Saturday, May 4, 2013

Interchangeability of International Socialism and Crony Corporatism

.
The thing is, international socialism and crony corporatism are becoming interchangeable labels for pursuing the same thing: the feed-lot farming of human beings. I don't think human freedom and dignity are "progressing," nor do I think that losing appreciation for transcendent spiritual values is "progress." The life of a cow in a feed lot is less violent. Numerically, there may be many more cattle now raised in feed lots or confined to pastures than there were in the early days of the Texas Longhorns. No doubt, feed lot cattle are bred (and soon to be genetically modified) to be peaceable and easily led. Until a disease spreads, like Mad Cow disease, the number of years of modern cow life will greatly exceed the years of Longhorn life. However, I am not sure I would call the life of a feed lot cow qualitatively better than the life of a Longhorn. I suspect it's only "better" (or fitter) once the cows are bred to it.

Being bred to the feed lot, cows learn to feel "entitlted" to their feed and pasturage. They would become unable to cope without the gay fences, brands, and neuterings that are imposed by their rancher. I don't credit this to "progress" or to the better angels of cow nature. Nor do I see much freedom or dignity in it. Of course, cows are not taught about freedom and dignity. Nor, for that matter, are collectivized human beings. If taught (or conditioned to) anything, they are taught that gay and neutered cow sex and devotion to fattening grains is good. Their glands lead them to moo in unison. I don't think this kind of increase in peaceableness and harmonic glandular pleasuring correlates with an increase in personal virtue or collective merit.

Nor do I think collectivist farming of human beings correlates in the long run with increased life spans. All that nature needs to debunk that correlation is time to promote a few more bugs and plagues to strike at bottlenecks of common dependencies on technological pipelines. The godless feed lot and the genetically-designed-for-collectivized-civilization human being is not necessarily the apex of merit or the progress of "better angels." I don't think there is virtue in capitalism without respect for transcendent values and the traditional family. Take away God and the family and what you are left with is the farming of the human feed lot. I wonder, will that be gay enough for our Ivy profs?

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

A person is not precluded from being both naive and bad. A naive person can be bad by heedlessly presuming to consolidate control over a ring of power that, in his frustrated heart, he knows he is too immature to wield with wisdom. Obama thinks he should be entrusted with the nuclear football, but a rural farmer should not be entrusted with a Glock.

Anonymous said...

Obama's explanation of his birth certificate is just as candid as his explanation of Bengazi. In fact, all Obama's explanations are just this candid. I would expect you would say, Thank you. (sarc)

Anonymous said...

Regarding Black Holes: People often wear themselves out looking frantically for external evidence of an objective truth that is more meaningful than trivial definitional truth (such as that 2 and 2 makes 4). The arch explanation each person finally accepts seems to come upon him more from his own exhaustion than from skilled hunting. It may be that all the external hunting is only to facilitate eventual finding of a truth that is subject to The Within. Perhaps, as each person begins to realize that each of us is only a common, limited, imperfect iteration of a single perfect, immeasurable Entity, i.e., Consciousness, then we may find it in us, inherently, to accord more empathetic respect (not quite the same as "love") for one another. Good parenting seems to unfold in this way: Children are inculcated with essential tools. They then experiment as adolescents, under guidance. And then they are entrusted as adults. The problem is in getting children to want to grow up.

Delayed maturity because of mass dysfunctionality in families just produces more cycles of delayed maturity. Every time we license elitists to regulate adults in fine with measured force, we produce just another disappointing dystopia for adults-in-name-only. Perhaps we should stop trying to force so many of our imperfections on others. Thus, we may begin to accord more respect for each person in his or her separate quest to relate to the common Source. Respect for the imperfect independence of adults is not owed because they competently earned it, but because they are endowed with it. And because we, being imperfect ourselves, are not the agency that is equipped to perfect them. When we begin to respect each adult as a separate Pilgrim, not as an entitled stomach or gland, we may stop empowering the search for the perfect, collectivizing, cattle feed lot. We may then begin to find ways to communicate in the logos of the One that permeates within.

