Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Relationship Between Fields Of Continuity versus Discreteness


CONTINUITIES: There seems to abide no favored or standard unit of time or space that is simultaneously and equally applicable in common to all loci throughout the apparent and sensible cosmos. Rather, to be rational, every local measurement of mass, charge, vector, and wave function must be renormalized to be in reference to its local frame of reference. Only in that way does there abide a standard for CONTINUOUSLY renormalizing relations. Only in that respect does there abide a renormalizing-math standard that can be applied to every locus of continuity in space-time.

DISCRETES: As to a standard for renormalizing DISCRETE and digitizing relations among particles at the leaping quanta level, whatever the explanation of its system: No such math-based standard seems to abide, except based in statistical randomness concerning degrees of freedom and kinds of exchanges.

RECONCILIATION OF SUMS: A math-sum of manifestations of DISCRETES among locally vectored centers of quantum fields is always reconciled to a math-sum of manifestations of CONTINUOSITIES among locally centered vectors of electro-magnetic-gravitational fields.

MASS: The math-value for every selectively measured and manifested particle-field seems to express Mass when it is simultaneously vectored in respect of more than one kind of quanta that is other than the quanta correlates (photons and gravitons) for the electro-magnetic-gravitational field.

UNITY OF ELECTRO-MAGNETIC-GRVITATIONAL FIELD: Is every gravitational field necessarily bound up with an electromagnetic field? Imagine a common approximation or model for analogizing gravity as the geometrical effect of a disturbance caused by a large mass in a field, as in the case of a bowling ball on a large and taut trampoline. Then imagine small marbles rolled towards the bowling ball. The marbles will roll round and round, gradually drawing close to the indentation correlated with the bowling ball. The marbles will not orbit, because the trampoline injects friction as the marbles roll along it.

Now, imagine an electromagnetic field were added, so that the marbles rolled along in air above the trampoline, but towards the bowling ball. In empty space, where an electromagnetic field is added to the gravitational field, the marbles, once directed towards the disturbance in the field caused by the bowling ball, could be caused to approach it at such a vector as to be captured in an orbit. If the bowling ball itself were rolling towards an even bigger disturbance in the field, then the marbles could be interpreted as rotating in an elliptical orbit around the bowling ball.

CONTINUOUS FIELD VECTORS: Is every gravitational field necessarily bound up with an electromagnetic field? Taken together, do they constitute one CONTINUOUS electro-magnetic-gravitational field? Is one fluxing electro-magnetic-gravitational field the math-basis for the continuous particle-vectors of all photons, gravitons, inertial masses, and energy radiations? Is the continuous, WAVE-LIKE flux of such field the calculus-math-basis for the wave function of such particle-vectors?

DISCRETE FIELD RANDOM LEAPS: What about DISCRETE-jumping-quanta-particles at the digital, random, and leaping level of statistical-math-basis? A purely geometric idea of a continuous geometric field cannot represent or correlate well with the digital-math-values for a field comprised of leaping, interconverting quanta. For such a field of discretes, should MASS-VALUES best be conceptualized based on a model of correlative Higgs Bosons? Should CHARGE-VALUES for quanta-level forces of attracton and repulsion be based on an idea of polarization and discrete-spins?

FLUXES SECONDARY TO RENORMALIZATION: Are continuous fluxes of electro-magnetic-gravitational fields and discrete jumps of quantized-particles "not real or directly relational in themselves," but only MATH-RENORMALIZED, to avail the storeage and communication of Information across the continuity of space-time and between the variously discretized local perspectives?

DEEP STUBBORN IMPRINTS: If so, then curvature of space-time and quanta leaps are not existents-in-themselves, but Mind-Constructs that are at a deep and stubborn level imprinted into every local perspective. They offer a way for each recording avatar and perspective of consciousness to record, translate, and interpret its mathematical locus of experience into sensations that are renormalized to its relational locus.

RENORMALIZATION TO LOCAL FIELD CENTER OF MASS AND CHARGE: In whatever way math-values flux and interconnect to describe a system, they must be experienced to every local recording and observation as being renormalized in such a way as to conserve constants for the speed of light and the acceleration due to gravity, based on locally unified field center-of-mass-and-charge.

LOCAL APPEARANCE OF CAUSE-EFFECT: But for the appearance that bodies (cue balls) can push and pull one another by setting up some kind of causal relationship or "contact," there would abide no way for different perspectives of consciousness to apprehend communications in measurable terms with one another as such.

LOCAL CAUSATION AND PARTICIPATORY WILL VS META CAUSATION AND RECONCILING WILL: For each locus, the present combined state of its photons and gravitons is not the cause of each next apparent unfolding. The present state is merely the correlative for the local renormalizing of measurable communications that accompany each next unfolding. The choice of each next unfolding manifestation of measurable substance is under the Meta-Conservation of the Reconciler. The Reconciler expresses itself through the various levels and layers of Participatory Wills of each and every perspective that is renormalized to whatever the frame of reference being experienced locally.

NO BEGINNING OR END TO MATH SPACE OR MATH TIME: The cosmos always consists with one system of math frames being pushed and pulled after and into another. The substantive space-time aspect of it, respecting an originating big bang or a final dissipation, is illusion. The only real aspect is an immeasurable qualitative that fluxes with its expression of Self Identity in terms made quantitative in respect of locally renormalizable math-values. That is, IT quantitatively renormalizes to local recordinga and appearances of perspective.

STANDARD REQUIRED, BUT NO NON-META STANDARD AVAILABLE: There is no non-meta, measurable recorder or observer that sets a standard for all loci in the cosmic system, except as to calculable sequence (chronology preservation). The experience of space-time may be distorted, stretched, expanded, compressed, but whatever the Information regarding events that may be shared among perspectives, its empirically calculable sequentiality is preserved. (Chronology Protection Device.)

