Sunday, April 20, 2014

Immanent Reality



IMMANENT REALITY:

VALUE:  Inspiration of consciousness is the value of understanding that the character of our limits consists not in science but in our apprehensions of math and spirituality.

EMERGENT REALITY:  What is physical reality?  Is it an emergent that is derivative of something "more real," but less measurable?  Are photon bits physically real and radiative across real distances in space-time?

CONCEPTUALIZING PHYSICAL PARTICLES AS MATHEMATICAL FORM-ULAS:  It seems particles may reasonably be conceptualized as bits of mathematical form-ulas that take on physically measurable attributes only upon interfunctioning among conservational contexts of consciousness.

CONSERVATIONAL SYSTEM OF FORM-ULAS:  A conservational system of form-ulas avails reconciliation in feedback among all levels and layers of signification by signifiers.  Such system is innately and qualitatively coextensive with all layers and levels of perspectives of consciousness.

ILLUSION OF SPACE-TIME: It appears that no sum of information that is collected from multiple photons is contained within any single photon.  Rather, Information subjective to a perspective appears to consist with such sum of photons as are actually conveyed to contact a recording lens or eye.  If the effect of magnification of images is due to lens pointing and focus adjustment, to affect which photons are locally and subjectively received and collected, then must the photons be actual, physical particles-in-themselves, actually travelling through space and time?  If one's rate of spin in space is affected, like a skater as one opens and closes one's arms, then must space-in-itself be real?  Or, may one reasonably maintain that time, distance, and physicality are illusions, secondary to consciousness plus math?  May space-time reasonably be conceptualized as a stubborn illusion, a derivative that is secondary to form-ulas that are fitted to avail sequential receptivity to one another under conditions of occupation by their locally renormalizing perspectives of consciousness?  May it reasonably be conceptualized that sequentiality and fitting of form-ulas to consciousness are what produce the effects that we interpret as events unfolding in space-time?

EXISTENCE:  Space-time-in-itself does not exist, except as a derivative, or practical illusion.  What exists with the perpetual present is mathematical sequentiality that is correlative with an appreciative capacity of consciousness to inhabit and effect forms of feedback.  The appreciative aspect of the universe of form-ulas that our perspectives of consciousness happen to occupy is the universe that we feed our thinking back to, that we tinker to apprehend.  Apart from the measurable expression of form-ulas, what is the appreciative aspect that actuates, transmits, and en-souls form-ulas and perspectives thereof, if not Holistic Reconciling Consciousness, i.e., God?

PERPETUAL POTENTIAL OF THE PRE-SENT:  In the perpetual present, God is immanent at all times.  What is potential in consciousness pertains to how consciousness happens to be guided to bond to particular fields of perspective and points of apprehensive view.  The process of changing and moving potentials among relational perspectives is unceasing.  It entails a Holistic Reconciler, guiding and making ready the environment of sequential form-ulizations out of which perspectives of consciousness emerge. Thus, the potential for emergence of consciousness among locally relational perspectives is not evidence that the Holistic Reconciler (God) has not always abided with the perpetual present.

EVOLUTION OF SEQUENTIAL PATTERNS OF FORCE MULTIPLICATION:  Every asymmetric pattern or system will have points where a single force, like a domino, would represent a potential for exertion of a multiplicative, destabilizing effect.  Depending on effective means of apparent force at hand, if the goal is massive immediate destabilization, then every pattern or form-ula has its weakest point.

LOCAL CONSCIOUSNESS BUILDING ON LOCAL CONSCIOUSNESS:  Local consciousness emerges with cycling systems of form-ulas that can store representations of Information as memory.  Local consciousness then draws on such memory, to favor purposeful selections in feedback response to pattern changes.  Artificial Intelligence will emerge in concert with new mathematical form-ulizations and programs, as the Holistic Reconciler guides such to come to pass.  It seems innately intuitive that God will avail feedback to conserve and guide such expressions of AI to the empathetic apprehension of God and personhood.


QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LIGHT AND SPACE AND TIME:  How do light photons alter their wavelengths to store information about that with which they come in radiative contact, and then signal such information to such receptors of conscious interpretation as happen to receive them?  How much information can be extracted from each photon, by processes of contextual and magnifying analysis?  How may parallax information be extracted?  What is a photon?  Is it a thing-in-itself?  Is a photon a kind of mathematically-based form or form-ula, that avails active, radiative transmission and communication of information across mathematically conservatory equality determinants?  In other words, is all that signifies, and that is signified, availed only because of, but not only from, forms of math (i.e., active form-ulas, i.e., math made active by entanglement with a mathematically immeasurable formulizer)?  We do not see any photon in itself.  We detect and interpret the mathematical sequentiality of its apparent path and the mathematical information it avails upon contactg with us.  We do not see any smallest particle.  Nor any edge of the cosmos.  Nor may we write an actual largest possible number.  Nor a smallest possible decimal.  In the here and now, what do we "really see" when a photon transmits information to our interpretation?

MAGNIFICATION OF POINT OF VIEW:  By repetitively magnifying with lenses that are curved, one can gather and focus more light.  More light can be gathered from a large mirror and delivered to the lenses.  The lenses can be arrayed in line, to multiply and refocus such gathering of information bearing photons.  In such process of collecting and focusing photons, one may collect and convey to one's eye those photons with which one would see and interpret an image of a distant object, were one closer to the object.  Thus, one may adjust one's focus, as if one were actually closer to an object being viewed.  Thus, a large mirror telescope can enable one to gather and focus more photons, to summarize information that is pertinent to the adjustment of the focus.  The way in which one points and adjusts one's gathering of focus would determine which information bearing photons one collects and interprets.  Such magnification, however, will be accompanied with distortion, attributable in part to magnification that collapses the background and in part to altering the eye's point of view by altering the focus.

HOW MUCH INFORMATION MAY A SINGLE PHOTON CONVEY:  May a single photon convey more than a single bit of on-off, yes-no, digital signalization?  A photon may be corkscrewed, i.e., spun, orbited, and rolled along various radiative axes.  Thus, it would seem that an advance receiver may be designed to receive more than a single bit of information from each photon.  Note that lenses gather and focus light, and can be adjusted and pre-prepared to do so in repetitions that select, sum, and magnify among pre-arranged radiations of photons.  Each re-focusing by each curved lens in line will affect and select the photons that are filtered for having their information summed and conveyed.  Some parallax effect will be filtered, then perhaps somewhat restored, then filtered again, and so on.  Depending on the quality of the method of telescopic telephoto analysis, how much differentiating parallax information may be extracted, modified, or even restored, from each photon and from the sum of photons availed for analysis?