The alternative is to allow ourselves to be ruled by people who lack the good sense to know what they do not know, even as they push us towards a certain calamity: Knownothing Progs revenging with pitchforks.

Anonymous said...

The fraudulent media's own weight needs to be used against it, to pull it down. The fraudulent media is helping crony internationalists masquerading as socialists and corporatists to farm entitlement-minded sheep. The media is working under a cloak of "diversity" (multi-culturalism). This is an utter fraud, because the cultures being favored consist ONLY of those for which it is easiest to pull wool over eyes. Peoples, cultures, cities, and nations are denied access when they are independent, competent, or accomplished. Those who are favored are those who are the most criminal, corrupt, illegal, ignorant, and pre-conditioned with third world mindsets to hate those who want to defend a home base that avails individual freedom and dignity. Orientals who are accomplished or who seek to escape despots are not favored. Competent, accomplished Europeans are not favored. This vile mask of Marxist-Muslim fraud needs to be ripped off!

Diversity itself needs to be used to denonstrate how it is only a ploy for fraudsters to
favor easily collectivized and intimidated sheep. How to do this? "Whitey" needs to mount a sustained resistence to the term Whitey. Every person who is individually comptent and who despises those who would reduce him or her to an easily
purshased vote needs to embrace muti-culturalism to its absurd outer limits.
Britains need to resist being reduced to Britains. They should be English. Nay, not just English. They should be Cockney. Nay, not just Cockney, they should be Cockney descendents of Celts and Druids. In like manner, everyone
should hyphenate himself down to the most atomistic level. Then, work up in order to establish salad-bowl rights to preferential treatment. In this way, competent
individuals may turn the tables on diversity mongers in order to reestablish natural preference for accomplished and competent individuals.

After all, what smart, hard working individual with access to the Internet cannot out-diversity-monger any slow-witted, LoFo, entitlement monger? There should be computer applications for establishing one's diversity bonafides and putting one in touch with one's homies. In this way, every competent person can lobby for preferential quotas. Pull the hyphenated regime down by using its own dead weight against it! There should be a George-Castanza-pity-me-shriveled-turtle march on Washington, with each person bearing a sign that says, "Where's Mine?" Occupy Congress' offices until Congress delivers. The sooner Congress is expelled, the sooner the nation can heal. We are past repairing the damage. The goal should be to bring down the regime by using its own human shields against it. Why wait in Galt's Gulch when you can help by demanding your own free lunch?

Anonymous said...

My mother and uncle tell me my grandmother (Ella Louise Carney, born about 1898, sometimes mistakenly called Eleanor Louise Corning, whose father may have been a territorial judge) was the granddaughter of a Cherokee woman who had been displaced to Oklahoma. The Depression impoverished a lot of people, so records are unreliable and have not been sussed out. For whatever reason, my 85 year old mom still loves well made Pendleton blankets. I have never tried to claim any affirmative benefits on account of apparently being 1/16th Native American. However, the desire of native people's to retain their identities apart from the salad bowl that is unraveling before us is becoming more understandable to me with each passing day. I have read only a little about the Nez Perce. Chief Joseph should inspire us to learn more. I admire Gulchers who are not into the idea just to parade glands gone wild. I recently read about Genghis Khan and the making of the modern world. His homage to the Eternal Blue Sky seems fairly comparable to ideas of Native Americans regarding the Great Spirit. That's sort of how I relate to Jesus. I think The Word is written in the unfolding logos of the cosmos. If my participation can contribute, it will not be on the side of entitlement minded collectivists.

Anonymous said...

We would be much better off had we more scorn and less pity. Those who think God is only about unrestricted love tend to hate the Old Testament, where the lessons of the day dealt with hard issues of survival among competing spiritual ideologies and cultures. The empathy of a God who is involved with leading and teaching us, who is into appreciative feedback that is availed only by hard evolution, is not necessarily restricted to love. A good parent will often punish a child, but will not "love" imposing punishment. An excess of tolerance will kill every decent thing.

