Sunday, January 25, 2015

Abysmals v. Seekers

What we have today is support by nearly every significant State and political institution of Abysmals over Seekers.  Down over Up. So divided, it is no surprise that middle class conservatives have become so neutered in terms of political funding and judicial support.

Consider:  Even assuming global warming, climate change, and environmental pollution are valid concerns, why are all the proposals made by elites and their followers so ridiculous and counterproductive? An obvious solution to materials out of balance is to wean the world towards a smaller human population.  So why, if elites are not corrupt and their followers are not stupid, do they move production to nations with dirtier factories? Why do all the proposed solutions seem bent to promote even more power by the corrupt and the ignorant over the decent and faithful?  Why are our borders broken to the point of incenting and inviting third world breeders and Muslims?  The unescapable implication is that our elites and their followers lust far more for power and pleasure than they seek sustainability, fairness, or enlightenment.

What can rebalance the sway of an alliance of corrupt elites and their ignorant and cheaply bribed followers?  Without some inspiration higher than greed, pleasure, pain and fear, we have no chance. Can the Source of such inspiration be real, or must it be mere additional misdirection for nefarious purposes?  In a sense, we become what we hope and believe, what we seek and sanctify.   If we choose to sanctify depravity and deceit, we will reap it.  If we choose to disrespect middle class families and individual independence, we will promote a boot of greed and lust against every throat. 

Our choice is not a quantitative choice between left and right or totalitarianism and anarchy, for there is no pure version of either.  Our choice is a qualitative choice for a spiritually evolving framework that can help us seek either to foster gangster corruption (Marx and Mohammad) or individual responsibility and dignity (Jefferson and Jesus).  Between sociopathic down (Abysmals) and spiritual up (Seekers).

An obvous check and balance against the well funded alliance of the corrupt and the ignorant would abide in un-neutered churches and local schools.  Once gov was used to cast God out of them, the path was cleared for the worst among us to divide and rule us. As we come to forsake, discredit, and expel belief in spiritual values of faith, family, and fidelity, so shall we embrace the spiritual degeneration of evil, despair, and false equivocation and deconstruction by a thousand ceremonies of legalism.  So shall our corrupting markets and crony media, unguided by popular deference to any assimilating faith, come to fund and promote the worst of deceivers and manipulators to campaign to divide and rule us.  Every gay and gaia legalism of the corrupt and visionless faithless is being shaped and contrived to replace all families with the rule of the most hideous.  Well funded Abysmals are misdirecting and using our best intentions against Seekers.


Problem:  How can we get gov off our backs, if we need gov to regulate or dissolve salad bowl multiculturalism, to help us assimilate?  Once we let diversity get out of hand, how now can we smelt it without gov?  How can we melt pockets of Sharia without gov that can outlaw its depredations?

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

List of Obama's "Accomplishments"

List of Obama's "Accomplishments":

1) Race -- inflamed racial animosities and divided Americans. (

2) Diversity -- failed to confront multicultural arguments that keep America divided into SCZ zones; has deemed gov-regulated redistributive equality (worldwide) more important than productive jobs. (

3) Culture -- fomented culture that condones replacing can-do manliness with metrosexual wussy whininess; has sissified children by deploying gay defenders against "bullying" people for inappropriate pda's. (;; Mimi's Moms | Teaching Tolerance; Pop Culture Has Made Us A Nation Of Wusses)

4) Drugs -- promoted chooming as cool. (

5) Health Care -- Lied and lied and lied.

6) Grooming Children -- (

7) Family -- failed to discourage the replacement of the family with the central gov, thinks central gov is not big enough; has helped to de-define marriage and to profane family friendly mores. (;

8) Morality -- promotedlying, conniving, baiting, bribing, prostituting. (;

9) Demographics -- has helped to condition lofos and livs to accept shallow sound bites in place of good faith investigations and responsible parenting and voting; promoted welfare breeding in cities of irresponsible people who make themselves burdens on decent society; has deployed non-democratic means to try to turn Texas demographics blue (;

10) Spiritual -- has profaned the Golden Rule by lying about and promoting Islam as a "religion of peace". (;

11) Human -- has undermined individual freedom and dignity to provide security by collectivizing metro-masses under the rule of crony fascists, at home and abroad. (;

12) Economic -- has continued converting the nation to a two-class society; has grossly increased national indebtedness; has continues the trend of exporting growth and good jobs abroad. (
13) Jobs -- moved economy to 30 hour work weeks at lower paying jobs. (

14) Inefficiency -- has replaced productive jobs with boondoggling gov incentives and redistributions (