RADIATION OF MATH BITS:  How are form form-ulas transmitted, received, interpreted?  Each photon may be conceptualized as a representation of math-formulas that radiate for communicating math formulas.  But math, in itself, does not radiate.  It seems some immeasurable, like a Holistic Reconciler of the Expression of Math Forms, must account for how math-bit-forms are interpreted as seeming to radiate, such as in a form that is interpreted to express such capacities as we measure and conceptualize with photons.  The illusion that math bits, as photons, radiate is a derivative of the immeasurable way in which the Holistic Reconciler qualitatively interfunctions to appreciate and apprehend unfolding expressions of mathematical, formulaic sequences in the feedback of the perpetual present.  Apart from the measurable expression of form-ulas, what is the appreciative aspect that actuates, transmits, and en-souls form-ulas and perspectives thereof, if not Holistic Reconciling Consciousness, i.e., God?

OF THE INFORMATION THAT IS CONVEYED BY PHOTONIC MATH BITS, WHAT IS IT THAT WE ACTUALLY APPREHEND AND "SEE":  We don't see objects in themselves.  We interpret information from photonic math bits that are presented to us, as if they had reflected from objects, which photons have their wavelengths altered by their reflections, and then our nerve reception systems renormalize and interpret the wavelength data received.  Except, we do not "see" the wavelengths.  Rather, our systems interpret the "impact" of the wavelength forms-formulas.  In effect, the transmissive communication is of form-formulas.  And the ultimate forms are not, "in themselves," of any measurable size.  No homunculous "sees" photons.  Rather, photonic math bits and interpretations of their paths of interfunctioning transmission are detected upon "contact" with senses or devices that happen to have become adapted for such purpose.  For a local perspective of consciousness to bond with a body necessitates that such local body sense and interpret interfunctions with photonic math bits as if they were radiating physical particles that had been transmitted to make contact with such body.  Our entire unfolding experience is like a simulation that is derivative of Consciousness as it appreciates, apprehends, and interfunctions with nothing more than formulations of systems of math.

NO OBJECT IN ITSELF:  Magnification affects parallax and perspective, but it does not bring any object-in-itself closer to a viewer, or a viewer closer to an object.  No object-in-itself really exists.  Thus, the appearance of bringing one's eye or lens or telescope closer to an object is a practical illusion that is derivative of consciousness interfunctioning with forms of math.  One does not get closer to any object in itself.  One simply interprets variously detailed, focused, interior, fractal perspectives of forms of math.


SPACE-TIME:  There is no space-time-in-itself that "really" presents.  Rather, what really presents to us is something that reconciles our experientiality so that we can renormalize communications regarding the sequentiality of interpretations of events.  That is, mathematical, economic tinkering on ways to communicate significations to other perspectives of consciousness.  The appearance of space-time mediates to preserve impressions and interpretations of separations in sequentiality, hence, separations in subjective perspectives of consciousness.


PARAMETER LIMITS:  What is the limit of analysis of a "massless" particle?  Is there a "smallest limit? Or may the make up of each photonic-math-bit devolve into a fuzz, to a phase shift analysis of sub sub sub "particles"?  May it be that each "photon" within a plate of photons (depending on magnification/perspective/analysis) may in potentiality convey incredible varieties of information, depending in large part on the contextual situation of the observer/interpreter/perspective of consciousness?

FOCUSING, RENORMALIZATION, AND RECONCILIATION OF INTERPRETATIONS OF CAUSE, EFFECT, AND CORRELATIONS:  Given great magnification, what interpretive differences may abide between an eyeball brought close to a distant object versus a magnification of presently experienced photons collected from afar?  What differences may abide, in sequential interpretation and parallax regarding relational maps of space and time and "cause and effect"?  If all presentation of causation is derivative of the interfunctioning of an immeasurable Holistic Reconciler with fields and forms of Math, then all local interpretations of causation are little more than apprehensions of correlative, Bayesian analysis.  That is, we cannot pinpoint or measure any locally specific cause-in-itselfWhat we can do is apprehend practical correlations.  Moreover, there is no specific or objective event-in-itself.  What we share are renormalized and reconciled interpretations (such as interpretations of the Moon).  We experience interpretations of sequentiality among perspectives of consciousness, bonded to an informationally shared and relative locus in space-time.  The appearance of spatial "distance" is derivative of the function of a mathematical relationship between each "distant" signal and each perspective of consciousness that is bonded to a relationally mediating locus in apparent space-time.  All appearance of space-time-matter-energy is secondary to mathematical forms of relationships that are actuated between communicating perspectives of consciousness.


COMMUNICATION AMONG LAYERS AND LEVELS OF CONSCIOUSNESS:  Perspectives of consciousness are inherently availed with levels and layers of form-ulas for apprehending and signifying communications among themselves.  The quality of a communication sent or received will vary depending on the contextual relationship between a mathematical locus of transmission versus a mathematical locus of reception.  Mathematical equations that are bonded or local to a perspective of consciousness inherently availl transmission of information across more encompassing, overlapping, or defining mediums and fields of equational functions.  A geometrical form communicates with a geometrical form and mathematically alters the representation of its form-ula.  And so on.  All significations are illusions for the contextually renormalizing appreciation of perspectives of consciousness.

RENORMALIZATION:  Each perspective of consciousness renormalizes, in respect of the Holistic Reconciler of such consciousness as we happen to share.  Each deals with meta math in respect of contemporaneous apprehension of here and now significations.  No one deals directly with meta math, except the Holistic Reconciler (God).  Yet, how each local perspective deals with here and now significations affects how God reconciles the meta.  What we apprehend are forms that are renormalized to our parameters.  Those forms may be conceptualized as actuated math, that is de-stabilized across equal and expanding conversion signs.  The "expansion" of our experience and universe is derivative of our unfolding of consciousness, as it is experienced in space-time.  Such expansion may entail perpetual phase shifts across parameters for innumerable possible expressions of shared cosmos.


