Friday, July 11, 2008

TIME TO TAX CONSUMPTION

(Click title above.)

Sixty-two scholars have signed on to a report by the Institute for American Values and other think tanks called, “For a New Thrift: Confronting the Debt Culture,” examining the results of all this.
....
The agents of destruction are many. State governments have played a role. They aggressively hawk their lottery products, which some people call a tax on stupidity.
....
Credit card companies have played a role. Instead of targeting the financially astute, who pay off their debts, they’ve found that they can make money off the young and vulnerable. Fifty-six percent of students in their final year of college carry four or more credit cards.
....
Congress and the White House have played a role. The nation’s leaders have always had an incentive to shove costs for current promises onto the backs of future generations. It’s only now become respectable to do so.
....
The tax code should tax consumption, not income ....

****
CONCERNS: Have energy, trade, deficit, and debt policies driven us to a point such that the world now coordinates an increasing price of oil with a declining value for the dollar?
Has lack of national health policy pushed the burden of financing health protection onto corporations, rendering them non-competitive with corporations of nations that do have national health policies?
QUOTE --- Henry Ford (during the Depression): “these really are good times, it’s just that few know it.”

COMMENTS:

BEGUILEMENT To Conspicuous Consumption has led us to various means and ends, as follows.

MEANS:
1) Undermining respect for traditional and family values;
2) Undermining of governmental legitimacy (by Marxist academia class and holdover hippies within professorial and journalist class);
3) Loss of faith and breach of trust from pyramid-scamming class (by Madison Avenue types, bent towards devaluing substance in trade for fluff);
4) Disloyalty to country and territory (by corporate class leaders' over-projecting of lines of influence, leading to thinness of military);
5) Sell outs (by greed-connivance class and corrupt politicians, selling out advantages of regulations and national resources and secrets);
6) Disloyalty from welfare and grievance class to common ideals (manifested in capitalism's enemies' grievance-mongering-extortion of other people’s money);
7) Impotency from addict and hedonistic class (resulting from surrender of integrity to instant gratification);
8) Undermining of society and posterity (by spendthrift class’s increasing proclivity for hawking children’s futures).

ENDS:
Imaginative justifications of treason; Energy dependency (oil); Porous borders; Over-extended military; Loss of American industries and jobs (steel, appliances, cars, robots); Inability and unwillingness to engage in common cause for long term planning; Overburdening of national debt; Borrowing against future; Stagnant economy; Increase in work hours, loss of vacation time; Loss of parent at home (two earner families); Loss of health care; Widening gaps in social and political influence (Gini index); Machiavellian pretenses of democracy; Failing adequately to address mounting concerns (relating to: environment, population, famine, rising religious radicalism and terrorism, rising nuclear thug powers); and tumbling loss of sense of spirituality and purpose.

RENEWAL:
We need to seek and inspire renewed empathy and faith in the spiritual value of pursuing civilizing purposes that are stable, sustainable, and worth the pursuing of surpassing fulfillment.
We need a modern Jimmy Stewart character, from “It’s A Wonderful Life!” We need to re-value and re-measure ourselves --- in relation to more than envy, wealth, and conspicuous consumption. We have
had quite enough of modern Democrats, Libertarians, and Republicans!
.
*****
.
1) Consumption taxes could mitigate or lessen the gulf in political power and social resources between "haves" and "have nots."
2) National sales taxes could facilitate promotion of socially desireable products while discouraging production of harmful products.
3) Tarriffs could reset scales of fairness, to protect American industries from predatory foreign competition.
.
****
.

Mining revenue to fund any nation requires a dance, both delicate and rough, harmonious and conflicting, among various ideals and methods for taxing occupants.

To counter or reduce the undemocratic exercise of disproportionate wealth and political power, a progressive consumption tax is recommended. Businesses should be precluded from making political contributions. Political contributions made by individuals should be taxed to them as forms of consumption.

To counter the rise and establishment of stubborn, undemocratic aristocracies, progressive death taxes are recommended.

To facilitate governance of inducements and discouragements of various forms of production and consumption, various sales and transactions taxes are recommended, for imposition both on individuals and businesses.

