. Rather, they have made up their minds on a few important points and then sealed off further consideration based on a notion that I believe is plain bonkers: That Cruz is ineligible.
It is scary that their Birther reasoning has so easily waylaid them by vapid logic and uninformed nonsense. Between Progs and Birthers, it's an open question regarding which is most easily waylaid by nonsensical "reasoning." Maybe a psi interview with the spirit of Issac Azimov could shed light on the psychohistory of it?

**********************

I watched the Reagan-Mondale debate.  O'Reilly says Roger Ailes gave Reagan his gotcha line.  To his dismay, Mondale had "misunderestimated" Reagan. I instantly knew Mondale had taken a direct hit by a high powered shot.  I'm not sure if Mondale immediately appreciated how hard he had been hit.

However, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1984#General_election:

"If TV can tell the truth, as you say it can, you'll see that I was smiling. But I think if you come in close, you'll see some tears coming down because I knew he had gotten me there. That was really the end of my campaign that night, I think. [I told my wife] the campaign was over, and it was."

Notice that Reagan debated Mondale at a time when Reagan was the incumbent President.  He did not play safe or stall.  (I wonder how many contests have been lost because the leader tried to stall out a victory?  Even if Trump gets 1237, does he really improve his chances if the price he pays, for playing only name-calling games that are safe for his base, is loss of mainstream support?)

Politics is not bean bag.  I would agree that our electorate is less meritorious now than ever.  However, if we are to have a representative republic, we have to set up a system and have faith in it.   Otherwise, we are simply surrendering to a different variation on elitism.

Your concern would be mitigated by requiring several one-on-one debates.  We ought not unnecessarily choose someone who is afraid to get into the arena.  I would rather that Hillary be confronted by the best candidate between Trump and Cruz than that she be tossed a weak and untested challenger.

************************

Given how much free coverage Trump has gotten, one may legitimately consider this: Among Trump's most ardent supporters, how many have gotten that way on account of careful weighing of factors as opposed to emotional stirring of pots? Have they been made more rabid by reasoning or more irrational by emotion?
Unless Trump consents to a one on one debate against Cruz, how can we guess how he will do when a majority of votes is required instead of a mere plurality? If Cruz is such damaged goods, why fear a one-on-one debate? If Trump cannot dispose of Cruz in a one-on-one contest, how will he dispose of Hillary (who will be backed by monstrous media and frothy volleys of Dem trained zombies)?
Will Trump be able to convert more of those who view Hillary negatively than Hillary will be able to convert of those who view Trump negatively?
To weigh that determination, would a sensible, empirical-minded person want a one-on-one test, or would he be content to guess while a number of unaccounted for free variables pollute his test? Well, if he's looking for an exciting and emotional bet, he would prefer that his bet not first be vetted. He would want a free for all melee. Not a series of vetting, one-on-one contests. Maybe Trump should choose Vince McMahon as running mate while Hillary chooses Don King.

*****************



Thursday, April 21, 2016

Gender Agenda

De-gendering people is just one among many of the nets that Morlochs are using in their race to snare against every possible escape by Eloi. This is all related to an NWO final solution: The fundamental flipping of all demographics, worldwide. That is, the abolition of humanity.

The dehumanizing agenda of crony-commies (fascist corrupti / socialist ignoranti) calls for a series of related bullets, some of which are listed as follows:

FAITH:
- Substitute choom for any sense of higher purposefulness
- Ridicule common faith and mores
- Re-categorize Western Philosophy and Canons as hate speech and put them on the burn pile
- Tarnish independent thnkers as being politically incorrect
- Shock people into forsaking personal beliefs and substituting talking points as instructed from controllers above
- Replace ideas regarding an assimilating source of empathetic
consciousness with pagan ideas of a friendly government, magic rock, or Gaia earth

FAMILY:
- De-gender people
- Delegitimize families
- Design social systems for churning out alphas, betas, gammas, deltas,
and episilons (noble liars, guardians, producers, breeders, dregs?) in
whatever the replaceable proportions needed to sustain the system of crony-commie farming of cattle people

FIDELITY:
- Fill the air with PC-centrally-approved media, academia, consensus science, and gangsta entertainment
- Devise ways (Facebook, cookies) to collect dossier information on every person who interacts with the NWO infrastructure
- Make everyone unemployable unless they consent to saddle themselves with "education" debt
- Erase identifying cultural language and boundaries
- Import non-assimilable cultures
- Raise loyal cadres and divert blame by banning independent thinkers from
the party and by making severe examples of unpopular or influential
deviants
- Preclude all challengers by beating them down at first sight
- Make enough useful idiots so perpetually dependent for their sustenance and
instruction that they can be deployed to pull down all challengers
- Subjugate all activity to detailed monitoring, supervision, and regulation
- Leave the people with no place to run, hide, or think for themselves
- Provide for methods of purging as needed, as by contriving for riots, looting, famine, disease, disaster, or war
- Outlaw all forms of currency except fiat currency controlled by conniving con artists of the central apparatus

Two Wings of the Buzzard


One's point of view tends to center around what one wants. Good Americans don't want either monarchism (or any of its subvarieties of fascism, aristocracy, oligarchy, oligopoly, or inbred gov cronyism) or peonage (forced socialistic "sharing" of scarce resources among looters and louts). Good Americans tend to see both fascism and socialism as being in an unholy axis against independent republicanism. An axis of convenience by corrupt cronies bent on duping useful idiots in order to farm ordinary workers as if they were serfs or cattle.