15) Debt -- has done nothing to reduce gov spending or to convert more workers to effective private employment. (Central bank prophet fears QE warfare pushing world financial system out of control - Telegraph)

16) Immigration -- failed to enforce borders; enticed third-world border jumpers. (

17) Law Enforcement -- resorted frequently to using IRS and FBI as thug inciters and enforcers on behalf of race baiters and cronies. (;

18) National -- continued converting nation from a free republic to a crony ruled collective. (;

19) Governmental -- continued undermining of checks and balances and separation of powers by appointing judges who rule based on "empathy" and by usurping power with executive "pen," thereby agglomerating ever more power to the central gov. (;

20) Spying on Americans -- continued measures for increasing spying and dossiers on all people, including Americans; continued efforts to disarm and neuter Americans; continued to build agencies that force Americans to capitulate to gov threats and controls (

21) Environmental -- continued regulating and taxing to promote transition to environmental depredations (such as bird killing wind farms and mercury based light bulbs) and inefficiencies that in cumulative effect increase environmental insults (by incenting the exporting of jobs to unregulated third world countries, that then kickback to corrupt domestic politicians). (

22) Space -- (

23) National Defense -- continued replacing generals with crony apologists, hacks, dhimmis, and metrosexual promoters; armed ISIS via Benghazi; kills insurgents in preference to capturing them for intelligence gathering purposes; stupid ROE's; failed in will to try and fry enemy savages who act beyond the Geneva Convention. (; No Charges, No Trials, No Closure: Obama Quietly Frees Guantánamo Prisoners)

24) World -- continued to inflame world; told Mubarek time to go, resulting in MB empowerment; promised "flexibility" to Putin; seems to have green lighted nukes for Iran (;

SO ... what Prog will Dems run for Prezy in 2016 who will be different in any substantively significant way? With which of Obama's insults to ordinary Americans does Hillary take issue? If any, why has she not previously spoken up? And, what Rino will do anything to actually represent the American Ideal of individual liberty or the fundamental import of the middle class?

Thursday, January 15, 2015

Stuff Happens

Commie atheists seem to dislike Jews because believing Jews believe in a reconciling godhead. Perhaps Muslims dislike Jews because they laughed at Muhammad, and they do not see God as a revenge-maddened monster. Commies would rather believe in an infinity of parallel, universal bubbles than in a providential reconciler that determines choices.

How does the reconciler determine choices? The possibilities seem to be:  Everything that is possible occurs in some world. Or some kind of preset random generator effects determinations within a closed bubble, in respect of which complex forms evolve in a process of replicative competition. Or existence implicates a Reconciling Being.

The emotional makeup of the people who deem themselves assured that no Reconciling Being abides seems to value not having anyone tell them what they should do with themselves, even though, behind cover of scientism, they reserve a claim to tell everyone else what they should do with themselves.

Whatever the determiner of choices among possibilities, I see no proof or even good reason to believe that its character, nature, or name is, "Stuff Happens." As to math and randomness: Statistics and geometry are branches of math. Whatever happens within a conservational system must of course accord with the maths of its conservation. Whatever the character or nature of the source-essence-reconciler and its determinations and predeterminations, they will of course abide by such math as is requisite to their conservational unfolding. Within God's system, nothing is expressed that is not consistent with conservation and unfolding renormalization. Whatever God chooses, man's understanding of statistics will approve.

In any event, neither a concept of multiple universes nor a concept of God is an "explanation" that is subject to quantitative proof as opposed to intuitive reason. The disadvantage of reviling a concept of a Caring Reconciler is that it pretends either that objective science should quantitatively determine our moral values or that each person "should" do as he can or will --- even though people who believe in a purely quantitative system of causation that is closed to qualitative apprehension can show no basis in purely objective science for why anything should be or be done. They are like children, spoiled of capacity to reason or appreciate beyond their quantitatives and their personal pleasures.

So, why are Jews often reviled? I think Muslims revile Jews for not having surrendered their humanity, as every craven Muslim is required to do. Commies revile believing Jews for not bowing to their elite scientists and social economists. Spoiled hedonists revile Jews for holding some traditions higher than immediate gratifications. Some people who think they are pure scientists revile all god believers for not being indoctrinated enough in the morally-stunting and unprovable idea of multiple separate and closed universes. Some Christians revile Jews out of a perverse reading of the Bible. As to some JINOs who are loyal to tribe but not to God or nation or American Ideals --- they can be reviled without bringing religion or anti-semiticism into it. Through all of this hatred and jealousy, the faithful Jew abides. Jews --- Imagine the world of corrupti and ignoranti without them.