To reduce temptations for black markets and tax evasion schemes, various forms of gift taxes may be recommended.

To preserve a viable, competitive nation, protect industry, reward allies, and discourage enemies, national taxes on various imports and exports may be recommended.

****
.
(Continued above, under "Managing Volatility with Sales Taxes and Tariffs.")

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

In schools, few study Greek philosophy.
Among Leaders, our media support only progeny of Karl Marx (Communism) or Adam Smith (Capitalism).
Since TR, few with gravitas seem to have found Regulated Capitalism.
What “Doctor of Philosophy” can diagnose the condition of our civilization and prescribe a course of treatment?
Looking at American dystopia, who really won WWII?
Looking at American colleges drowning in hippie Marxist professors, who really won the Cold War?
On today’s world stage, few of gravitas and vision present.
It remains to be seen whether RAM’s will rise to the occasion.

Anonymous said...

See http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama%E2%80%99s-trickle-up-economics/#comment-109448:

CONSUMPTION TAXES:

To more democratically redistribute wealth and power, what is needed is to end income taxes and to substitute consumption taxes, in the form of (1) a progressive tax on each individual’s annual consumption and (2) a sales tax on all retail sales, with rates depending upon the deemed social value of the product.

Consumption taxes can better strike their intended targets and better address re-apportionments of consuming power.

Income taxes tend to be too complicated and considerably less functional.

****

Snippets from http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/obama%E2%80%99s-trickle-up-economics/2/:
Obama’s Trickle-Up Economics
September 19, 2008
by Patrick Poole

....

Economists have long known that taxes targeted solely on the rich rarely strike their intended target for a variety of reasons. For one, when the rich begin to feel the tax bite they simply readjust their income to offset tax increases. They can do this by deferring income or decreasing the amount they work. Obviously, the rest of us don’t have these options.
....
For any increased taxes that the rich do end up paying, they pass those off to the middle class who are their employees (through pay cuts and layoffs) and customers (through price increases). Thus, tax increases on the rich actually result in stealth tax increases and layoffs that land squarely on the middle class and the poor.
....
And when prices of everyday goods begin to increase, the result is inflation, meaning that the money you have today is worth less tomorrow. For high inflation and high unemployment, think Jimmy Carter.

Anonymous said...

GINI INDEX GULF:
Snippet from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/09/opinion/09reich.html?th&emc=th:

The top 1 percent now takes home about 20 percent of total national income. As recently as 1980, it took home 8 percent. Although the economy has grown considerably since 1980, the middle class’s share has shrunk. That’s a problem not just because it strikes so many as being unfair, but also because it’s starting to limit the capacity of most Americans to buy the goods and services we produce without going deep into debt. The last time the top 1 percent took home 20 percent of national income, not incidentally, was 1928.

Anonymous said...

PROGRESSIVE CONSUMPTION TAX:

Corporations should be prohibited from making political contributions. And contributions by individuals to specific political candidates or parties should not be tax deductible. Rather, such contributions should be considered as a form of “consumption,” and should make the contributor subject to a progressive consumption tax.

Anonymous said...

It is immoral to take from those who produce in order to "spread their wealth" and income around to work-a-phobics.

It is also immoral to fail to check against institutions calculated to advantage such disproportionate accumulations of wealth and power as to sink democracy under the rule of oligarchic aristocrats.

The way to check against both of the above modes of immorality is not with taxes on income or with giveaways to non-workers. Rather, it is consumption that should be taxed, progressively. Such tax revenues should be used to build, rebuild, and maintain the infrastructure that is used by all citizens.

Such use would create jobs. Such tax would not harm the poor. Such tax would help check against oligarchies.

Dlanor said...

Presently, worldwide commerce, free of worldwide governance, facilitates worldwide shenanigans. So long as individual nations remain stymied and the United Nations remains divided, power will gravitate to international pirates of volatility.

Worldwide mores have not evolved to facilitate worldwide governance. So, each nation must look to its own preservation, perhaps allying among leaders. To survive, nations must learn how to hold international pirates and money masters at bay.

To preserve representative governance, a republic must become quick to defend borders and to burst bubbles of financial piracy. America must, simultaneously, gain control over both its physical and its financial borders.