Anonymous said...

Promoters look for middle managers who can relate well to newly employed youth. Newly employed youth relate best to middle managers who are apologists for instant gratification and projection of blame onto old fogies who need to be moved on. Until the old fogies are moved on, Few others notice or defend against the primitives banging at the door. The majority of Americans realize this, but the youth and their middle managers do not. Because of a consortium of lofo voters, these lofo middle managers are soon promoted to high political management. When these choomers tell small business owners that "they did not built that," it's because these choomers know they themselves have not built or earned anything. The problem is: How can most Americans be brought to realize what is going on and then get activated to turn it back? This problem is in our youth and all our institutions. It may as well be in our blood and water systems. The direness of the situation can hardly be overstated. Meanwhile, comedy shops thrive by redirecting the concern. Evil is hammering at the gate, but Americans are entertained and laughing. Don't trust anyone under 60.

Anonymous said...

Obama was not chosen by an informed electorate. He was manufactured for a LoFo electorate. A LoFo electorate is not capable of electing a leader. It is capable of electing a front man for sheep dealers. We will not in the foreseeable future have an electorate that is capable of electing a president who would lead us to restore human freedom and dignity. The road we are on cannot take us to that place. There are dark and dangerous woods all around. It's probably time for Galt Gulchers to make allies with Native Americans.

Anonymous said...

We are not nice guys, nor is Obama a nice guy. Obama is a cold herder of sheep. Must we become cold herders of herders? Obama people will not allow freedom lovers a homeland, either in America or in Israel. We are the fading remnant of Chief Joseph. LoFo Obama people will not leave us in peace, so we must identify them for the stone cold LoFos and subjugation monkeys that they are. We must expel them, put tight strings upon them, disrupt our cooperation with them, or hide and wait while they implode. Meanwhile, the Field ever avails ever tightening connections. Will it perfect a global strait jacket, or will it implode? Scientists are becoming consensus captives. Feed lot technology is overtaking human freedom and decency. Will our technology ever avail mountain people, hidden gulches, and primitive areas that are not zoos? Might Native Americans become natural allies with Galt Gulchers?

Anonymous said...

While there seems no limit on the possible number of iterative permutations of inter functionings of perspectives of consciousness, I wonder how "separate" each perspective really is. The quality of being a perspective of consciousness seems to partake of one common aspect or identity. Consciousness is consciousness. I wonder how separate each iteration "really" is, as opposed simply to being a mathematically renormalized expression of a singular reconciling quality? The measurable reality we participate in creating may consist of iterative expressions of the present state of mind of a reconciling function of the one consciousness of which we all partake. When our present perspectives are primitive, that may express an iterative shadow of a present state of apprehension in the reconciling consciousness. Insofar as evolution of avatars of communication seems necessarily to be bloody in tooth and claw, it may be that complete escape from the primitive is not possible, even for the Reconciler. Not if anything is to compete to be carried forward as a communication of harmonies and apprehensions.

Anonymous said...

A question begged is: what is the quality of chaos? I qualitatively intuit, but cannot measurably demonstrate, that the Reconciler its/his/herself is appreciatively purposeful. I think immeasurably appreciative reconciliation is a key qualitative factor for how chaos sets forth paths and patterns that can be appreciated as purposeful. Self fulfilling purposefulness seems to orbit along a path of cyclic feedback. Faith and meaningfulness are inextricably linked to a quality whose works can be seen but not measurably attributed, which may sometimes be called chaos. If there is a qualitative difference between an atheist and a person of faith, it would seem to be in the believer's bootstrapping, self fulfilling faith in a reconciling meaningfulness. That is, an attitudinal disposition towards optimistic purposefulness.

Anonymous said...