Monday, January 5, 2015

Spiritual Protoplasm

The brain seems like a self programming protoplasm, like an expression of an even more fundamental, spiritual kind of protoplasm.  As if the world were the expression of a reconciler of self programming programs.  As if such were the building blocks for all interpretations, representations, and manifestations of the world.

Sunday, December 21, 2014

Self Programming Programmer of Programs -- Binary Code


METAPHORS AND MODELS: Why does Dawkins seat his metaphor of selfishness (or "behavioral tendencies") in genes, as opposed to organisms, niches, cosmos, or programmers? Dawkins wants to conceptualize genes as replicators, organisms as their vehicles, and cosmic environments as their niches. Yet, he recognizes that MEMES also can be replicators. Presumably, he recognizes that memes can lie dormant in books, until such time as they find suitable minds to serve as vehicles for propagating them. So, what about memes of memes, patterns of patterns, and contexts of contexts? Can an existentially fundamental and clear line really be drawn between a replicator and its vehicle, or between a programmer and its program?

MEASURABLE BEHAVIOR: Dawkins explains how GENES seem to behave mathematically in reinforcing kin selection, AS IF they were purposively selfish. He recognizes that genes are not in themselves conscious, yet they seem to function AS IF they were driven or pre-programmed to exhibit comparative selfishness, based on capacity to preserve survival-machined organisms for paying their genes forward, almost as immortals. He wants to call the language of purposefulness, selfishness, and drivenness as if they were mere metaphors, because he does not consider genes in themselves as "really" being conscious. However, this kicks the can down the road of regress.

SEAT OF CAUSATION: If the gene is unconscious, and the organism does not have free will, and the future is not predetermined, then what does "cause" mean, and where does causation come from? Where do purpose, direction, determination, drive, selfishness, indifference, and altruism come from?

WHY do genes behave in pre-programmed ways? How are the programs preset? How are the programs changed or mutated? If the environment or the context (encompassing and including the program of the gene) affects, programs, and changes the programs of the genes, then is it the environment that is purposive? Is energy emanating from a Big Bang purposive for programming patterns, which in turn program more complex patterns (notwithstanding entropy)?  However, if the quantifiable environment is entirely constrained to unconscious math and statistics, then how can it make sense to conceptualize the environmental context as the purposive programmer? Does originating energy plus entropic expansion necessarily, dumbly, and naturally select for more and more complex replicators of patterns?

METAPHYSICS: Insofar as patterns are manifestations of programs, may there abide some spiritual aspect behind the physical environment, which functions akin to purposively programming consciousness?  Is the Big Bang a physical reality, or a derivative of a spiritually emanating binary code that continuously programs itself in respect of feedback?  If the binary code system of programming is all there is, then how is it continuously programmed and re-programmed -- unless there abides a program self-programmer?

SELF PROGRAMMER OF BINARY CODE: May there abide a spiritual, immeasurable, qualitative, source-essence, i.e., a self programming pre-programmer of constantly-changing programs?  May the building block of the apparent cosmos best be conceptualized as a system of self-programming, that "meta-vibrates" and fluxes to exhibit variously relating, resonating, reinforcing, replacing, renormalizing, reconciling, conserving layers and levels of programs -- all based in binary code?

CAUSE OF BINARY CODE: What could be the "cause" of the binary code that propagates pre-programs, generally? Must the programming be that of a self-programmer? If such an existent is reasonable to intuit, its existentiality abides as a spiritual immeasurable. The self-programming programmer of the cosmic program would be like a spiritually conscious, resonating, guiding God.

CIVILIZING OUGHTS: Dawkins believes human organisms should exercise their capacity to overrule some of the diktat of their "selfish" genes. But why does he believe they SHOULD do so? In respect of what values does he believe they should do so? And to what, if not from pre-programmed diktat, does he believe they should look in order to derive or establish such values? Despite protestations, does not Dawkins, as surely as every other militant scientist, take a leap of spiritual faith, not into science, but scientism?

BUILDING BLOCK:  Ultimately, the building block for our apparent reality seems better conceptualized not as a material particle, but as an immaterial program.  A no-thing.  Not a nature-based gene-meme of natural selection. Rather, a participatory, feedback-based program of self-programming, artificial selection.  Like a mind that changes itself, a program that programs itself.