GOD IN THE PERPETUAL PRESENT AND OUTSIDE OF TIME:  How does God interfunction with forms and fields of math? Were there a state where nothing were expressed, it would take an initial, borrowing, destabilization across the equality of nothingness in order to avail the expression of anything. Once Something were expressed, could, would, or should it ever settle back into a precise and perfect zero balancing of digital pluses and minuses? Or must it in perpetuity delay and resist any such perfectly symmetrical balancing out? Must all particular perspectives eventually reset to a single subsuming nothingness? Or must every purposeful or random attempt that tends towards a re-balancing into nothingness function like a perpetual-motion-destabilizing-machine? Could there ever have been a first de-stabilizing event, without its de-stabilizing function having forever been inherent to the cosmos? If inherent, can the function towards relativistically absolute change and de-stabilization ever cease? Must an inherent-meta-fictional-immeasurable-force-agent of change be accompanied by a mirror agent for resisting change, and vice versa? Must an inherent agency preclude a settlement back into a balanced nothingness?  What may such a agent and counter agent sponsor, in respect of mortal perspectives? Must it/they sponsor a perpetual process of conscious feedback between and among its/their holistically encompassing aspect and its particularly expressed aspects and perspectives?

May it be that there never was a symmetry-breaking destabilization, because there has always been Something, i.e., a meta sponsor of perpetual apprehensions and appreciations and effectuates of changes and re-normalizations and reconciliations? De-stabilization is inherently represented as digitized changes crossing the balancing scale of zero, with Zero Equality never itself being realized. In effect, Consciousness actuates formulas for transitioning across equalities. The math is actively actuated and delayed, like dominoes on spring strings.  The reconciling Holism that feeds back to guide us to adjust the math programs of our receptivity simultaneously adjusts the math programs for the signals it sends to us, for our reception.  As to the synchronization in itself, we cannot detect why or how such holistic synchronization is or should be the case.

THE SYSTEM PROGRAM:  The program seems to be both a priori and subject to phase shifts, transitions, new beginnings, and incremental influence-- perhaps even by us. That is, we also may experience capacity to program virtual worlds within subprograms of virtual worlds within virtual worlds. Like a fractal of never-ending conscious creativity. All within a Perpetual Present. We cannot all at once prove the cause of the system or program as a whole. But we can continuously tinker at the edges and in the fuzz. See Deutch, The Beginning of Infinity. Thus, there seems to be no particularly pre-set God. But if Consciousness is taken as God, and it is recognized that we are all of the same intuitive, empathetic Consciousness, then we are all subject to an entanglement with God.

FRESH FROM DELPHI -- IDENTITY AND SPIRITUAL CONTINUITY:  The nature of the form-ulas with which one identifies imposes limitations on one's capacity to move among apparent distances between apparent objects.  God's need for companionship and feedback in appreciation of meta points of view seems to cause temporal perspectives of consciousness to bond and identify with local bodies, that seem to be separate travelers across stubborn illusions of space-time.  Spiritual continuity is correlative with continuous change via continuously creative destruction.  A balancing act is necessary to preserve spiritual empathy for norms, even as it becomes necessary to participate in their change.  This necessitates Conservers of Liberty, i.e., those who advocate for that which is necessary to preserve a decent civilization that avails freedom and dignity.  It necessitates effective checks on behalf of individuals faised from infancy by families against tyrannies of collectivizing government.

CHRISTIANITY:  This seems not contrary to the essential message of Christianity. The Kingdom of God is within you. Beingness is entailed with a Trinity: programming Information, renormalizing experience of relationally measurable Substance, and qualitatively appreciating Consciousness. There is one common godhead. It's essential nature is in qualitative empathy. It is the Source. It carries on a personal relationship with each of us. It seems to be eternal. It seems to have a purpose: facilitate evolution towards empathetically civilized perspectives for experiencing and communicating empathies. It does this via feedback in pragmatic and discrete significations within the here and now. Morality abides in that which facilitates such guided and unfolding evolution. Judgment for how and when to avail phase shifts in the mathematical environment of programming that we share is subject to the judgment and Reconciliation of the godhead.





46 comments:

Anonymous said...

CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: The crucifixion may be conceptualized as the ultimate word regarding the necessity for creative destruction.

IDENTITY AND SPIRITUAL CONTINUITY: The nature of the form-ulas with which each one of us identifies imposes limitations on our capacity to move among apparent distances between apparent objects. God's need for companionship and feedback in appreciation of meta points of view seems to cause temporal perspectives of consciousness to bond and identify with local bodies, that seem to constitute separate travelers across stubborn illusions of space-time. Spiritual continuity is correlative with continuous change via continuously creative destruction. A balancing act is necessary to preserve spiritual empathy for norms, even as it becomes necessary to participate in their change and eventual transcendence. This necessitates Conservers of Liberty, i.e., those who advocate for that which is necessary to preserve a decent civilization that avails freedom and dignity. It necessitates effective checks on behalf of individuals, raised from infancy by families, against tyrannies of collectivizing government.

CHRISTIANITY: This seems not contrary to the essential message of Christianity: The Kingdom of God is within you. Beingness is entailed with a Trinity: programming Information, renormalizing experience of relationally measurable Substance, and qualitatively appreciating Consciousness. There is one common godhead. It's essential nature is in qualitative empathy. It is the Source. It carries on a personal relationship with each of us. It seems to be eternal. It seems to have a purpose: facilitate evolution towards civilized perspectives for experiencing and communicating empathies. It does this via feedback in pragmatic and discrete significations within the here and now. Morality abides in that which facilitates such guided and unfolding evolution. Judgment for how and when to avail phase shifts in the mathematical environment of programming that we share is subject to the judgment and Reconciliation of the godhead. We happen to be living during a time of great and necessary change.

Anonymous said...

Progs are wishing America to the conrfield. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_C34g5mz1ZQ The politics of juvenile, anarchistic Progs is to try to invalidate Conservatives' politics, as unlawful and impossible attempts to establish religion by legislating morality and family friendly values. Progs deem this to be hate speech against their preferred lifestyles of parasitism and dissolution of all that can sustain a republic against fascistic, two-class socialism. On the other hand, Progs deem that legislation that dissolves family friendly incentives to marry and raise responsible children is just dandy. Because Progs deem their political interests not based in religious or moral values, their positions reduce to this: Free speech for me, the enlightened, but not for thee, thou wretched villain. Sadly, "tolerant" citizens are letting puerile Progs get away with this travesty.