GOD: There is no non-meta, measurable recorder or observer that sets a standard for all loci in the cosmic system, except as to calculable sequence (chronology preservation). The experience of space-time may be distorted, stretched, expanded, compressed, but whatever the Information regarding events that may be shared among perspectives, its empirically calculable sequentiality is preserved. (Chronology Protection Device.)

Math-value is constantly, continuously, immediately, and synchronously renormalized for the range of freedom that is allowed for the expression of every particle-field. Every particle-field is defined in respect of whatever may then and there constitute the center of its local mass and charge of reference. Every locus in the electro-magnetic-gravitational web of space-time and apparent-contact-sequence is renormalized to the perception and experience of whatever its local recorder or observer.

How and why is the measurable cosmos set to so much fine tuning effort to avail every local perspective with potential for experiences that are renormalizeable to it? Mere math, by itself, could not do this. Intuitively, some immeasurable quality or Character seems needed to synchronize, reconcile, activate, vector, and guide all the appearances that are presented to us in quantitatively renormalized terms. Does this not reasonably lead to intuition of a purposeful Meta-Reconciler?

If no-thing of what appears is related to any common standard for measurable reality, if all that appears seems to bubble forth in respect of math-values out of otherwise nothingness, then is not some Immeasurable-Meta Essence-Source implicated? After all, even a zero bank account is still more than zero. Rather, it is a bank account, with measurable potential that depends on a qualitative character of its sponsor.

LIMITS OF GOD: I do not need to try to figure out the limits, if any, of God. I don't seek a complete explanation of everything and every possibility. I am instead interested in appreciating, in a consistent and coherent way, how and what God seems here and now to be communicating to us.

*********

INFORMATION:

RELAY OF BITS OF INFORMATION: Photons and electrons relay Information about the contact surface of particles from which they reflect or originate.

INTERPRETATIONS OF COLLECTED ORGANIZATIONS OF BITS: Computing Beings interpret Information from collections of photons and electrons that are received as a result of reflection or origination from an Organized Body.

ORGANIZATIONS OF ORGANIZATIONS OF INFORMATION: Organized Information about Organized Bodies can thus be sensed, modeled, and interpreted. Abstract organizations (printed words and physical signs) can be modeled for preserving Information about sub-abstractions about sub-abstractions about sub-abstractions.

CONSCIOUSNESS: Appreciation of Consciousness is entailed in the renormalization of Information for a contemporaneous Observer-Appreciator with which Information is received and collapsed into a quantifiable state.

CONTINUITY OF IDENTITY: Continuity in the qualitative appreciation of Information does not destroy the Conscious Identity state of an Interpreting Observer.

SUBSTANCE: Potential for quantitative Measurement of Substance is entailed in the renormalitive absorption of Information with a non-consciously-observing Recorder-Storer. The Information that is absorbed may in some respects be kept in an ambiguous and unresolved state. Continued absorption of Information changes by erosion and accumulation the physical state of the Recorder.

INFORMATION: Information is that which is qualitatively appreciated by Consciousness and quantitatively measured by Substance.

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Chronologically Appreciated Unfolding From Superpositions of Ambiguous Potentialities


SUBSTANCE: Substance is that which is measurably spun, revolved, orbited and vectored.

INFORMATION: In-form-ation is what is accumulated in mathematically-digitize-able and manifested representations among part-icle-fields, as represented and signified in the co-relational appearance of each locally-viable and contextual interpretation of its organically co-relational spins, revolutions, orbits and vector rates.

PARTICLE-FIELD: Each part-icle-field (or interval of space, time, matter, energy, vector, mass, organized sub-system) is not itself Information, even though each part-icle is itself constantly, continuously and perpetually renormalized. In-form-ation is that which is communicated to each focus of each degree-kind of part-icle concerning its cumulative context.

PROVING A NEGATIVE: Can a lack of Information being "collapsed" (measured by a co-relator) be "recorded"? Can a negative be empirically demonstrated by its absence from a sub-system?

SUPERPOSITION: Except as measurements are taken (co-related, communicated, received, recorded, observed), every sub-system, before-being-measured-by-a-new-measurer, would be charged in an ambiguous state of superposed, possible potentialities.

IN-FORM-ATIONAL MANIFESTING: A co-relative of Information is exchanged only among such part-icle-fields of substantiality as then and there happen to be receptive to record or observe such co-relative of it.

THE NON-MANIFEST POTENTIALITY:  Possible co-relations of Information that are neither recorded to part-icular storeage nor accumulated to observation are co-preserved with the mathematical ambiguity of the possible potential.

PARTI-CLES THAT HAPPEN TO TRANSLATE CHRONOLOGICAL COMMUNICATIONS: Only such electromagnetic, radiative, gravitational, or attractive propagatons of Information occur as are "collapsed" to manifestation for symbolic-recordation or interpretive-observation. That which is chronologically phase-collapsed to manifestation for symbolic recordation or interpretive observation is that which happens to be translated, transmitted, and received co-relationally among level-layers, degree-kinds, range-fields of part-icles.

EPIPHENOMENA OF META-MATH: A part-icle, as such, does not within its field attract the attention of a perspective of consciousness unless and until and to the extent that a two-way current in meta-math is established and represented in a math-field made measurably manifest or appreciative to some level of consciousness between or concerning them. All that is recorded or observed to manifestation is renormalized and collapsed in measurable translations of appearance of particle-fields.

ALL CENTERS OF ALL DEGREES AND KINDS OF PARTICLE-FIELDS ARE RENORMALIZED / EXCEPT IN FAITH, NO CENTER IS REAL IN ITSELF: Every thing that records Information concerning every kind and degree of localized context is a renormalized and renormalizing part-icle (that is of an eternally present system of Meta-Math) that in itself (apart from co-relational appearance) has no real center, perimeter, beginning, or end. Without Faith, we are all prey for madness. Among America's faithless (faithless in God, Family and Country), madness is rampaging.