Beingness seems to unfold as the reconciled effect of purposeful observers apprehensively functioning in respect of a shared context. This "observer effect" is reconciled, whereby particularly vectored perspectives are reconciled to their holistic context. I would call this the "observer-purpose-context effect." Because that effect is trivalent, I don't think truth can be set in stone in any bright line between matter and consciousness, between preset laws and contemporaneously determined unfoldings, or between subconsciously conditioned preferences and consciously manipulated (conspiratorial?) outcomes.

Unless God were an ultimate and punitive conspirator, that which fires minds to common courses is not conspiracy-in-itself, but apprehensions of feedback from unfolding patterns of fractals. Conspiracies do unfold, but I doubt they follow any predetermination of the alpha and the omega. Rather, there is a dance of appreciative feedback between patterns of consciousness and measurable significations in their communications. Morality and Truth are invisible hands functioning with a material glove. The hand-in-glove effect is observed and often credited as "conspiracy." While patterns are measurably mainfest, their unfoldings are not necessarily consciously predetermined. Rather, many patterns are reconciled in concert with contemporaneously shared apprehensions. Strictly speaking, I don't think we have either free will or predetermination. So there is no such thing as "conspiracy in itself." Rather, I suspect our human freedom and dignity are qualitative functions of how we participate as appreciative avatars of contemporaneous co-determination. (The better shorthand label for that may be "conscious will," rather than "free will.")

Regardless, "levers of determination" are being consolidated into a kind of meta machine of collectivism. Fewer and fewer people are being positioned to push and pull levers of all significant institutions of collective civilization (including institutions of banks, foundations, academia, media, moral persuasion, and regulatory enforcement). The participatory influence of individuals who measure themselves as being distant from such levers of influence seems less direct. Thus, people who measure themselves as being distant from levers of influence often think those who are seated with their hands on such levers are operating in unison, in order to effect some nefarious and preplanned conspiracy. No doubt, some planners ARE more powerfully seated than others. Indeed, I suspect most people in seats of power DO presently tend to be disposed to want to continue to benefit by farming people collectively.) Yet, all are subject to an unfolding and qualitative dance, i.e., an "observer-purpose-context effect." Even so, every competent mind that can apprehend can contribute to communicate such apprehensions as are to be reconciled. Apprehensions that "make sense" will be pushed forward --- but not before their time. (For example, I doubt the time for apprehending this comment has arrived. Say what?)

Anonymous said...

The thing is, international socialism and crony corporatism are becoming interchangeable labels for pursuing the same thing: the feed-lot farming of human beings. I don't think human freedom and dignity are "progressing," nor do I think that losing appreciation for transcendent spiritual values is "progress." The life of a cow in a feed lot is less violent. Numerically, there may be many more cattle now raised in feed lots or confined to pastures than there were in the early days of the Texas Longhorns. No doubt, feed lot cattle are bred (and soon to be genetically modified) to be peaceable and easily led. Until a disease spreads, like Mad Cow disease, the number of years of modern cow life will greatly exceed the years of Longhorn life. However, I am not sure I would call the life of a feed lot cow qualitatively better than the life of a Longhorn. I suspect it's only "better" (or fitter) once the cows are bred to it.

Being bred to the feed lot, cows learn to feel "entitlted" to their feed and pasturage. They would become unable to cope without the gay fences, brands, and neuterings that are imposed by their rancher. I don't credit this to "progress" or to the better angels of cow nature. Nor do I see much freedom or dignity in it. Of course, cows are not taught about freedom and dignity. Nor, for that matter, are collectivized human beings. If taught (or conditioned to) anything, they are taught that gay and neutered cow sex and devotion to fattening grains is good. Their glands lead them to moo in unison. I don't think this kind of increase in peaceableness and harmonic glandular pleasuring correlates with an increase in personal virtue or collective merit.

Nor do I think collectivist farming of human beings correlates in the long run with increased life spans. All that nature needs to debunk that correlation is time to promote a few more bugs and plagues to strike at bottlenecks of common dependencies on technological pipelines. The godless feed lot and the genetically-designed-for-collectivized-civilization human being is not necessarily the apex of merit or the progress of "better angels." I don't think there is virtue in capitalism without respect for transcendent values and the traditional family. Take away God and the family and what you are left with is the farming of the human feed lot. I wonder, will that be gay enough for our Ivy profs?

