Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Chronologically Appreciated Unfolding From Superpositions of Ambiguous Potentialities


SUBSTANCE: Substance is that which is measurably spun, revolved, orbited and vectored.

INFORMATION: In-form-ation is what is accumulated in mathematically-digitize-able and manifested representations among part-icle-fields, as represented and signified in the co-relational appearance of each locally-viable and contextual interpretation of its organically co-relational spins, revolutions, orbits and vector rates.

PARTICLE-FIELD: Each part-icle-field (or interval of space, time, matter, energy, vector, mass, organized sub-system) is not itself Information, even though each part-icle is itself constantly, continuously and perpetually renormalized. In-form-ation is that which is communicated to each focus of each degree-kind of part-icle concerning its cumulative context.

PROVING A NEGATIVE: Can a lack of Information being "collapsed" (measured by a co-relator) be "recorded"? Can a negative be empirically demonstrated by its absence from a sub-system?

SUPERPOSITION: Except as measurements are taken (co-related, communicated, received, recorded, observed), every sub-system, before-being-measured-by-a-new-measurer, would be charged in an ambiguous state of superposed, possible potentialities.

IN-FORM-ATIONAL MANIFESTING: A co-relative of Information is exchanged only among such part-icle-fields of substantiality as then and there happen to be receptive to record or observe such co-relative of it.

THE NON-MANIFEST POTENTIALITY:  Possible co-relations of Information that are neither recorded to part-icular storeage nor accumulated to observation are co-preserved with the mathematical ambiguity of the possible potential.

PARTI-CLES THAT HAPPEN TO TRANSLATE CHRONOLOGICAL COMMUNICATIONS: Only such electromagnetic, radiative, gravitational, or attractive propagatons of Information occur as are "collapsed" to manifestation for symbolic-recordation or interpretive-observation. That which is chronologically phase-collapsed to manifestation for symbolic recordation or interpretive observation is that which happens to be translated, transmitted, and received co-relationally among level-layers, degree-kinds, range-fields of part-icles.

EPIPHENOMENA OF META-MATH: A part-icle, as such, does not within its field attract the attention of a perspective of consciousness unless and until and to the extent that a two-way current in meta-math is established and represented in a math-field made measurably manifest or appreciative to some level of consciousness between or concerning them. All that is recorded or observed to manifestation is renormalized and collapsed in measurable translations of appearance of particle-fields.

ALL CENTERS OF ALL DEGREES AND KINDS OF PARTICLE-FIELDS ARE RENORMALIZED / EXCEPT IN FAITH, NO CENTER IS REAL IN ITSELF: Every thing that records Information concerning every kind and degree of localized context is a renormalized and renormalizing part-icle (that is of an eternally present system of Meta-Math) that in itself (apart from co-relational appearance) has no real center, perimeter, beginning, or end. Without Faith, we are all prey for madness. Among America's faithless (faithless in God, Family and Country), madness is rampaging.

NO PART-ICLE IS MANIFESTED INTO RECORDED EXISTENCE EXCEPT AS IT IS ON SOME LEVEL APPRECIATED: Part-icles are fuzzed and do not clearly exist in themselves, except in respect of how they are somehow brought into focused appreciation in respect of the happenstance of a Recorder or Observer.

PART-ICULAR SIGN-IFICATIONS OF THE LIVING WORD: In that sense, every part-icle-field represents the Living Word -- the Meta-Mathematician, Renormalizing Reconciler, Self-Programming Programmer, Essence-Source, Changeless-Changer.

*******

IDENTITY OF CONSCIOUS PERSPECTIVE:  Experiencing a conscious identity entails a cumulatively connecting organization of ideas and translations of interpretatons and apprehensions in a flux state of becoming.

ORIENTATION:  Some aspect or teleology of projection of Information onto a system-recording device is fuzzed in respect of a meta-orientation and potentiality of the Recorder-Projector.

IDEAS:  Ideas are defined, yet open. Quantifiably representable, yet qualitatively appreciable. Become, yet becoming. Ideas are not quantitatively, mathematically closed.  They are mathematically open to interfunctioning with an encompassing system of sub-systems, contexts in flux with contexts.  They are co-relative with unfolding, vectored, "Active Math."