NO PART-ICLE IS MANIFESTED INTO RECORDED EXISTENCE EXCEPT AS IT IS ON SOME LEVEL APPRECIATED: Part-icles are fuzzed and do not clearly exist in themselves, except in respect of how they are somehow brought into focused appreciation in respect of the happenstance of a Recorder or Observer.

PART-ICULAR SIGN-IFICATIONS OF THE LIVING WORD: In that sense, every part-icle-field represents the Living Word -- the Meta-Mathematician, Renormalizing Reconciler, Self-Programming Programmer, Essence-Source, Changeless-Changer.

*******

IDENTITY OF CONSCIOUS PERSPECTIVE:  Experiencing a conscious identity entails a cumulatively connecting organization of ideas and translations of interpretatons and apprehensions in a flux state of becoming.

ORIENTATION:  Some aspect or teleology of projection of Information onto a system-recording device is fuzzed in respect of a meta-orientation and potentiality of the Recorder-Projector.

IDEAS:  Ideas are defined, yet open. Quantifiably representable, yet qualitatively appreciable. Become, yet becoming. Ideas are not quantitatively, mathematically closed.  They are mathematically open to interfunctioning with an encompassing system of sub-systems, contexts in flux with contexts.  They are co-relative with unfolding, vectored, "Active Math."

REPRESENTATIONS OF QUANTITATIVES AND QUALITATIVES:  Ideas are not merely co-relative of translations of the quantitative. Ideas are not merely representations of quantitatively measurable past influences (that which has been).  Ideas are also representations of qualitative potentialities (that which may or may not become).

IDEAS OF IDEAS OF IDEAS:  Can we in any specificity imagine a color that our experience has not yet led us to experience?



Saturday, April 11, 2015

RENORMALIZATION OF THE SHARED CHRONOLOGY-FRAMEWORK


RENORMALIZATION OF THE SHARED CHRONOLOGY-FRAMEWORK FOR PURPOSES OF MORAL INTUTION AND PHILOSOPHY:

SPEED OF PERCEPTION SHARED AMONG RENORMALIZED IDENTITIES: A being that were perceived to travel faster than the speed of light (or the speed of gravity) would be a being that was perceived to upset the present informational record of chronological sequences. All beings that did not travel faster than the speed of light would be renormalized in their identities and experiences such that they would have no empirical way to prove or notice the alterations. What would be the relative frame of perception among beings that each traveled at the same or different speeds in excess of the speed of light? Do identities often travel faster than the speed of light in relation to one another, but simply renormalize their measurable and relational perceptions to make it appear that they do not? Can or does any unifying Identity exceed the speed of light and know that it does and know what alterations it has effected in the continuous renormalization and reconciliation of locally measurable events?

ILLUSIONS DERIVATIVE OF THE META: In the way that all measurable Substance (matter, energy, spin, revolution, orbit, charge, potential, polarity, frequency, wavelength, amplitude, intensity, distance, space, chronology, time, radiation, vector, direction, and appearance) is illusion, so also is speed a relational illusion. Why does the relative-constant of the speed of light appear to be a real constant, almost like a rule-in-itself? Well, in the way that all measurable appearance is renormalized to each experiential perspective (avatar of identity) of consciousness, so also, by definition, those perspectives that happen to share an experience of a chronology of events will perceive their relationships as being renormalized to preserve their shared chronologies. No perspective can share the chronology-framework unless it is constrained (renormalized and reconciled) so as not to measure any event as exceeding a speed that avails such chronology preservation.

USEFUL FICTIONS OF LIGHT AND TIME AS THINGS IN THEMSELVES: It is not that the speed of light is a constant-in-itself. It is that those perspectives that happen to relate to share a chronology-framework cannot be allowed to measure a speed that would exceed the capacity of the framework to preserve its recordation and perception of a shared chronology. For any single perspective to have power to measure a relative and continuous violation of the Limiting-Speed-Of-Renormalizing-Perception (light) would be for it, and it alone, to have power to upset and render chaotic the framework of shared chronology. All perspectives that would share a non-chaotic framework of experiential chronology must share a renormalization of their experiences in such a way that no one among them is allowed to upset the common chronology. It is not that the speed of light is "really" constant. It is that each perspective is constrained in the way it is renormalized to the shared framework to make the appearance of light appear to occur at a relationally-constant speed.

LIMITATION OF SPEED WITHIN THE CONTINUITY: It is not that no light-in-itself exceeds the relational speed. It is that no light-as-it-is-perceivable is able to be related to any particular foci or perspective except such light as avails renormalization of perceptions to the limiting speed that is requisite to the preservation of the shared chronology. Thus, in traversing through a continuity of space or space-time, no individual is allowed to perceive or experience a relational violation of the speed of light. Continuous travel in excess of the speed of light is not allowed. But, what about instantaneous travel, or "spooky action at a distance"?

INSTANTANEOUS CONVEYANCE OF INFORMATION: Can Information be conveyed at a distance, instantaneously? Well, it appears events can be reliably connected and correlated, instantaneously and from a distance. But can Information be so conveyed by any individual less than the Godhead??? It seems presently unknown whether this is unknowable.

TIME IS USEFULLY CONCEPTUALIZED AS BEING BOTH GRANULAR AND STRETCHABLE: It appears that personages at remote segments of the cosmos would experience the sequential unfolding of events to be proceeding at different rates. "Time-in-itself" does not exist, except as a conceptualization or useful fiction. As a useful fiction, is time-in-itself best conceptualized as being granular, continuous, or "stretchable"? Unless time as we experience it is "stretchable," it would not appear that correllative points could long preserve polarized and correlated action at a distance. Unless time as we experience it is both granular and stretchable, it would seem that reliable transmission of Information from a remote distance is not permitted. Time exists as a useful fiction in respect that the math of the Godhead that renormalizes and preserves chronologies treats time as if it consisted in respect of meta-particles that are both mathematically granular and stretchable.

