Commie atheists seem to dislike Jews because believing Jews believe in a reconciling godhead. Perhaps Muslims dislike Jews because they laughed at Muhammad, and they do not see God as a revenge-maddened monster. Commies would rather believe in an infinity of parallel, universal bubbles than in a providential reconciler that determines choices.
How does the reconciler determine choices? The possibilities seem to be: Everything that is possible occurs in some world. Or some kind of preset random generator effects determinations within a closed bubble, in respect of which complex forms evolve in a process of replicative competition. Or existence implicates a Reconciling Being.
The emotional makeup of the people who deem themselves assured that no Reconciling Being abides seems to value not having anyone tell them what they should do with themselves, even though, behind cover of scientism, they reserve a claim to tell everyone else what they should do with themselves.
Whatever the determiner of choices among possibilities, I see no proof or even good reason to believe that its character, nature, or name is, "Stuff Happens." As to math and randomness: Statistics and geometry are branches of math. Whatever happens within a conservational system must of course accord with the maths of its conservation. Whatever the character or nature of the source-essence-reconciler and its determinations and predeterminations, they will of course abide by such math as is requisite to their conservational unfolding. Within God's system, nothing is expressed that is not consistent with conservation and unfolding renormalization. Whatever God chooses, man's understanding of statistics will approve.
In any event, neither a concept of multiple universes nor a concept of God is an "explanation" that is subject to quantitative proof as opposed to intuitive reason. The disadvantage of reviling a concept of a Caring Reconciler is that it pretends either that objective science should quantitatively determine our moral values or that each person "should" do as he can or will --- even though people who believe in a purely quantitative system of causation that is closed to qualitative apprehension can show no basis in purely objective science for why anything should be or be done. They are like children, spoiled of capacity to reason or appreciate beyond their quantitatives and their personal pleasures.
So, why are Jews often reviled? I think Muslims revile Jews for not having surrendered their humanity, as every craven Muslim is required to do. Commies revile believing Jews for not bowing to their elite scientists and social economists. Spoiled hedonists revile Jews for holding some traditions higher than immediate gratifications. Some people who think they are pure scientists revile all god believers for not being indoctrinated enough in the morally-stunting and unprovable idea of multiple separate and closed universes. Some Christians revile Jews out of a perverse reading of the Bible. As to some JINOs who are loyal to tribe but not to God or nation or American Ideals --- they can be reviled without bringing religion or anti-semiticism into it. Through all of this hatred and jealousy, the faithful Jew abides. Jews --- Imagine the world of corrupti and ignoranti without them.