REPRESENTATIONS OF QUANTITATIVES AND QUALITATIVES:  Ideas are not merely co-relative of translations of the quantitative. Ideas are not merely representations of quantitatively measurable past influences (that which has been).  Ideas are also representations of qualitative potentialities (that which may or may not become).

IDEAS OF IDEAS OF IDEAS:  Can we in any specificity imagine a color that our experience has not yet led us to experience?



125 comments:

Anonymous said...



Why do rapists rape, robbers rob, plunderers plunder, killers kill and oligarchs "garch"? I think they're hollow and trying desperately to fill a hole by fleshing themselves out on the flesh of others. Why are they hollow? They've never understood good faith, so they entertain themselves by trying to break the faith of others. There is no good faith or good will in them.

Obama finds entertainment in negotiating with jihadi killers, who are filled with secular and subterranean hatreds and superstitions that ape religions. For Obama, the most beautiful sound in the world comes with communing with choruses of apetoids -- underground apes like Bill Ayers and Rev. Wright, who "howl, bare their fangs, dance, tumble in the rushing water, musty, wet pelts glistening in the blue."

Anonymous said...

Our problem is as much our out of control oligarchs at home as it is the NorKos and NukeIrans abroad. We would not have Obama the Clown Romantic or Hitlery the Rotter Rodham if we were not already being ruled by lying oligarchs at home -- who know all about adolescent agglomerating, but nothing about human responsibility.

Yet, many among us accept the idiocracy that it is some kind of virtue to allow the linearly unimpeded, virtue-untempered agglomeration of personal wealth and power -- as if the correlative destruction of the middle class would of itself cure adolescent irresponsibility. A society cannot shift from having a middle class to having only a lower eloi and an upper morloch class without phase shifting from a republic to a despotism.

Nothing will be done to protect us from the quickening of despots abroad until we do more to protect (check and balance) ourselves against the corrupt and juvenile oligarchic corporatists at home. We will have to take back faith, family and republic -- away from the godforsaken, demented oligarchs.

Oligarchs we have let run amuck at home have distracted us with divisiveness while double dealing with degenerates in order to deliver us into serfdom with money that is siphoned and kicked back. It is they who have presented us with Obama and his disstaff of swishy swooners.

Anonymous said...

Until foolish ideas of quota consistent fairness are stopped, the Prez and Party Leaders who promote quota based systems should be required to get every first and second medical treatment opinion from a random pool of local doctors and hospitals. Their children should be required to attend public schools. Their secret service protection should be randomly provided from the local police force. And their house servants should be randomly provided by newly invited border jumpers. And everyone near them should be disarmed except to rely on calling 911.

Anonymous said...

C.S. Lewis, from The Abolition of Man: "I am very doubtful whether history shows us one example of a man who, having stepped outside traditional morality and attained power, has used that power benevolently."

Anonymous said...

Obama recruited a lot of voters by teaching them to come to him for hand outs. Socialistic nations watched, and so they also now approach Obama with hands out. After all, he has flexibility, a pen, and he wants to spread the wealth. Hands out; shoot me some chit.

Anonymous said...

I can name some of leaders for a decent black community: Lloyd Marcus, Stardust, Alan West, Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas, Ben Carson, Herman Cain. There are many more, but they are as intimidated by black Progs as Christians in the Middle East are by Muslims.

Anonymous said...

It takes a typical black community to ruin a child. Not a decent black community, but a typical, inner-city black community. One where the central gov appratus has replaced the father in the house and the local church. One where the local church has become a front for race-baiting shakedown artists. One where the ultimate in abusive and fake religion (Islam) soon comes to pretend it can fill the void.

A child raised by supporting parents in a charitable community does not tend to become feral. A child abandoned to feral peers does become feral. A child reinforced to learn that organized agitations shake freebies loose learns to become a shakedown artist. He learns not to appreciate charity, because he learns to think charities owe him.

Gov given benefits to inner city families undermine any chance they might otherwise have to learn how to be responsible members of a decent society. Once the majority of an electorate becomes as entitlement-minded as community organizers (shakedown artists), their nation rapidly unravels.

Anonymous said...