RATE RENORMALIZATION WITHIN CHRONOLOGY PRESERVATION: If points of time as we experience them are, in respect of a common and renormalizing system of meta-math, both granular and stretchable, then, even though continuous travel in excess of the speed of light is not possible, INSTANTANEOUS travel and transmission of Information may be possible -- without upsetting the chronology framework. Thus, even though different perspectives from different foci may experience events as unfolding at different relational rates, they will still perceive the events as unfolding in the same sequences. Thus, the shared renormalization rule of the chronology-framework dictates that events may be perceived from different perspectives to unfold at different rates and in different degrees of focused clarity or collapsed fuzziness, but not in different sequences.

VIRTUAL PARTICLES: If, at some level, Information is instantly conveyable back and forth across both space and time, and without direct contact between "particles," without such Information being useable by humanity to alter macro chronologies, then such forays back and forth between the present and the future may be modeled as proceeding under a conceptual fiction concerning "virtual particles."

GODHEAD: In respect that it is reasonable to conceptualize that all appearances of measurable Substance are, in themselves, merely illusions, derivative of a Meta Essence-Source, it seems reasonable, for purposes of Moral Intuition, to suppose that all that appears is derivative of something about the Godhead that avails it to sponsor and experience a potential infinity of Perspectives of its Identity by nothing more than applying various maths of renormalization to Itself. But for such renormalization to be reconciled by the common and caring Godhead, there would abide no way for each perspective to part-icipate being a-part from, or in communication with, any others. This is the essential basis for Moral Philosophy.

TRINITY: The Godhead is trinitarian in IT's aspects for availing Consciousness, Substance, and Information (CSI).

CHANGELESS-CHANGER: It is sometimes thought that the only thing that does not change is change itself. (No river flows twice through the same channel.) How can this be? It can be because the changeless aspect is immaterial and immeasurable, while the the changing aspect is relationally measurable and renormalizing. It abides because the Essence-Source somehow has capacity to experience and communicate with itself among various different perspectives, whose locus in measurable space-time is derivative of mere math applied to a meta aspect. CONUNDRUM: If time does not really exist as a thing-in-itself, then does the Source-Essence "really" learn, remember, change its "Mind" -- or does IT just know, appreciate and Empathize in respect of IT's Eternal Present?

THE ESSENTIAL MORAL COMMANDMENT: The essence of the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule: Be Empathetic! That is, be respectful of what is needed to exemplify, establish and sustain human freedom and dignity and to lead it towards sublime surpassage.

**********

RENORMALIZATION OF SPEED OF GRAVITY:

How can a body that is not under the directional control of any force -- other than the propulsion of its initial creation (or se-part-ation) and the push or pull of gravitational distortions in space-time -- exhibit simultaneous conformance with the gravitational constants of multiple fields when it comes under the influence of competing gravitational frames of reference?

Well, different gravitational distortions probably harmonize in additive, sequential, and lagging center-of-gravity effects (gravitational drag), rather than compete. And, various curvature effects in respect of spins, revolutions and orbits may harmonize, so that effects of gravitational constants are preserved in that way. And, web stretching or compressing of granular points of space, time, and space-time may fuzz out what would otherwise constitute violations of renormalization of bodies to locally significant frames of gravitational reference. If so, renormalization is possible because of shedding or gap-filling of Information between perspectives, i.e., ranges of significant clarity and fuzziness.

In any event, mass and gravitational force (geometric curvature in space-time), in respect of the Meta Essence-Source, are as derivative and ultimately illusory as any other dimensional aspect of relatively-measured Substance. Thus, gravity is an aspect of the expression of the Essence-Source of distortions in space-time, as the Essence-Source (Godhead) applies math to itself, to renormalize foci for its various perspectives.

ELECTORMAGNETIC CHARGES IN SPACE-TIME:

May micro relations among particles at and below the atomic level be usefully conceptualized as following geometrically-induced distortions in the field of space-time in such a way as to produce vectored and potentialized levels of elecrical charges or polarized relations? Even if so, such fields of disturbance and distortion in space-time would not, in themselves, be real. That is, geometry is not a "real-er" math than arithmetic. Ultimately, geometry is also derivative of the Essence-Source applying math to renormalize foci for its various perspectives.

RENORMALIZATION OF THE POTENTIAL OF INFINITY:

Intuitively, the potential flux of the math that can be applied by the Essence-Source to itself appears to be infinite.  The experience of the Potential is made Manifest as Information is recorded or Conscious Observation is experienced.  It may be that the Essence-Source does not appreciate all potential unless and until and as IT "applies" math to Itself, to make events manifest.  "Applies" entails becoming.  Becoming abides between being and has been.  Whether, how or why the Essence-Source experiments, chooses, decides, guides, proposes  or purposes to Becoming is a sacred mystery, approachable only in Intuition, Empathy, and Faith.

STRETCHING, COMPRESSING, LOSING, FUZZING AND SHORTHAND INTERPRETING OF INFORMATION:

All Information about every event that can be directly and contemporaneously experienced to interpretive sensation as the sensation occurs is not instantly conveyable to another perspective whose senses are set, defined and limited to operate from a locus that is made to it to appear to abide at a remote distance.  Some Information is necessarily lost or fuzzed in the interpretive recording, bundling, stretching or compressing of it.

For example, a twin who is situated at such a distance and in such a gravitational frame as to age faster than his counterpart will not be capacitated to receive Information after his death concerning the ongoing experiences of his younger twin.

Moreover, Information that is bundled and reduced to representative form will inevitably take on a gloss from its interpreter, and its interpreter will have to reduce the Information to such bits in which he or it took interest and care to record and convey.