Anonymous said...

Reminiscent of Chris Matthews asking Kirk Watson to name an achievement of Obama. .
www.youtube.com/watch?v=TlpN3p...

Of course, since that time, Obama has utterly failed to stem the red ink, alienated friends, stirred up the middle east, crapped on health care, and set back race relations for years. He has weakened, indebted, endangered, divided, confounded, and demoralized our nation and the world. He would do better as a pigeon on a chess board, who thinks he's a beauty contestant, reminding a madhouse electorate and a western civ of metrosexuals that he "won."

Hillary's accomplishment was to hold Obama's hand while they told audacious lies to misdirect the public about Ben Ghazi. In years to come, they can co-write The Audacity of Lies.

Anonymous said...

The motto for crooked brokers in Glengary Glen Ross was "always be closing." For rotten, race-baiting, immigrant-baiting, Prog-DinoRino-border-erasers, the motto is "always be parasitizing." When I listen to Sotomayor, I hear the buzz of a blood sucker.

Anonymous said...

Of course we have enough to pay our national debt. All we have to do is continue to sell out our nation and our freedom. Slaves need not worry about debt, because they are already wholly owned. The despicable, self-godded Oregime of DinoRinos hates the idea of a republic that serves the interests of ordinary free thinkers, because it knows free thinkers will not long be fooled or controlled by the regime unless the force of hate is applied in mass against them.

Anonymous said...

Yelling descrimination is their best knife for carving white turkey. Many Americans are fed up with being carved up.

Anonymous said...

They look for racism because they want to find it. They want to find it because they want to justify what cannot be justified: Refusing to grow up and get off the special treatment teat.

Anonymous said...

Other than to stoke racial fires in order to continue to write about racial fires, what good do these race baiters do? They don't improve a damn thing! What they do is try to continue to justify special treatment laws and entitlements for all whiners who do not want to have to work hard in order to get ahead. If you don't want to be treated as a whiner, then stop whining! Regardless, no more special race based treatment. No mas. Obama and Holder's antics have set back race relations. They have damaged America. They will not get me to want to use central gov to promote more special programs restricted to certain races. Gov has proved beyond all doubt that such programs are counterproductive -- unless your goal, like Obama, is to live as a race baiting con artist. Whiners will, however, earn my loathing as whiners. "It's the whining culture, stupid."

Anonymous said...

I think I see the theory. But reality is more messy in how it unfolds. In reality, we have an income tax under which Congress has provided for spouses to be able to file jointly. Whether or not there is a benefit to that, gays say they have a right to do the same. But I rather doubt that Congress intended such a thing. So it is not a legal right, nor an unalienable right. And it seems to me to make rational sense that Congress may reasonably intend to encourage traditional marital unions for raising succeeding generations. Now, should judges, or Eric Holder, or Obama with his pen, take it on themselves to "fix" this as a matter of "equal protection?" And when a state calls gay unions marriages, must fed law then entitle such unions to a fed status of married filing jointly? I don't think so. nor do I think Congress should "fix" this. IAE, gays will continue to insist that this (and every other possible issue of equal fairness) be addressed. This assault by militant gays, whiny metrosexuals, and poorly instructed children will not subside by ignoring it, nor by punting it to the Constitution. And, regardless of how it unfolds, it will not satisfy all the little weiner whiners who want to make a central federal case and law out of every possible issue of "fairness." Just because Republicans don't want to fight such issues does not mean that Progs will stop. And they will not stop. No whiny child ever stops until his parents firmly say, No! Parents who say, "Do whatever you want, but I don't want to hear about it!" will raise whiny children who will never grow up and will be burdens forever. If Congress does not sink the republic with amnesty, and if family size trends continue, maybe the republic will be salvaged as the electorate gradually grows older and wiser.

Anonymous said...

It's a problem when every issue that Is on the wrong side of what Progs want is made illigitimate for consideration in the public square merely by the magic of calling them issues that pertain to morality --- as if that label by itself should discredit all such issues from social consideration in the public square.

The regime is doing all it can to replace the family with the government. This is a major cause of spending, which a republic, to remain a republic rather than a banana despotism, cannot afford. The regime has spent gov money to train lofos to look to gov, to revile standards of common decency, and to destroy minority families. Those are fundamental, driving social issues. Swamping us with illegal alien lofos is a major social issue. Failing to address the crony corporatism that is deliberately and with malice aforethought destroying the fabric of middle class society is a social issue. The solution is not to roll over and let the gay mafia and cannibal crony corporatists splinter all norms that bind society and make us a nation by calling all moral issues illegitimate to the public square.

Lofos toss about a slogan that you cannot legislate or regulate morality. Maybe that's why kids from lofo families so often seem to have been raised to be so screwy. From there, some lofos intimate that any attempt to regulate or moderate morality is an insult to their chosen lifestyle or religion. Thus, they can parade and shove their stuff into our kids' classrooms, but it is hate speech or an unlawful establishment of religion to parade to oppose them. That is nutty.

Anonymous said...

The regime is doing all it can to replace the family with the government. This is a major cause of spending, which a republic, to remain a republic rather than a banana despotism, cannot afford. The regime has spent gov money to train lofos to look to gov, to revile standards of common decency, and to destroy minority families. Those are fundamental driving social issues. Swamping us with illegal alien lofos is a major social issue. Failing to address the crony corporatism that is deliberately and with malice aforethought destroying the fabric of middle class society is a social issue. These imbalances in social forces do not get resolved in any decent way by treating social conservatives as unwanted step children. Or by expecting all would be well if we just pushed concerned people out of the way and let crony depraved corporatists rule the roost. The solution is not to roll over and let the gay mafia and hedging corporatists splinter all norms that bind society and make us a nation.

Anonymous said...

Our society is at grave risk because of corruption pretending to be wisdom. Especially in the businesses of banking, stock brokering, and real estate. Cutting spending by the central government would help, but Rinos do not really seem so intent on cutting spending or decentralizing government. No child left behind was a Republican idea. Mainly, Rinos just have different pet predators to feed. Indeed' Rinos want to flood the electorate with new immigrant Dim voters. Some of the corruption in real estate may be mitigated by the three day period for a buyer to change his mind. That kind of arrangement is not feasible in the flash transaction marketplace. Perhaps a tax on moneys transferred out of country might slow some of the cleaning out of the country..