- GOD: God, as the meta source-essence whose meta-vibrations resonate to define, delimit, and drive us, continues to guide us (has not left the building).
- BUILDING BLOCKS: The ultimate building blocks for all that we experience are programs derivative of binary code --- not any system of material particles-in-themselves.
- SELF WILL: We express localized functions of participatory self-programming (participatory will).
- CIVILIZATION: We carry innate capacity to phase into civilized, empathetic, moral beings that can become aware of self and service to God.
- TRINITY: The upshot of the system of self-programming of programs is to avail expression of self-aware purposefulness (consciousness), measurably physical relations (substance), and rules and equations and sequences for limiting and programming the ranges of their interfunctionings (information).  The trinitarian upshot is Consciousness, Substance, and Information.
- CHRISTIANITY AND RECONCILIATION: In spiritual and moral effect, the consequences seem to mirror most of those of Christianity. The potential worth of the human form, in terms of its participatory freedom and dignity, is respected.  Thus, spirituality and science are reconcilable.
- PROPHECY:  Feedback will continue to be reconciled in the binary code.  The new stabilizing shapes of things to come and when they are to come are beyond the clear knowledge or foresight of any mortal.  At best, we can continue in good faith to try to be receptive to intuitionally available guidance from the Reconciler.  We can temper good faith in good will among ourselves, i.e., empathy grounded in service to the Lord.  In that way, we can seek to continue to establish, communicate, and preserve decent civilization.


Regardless of whatever flux may crystalize out of chaos and into a system of stable complexity, anti-God people would rationalize that such temporal stability was a consequence of an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS), i.e., an "unconscious strategy" that just happened to happen "because" of the "selfish behavior" of unconscious building blocks.

The accessibility of math to easy rationalization is a wonder.  Indeed, if all that we experience is derivative of vibrations of a source-essence, then such vibratons would by definition broadcast binary code, such that the expression of every program would conform to a kind of inherent math.  Thus, an anti-God person may ratonalize that "dumb math" is the father of the cosmos.  However, such a rationalization would ignore that the math is mysteriously self-reflective, self-responsive, and self-programming.

Since physical matter does not really exist in itself, space, time, matter, and energy do not really exist in themselves.  What seems to exist in itself is a paradoxically changeless-changer, i.e., a self-programming programmer, i.e., a source-essence that vibrates.  All that appears and seems to be material is ultimately no-thing really physical, nothing more than binary code, programmed to express simulations that are normalized to local interpretations.  Such a self -programming, ongoing, unfolding system of programs seems inherently and qualitatively godlike, rather than "dumb."

POLYTHEISM: What if there happened to abide more than one vibrating source-essence?  If so, to be relevant to one another, they would have to share a potentially commonizing context.  Suppose there are two. That would implicate that a unifying programmer-program were the Author of both.  In other words, that the two subservient source-essences were, from another perspective,  the programs of an encompassing programmer.  Thus, the implication remains:  A singular unifying reconciling source-essence.  Moreover, binary code is binary code.  If the singular Author split into several sub-authors, each would still express itself in code that was ultimately reducible to binary code.  Such code would still give expression to C, S, and I.  The expression of C, S, and I is still the expression of C, S, and I.  Consciousness is Consciousness.  Identity is Identity.  Perspective is Perspective.

REPRESENTATION:  The meta vibrations that inherently express the binary code from which all experience is derived are connected to their source-essence in a self-referential, self-normalizing, self-reconciling, self-programming way.  A binary code of vibrations can represent a form for representing an original idealization of an apparent and measurable thing, but it cannot by itself be the original thing, nor can it by itself be the originating idealizer of the idealized thing.  Math does not exist by itself, apart from a source-essence of beingness.  Indeed, there is no representative conception that can, by and in itself, be a measurable thing.  It can only be a representation that can be conceptually attributed to an idealizer.  The Idealizer itself is a singularity: a self programming programmer; a self-reconciling reconciler of its perspectives of idealization; a source-essence of meta vibrations.  It may be intuited or implicated, as the implicated orderer.  Its purposes may be empathetically interpreted.  But it cannot beyond itself be objectively known or measured.

Sunday, November 9, 2014

The Cosmos as a Self Programming Computer

Cannot binary-based computer signal switches be set to regulate functions algorithmically, to control logic gates and signals for expressing every kind of systemic, conservation based flux?  In respect of a power source, every kind of discrete, continuous, constant, fluxing, directional, alternating, reversing, reverberating, juxtaposing, superimposing, dimensional signal can be represented in binary code.  If the power source is self programming in response to its own flux of internal feedback, it may facilitate switches for expressing logical functions for every kind of math and dimension based geometry.  It may express yes-no, true-false, go-stop, either-or, and/or, random, series, resistence, alternatiion, flux, expansion, contraction, trade off, transition.  An ultimate, self-programming power source may program sub-self-programming power sources.  An intelligently aware computer may program sub-perspectives of itself that are confined to experience lower levels of dimensional analysis and awareness.  Their programs may be such as to end their facilitations of local consciousness before they can transcend or assimilate to become or merge with separate yet higher perspectives of consciousness.