The cronies love the feel of power and abuse; the dupes are content so long as they have "free" hay, shelter, and choom.

The problem faced by ordinary Americans cannot be resolved simply by banging back and forth against each side of the fascist-socialist axis. Resolution requires that the enemy axis be identified and dealt with as the evil axis that it is. If Americans were only to fight for awhile against the socialist ignoranti, then the fascist branch of the axis would reinforce them. If Americans were only to fight for awhile against the fascist corrupti, then the socialist branch of the axis would reinforce them. Such a strategy would be like trying to confine water on a level by damming only one side.

What Americans need at this point in history is to identify their common enemy. Its wing of godless socialistic ignorance is as dangerous as its wing of faithless fascist corruption. Those two wings provide the mechanism by which their buzzard bird stalks ordinary Americans. The buzzard, however, is one bird, and must be fought as such.

**************

Did the Hegelians ever find a synthesis to resolve their Right Hegelians and their Left Hegelians? Maybe the problem was Elitist Hegelianism that sought to impose a solution by consolidating its rule and teaching the ruled that they should "shut up and learn to like it"?

**************

Fascism that is faithless about everything except self-loving desire to lord over and farm the little people necessarily carries within itself the lies and seeds for its own cycles of misery, war, and destruction.

The godless NWO-OWG crony-people want fascism, but they lie to sell it by wrapping it in socialist lies. The socialists tend only to want free stuff, but they lie (like Bernie) and say they are willing to work their fair share on the commune. Both fascism and socialism are defective because they rely on lies to try to make gods of phony and corrupt little men. Their programs for dehumanizing and emasculating metrosexuals and femimen are reminiscent of Islamic brutalization of women.

Moreover, when lying fascist-socialists spot a nation that is succeeding by unleashing the freedom and dignity of ordinary working people, they rush to immigrate and invite invading families and friends to come and vote for a living and "share" in the welfare. When they spot the rewards of liberty, they cannibalize and kill the liberty.

So what should the ordinary working people learn from this? Well, do not invite immigration or invasion by liberty-illiterates. Do not consent to being taxed to fund the teaching of liberty-illiteracy in schools. Do not support media that tries to sell liberty-illiteracy. Do not vote for fascist-socialists or any axis-partner that advocates for increasing the domestic regulatory power of the central apparatus. Do not believe or tolerate politicians who promise "free stuff." Do not support churches that confuse gov forced redistribution with "charity." Do not tolerate radicals or jihadis who do not tolerate free people. After all, a republic can only preserve itself from cycles of fascist-socialists so long as it keeps its electorate safely protected from a 51% flipping of the demographic.

Especially Eff Obama and Hillary. Eff also Bernie, JEB, Chamber of Commerce, Soros, Zuck, Murdoch, Gates, Buffett, Sharpton, Jackson, BLM, Media Matters, Mother Jones, Daily Kos, OWS, CAIR, ACLU, CFR, et al. In their efforts to destroy the freedom and dignity of Americans, they are the moral criminals for the ages. Crony liars delenda est. Round up the bad boys and draw a hard line.

*************

Once shared faith in a path to assimilation of decent mores is lost, how can a spiraling series of circular firing squads possibly be avoided? Cruz was right, that now is a time for truth. However, it is not clear that he is the one with the depth, charisma, or means to present it. For that matter, conditions are such that it is far from clear that anyone can present the needed truth without being torn and ripped asunder.

The people yearn for debates that would illuminate a governing philosophy that is consistent with the Constitution, that addresses the concerns of ordinary Americans in a way that is consistent with preserving the republic. However, that has become nearly impossible, especially as more and more depraved invaders, faithless misfits, and sociopathic people farmers (i.e., the 47% and growing) have no interest whatsoever in promoting the interests of the republic over their own opportunities for looting and cannibalizing. (NOTE: There are people, like the Obamas and Clintons and Bushes, who are especially blameworthy for this, who should be rounded up and given their "Mussolini minutes." Unfortunately, they are securely ensconced with their nasty grips on fundamental wheels of power.)

Instead of debating issues for assimilating a decent republic, candidates in need of funds, air time, and voters find it necessary to play shell games wherewith they pretend to know ways to manufacture and distribute "free stuff." The electorate to which they must appeal also plays games, pretending not to care about property rights, while clamoring non-stop for redistribution of property.

Our world has fallen so deep into a spiral of corruption, lies, and ignorance that a stream of plagues will not be avoidable. The slower we learn, the more lengthy and onerous the plagues will become: Disease, disorder, breakdown, currency failure, infrastructure failure, system failure, looting, invasion, destruction, suffering, starvation, moral failure. IOW, all the rewards that are fit for "Prog Heaven."