First, understand and believe there is such a thing as goodness. Then be receptive to a source of it. That is the beginning of good faith and good will. Then respect the light in each person whose acts tend to exemplify that receptiveness. Accord free thinkers with general freedom of expression, enterprise, and association. Absent good reason to the contrary, let the marketplace decide. But let no one person or oligarchy become so disproportionately powerful as to essentially own the gov that regulates the marketplace. When that system of faith is lost, "good" can no longer be "decided" because it will have been lost.

Anonymous said...

Given our electorate, pols have to misdirect the lofos. No one can dare to talk to them as if they were responsible or capable adults, because they are not. So, silly ideas are floated for political consumption. Later, when they cannot be enacted (thank goodness!), blame is poured on the opposing pretender. Given who he was named after, I doubt Rand is serious in this proposal.

Problem is, these kinds of silly ideas tend eventually to get enacted or "penned". Ta da: ObamaCare, ObamaBorders, ObamaSpring, ObamaEducation, ObamaMarriage, ObamaBanking, ObamaFreedom, ObamaPrivilege, ObamaLand.

Anonymous said...

Some smart and energetic people like voc ed because they like practical work. Some people do voc work because they do not have the aptitude to do college level math and science. Some people feel they are entitled to be presumed to be as good and smart as anyone else, even without actually having to demonstrate it. These are the people who want to force society to treat those who are trained in gender and ethnic studies as being "equal" to those whose energies and aptitudes earned them degrees in more difficult subject matters.

The entitlement-mongering class has found that it can entice pols to offer gov tax redistribution schemes as a way to force everyone else to "rspect" them. Or at least pretend to. So, instead of learning a trade, they "educate" themselves on your dime in dishonest and despotic studies. That is, when they have not already been saturated in that "education" for free from the pants-on-the-ground-whitey-is-bad culture at large. Good progies, good progies. Here's a sea biscuit.

Anonymous said...

The problem with using the central tax apparatus to incentive good things is that it invariably festers into rot. Indeed, it leads to inflated tuition for indenturing students for the privilege of learning rot. Tax funded benefits are probably a big part of the Prog campaign for equality in tax benefits for all relationships. This is how homosexual relationships get renormalized and conflated into being equal for tax purposes to traditional marital relationships. It's how minority profs in gender and ethnic studies justify demanding equal pay with profs who teach STEM subjects. It's how Prog agitators promote commie and islamic indoctrination as being entitled to tax support.

The central gov apparatus needs to get out of the business of taking tax money from some to pay for the indoctrination of others. Let businesses, alums, charities, West Point and Annapolis provide scholarships and internships. Otherwise, get the central gov out of it. Explain to young voters that it is in their best interest to find better ways to learn trades and educate themselves than to clamor for central gov to ply them with loans so schools can inflate costs for a corrupted product in order to turn them into debt slaves for the next 20 years.

Anonymous said...

I wish the gang bangers, race baiters, and professional victims would also agree. I mean Oprah, Obama, Sharpton, Wright, etcetera. Shame on them!

I don't think I am prejudiced for wishing they would grow up! I think they are stunted in a childish Neverland. But professional victims never stop with race. They graduate into militant genitalians, pushers, pimps, gangsters, sex slavers, child abusers, and excuse-making madman monsters and mus loids. Eventually, they elect and create destroyers of nations, cultures, and human decency.

Anonymous said...

I don't support any mass, sudden, demographic change, because it would almost invariably be forced by a despot or gang that wants to destroy (fundamentally change) the republic.

If the republic had happened to consist mainly of blacks who happened to be independent and republican-minded, and I, regardless of my color, were one among them, I would be opposed to any change that sought to weaken the republic by suddenly importing a lot of third world whites.

I am far more interested in the character of a person for individual competency than I am in his skin color. I would rather live among fair-minded and competent Blacks or American Indians anyday than among whites who sacrificed their children to Baal.

The unfortunate thing is this: A lot of low lifes associate, agglomerate and gang up -- based mainly on superficial markers. Like color, eyes, sexual deviancy, despotic religion, tattoos, etc.

The consequence is that decent and well-educated members of the human race have little choice but to be aware of the demented prejudices of a lot of people that are based on superficial characteristics. It may be necessary, but it's a sad thing, and, where reasonable heads can prevail, it ought to be resisted. Meantime, it would be foolish to walk about without protection in any hood that was obviously populated by very prejudiced gang bangers.