For example, a writer who undertook to describe events of the last year would typically omit describing some events altogether and would tend to give shorthand interpretations of events that required more time in their actual unfolding.  A description of all events that occurred during the time that is represented by a writing (or compressed recordation) about them will necessarily constitute a selected, edited, shorthand and indirect interpretation of such events -- even if such writing itself were instantaneously conveyed to the granular, stretchable and contemporaneous time of a distant twin.

Thus, between the distances that appear to separate perspectives, the cosmos necessarily conveys fuzzed, incomplete, selected, and inexact recordations and descriptions of distant events as they occur locally.  Thus, using conveyances of bursts of compressed, or digitized bits or writings cannot fill or clarify all gaps or fuzzes in Information as it unfolds from and between distant loci.  Mortals simply cannot access all the Information that is created by or accessible to the Godhead.

UNCANNY AND CREATIVE DANCE OF MATH WITH THE UNFOLDING OF TECHNOLOGIES: If we conceptualize that time is both granular and stretchable, then, depending on our relational vectors within the web of space-time, we will more likely develop maths that will facilitate technologies for the spooky and instantaneous transmission of digitized bursts of information from a distance. Make it so!

The power of imagination and the insights of Jesus grab many people, like a spooky flash of insight from a distance. :)


**************
**************

COMMENT:


I think people wonder where our need to survive in a group came from. To say morality comes from our need to survive in a group is to beg a question: What group should take priority? And, if a multicellular organism constitutes a group, then should a single organism that somehow acquires the most situational power be then and there thought to be the most authoritative fount of moral instruction? If might makes right, then what would be the point of pondering what is right? One would, like Progs, merely FEEL what is right. Non-Progs tend to think there is more to a decent life than just surviving. Many think a kind of meta empathy is perhaps the superior reality over a merely derivative and inferior illusory ride.

*********

RENORMALIZATION OF ILLUSIONS: In the way that all measurable Substance (mass, gravity, matter, energy, spin, revolution, orbit, charge, potential, polarity, frequency, wavelength, amplitude, intensity, distance, space, chronology, time, radiation, vector, direction, and appearance) is illusion, so also is speed (as in speed of light and speed of gravity), ultimately, a relational illusion. Why does the relative-constant of the speed of light appear to be a real constant, almost like a rule-in-itself? Well, in the way that all measurable appearance is renormalized to each experiential perspective, so also, by definition, those perspectives that happen to share an experience of a chronology of events will perceive their relationships as being renormalized to preserve their shared chronologies. No perspective can share the chronology-framework unless it is constrained (renormalized and reconciled) so as not to measure any event as exceeding a speed that avails such chronology-preservation.

USEFUL FICTIONS OF LIGHT AND TIME AS THINGS IN THEMSELVES: It is not that the speed of light is a constant-in-itself. It is that those perspectives that happen to relate to share a chronology-framework cannot be allowed to measure a speed that would exceed the capacity of the framework to preserve its recordation and perception of a shared chronology. For any single perspective to have power to measure a relative and continuous violation of the Limiting-Speed-Of-Renormalizing-Perception (light) would be for it, and it alone, to have power to upset and render chaotic the framework of shared chronology. All perspectives that would share a non-chaotic framework of experiential chronology must share a renormalization of their experiences in such a way that no one among them is allowed to upset the common chronology. It is not that the speed of light is "really" constant. It is that each and every focus for recording Information and observation for experiencing Consciousness is constrained so as to be renormalized to the shared framework, to make the appearance of light and gravity appear to occur at relationally-constant speeds.
In traversing through a continuity of space or space-time, no individual is allowed to perceive or experience a relational violation of the speed of light. Continuous travel in excess of the speed of light is not allowed. But, what about instantaneous travel, or "spooky action at a distance"? Can Information be conveyed at a distance, instantaneously? Well, it appears events can be reliably connected and correlated, instantaneously and from a distance. But can Information be so conveyed by any individual who is less than the Godhead? It seems presently unknown whether this is unknowable.

TIME MAY BE USEFULLY CONCEPTUALIZED AS BEING BOTH GRANULAR AND STRETCHABLE: It appears that personages at remote segments of the cosmos would experience the sequential unfolding of events to be proceeding at different rates. "Time-in-itself" does not exist, except as a conceptualization or useful fiction. As a useful fiction, is time-in-itself best conceptualized as being granular, continuous, stretchable, or both granular and stretchable?
Unless time as we experience it is both granular and stretchable, it would seem that reliable and correlated transmission of Information from a remote distance could not be facilitated. Intuitively, it seems that time exists only as a useful fiction. That is, a math of the Godhead that would renormalize and preserve chronologies may treat time as if it consists of meta-particles that are, mathematically, both granular and stretchable.

If points of time as we contrive to measure and experience them are, in respect of a common and renormalizing system of meta-math, both granular and stretchable, then, even though continuous travel in excess of the speed of light is not possible, INSTANTANEOUS travel and transmission of Information may be possible -- without upsetting the chronology framework. Thus, even though different perspectives from different foci may experience events as unfolding at different relational rates, they will still perceive the events as unfolding in the same sequences.

GODHEAD: In respect that it seems reasonable, for the purpose of moral philosophy, to conceptualize that all appearances of measurable Substance are, in themselves, merely illusions, derivative of a Meta Essence-Source, it seems reasonable to suppose that all that appears is derivative of something about the Godhead that avails it to sponsor and experience a potential infinity of Perspectives of its Identity by nothing more than applying various maths of renormalization to Itself. But for such renormalization to be reconciled by the common Godhead, there would abide no way for each perspective to part-icipate being a-part from, or in communication with, any other. This would seem to be an essential basis for Moral Philosophy.