Anonymous said...

No government can afford to underwrite all the bad decisions of its citizenry unless it undertakes to regulate all the decisions of its citizenry. This is the inescapable result of embracing the NWO. For every Big Bro, there is first a Big Momma.

Anonymous said...

We will know we are in Prog Heaven when our generals are 4 star Geisha girls and our chief poppy is a chooming panderista doing fandangos south of the border.

Anonymous said...

In the name of not punishing the child, we incent the mom to produce 10 more. In the name of not punishing the mom, we abort 10 more. Government: whatever would we do without it?

Anonymous said...

Re: "not be surprised to find that there is little will to be concerned with more than the pursuit of whatever brings a moment of pleasure"

Look under the hood of the skull of a Militant-Prog-Athest-Homosexual and the ONLY thing you will find is a full inventory of tools for rationalizing every deviant behavior imaginable. For an MPAH, nothing is worthwhile unless it can somehow be twisted into position for being smoked or screwed. Snicker fi.

Anonymous said...

Real charities work to get sponsored derelicts off the dole. But government sees derelicts as voters. So government works to recruit derelicts to the dole. Government works to spread orphanages by encouraging run away parents. Once government becomes top heavy, it "invests" in taskmasters to work orphans to turn a profit. That is the cycle of serfdom for the irredeemably stupid and sinful. It may be possible to escape or divorce such a land, but such a land, once so corrupted, cannot be reformed by any mere mortal. In trying to nation-build heathens, Westerners are heathenizing their own lands. Fence out heathens who want to elect heathens! False charity cannot reform them, but it will empower them to despise you all the more. There is no "path to citizenship" for becoming a free thinking American once one has been raised to be an irredeemable derelict. The more Obama is shown the error of his ways, the more he and his followers despise free thinking Americans. His ilk come here not to become Americans, but to cannibalize Americans. A tic does not admire its host. It despises and devours its host.

Anonymous said...

As children become the moist property of the state, marriage becomes a problematic, even meaningless, appendix. Once children are made mere property, there is no reason they cannot be farmed out to homosexual gardens.

Anonymous said...

Re: "administration is proactively replacing anyone in the upper echelons who does not sign on to their agenda"

It's a Catch 22 Ratchet Racket: First, these guys have to be brought on board, in the name of diversity. Then, once they are on board, the only persons they will promote are those who are like them. Apparently, generations that did not sacrifice, but to whom much was given, are trying to merit what they have been given ... by giving it away ... to people whose only claim to meriting it is that they are "entitled" to it. Obamanuts have no gravity. They suck everything as an entitlement, as a walking Aids contagion against which our collective so far has no effective antibody.

Anonymous said...

The mind of someone who has been conditioned to accept the shame that is Islam has necessarily been made impervious to attacks that would shame Islam. A mind that has been bent to accept the justice of obvious injustice will likely never be able to grow out of the bend.

Anonymous said...

To advertise that one has no values that disagree with streaming propaganda is to let it be known that one is willing to do whatever the regime asks, with no standards that would get in the way. On the other hand, to mention that one does have standards apart from the propaganda stream is to put oneself on the regime's do not promote list. Obama became prez by celebrating everything and never defending a standard of decency unless it was popular with the propaganda stream for a collectivist people's republic. Whatever insults the traditional values of individually competent people, the Obamanats are quick to glom onto it.

Dlanor said...

Test

Anonymous said...

People who are too disappointed to believe in or stand for anything tend to want to deconstruct everything for everyone else.

Dlanor said...

An electromagnetic web of increasing complexity among interconnecting functions is exponentially growing around Earth. Call it the Emagosphere. It is self organizing, not entropically dissipating. How will individual perspectives of consciousness be bent to report to it?