Anonymous said...

Negotiating about Israel with apocalyptic Muslim Arabs is like police negotiating in Arizona with the apocalyptic (Matthew 24*) Gaver family from Idaho.
http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/2...

* Matthew 24 New International Version (NIV)
The Destruction of the Temple and Signs of the End Times
24 Jesus left the temple and was walking away when his disciples came up to him to call his attention to its buildings. 2 “Do you see all these things?” he asked. “Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.”

Anonymous said...



Once those feral Blacks who have been educated to hate America de-legitimize law enforcement, and they have their support guaranteed by a welfare system, what is to prevent roving street gangs from refusing ever to comply with police instructions? Once they are free to roam and pillage without fear of force absent an entire squad of police, how will decent society be kept safe? For a breakdown of law and order among feral non-blacks, take a look at the Cottonwood Brawl and what happens when a squad of police is necessitated. http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/2....

Anonymous said...

It's blanching to see how effective in-your-face Hitlerism still is, especially among a lot of people who claim to be social justice warriors. Especially among people who claim not to need to be churched in a merciful and inviting God.

Anonymous said...

Hillary can't quit until the mask swallows her up. Who would listen to her, once she quits running and quits with Bill? Will the metrosexual genitalians still be there for her, then? No, they will move on to other celebrities. Until then, I would not count on the satanic oligarchy not to dress and pull her morally despoiled and dead carcass across the victory line. They can always ventriloquize her lines, while she gives them cover to go about making their messes. She'll always be good as a slop bucketeer.

Anonymous said...

Among forms of community organized psychopathy, the author mentioned Marxism and Islam. There is a third form that is ubiquitous: Internationally-syndicated crony-corporate oligarchism. Thus, there abides an unholy flux of "3M" trinitarian contenders: Marxists, Muslims, and Muck Marketeers, aka Crony-Corporatist Oligarchs. Among these, perhaps the most "honest about their scientific and deviant amorality" are the Oligarchs. The Marxist nomenklatura and Muslim extortionists are more like Oligarchs pretending to have scruples. The oligarchs have found they don't need John Galt so long as they have John SellHisOwnMother.

The extension of neo-con'ism abroad is an extension of neo-con rule at home. The oligarchic pyramid at home depends on defending itself against competing pyramids abroad.

Our oligarchs are not exporting democracy or republicanism. They are exporting one-world corporate-pyramidism. For that, there are other models that compete with the American model. They are from China, Russia, and Iran. (Weaker variations are found in Europe and Japan, Saudi Arabia, and the South American cartels.) Each exploits weak spots of the others. Each seeks to fester at the back doors of the others. Each hedges to form cross-contending and fluxing alliances of convenience with others.

The direction seems to be towards replacing nations with one pyramid of explosively contending corporate oligarchs and power-maddened religionists. I don't know how America can safely isolate itself from this growing powder keg.

If we did not have rule under central oligarchs at home, we would not have them consolidating power over us by extending means of control abroad. However, we would still have oligarchic fascists seeking to undermine us from abroad. The oceans no longer protect us. And oligrachs abroad prefer to deal with one American oligarchic establishment (of Rino-Dinos), rather than a lot of unruly, less predictable, decentralized small businesses. This situation sorely challenges the short-lived experiment in human freedom and dignity.

Anonymous said...

Our political-economic-social system continues to become ever more biased towards affirmatively favoring the promotion of people whose motives for wanting to climb up in a machine-hierarchy for ruling and regulating in fine detail are far from pure. Rules for Radicals tell them how to obtain power, but not what they should do with it after obtaining it. In effect, the Rules simply tell people who want to rule that all other people should be ruled.

Decent, ordinary people need to assimilate in ways for recognizing and neutering the power of people who are not decent. Such as: People who hire and pay czars to groom children to perversion. People who de-define basic institutions of decent society. People who undermine the border in order to enserf producers. People who nurture entitlement-mindedness among feral thugs and encourage them to force producers to accept their association (to be punished by the legal apparatus if denied). People who promote the use of the legal apparatus to disfavor and punish people who do not sufficiently kowtow to the radical thugocracy (which flatters itself as an organization of social justice warriors).