CHANGELESS-CHANGER: It is sometimes thought that the only thing that does not change is change itself. (No river flows twice through the same channel.) How can this be? It can be because the Changeless Aspect is immaterial and immeasurable, while the Changing Aspect is relationally measurable and renormalizing. It abides because the Essence-Source somehow has capacity to experience and communicate with itself among various different perspectives, whose locus in measurable space-time is derivative of mere math applied to a meta aspect.

THE ESSENTIAL MORAL COMMANDMENT: The essence of the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule: Be Empathetic! That is, be respectful of what is needed to exemplify, establish and sustain human freedom and dignity and to lead it towards sublime surpassage.
RENORMALIZATION OF THE POTENTIAL OF INFINITY: Intuitively, the potential flux of the math (that can be applied by the Essence-Source to itself) appears to be infinite. The experience of the Potential is made Manifest as Information is recorded or Conscious Observation is experienced. It may be that the Essence-Source does not appreciate all potential unless and until and as IT "applies" math to Itself, to make events manifest. "Applies" entails becoming. Becoming abides between "being" and "has been." Whether, how or why the Essence-Source experiments, chooses, decides, guides, proposes or purposes to Becoming is a sacred mystery, perhaps approachable less in logic and empiricism than in Intuition, Empathy, and Faith.

*******

ANALOGY FOR GOVERNANCE:  In similar fashion, a decent and representative republic ought to renormalize wealth and power among its citizens, so that no one person or generation acquires such disproportionate wealth, power, property or influence as to subjugate the participatory freedom of most others.

PHASE TRANSITION:  A thing that flips into a violation of the rules that define it will accompany a phase flip -- in itself, the system that defines it, or both.  A person who becomes too powerful to be a  citizen of a republic will become no longer a citizen and no longer a member of a republic.  He will become despot over a dictatorship.




Monday, March 30, 2015

Rainbow Gravity -- Philosophical Intuitions


Re: RAINBOW GRAVITY -- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/large-hadron-collider/11489442/Big-Bang-theory-could-be-debunked-by-Large-Hadron-Collider.html

Dave,

As you probably know, a new idea in physics relates to "rainbow gravity." whereby the effect of gravity is felt differently by different wavelengths of electromagnetic energy. For scientists, experiments are underway to seek testable measurables for relating to this idea.

For philosophers of intuitive but untestable aspects of our existentiality, the choice of word of "rainbow" would seem interesting. For observers who reside within a rainbow-producing system, every attempt to catch the end of the rainbow recedes and regresses until the rainbow melts back into the background. For astronomers who seek to map the cosmos, every attempt to find and see the furtherest star recedes, and every point of reference seems to share a common condition such that its observations tend to show the same densities in all directions. There does not seem to be any real center to the cosmos. Nor perhaps any real beginning ("Big Bang").

This phenomenon may be conceptualized as an uncanny renormalization of every measurable within every context to the separate focal point of each individual observer and recorder. One begins to wonder how much one can trust one's senses to identify what is "really out there." One may even begin to doubt whether not only time, but also recorded chronologies of events (i.e., information), are "just" stubborn illusions that are somehow renormalized to each perspective, but not carrying forward any "reality in themselves."

What may a concept of "rainbow gravity" implicate to "reasonable" philosophical intuition concerning the apparently constant and continuous renormalization of observations and recordations to perspectives and foci? What may it implicate regarding a "beginning to time" or a lack of any "real beginning"? Like the receding rainbow, does information recede, regress, and become lost or "forgotten" to whatever extent is needed to facilitate each interpretation that is renormalized to each perspective-context within a shared bubble of experience?

It is one thing for a recording device or observing perspective (person) that functions within a context to record or apprehend as if there must have been some kind of chronological beginning to whatever the nature or character of the bubble that happens to sustain it. It is another thing for a perspective to believe that such beginning must be of a reality that is more than mere renormalization to its situation.

It is one thing to postulate, as a convenient conceptualization for a purpose of renormalitive calculation, that there was a beginning point of infinite density. It is another thing to believe that such a beginning point of infinite density ever existed as a "thing in itself." It may be that the apparently unfolding sequence of measurable events does not exist independently, but only artifactual to perceptual interpretations that happen to be renormalized in respect of a shared bubble.

If so, it would be a very strange bubble, because it would not seem to exist as a thing in itself, either. This "bubble" does not coherently seem to have any center-favored, focal-point of reference in time, space, or space-time. Every point that may be randomly chosen as a point of measuring reference seems to appear only as a function of a recorder or observer of information that interprets events as they unfold around it in a way that "just so happens" to renormalize all measurements to its perspective and context. This "bubble" seems to be more like a web of no-thing, more like a digitally-actuating and renormalizing math, i.e., a self-programming programmer, i.e. the
Essence-Source-Sponsor of a trinitarian participatory-feedback-flux of Consciousness (Son), Substance (Father) and Information (Holy Ghost).

At least, that's where my moral perplexity seems to lead me "at this point."

********

"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable."

"There is another theory, which states that this has already happened."

Douglas Adams - The Restaurant at the Edge of the Universe

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

TRINITARIAN GODHEAD

TRINITARIAN GODHEAD:  The Source-Essence-Purposer-Reconciler abides as a trinitarian flux that expresses Substance, Information and Consciousness. In aspect of Substance, its sponsor may be conceptualized as the creating Father. In aspect of Information, its sponsor may be conceptualized as the accompanying Holy Ghost.  In aspect of the Particular Exemplar of Consciousness, its sponsor may be conceptualized as the guiding Jesus.  That our existentiality entails a trinitarian flux of Substance, Information and Consciousness is self evident.  Substance disperses, Information collects, and Consciousness (identities and memories) changes. The world of present manifestation in Substance is the world that is presented and created by the Godhead. Jesus' kingdom would not be of this world of present manifestation. Jesus' kingdom would be of the always receding, guiding potentiality of substance and information in Consciousness. In Jesus' kingdom, the battles are among empathies and ideas.  In the kingdom of manifested substance, there is no avoiding that the battles are in flesh and blood.