How is it that we, in our consciousness, sense, record, analyze, and remember "substance" and "information?" What gives abstractions meaning is, ultimately, a character (God?) that we can perhaps intuit, but not measure or confine -- whether or not we profess to have faith in it. What I would call the three faces of God (Consciousness, Substance, and Information) seem to relate (con-substantiate) in ways that no logic or science will ever confine to measured explanation.

It seems some fundament abides that is both causal and/but, in itself, immeasurable. Maybe it applies nothing more than binary code to self program itself. If the ultimate Source does program itself, that seems pretty qualitatively mysterious and godlike. I doubt such a fundamental qualitative can reasonably be expected to be reduced to quantitative control, especially by any mortal.

As to its qualitative character, whether it is caring or indifferent, it would seem to me to entail a more difficult faith to believe it is entirely indifferent than to believe that it is involved in feedback as it continues to self program. It's a mystery. Being a mystery, I would opt for that fundamental orientation towards moral purposefulness that seems most conducive to decent sustenance of civilized freedom and dignity. That seems to consist in Christian values. I agree that any kind of worldview will unavoidably entail a leap of faith.

I have given up on the scholastic-essentialist philosophers. And I don't find the foundational assumptions of analytic philosophers to be much of an improvement for addressing the most important concerns of humanity. They seem too much to subordinate the participatory conscious will of human beings to their ideas of pre-determining or overriding natural laws. I think that way leads to a moral dead end, much the same as alchemy led to a scientific dead end.

I think I see the outline of an alternative. I have not seen a name for it, so I may need to make one up. I guess I would call it CSI Feedback Philosophy. Were I to apply it to think about an implicate order, I would conceptualize the implicate order to be an unfolding beingness that fluxes to express CSI -- consciousness, substance, information. Such a philosophy would recognize that every measurable manifestation of substance must balance to obey a requirement of conservation. But it would also recognize a participatory role for consciousness to reconcile among the possibilities that are availed in potentiality, in order to choose which ones to make part of the manifestations that are rolled into the informational record. The capacity to choose is the key to placing moral responsibility. Without respect for freedom to choose, the arts of civilization seem to reduce to a pig farm.

If God is consciousness, and consciousness is part of the implicate order, then science is helpful, but hubristic scientism is inadequate to explain, entertain or inspire human beings.  Or any other form of purpose driven, self aware, intelligence.

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Science v. Scientism

The practice of empiricism that has to do with reliably persuading events is science. Science does not rely on a placebo effect, except to rule it out.

The practice of empiricism that has to do with persuading people as if they were naive children or patients is scientism. Scientism relies on a placebo effect, to take advantage of it.

There is a history, skill, and art of placebo effects, but not a science. By careful attention to history, skill, connivance, and art, an artisan or practitioner may become a wealthy and powerful opinion leader and ruler of sheeple. A scientisimist can be well intentioned or malicious. When focused on improving the health of another, a scientisimist may be a doctor, i.e., both a scientist and an artisan. When focused on improving or ruling the politics of a society, a scientisimist may be a statesman or a despot. The road to perdition is paved with the good intentions of over-reaching scientisimists, such as the scientisimists who want to convince people of the need for a system of carbon taxes as a ruse for justifying ever more governmental intrusiveness by well intentioned elitists. Of course, once such elitists acquire the power they seek to do good, they tend to become corrupt cronies, demagogues, and despots.

The sheeple targeted by scientisimists tend to be the stupid, the naive, the young, the trusting, the idealistic, the senile, the feeble, and the ill. Scientisimists also often bait and target one another, such as when they intuit that the other is easily blinded either by his virtues or his vices. Greed, jealousy, envy, avarice, lust, anger, and pride are often blinders. Thus, scientisimists often ally or war with one another. They practice deceiving and plundering one another, which produces maelstorms. In such maelstorms, everyone tends to be caught, including ordinary, competent, self sustaining, decent people of good faith and good will who do not want to be either rulers or sheeple.

It's not that scientism is bad, per se.  It's just that it ought not be confused with, or allowed to cloak itself as, or claim the dignity of, science.  Scientism is concerned more with self-fulfilling or self-aggrandizing truthiness than with truth.  If people are to preserve their freedom and dignity, it is vital that they become more aware of the difference between science and scientism.  This is why the role of educators in such matters should be to teach people how to think critically, as opposed to what to think.