Regardless, detailed regulations by central fascist rulers is no answer to the cauldron of greed mixing with corruption. The only real deterrent to that consists in respect for assimilated higher values, i.e., spirituality that is inculcated forward among infants by caring parents. The institution of the god-respecting family is the only real deterrent against the fascist greed and corruption of central government. The most important thing the people can do is to stop allowing fascists to exclude the secular values of people of good spiritual faith from the public square. Good faith pertains to what advocates and their flocks really believe. Not what they are forced to pretend to believe in if they wish to keep their necks

Anonymous said...

To control how facts are reported is to control what is barked as social and economic "science." The Oregime thinks that it will save us if only we will believe in it. As it resorts to corrupt reporting of facts, it will come to resort to witch hunts. The Gay Mafia will become the new Red Guards and Grand Inquisitors. Anyone whose faith is in a spirituality higher than the Oregime will be marked a heretic. For Obama so loved fascist socialism that he sacrificed his only begotten census.

Anonymous said...

If each person's goal is to pursue a quality civilization for himself and his progeny and fellows, I should think that population numbers must be held, after awhile, to be ridiculous. Surely, we need not pursue cramming earth with every last human being it can possibly feed. Please. A little common sense. People ought to be taught to be responsible. That is, don't bring children into the world that you have no expectation of supporting and raising. We have more than enough Dims already.

Anonymous said...

The Koch Brothers produce products. Look at some of the billionaires who support Dims. What do they produce? Read Flash Boys. And Trading with the Enemy. Then watch Glengarry Glen Ross (caution -- bad language -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v... and Wolf of Wall Street. Then tell me how these guys and Fed Reserve bankers "merit" their profits, made by corrupt people selling blue sky and political crap to ignorant, doped out, loser Dims.

Anonymous said...

CREATIVE DESTRUCTION: The crucifixion may be conceptualized as the ultimate word regarding the necessity for creative destruction.

EXISTENTIALITY: Space-time-in-itself does not exist, except as a derivative, or stubborn but practical illusion. What exists with the perpetual present is mathematical sequentiality that is correlative with an appreciative capacity of consciousness to inhabit and effect forms of feedback, i.e., the Mind of God.

IDENTITY AND SPIRITUAL CONTINUITY: The nature of the form-ulas with which each one of us identifies imposes limitations on our capacity to move among apparent distances between apparent objects. God's need for companionship and feedback in appreciation of meta points of view seems to cause temporal perspectives of consciousness to bond and identify with local bodies, that seem, no matter their relative size, when measured against the cosmos, to constitute ridiculously tiny yet separate travelers across stubborn illusions of space-time. Spiritual continuity is correlative with continuous change via continuously creative destruction. A balancing act is necessary to preserve spiritual empathy for norms, even as it becomes necessary to participate in their change and eventual transcendence. This necessitates Conservers of Liberty, i.e., those who advocate for that which is necessary to preserve a decent civilization that avails freedom and dignity. It necessitates effective checks on behalf of individuals, raised from infancy by families, against tyrannies of collectivizing government.

CHRISTIANITY: This seems not contrary to the essential message of Christianity: The Kingdom of God is within you. Beingness is entailed with a Trinity: programming Information, renormalizing experience of relationally measurable Substance, and qualitatively appreciating Consciousness. There is one common godhead. It's essential nature is in qualitative empathy. It is the Source. It carries on a personal relationship with each of us. It seems to be eternal. It seems to have a purpose: facilitate evolution towards civilized perspectives for experiencing and communicating empathies. It does this via feedback in pragmatic and discrete significations within the here and now. Morality abides in that which facilitates such guided and unfolding evolution. Judgment for how and when to avail phase shifts in the mathematical environment of programming that we share is subject to the judgment and Reconciliation of the godhead. We happen to be living during a time of relatively great and necessary change.

Anonymous said...

It seems relations with and among minorities get worse the more the gov intrudes. The race "conversation" by race baiters has done more harm than good. It seems the only way to get people to grow up is to get gov off their backs. The more people think gov should entitle them, the more they divide into caucuses and enclaves. Our failure to decentralize gov and restore the family is greasing us towards a madhouse.

Anonymous said...

We need less central gov, more revenue sharing with the states, and effective strategies to restore the middle class and wean people who can work but who are not working to return to work. We need to break up the top-bottom, oligarch-serf, two-party war against middle class values. Otherwise, nothing can divert most of us from the road to serfdom.

Anonymous said...

To trade fairly, I think one needs to have something to trade. An infant trades with cute coos and sympathetic cries. If that's all the infant ever learns, the coos and cries soon grow old and of little value for any trade, fair or otherwise. Civilization is a competitive jungle with a cooperative safety net. A child who never learns how to compete for himself while defending rather than abusing the safety net has nothing to trade with his civilization, fair or otherwise. If fairness is akin to being charitable with the civil system, then it does not tend to be well expressed by usurping authority to redistribute other people's money to such a point as to destroy the familial institution and the accultured mores out of which fairness is taught. Replacing middle-class, family taught fairness with two-class rule of "wise" despots is conducive, I think, to serfdom, not fairness. The coos and cries of infants are not cute to a detached, generally centralized government that is more concerned with the "perfect" system of widget management. Without the bonding and assimilative effect of family and culture, a system of artificially intelligent managers will be programmed to be singularly ruthless. The Bomb has temporarily stifled some of our competive impulses that are not adequately moderated or softened by familial bonding. As the family institution breaks down, so will that softening influence. That, in turn, will necessitate much greater distrust and, therefore, governmental invasions of privacy. A similar challenge applies to our competiton towards developing singularly intelligent A.I. We need an assimilative culture that will restore familial bonding. I think that is not a multi-culture of people who incline to exploit collectivism so that they need never to have to grow up to become anything more than serfs for rulers.

REFLECTIVE EQUILIBRIUM: See http://intelligence.org/summar...
"Possible bootstrapping algorithms include “do what we would have told you to do if we knew everything you knew,” “do what we would’ve told you to do if we thought as fast as you did and could consider many more possible lines of moral argument,” and “do what we would tell you to do if we had your ability to reflect on and modify ourselves.” In moral philosophy, this notion of moral progress is known as reflective equilibrium."