DIGITALITY:  We communicate in what may be represented or conceptualized as digitally signified and chronologized quantitatives. The digits by which signification is cnceptualized and availed are special in that they have no experiential existentiality in the absence of perspectives of Consciousness, whose perspectivistic conceptualizations are made, renormalized, and reconciled in respect of such active digitalization.  The digitalization is such that no one aspect of the Trinity can abide without entailment with the other two.  Changes in levels and layers of identities and memories of Consciousness entail the collection of Information and the dispersal of Substance.  Consciousness entails the collection of Information over the dispersal of Substance.  (C < --> I/S.) The collection of Information entails the constant changing and renormalization of perspectives of Consciousness times the dispersal of Substance.  (I < --> CS.)  The dispersal of Substance entails the changing of Consciousness times the collection of Information.   (S < --> CI.)  The unfolding flux of C,S and I as a whole entails the cooperative operation of each component.  CSI functions to our perspectives as a Trinity.  The Trinity's expression of Quantiatives requires quanticized conservation:  Sacrifice and transition; pain and pleasure; death and life; framework and change.

GODHEAD:  The Source Essence that programs Digitalization facilitates: SUBSTANCE that obeys conservation; INFORMATION that avails access to recordations of sequences of transitions; and local recordations of representations and Perspectives of CONSCIOUS MEMORIALIZATION that renormalize to locus within context.  In other words, the Godhead synchronizes a flux of Substance, Information and Consciousness.

JESUS:  Consciousness as we relate to it that has special moral insight above all others into both the Substance and the Information is the "only begotten Son" -- the apex for seeking to understand the Changeless-Changer.

EXEMPLAR:  The way of evolution entails pleasure and pain.   The Exemplar needed to exemplify both.  To become an exemplar for humanity, He needed to experience the heights of joy and the depths of pain.  This is less because men and mortals are purely evil than because they are incomplete, imperfect, and in need of guidance in how to face all potentials to our limits.

SIN:  To be in a state of sin need not be conceptualized as evil, per se.  It may be conceptualized as signifying a state of karmic cosmological evolution.  Suffering and pleasuring are less to atone for sin or to reward joy than to facilitate reconciliation to moral purposefulness.  To be in a state of sin may be conceptualized as being in a state such that the Godhead (Changeless-Changer) is attuned and available to guide our communications to the pursuit of meaningful dignity.

SALVATION:  Regarding heaven or hell, the issue of concern need not be how a body saves into spirit, but how does spirit pursue morally purposeful expression in a body.

POTENTIALITY:  Consider Jesus, Shakespeare, Newton, Franklin, Jefferson, Mozart, Einstein, Turing.  Is it not astonishing what can be expressed from the digital potential of the mind of God?  But for Jesus, what would have come of moral philosophy throughout the world?

PURPOSE:  Investigate how intelligent and powerful each individual can be guided to become, while still preserving a civilization that can trust enough to avail decent freedom and dignity without annihilating itself.

Thursday, March 12, 2015

Social Cycles of Diminishing Returns

On Laws of Diminishing Returns for Types of Organizations:

Collectives tend to be organized to purposes.  Parts that are valued tend to be devoted to coordinate the various needs of each collective.  Parts can be developed to levels that maximize the capacity of an organism to pursue its purposes.  The maintenance of each part is contemporaneous with an opportunity cost concerning what could have been done with the energy that maintains the part had it been devoted to other purposes.  A society consists of member parts that direct various energies to facilitate various of the society's purposes.  Applying some of a society's energy sources to preserve the physical and mental health and competence of the members that contribute to its purposes facilitates the efficacy of the society.  Taking energy from a contributing part to indulge non-contributing functions of other parts diminishes the efficacy of a society.  When the efficacy of a society as a whole diminishes, the sense of well being of all its parts tends also to diminish.  This inefficacy produces diminishing returns for the well being of the society and all its members.  Individual parts sometimes conspire to work together as parasites to pursue subsets of well being at the expense of the well being of the system of the set as a hosting whole.  As parasites increase in activity, they reach points of diminishing returns, such that they ruin the health of the host.

Societies often benefit by centralizing governance that can redistribute resources to better preserve the welfare and mental health of its needed members.  For awhile, increased devotion of resurces to purposes of centralization may enhance needed redistributions.  After awhile, a society may come to consist mainly of resource takers (redistributers and redistributees), to the neglect or weakening of resource producers.  Then, increases in centralization and regimentation tend to make the society inefficacious to its purpose of enhancing the well being of its members.  Centralization begins to produce diminishing and even destructive returns, sort of like an out of control dive by an airplane that has lost its engine.  Alliances of parasitic takers (redistributers and redistributees) begin to find ways to barricade themselves from the producing members of a society, so that producers cannot stop them from continuing to cannibalize and weaken the society as a whole.  The increasingly centralized empowerment of such parasites reaches an apex of selfish efficacy, and then puts the system as a whole into a nose dive of a collapse.  Even if the class of proudcers wakes to the the danger, the awakening often comes too late to avoid catastrophe.

**********

I doubt there is any simple one on one causal relationship, but a complex sloshing brought on by hubristic over centralization and its inevitable spoliation of social trust. Waves of mass hysteria are brought on by out of whack central planning. Americans at home are producing fewer things other peoples want to buy. They can't eat bureaucracy and 2000 page laws. So capital went overseas. There, it produced potemkin villages that the natives could not afford to habitate. So, capital re-diverted to produce more cheap goods to sell to Westerners, leading to price deflation for Westerners. Eventually, foreigners may be first to experience inflation, in respect that dollars paid by Americans don't purchase much from an America that does not produce much.