What principled difference is there between demented sex slavers who work across borders and demented slavers who work within borders? Consider the language of our wannabe rulers when they think the public is not watching. Consider their willingness to sacrifice numerous unwilling subjects for the "greater good" of the new world pyramid.

Until decent people begin assimilating and fighting back, indecent people will continue to consolidate their rule and make it ever harder to fight back. The world should not be one big pyramid with the most thuggish at the top.

Anonymous said...

Conservatives are the Party of adults. Progs are the Party of children. When adults act as children, they lose more credibility among adults than they acquire among children. We can deploy ad hominems as heuristic devices. Less so as firm beliefs. What we really need to do is stop treating children of any age as if they were adults. Once a person of years, however many, shows to be in mind a child, that person should be forfeited of any expectation of being treated as an adult.

What prevents this is the upending of law, which now requires that adults must associate with childishly behaving people. Like gays demanding a right to force a baker to make a cake, on pain of fine or forfeiture. Or demanding a right to groom school children, on pain of expelling children who are not reconditioned to their satisfaction. Or blacks demanding that their hoods be immune from being policed. Or illegals demanding that they not be required to show voter identification. Or muslims demanding a right to immigrate to establish anti-American ghettos. Or oligarchs demanding their right to buy and manage politicians with graft and paid protesting dupes. In everyway imaginable, irresponsible children have come to threaten and plunder adults, while most adults walk about dazed, confused, neutered, and enserfed.



The beginning of the end to the free republic was when adults surrendered virtually all of their freedom of association. That is what will have to be take back. If necessary, by force of arms. The alternative is the upside-down rule by totalitarians over a permanent demographic majority of perpetual children.


Our challenge has become more one of answering with requisite force to overcome despotic force that hides behind law than of overcoming un-reason with reason. We will have to use either the force of arms or the force of numbers (Convention of States), or both.

Anonymous said...

Well, I certainly AGREE that there is a deliberate worldwide operation, even when it is not articulated. That is, there is a deliberate operation to reduce the masses so that they are individually incompetent, irresponsible, and completely dependent. This is so they can be farmed. Without doubt, this is a worldwide operation.


DIVERSITY is a trick word to try to force the destruction of individualism down more easily. It so happens that, until the recent past, European Whites tended to be the most competent and successful as free-thinking individuals.



Nothing in history recommends multi-culturalism or racial diversity, per se, for enhancing human freedom and dignity within a nation. Whatever diversity is needed to enhance cultural advances would better be accomplished by assimilable cultural (not necessarily racial) diversity -- with the emphasis on assimilable. There is no moral justification to try to force a free republic to assimilate cruelly repressive muslims. Nor to assimilate third world cultures whose peoples have been conditioned to be thoroughly unfit for non-collective, individual responsibility.



I AGREE that the racist emphasis by the oligarchy (that wants to divide, rule and farm the rest of us) on requiring white and christian countries to accept more and more black, third world, and non-christian immigrants is for an EVIL purpose, i.e., to reduce the masses to manageable and docile farm animals.

Anonymous said...

I agree that it is necessary to fight the racist operations of establishmentarian oligarchs. I agree that the establishment has pushed free thinkers to the point that counter racism may soon become unavoidable. Still, I think that is a very sad situation, and I think it should be a last resort.



To me, the primary thing is to accept the invitation of the Lord to seek to become a competent and morally responsible individual. That is, I value human freedom and dignity over any notion of trying to preserve any particular race in perpetuity. Human freedom and dignity should be sustainable, defensible, and surpassable. By surpassable, I mean we will always be pressed by competition and Nature to adapt.



If freedom and dignity can be preserved without resort to superficial markers for attracting opposing gangs, then such should be done. If not, and if oligarchs and their useful idiots continue to force the issue, then Katy bar the door.

Anonymous said...

There are exceptions and perhaps you're one. Most people are ducks, looking to follow a duck line. If they are not led otherwise, they fall easily into line for the airy promises of people farmers posing as well-meaning socialists. Against the bad influences that are rampant in modern society, I found companionship with church people to be very helpful for raising a good family.

I am not a biblical literalist. I look to the literature of the past as an important and figurative guide that can inspire interesting correlations for the present. There are many key values in the judeo-christian tradition that I consider to be valid for any republic that desires to preserve decent human freedom and dignity.