Anonymous said...

Cameras can spot plates and be hooked with programs to bill tolls to vehicle owners, so toll roads are probably economically feasible. Turning them over to the States would lead States to lease them for long terms to private companies. In the short tun, this would bring more political cronyism to the States, more foreign bidding for control over our infrastructure, and more hard wired selling out of our country.

This could be mitigated if there were checks and balances adequate to defend the republic and its constituent states against the kind of international corporate collectivism that is hell bent to erase all national boundaries. Unfortunately, there are not. So the open border, open society, crony cannibalism and corporate collectivism will continue. Sort of like a new amalgam of Naziism, Bolshevism, and New Dealism. That is, the dirty dream of race-to-the-bottom Nazi financiers. This is so elite corporatists can lead us to our "collective salvation," of course. The "added value" they bring will be the safety of our collective incarceration.

Anonymous said...

Maureen has no credibility until she eats her own steaming pile of humble pie, filled with all her idiotic love affair with the Prog tendency to call everyone she disagrees with a racist.

Dowd -- "I’ve been loath to admit that the shrieking lunacy of the summer — the
frantic efforts to paint our first black president as the Other, a
foreigner, socialist, fascist, Marxist, racist, Commie, Nazi; a cad who
would snuff old people; a snake who would indoctrinate kids — had much
to do with race."

Apparently, it is "racist" to recognize that: Obama believes the Muslim call to prayer is the most beautiful sound in the world; he thinks equality of results is more important than equality of opportunity; he assured Putin he could be more flexible once he was reelected; he has appointed commies among his czars; he stirs up racial divisions; he has an agenda for preventing opposing political speech by investigating it as hate speech; he stonewalls investigations into abuses under the IRS; he is a tool of corporate collectivizers (as were the Nazis) in order to politically favor their business manipulations (Keystone pipeline).

Anonymous said...

I wonder whether the Nazis and Bolsheviks had similar programs for detecting and preventing anti-regime hate speech. When Progs become the executors of the law, the law gets executed.

Anonymous said...

A regime that fabricated the film flim flam about Ben Ghazi cannot be trusted to tell the truth about bin Laden or anything else. Every Obama presser should end with a question: Why should we believe you? No doubt, CBS would soon equate that with being racist. Hey hey ho ho, this racist crapola has got to go.

Anonymous said...

America is now filled with enablers of whiners. So much so that we have put them in charge of delivering us to the spiritually dead olizombies who print our money and sell out our nation.

Anonymous said...

Race baiters want me to care. They want to fan flames to claim entitlement to special favors to the end of time. But I don't care. If you are black and want to make a good life in America, you can. Ditto with any other race. This crap will never stop and whiners will never grow up until more people say "I don't care." Sterling has been branded and exiled. That is enough. Period. Now go back to work. Or writing anti-Whitey rap crap. But race baiters will not. They do not want to reform Sterling's heart. They do not want to make him a better man. They want to use him to ride a gravy train, and they will ride it until the gravy stops. So stop the gravy. There are plenty of evil people in the world. Whining will not change that. Nor can mere law change it in a Prog-Oligarchic Society, which is, almost by definition, largely a lawless churning of spoils.

Anonymous said...

Re: The Benghazi reaction was an example of that. Immediately, they have to lie, even to the extent of denying free speech, perhaps the most fundamental of our rights. Even if that video HAD caused the attack, the proper response would have been "free speech is what the U.S. stands for. Get used to it." (Bold added.)

Truth! Well said. Muslims have to lie about their "faith" so they can keep their necks. Dim locusts for corporate collectivists have to lie so they can eat the republic. Islam and corporate collectivism both need to keep their societies filled with locusts. American bankers and industrialists enabled I.G. Farben to empower Hitler. They're doing much the same, again, with China. The nemesis of American liberty is Chinese style corporate collectivism, taught by American oligarchs. Our real nemesis is not communism, because communism has neve existed, except as a tale of fairies and dragons, sold by oligarchs and idiots. If Americans want liberty, they are going to have to pull it out of the fire that is fueled by the lies of oligarchs.

Anonymous said...

This Ben Ghazi revelation should be a big story with big legs. But the owner of the LA Clippers is getting all the media oxygen. Media is so contrived! Regime despots have dossiers and contingency plans to neutralize every threat to the NWO. I wonder: In what dark hole was the regime storing its film flim flam for maximum opportunity? The Regime probably has ideas for creating racism stories at the drop of a hat, on an as needed basis. The republic is being murdered, and meanwhile the media is breathlessly wringing its hands about how some racists feel about one another. We could be exposing and exiling political despots. Instead, the media has everyone watching ringside ethnic taunts. The purpose is two-fold: Divert attention, and intimidate everyone not to stick their necks out on anything that the media might be able to spin into a race, ethnic, gender, homo card. It's time to unplug the central machine.

Anonymous said...

The Regime is illegitimate and filled with fraud: Fraud about circumstances of birth, education, merit, faith, religion. Voting fraud out the wazu. Immigration fraud. National defense fraud. Fraud even to its true believers. Fraud about laws and pen powers. Fraud about equality (the regime means to rule).

The Regime and Congress are paid by the same lying paymasters, using faux money that is based on the world's faith and trust in ordinary producing Americans. This criminal charade is funded by taking advantage of our trust. This band of criminals has groomed our children. Congress will do nothing that is effective. To be effective, the whole rotten mess in DC would have to be exposed, and Congress will never volunteer for that. I am dismayed if Cruz's wife works for Goldman Sachs.

The wolves of the streets of DC will not self reform. And they will tarnish all outside reformers. We need a thousand, nay, tens of millions, of Clive Bundys who have had enough! Please don't advocate that a flat tax, in and by itself, is enough to protect us from these sucking open wound scumbuzzard criminal frauds.

Anonymous said...