Printed money tends mainly to be siphoned to crony capitalists. As America became non-competitive, there was less for cronies to invest in, in America. So they held their money or put it overseas or in art, gold, or jewelry --- the kinds of things the little people tend not to buy. Printing money is meant to ease America's debt on the backs of foreigners. So long as foreigners have little choice but to accept fiat dollars, and so long as investment in industry in America does not take off, the printed money does not compete to drive up prices at home. (So long as America ensures the peace, this does not seem unfair -- except that America is no longer so much in the peace insuring business.)

This will change, as surely as waves slosh back and forth. The crony hedgers (and their hired shills) who can control the timing of the sloshing tend to benefit at everyone else's expense. They've got you coming and going. Until they kill their own host. Meanwhile, they will monetize debt until it becomes unsustainable, either because no amount of fiat money can serve the interest, or because there is no industry adequate to distribute real buying power.

Printing money does not in itself cause deflation. It is the circumstances that lead to the current printing that are leading to deflation. For now.

*******

Obama's program is one of treason to overturn the republic and to consolidate the rule of an establishment that hates the American Ideal.  His program is to change the republic from one that represents citizens who want to enjoy the freedom and dignity to express themselves without being intimidated by goons and thought police.  Obama wants the masses to be in equal servitude to elite rulers who have been "enlightened to know best."  The establishment of godforsaken elite rulers and their goons has been nearly completed.  Finishing touches are being put on the pacification of the ruled class.  Everything the regime does is filtered to this purpose, which is driven by red-eyed hatred of independent minded, self reliant, competent Americans. 

If Congress did not consist of shills ensconced for the same purpose, it should have removed Obama long ago.  The establishment has ensconced a Congress that is treasonous to the ideal of a free and representative republic. The mind-numbed electorate has ensconced a red eyed hater as President of America.  Obama has ensconced two Supreme Court Justices who cater to his program.  High level civil and military servants are likewise being replaced with servants of the anti-American establishment.  Each new regime drone is expected to establish like drones.  We are seeing geometrically increasing lines of drone dominos being placed and tipped to bury America and the West.  Trillions of dollars of fiat money are disseminated to the purpose.  Soon, mosques will likewise increase, geometrically. 

All the money and power in the world are being focused to the subjugation of middle class people everywhere.  Liberal and libertarian women and femimen have no clue concerning the quickening evil that they are greasing.  They are helping to drown the only people who could restore decency:  the people who apprehend the importance of faith in a Reconciler, loyalty to family, and fidelity to a representative republic.  Without faith, family and fidelity, most of humanity will be greased to serfdom.  But maybe the dope and sex will be good.

**********

Obama is an atheist who greatly admires and sympathizes with Muslim totalitarianism. He likes the idea that those who mean to rule the State should hire elites to lead the masses to believe the State knows best in all things. He likes the idea of worship of the State. To obtain statist rule in the West, he seeks to de-define the family and replace the authority of parents with that of the State. To accomplish this, he holds out carrots. Those carrots include tolerance of whatever depravities are needed to induce support from lofos and addicts. To make such inducements palatable, he joins with those who try to discredit the idea of any higher Reconciler or that any moderation or self discipline in drug or sexual proclivities is needed. For political calculations, he does this while lying and claiming to be a Christian. Were the regime to obtain enough power, and were it to deem sticks to be needed and helpful to the consolidation of central statist control, its fronts, like Obama, would not hesitate to use sticks. Obama's fundamental principle is that people like himself should rule without having to dispute with any self-ruling middle class. Obama is to Mohammad as Allah is to the State.





Tuesday, March 10, 2015

On Levels of Sensation

ON LEVELS OF SENSATION, CONSCIOUSNESS, AND RECONCILING PURPOSEFULNESS

Parts, Sum, Whole
Program of Program of Program
Author of Author of Author
Incomplete Perspective of Incomplete Perspective of Incomplete Perspective
Sensations of sensations of sensations
Representations of representations of representations
Spheres of Being overlapping with Spheres of Being overlapping with Spheres of Being
Recordings and Communications of Interpretations of Sensations
Approbations of Appreciations of Apprehensions
Ideas of Images of Perceptions
Identities reconciling Identities reconciling Identities
Complexity Coalescing out of Chaos
Consciousness of  Information concerning Substance
Qualitative experience of Quantitative of Qualitative-Quantitative

Apprehend:  contemporaneously sense
Appraise:  reflexively evaluate
Approbate: participatorily advise and consent

Sense, Evaluate, Participate
Divide, Add, Analyze
Extract, Phase, Change
Measure, Induce, Intuit
Experience, Sentiment, Purposefulness
Dress, Address, Redress
Circulation of Correlation and Cause
Know, Believe, Doubt
God, Godforsaken, Godless
Regression, Shift, Return
Infinity, Eternity, Essence
Existence, Being, Identity
Empiricism, Intuition, Morality
Reflexive apprehension of Reflexive apprehension of Reflexive
Changeless Changing Changer
Essence, Expression, Experience
Self Interest, Weighted Sentiment, Unfolding Moral Principle
Relative, Absolute, Relational-Absolute
Substance, Catalyst, Transistence
Being, Becoming, Existing
Chronology, Measuring Perspective, Rationalizing Interpretation
Measuring, Modeling, Molding
Perception, Interpretation, Communication
Caring, Rationalizing, Projecting
Evolution, Participation, Guidance
Recorder, Participator, Reconciler
Matter, Medium, Form
Math, Computer, Self Participating Programmer
Apprehension, Observation, Causation
Truth, Beauty, Purpose
Self, Society, Soul
Seek, Subjugate, Surrender
Manifestation, Potential, Choice
Measured, Rationalized, Renormalized
Determined, Random, Guided
Nothing, Everything, Math
Measurable, Immeasurable, Intuitable
Renormalization of Experience, Reconciliation of Values, Synchronization of Expressions
Conservation of Equational Transitions
Music, Noise, Time Keeping