Neither the proposals of Obama nor of McCain even begin to address WHAT MUST BE DONE. Both Obama and McCain will undermine America’s borders, both physical and financial. However, Obama’s undermining will be quicker, deeper, more destructive, and longer lasting.

Obama is wrong on borders, defense, terrorism, allies, Israel, civilizing family values, and constitutional rule of law.

Obama’s one policy that may be better than the stupid Republican policies we have endured for eight years relates to the economic gulf between haves and have nots. However, the best way TO ADDRESS SUCH GULF is not with a progressive income tax, but with a progressive consumption tax.

So long as no political party is willing to promote an effective consumption tax, a more progressive income tax may be the next best alternative. For this, REPUBLICAN BLINDNESS to the obvious need to address the widening gulf in income and economic power has made manifest astonishing stupidity.

Regardless, my main concern is to rally against the suicidal surrender of representative governance to the virulent spread of international pirates of financial volatility.

Taxing income, regardless of how progressive the tax rate, is no way to attack such virus. Simply put, international money masters have too many easy avenues for avoiding such faux medicine. Indeed, more effective taxing of the income of millionaires simply widens the gulf and increases the control and power of international billionaires.

So, WHY HAVE SO FEW PROPOSED effective medicine? Well, the virus is hard to explain to the electorate, even as it has infected our institutions through and through. Indeed, much support that has been essential to both Obama and McCain has derived from billionaire bandits. So, it must fall to maverick academics to fashion ways to educate the electorate, before, it is hoped, it becomes too late.

Obama’s “spread the wealth” plan, based as it is on progressivism in income tax rates rather than in consumption tax rates, is flawed, for the following reasons:

--- His plan will fund and reward layabouts, thereby diminishing productive work (rewards sloth).

--- His plan fails utterly to REGULATE FUNDS USED BY INTERNATIONAL MONEY MASTERS to buy and control politicians, media, academia, and opportunities for inciting and exploiting social and economic volatility (empowers rule of pirates).

--- His plan blinds masses to their loss of freedom and dignity, by laying before them illusions of security (institutionalizes mind control).

Obama’s plan, by not promoting movement towards a PROGRESSIVE CONSUMPTION TAX, fortifies power protection for his money masters, by making it much more difficult for mere millionaires to make the quantum leap to financial piracy status. Obama’s plan does nothing to treat the spreading virus that renders us susceptible to being preyed upon by war profiteers and other opportunists of financial volatility.

****

HOW COULD OR SHOULD A PROGRESSIVE CONSUMPTION TAX WORK?

Civilization has two main problems: To keep alive: (1) purposefulness (freedom and dignity) and (2) representative governance.

Conditioning people to believe government owes them purpose and a living is unhealthy to any society that hopes to endure.

Enabling people to leverage wealth to the point of buying up politicians, media, and academia is suicidal to democracy.

Squaring the Circle:

End redistributive income taxes. Instead, resort to progressive consumption taxes. Add up all individual, non-business related purchases; allow no deductions for charities or political contributions or overseas or internet purchases. Then, tax every citizen's consumption --- progressively. Allow no political contributions from investment foundations, businesses, or corporations.

Mere Spreading of Wealth is not Moral:

It is immoral to take from those who produce in order to "spread their wealth" and income around to work-a-phobics.

Allowing Rule-Leveraging for Money Masters is not Democratic:

It is immoral to fail to check against institutions calculated to advantage such disproportionate accumulations of wealth and power as to sink democracy under the rule of oligarchic aristocrats, who are inclined to solidify control by buying up politicians, media, and academia.

The way to check against both the immorality of (1) wealth-spreading and (2) money-ruling is not with taxes on income or with giveaways to non-workers. Rather, the way to check against such abuses is by taxing consumption, progressively.

Consumption tax revenues should be used to fund health care and to build, rebuild, and maintain the infrastructure that is used by all citizens.

Such use would create jobs. Such tax would not harm the poor. There would be little need to spread wealth to layabouts were wealth used to incentive work, fund health care, fund jobs, and build and maintain infrastructure. A progressive consumption tax would help check against the sort of oligarchic influence we suffer on account of those who now own and control our politicians, journalists, and professoriate.