Banking, stocks, insurance, real estate, utility energy, big technology. These fields attract corporate collectivist rinodinohedgers, whose religious purpose is to farm people. We have seen these bloodsucking corporate collectivists before, among the Nazis, Bolsheviks, and New Dealers. They run the institutions and warp the minds of our children. And if you try to stand against them, they can blow you away. Are femimen hobbled by PC going to scare them? Not a chance in hell. What may rout them? People made righteous in their Reconciler, who are willing to fire them in their hubristic pride. They will be kindled in due time by their own dry, soul dead rot. Meantime, they smell the destruction of America at hand. Just a few more easily bribed immigrant ignoranti to turn Texas blue, and you can kiss Camelot and human freedom and dignity back to the mists of legend.

Anonymous said...

There are paymasters to serve. Pull the curtain back and look at the corporatists operating the collectivist show. American corporatists were (and are) thick with soul stupefying Naziism, Bolshevism, and New Dealism. We don't have corporatism or collectivism. What we have is corporate collectivism. There's no business like big pull business. Rather than representation, the productive middle class is being treated, softened, and dumbified with new versions of head spinning bread and circuses, i.e., rap and crap. Any kind of diverse deviance you want, they've got it.

Anonymous said...

The video at http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2014/04/27/microclimates-of-totalitarianism/2/ explains how Politically Correct Critical Theory is used exclusively to fit a narrative for targeting Western Civ. This is why other cultures, includiing Islamic, are not targeted by Prog tools: Their agenda is not advanced by Bolshevik revolutions in third world states. To advance the Prog agenda in order to ring in the "salvation of the collective" (and enrichment of false prophesying predators), they must first bring down the republics of Western Civ. They convince their useful idiots that bringing down the cultures of the republics of Western Civ will open the way for a collective flowering. Their useful idiots are blind to the fact that it is Western Civ that has lifted many third worlders out of abject desperation. They are impervious to the danger of plunging the entire world back into a dark milennium. The more they succeed, the more the oligarchy becomes powerful and the more the middle class becomes sick. Seeing how more people are falling out of the middle class, their prescription is to continue to bleed the patient. Unless stopped, the axis of godless oligarchs and idiot critical theorists will be the death of human decency.

Anonymous said...


Many universities have succumbed to insipid stupidity. When Jews succumb, people tend to notice more. As persecuted as Jews have been, one would hope more among them would learn to tell the difference between their friends versus their persecutors, and that they would not encourage obsequious toleration of those who wish to tolerate them out of existence. What sense can it make, in effect, to support and vote for those who want to end support for your right to vote? Repressively over tolerant metros are going to be the repressive death of the republic.

What is at work is an evil axis of oligarchs and useful idiots, which has long been promoting politically correct critical theory. An excellent video describes what has been hornswaggling every decent republic of Western Civ. See the video at http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/.... It explains how Politically Correct Critical Theory is used exclusively to fit a narrative for targeting Western Civ.

This is why other cultures, includiing Islamic, are not targeted by Prog tools: Their agenda is not advanced by Bolshevik revolutions in third world states. To advance the Prog agenda in order to ring in the "salvation of the collective" (and enrichment of false prophesying predators), they must first bring down the republics of Western Civ. They convince their useful idiots that bringing down the cultures of the republics of Western Civ will open the way for a collective flowering.

Their useful idiots are blind to the fact that it is Western Civ that has lifted many third worlders out of abject desperation. They are impervious to the danger of plunging the entire world back into a dark milennium. The more they succeed, the more the oligarchy becomes powerful and the more the middle class becomes sick. Seeing how more people are falling out of the middle class, their prescription is to continue to bleed the patient. Unless stopped, the axis of godless oligarchs and idiot critical theorists will be the death knell of human decency.

Anonymous said...

The Godless, the Gullible, and the Good: Too many among the Good have become girly men, so they are being reduced to grunts for the Godless and the Gullible. Eastwood needs to bring out his empty chair again and grok this out, to wake more Glam Men up to how we are being choom groomed and grifted by crude dudes.

Anonymous said...

The goal of rulers is to increase their power by weakening the ties that bind traditional families and society. That is, to make the fiat of elites and the laws of the gov they control superior over society. The goal of the gullible low class lofos and socially immature youths they recruit as troopers is to force tantrums on society. Working together, godless elites and gullible lofos are constant threats for destroying every decent society. Decency is often thus replaced with a despotism of the most inhumane godless and gullible possible. Few care what homos do in privacy. Few homos care about keeping gov small. What militant homos want is the goose stepping power to replace family based society with fascist rule under godless elites who deploy the gullible brawn of the most socially irresponsible and depraved. Meanwhile, witless feminists and metrosexual men "tolerate" this repressive toleration that excites and eroticizes deviant destroyers. These faux enlightened fools will be the death of decent, representative republicanism. The world seems never to learn to stop loving parades of goosestepping deviants. The gates are open and they are here, now.

Anonymous said...

John Archibald Wheeler: It from bit. Otherwise put, every "it" — every particle, every field of force, even the space-time continuum itself — derives its function, its meaning, its very existence entirely — even if in some contexts indirectly — from the apparatus-elicited answers to yes-or-no questions, binary choices, bits. "It from bit" symbolizes the idea that every item of the physical world has at bottom — a very deep bottom, in most instances — an immaterial source and explanation; that which we call reality arises in the last analysis from the posing of yes-or-no questions and the registering of equipment-evoked responses; in short, that all things physical are information-theoretic in origin and that this is a participatory universe.

Wheeler was awarded the Wolf Prize in Physics in 1997.

Wheeler has speculated that reality is created by observers in the universe. "How does something arise from nothing?", he asks about the existence of space and time (Princeton Physics News, 2006). He also coined the term "Participatory Anthropic Principle" (PAP), a version of a Strong Anthropic Principle. From a transcript of a radio interview on "The anthropic universe"

Wheeler: We are participators in bringing into being not only the near and here but the far away and long ago. We are in this sense, participators in bringing about something of the universe in the distant past and if we have one explanation for what's happening in the distant past why should we need more?
Martin Redfern: Many don't agree with John Wheeler, but if he's right then we and presumably other conscious observers throughout the universe, are the creators — or at least the minds that make the universe manifest.

Anonymous said...

Rinos and Dinos serve the same end. They just exhort different fairy tales for the same narrative. That narrative is that there is no oligarchic-idiot elephant in the room that is trampling the middle classes. The Prog Dino version of the fairy tale for the narrative is that collective salvation is desirable and feasible, and that the only roadblock is the middle class of Western Civ. The Rino verson is that salvation is desirable and feasible by letting oligarchs be oligarchs, and that the only roadblock is lack of enough free trade with despotic nations.