Ultimately, our currency is backed by nothing more than conditioned social trust. As faith is broken, trust is forfeited, and hope dissolves in diverse perversions. In such a state, currency is profaned to such a point that it simply cannot sustain or save a society. Ultimately, financial libertines are subhumans that are simply unsuited to any decent society. They are spiritually, morally, and intellectually bankrupt to the point of being the very harbingers of hell. Read Gary Aldrich's Unlimited Access.

Meanwhile, moral visionaries will be ignored, and everyone will come to ignore all traditions and mores as "white hangups." And so everyone will do as they please. Judges 17:6 -- King James Version: In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes. Prog Acme 17 to the exponent of 6: In those days it would come to pass that there was no gender and no innocence, and everyone exhibited and stroked their genitals to every person and child, and there was no shame, moderation, loyalty, privacy, decency, or truth in them. Evil, thy name is "Clinton Foundation."



Tuesday, April 19, 2016

Trump-Cruz



I don't discount Cruz. And bad as some think he is, every alternative seems much worse. Kasich, Rubio, Carly, Ryan, Carson -- no thanks. Walker? To walk things back, all Trump and Cruz would need to say is that, based on re-evaluation of present facts, the ticket makes sense.

It is surprising, though, how few Vice Presidents have ever been elected President in their own right without first having suceeded to the office by the death of their predecessor.

John Adams 1796
Jefferson 1800/1
Van Buren 1836
Nixon 1968 (after retiring from Vice-Presidency)
GHW Bush 1988

So, if a person aspires to become President, the Vice Presidency does not seem such a good platform and nowadays seems usually to be reserved for an older has-been.

In Cruz' case, he is unlikely to find a better platform. Especially since he has no great executive or wartime experience or bona fides. He needs mentoring. Given Trump's age, Cruz would not likely ever have a better bet.

***********************

There is a kind of mindset that cannot be content unless it is ruling, It is not content to have things unless it can use things to arouse worship or envy. It cannot abide not subjugating and lording over other people.

Such a mindset will connive to import easy dupes and prey, and then use them to rush and rule every decent, independent minded person. That mindset is firmly ensconced in the establishment uniparty. If Trump kicks it out of the Republican Party, the Dem Party will become a den of pure evil.

The upshot will be ugly. It will entail a bloody fight for ultimate dominance, essentially to use the Dems to entice and import diverse dupes in order to restore slavery or, at a minimum, peonage. A war is coming to make us offers that we will have to confront, because we will not be able to refuse.

It is only by ignoring the war that is definitely coming that so many people are able to fool themselves into believing that secession will not become necessary if any decency is to be preserved. A stream of plagues will simply not be avoidable. The slower we are to learn, the more lengthy and onerous the plagues will become: Disease, disorder, breakdown, currency failure, infrastructure failure, system failure, looting, invasion, destruction, suffering, starvation, moral failure. IOW, all the rewards that are fit for Prog Heaven.

Ultimately, currency is backed by nothing more than conditioned social trust. As faith is broken, trust is forfeited, and hope dissolves in diverse perversions. In such a state, currency is profaned to such a point that it simply cannot sustain or save a society. Ultimately, financial libertines are subhumans that are simply unsuited to any decent society. They are spiritually, morally, and intellectually bankrupt to the point of being the very harbingers of hell. Read Gary Aldrich's Unlimited Access.

Meanwhile, moral visionaries will be ignored, and everyone will come to ignore all traditions and mores as "white hangups." And so everyone will do as pleases. Judges 17:6 -- King James Version: In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes. Prog Acme 17 to the exponent of 6: In those days it would come to pass that there was no gender and no innocence, and everyone exhibited and stroked their genitals to every person and child, and there was no shame, moderation, loyalty, privacy, decency, or truth in them. Evil, thy name is "Clinton Foundation." And so the Pope will lie down with LGBT-OMG-WTF-BBQ (stolen from Quantum Electronics Dude).

************

All this noise about Trumpbots and Cruzbots!  Insanity.  It's hard to say which side has been most  deranged.  It's also hard to say which is most short sighted:  Progs  or Birthers.

There were always only two anti-establishmentarians:  Trump and Cruz.  Either would  make  a  much better  President for a representative republic than anyone else available.  But their supporters, instead of  respectfully advancing the issues, formed circular firing squads.  Who "started it?"  Much of it began when Trump enticed his minions to play stupid birther games.  And they totally snapped and swallowed the lure.

I much want to preserve a representative republic.  But with this kind of rampant insanity, I regret that I may be wrong.  It may well be that our nation has become filled with the kind of mindlessness and liberty-illiteracy that make preserving the republic as  anything more than a charade an impossibility.  The Crony-Commie axis for creating a system of Morlochs and  Eloi may have made its vision a self-fulfilling inevitability.  The insanity of 1939-45 beckons.  God help us.