****

TRANSACTION AND TRADE TAXES:

All trades and sales between separate legal entities should be subject to transaction (sales) tax.

Within a nation’s borders, rates should be based on the social, political desirability or undesirability of the particular product being transacted or sold.

A nation, across its borders, may generally prefer not to impose transaction taxes on its acts of export.

On its acts of import, a nation may wish to impose such transaction tax rates (tariffs) as may help protect local markets, industries, allies, or needy third world nations.

Non-monetary gifts between individuals need not be taxed, although estates and inheritances should be taxed.

Gift taxes should be imposed on gifts of all kinds to or from businesses.

In addition, gifts from businesses to individuals should be taxed to individuals, as part of their basis for consumption tax purposes.

Gifts from individuals to businesses should also be taxed to such individuals, as part of their basis for consumption tax purposes.

All gifts, transactions, and purchases by individual citizens with or from foreign entities, businesses, and individuals should then and there be added to each such citizen’s consumption basis.

Aside from export or import taxes, a local business’s purchase of raw materials from a foreign business should not be additionally taxed, provided the purchase price is paid directly to the selling business or by deposit in such business’s account.

Otherwise, transfer of funds from a local business or bank to a foreign bank should be subject to some sort of transaction hold and tax, to diminish incentives for evading high-end progressivity in local consumption tax rates.

Using techniques as listed above, America could still preserve its borders ---- physical, traditional, political, and financial.

****

.

See:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Id1IKJGVkvg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTwqYM2kNuE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB3qVTsDBE8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppQszYT3djE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBTtn0pns54
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qthiDQXpfxc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tcfb2aR7V_U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heWbwsq4YL0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8PS6574R0E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8PS6574R0E (Coulter says Soros picked both Obama and McCain)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nnf62Uhl3ac (Regarding Soros, about the bubble of American supremacy; does it not seem that Soros and friends want to regulate markets, nations, maybe even cultures and religions; he wants to control the education of the “well informed electorate” of the “open society,” i.e., the Ministry of Truth)

*****

--- Redistribution of wealth --- http://www.nypost.com/seven/10282008/postopinion/opedcolumnists/obamas_ideas_for_a_radical_court_135633.htm

Anonymous said...

A progressive consumption tax would not interfere with the accumulation of power or wealth, such as for business owners or managers to direct social choices about production. Rather, such tax would only be felt upon distribution for use and consumption by individuals.

Thus, political influence would be restored to reasonable parameters and limits. Businesses would be precluded altogether from making campaign contributions. Individuals making escalating political contributions would face escalating taxation.

Problem: How can legislators become educated about business’ legislative concerns, unless providing such information (business free speech, i.e., lobbying) can be engaged in as a business expense? And, if it can, and if such expense is not taxed to businesses, then would not businesses, in accumulating wealth for directing choices about production, also be accumulating (untaxed) wealth for unduly influencing politicians in the writing of favorable legislation, such as for regulating in aid of monopolies, etc.?

What, then, would incentive protecting the environment and preserving arms length competition in the market place? If political lobbying must become subsumed as part of the “marketplace,” what becomes of the democratic notion of “one person, one vote”?

Note: The higher the cost of lobbying, the greater the advantage to established businesses and incumbent politicians; the greater the profit to business, the greater the value of political threats and promises.

Would free speech, governmental transparency, term limits, and line item vetoes provide adequate checks against such unbalancing?

RECOMMENDATION — SPECIAL CONSUMPTION TAX ON LOBBYING:
For all expenses relating to lobbying and informing lawmakers, businesses should be charged progressively increasing special consumption taxes, even though businesses should otherwise ordinarily not pay income or consumption taxes, but only transaction taxes.
While established businesses would have a money advantage in getting their message to lawmakers, pursuing such advantage would become progressively more expensive, thus tending to make the playing field less uneven. And, the taxes would not go to lawmakers, but to the general treasury.

Anonymous said...

Sin / Sales / Consumption Taxes --- see http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/politicians_then_and_now.html.