Anonymous said...

Congress has been bought. Yes, treason is rampant, and our institutions and colleges are the apologists for it. Ordinary Americans, envisioning sugar plums, slept while the nation was sold. The domino set up was completed. All that was needed to set it in motion was the election of a black domino. What we see now is the scurrying to sew up tears in the curtain, so the reset can be pushed and the corrupt narratives can be continued.

Anonymous said...

Modern corporate collectivists have studied Alinsky, Marx, Stalin, Hitler, and Mao. They have learned how easy it is to recruit the most cowardly and corrupt. When your target or enemy is your own nation, you recruit the most cowardly and the easiest to corrupt. So what do the decent troops who remain do? In a gov army whose mission is muddled (where the mission of Nasa is Muslim outreach and the mission of enlisted personnel is to learn to tolerate diversity and homos), what happens to morale and sense of purposefulness? Well, they are replaced by paycheck drones. The regime keeps its paycheck drones while it weakens the nation and foments crisis by increasing fiat money paychecks. Those who are promoted are drones on sticks, that relish beating targeted citizens of their own country (like Jews and Straight Shooting Males). Trying times are coming. The importance of defeating the open border, open society, NWO of crony oligarchs controlling private armies of useful idiots cannot be overstated and ought not be underestimated.

Anonymous said...

Most academics seem to have it that Prog Science is settled: Since they know best, they want to replace representative governance with elitist despotism. Their tactic for doing so is to centralize authority in order to destroy every value that may otherwise help assimilate a nation's culture. Progs will not allow any first world, assimilating value to survive their deconstructive critical theories of culture. Politically correct multi culturalism is their way to strangle the American Ideal and replace it with Big Brother elitism. Their goal is to replace society with a new singularity: Big Transcendent Government. They are directly opposed to having government leave anyone alone. They want everyone to be entitled and gifted with equally complete governmental regulation. Prog Heaven is closed to anything other than a secular paradise of totality in legalism. This means the family must be destroyed, de-defined, and deconstructed as an institution.

Anonymous said...

It's all part of the narrative for the politically correct theorists who criticize Western Civ and seek to place it (fundamentally change it) under the rule of crony oligarchs served by useful idiots. Every decent value that sustains Western Civ is under attack by critical gender theorists, critical race theorists, critical family theorists, critical freedom theorists, critical planet theorists, critical morality theorists, critical spirituality theorists. Godforsaken crony oligarchs know one another the same as wolves know one another. They are united that everyone else is fair game. We are closely monitored by their Judas goat academists and useful gulls. Every now ant (pun intended) then, their façade is ripped. When that happens, pre-trained bees buzz out to spread talking points, divert attention, repair the rip, kick up confusion, and cycle it all down the memory hole. "Dude, that was like old news that makes no difference at this point." Get mad as hell. It's clobberin' time.

Anonymous said...

The more people we have, the more people are looked upon as a resource to be organized and regulated. Cronies enjoy power and make money by exploiting government in order to organize and extract work from people. Why should any decent society want to deliver more people to be trained to vote to live lives of exploitation under community organizers who work for crony oligarchs? A decent and responsible government (oxymoronic, I know) would mostly close the damn borders, encourage responsible families to not have more children than they can supoort, and stop aiding abortions. A responsible government would not encourage illiterate cheap laborers to illegally breach our borders. It would not encourage industrialists to export industries to societies that deliberately perpetuate cheap laborers. It would not pay people to have children they do not intend to work to support. It would not be substituting itself for charities that know how to motivate the people they help to become responsible adults. We do not need more people to feed the oligarchy machine.

Anonymous said...

The judgment of "who am I to judge" is always directed AGAINST those who advocate for a government or society that can preserve individual freedom of expression and enterprise. Such judgement is never directed against politically correct Progs who aim their critical theories only against Western Civ. You won't see community organizers, race baiters, fascists, socialists, feminists, gays, or anarchists, when considereing the values of the family-based, productive, middle class, askiing themselves, "Who am I to judge?" Indeed, the critical theorists among the politically correct axis of Progs are nothing if not judgmental. Lies and liars!

Anonymous said...

Re: "This is the core problem with Progressivism; it believes in contradictory and incompatible concepts: limited individual freedom, relative fairness, controlled opportunity and powerful central government."

The useful idiots, the dupes of the oligarchs who benefit from Progressivism, believe that. I doubt many of the oligarchs they serve believe that. Progressivism is a lie told by oligarchs that is believed and evangelized by their dupes. It is a lie that is used in order to enserf everyone else.

Anonymous said...

Powerful central government that is operated by and for powerful corporate cronies is contradictory to the freedom of individual citizens. To consolidate power centrally is to reduce freedom individually. This leads more to individual enserfment than to limited individual freedom. A society that values the contemporaneous freedom of its individual participants contradicts values of individual freedom when it constrains such freedom under a central, arbitrary fascist. The "fairness" such a two-class fascist-socialism will deliver is the equality of serfdom, lived out under the changing and arbitrary whims of "those who are more equal than others." To be an intelligent person, a human being, is to be free at least to think for oneself and to communicate one's thoughts. Progressivism makes the expression of many thoughts into "hate speech" when such expressions challenge the prevailing enserfment. Progressivism is fundamentally an incoherent, self-contradictory, incompatible set of lies. It is dissonant with being a human being.

Anonymous said...

No intelligent, decent, student of journalism can survive the vetting for the oligarchic media. The head of the fish is rotted, so the rot goes all the way down. Any intelligent, decent, student of journalism is unemployed, kept out of the loop --- or working under cover, probably for himself. That's an heroic lot to ask of any individual. May God sustain such people, to expose the rot of the Progressive, two headed beast of corrupt oligarchy and gullible idiocy!

Anonymous said...

No intelligent, decent, student of journalism can survive the vetting for the oligarchic media. The head of the fish is rotted, so the rot goes all the way down. Any intelligent, decent, investigative journalist is unemployed, kept out of the loop --- or working under cover, probably for himself. That's an heroic lot to ask of any individual. May God sustain such people, to expose the rot of the Progressive, two headed beast of corrupt oligarchy and gullible idiocy!