I think there does abide a Reconciler, or at least a reconciling principle, that is available to guide those who choose to be receptive. Its Author "speaks" to us in metaphors and parables. If you believe in values that are higher than the fleeting wannas of any individual, to which individuals should look instead of to the collective force of gov, then I take you as being "churched" in those values and as believing in their Principler.

Anonymous said...

The game of office politics has become rigged against good gov employees in the same way it is rigged against tenure for conservative professors. The glass ceiling is there for those whose integrity cannot be bought. An honest Pol in Capone's Chicago has no bright future.

As we read, corrupt and contemptible Pols are groveling before billionaires, to do their bidding at all costs. This situation becomes well nigh inevitable when absolute power centralizes and consolidates in one pest hole. In the face of this situation, corruption will not be corrected merely by honest gov employees continuing to be honest.

Anonymous said...

You can't force gluttons, addicts and looters on a diet of reason. Especially when their pushers and pimps have acquired control over most media and academia of persuasion. The time for Convention of States, Nullification, and Secession is at hand. Otherwise, even those means will be replaced by unbreakable shackles.

Progs have made all the anti-Whities who have no talent or desire to be free into their straw guards against the rest of us. Moreover, Establishment Progs are scurrying for help in locking the cage by rapidly importing and drowning us in people who want to be in the cage. The election process is a sideshow farce.

Anonymous said...

Harvard Law: The Constitution is just a gimmick set up by a bunch of dead old white guys who didn't want to work their fair share for all the homies in the rest of the world. We must devour Whitey's Constitution in order to reconstitute it. Fundamental change, baby.

Anonymous said...

Profs, Pols, Lawyas and Cronies act as they do because that's how the central fiat money is siphoned. Manure flies stick their proboscises where the manure is. Why is there so much money in sucking America of everything that is decent? Those who suck us the most have removed all modesty from our mores and all effective moral screens from all homes. Their incessantly whispered message becomes the din of a brain infestation. http://www.deathandtaxesmag.co... They opportunize as maggots feasting on brains. Thus, they give thanks to our federal cronies, centralizers, consolidators, collectivizers and communists. Thus, they prepare us to become ready for Hillary, "for the greater good."

Anonymous said...

QE has probably helped Americans continue to buy goods that are cheaply produced abroad. Thus, Americans have been relieved of having to produce for themselves. Is this a good thing? It won't be, once foreign producers figure out we don't have much that is worth trading their labor for.

Anonymous said...

To pay our debt, we will only need to pledge our labor -- in debt dhimmi perpetuity.

Anonymous said...

The West is too flush with swishy swooners to consent to a firm exposition of the obvious evils of Islam. The triumphalism of feminaziism, girlymanism, pants-on-ground gangsterism, and spineless-godless-hedonism ensure that Islam will for the foreseeable future fester and grow at our weak points. This confluence of anti-Whitey metrosexual effluence ensures that the West is not equipped by mere transference of amoral knowledge to inspire Islam to off itself.

If anything, until pigs fly and metrosexuals grow up, Islam will continue to make encroachments. Heck, the metrosexuals and their limp wristed academics are so josh earnestly confused they tend to be inspired more by the head cutters of ISIS than by the American heroes who defend human liberty.

It's only because reasoning people often tend to project their value systems on others that they fail until too late to see the snowballing danger of a class of amoral demagogues who pander to the call of immediate pleasures and pains. And so the favorite moonbats of infants win their love by singing of world peace and planetary salvation. The electorate, academe, media, and entitlement preachers we now have in America are a growing burden that shows no sign of reforming itself short of collapse into a pitiful pile of feminine tears. Is the world ready for collapse into a pile of Hitlery curses and cries? Bun fyah.

Anonymous said...

Among leaders, I think the tactic is often to collectivize, i.e., to farm the people. Such tactic is in the service of an ideology, which is: Deviation secondary to freedom of thought is not allowed. Rather, it is met with physically remedial counseling to bring the wayward sheep back to the collective.

When sheep farmers become mainly concerned with farming people, the tactic can become the ideology. (The medium becomes the message.) Controllers come to farm people for the purpose of farming people.

It can get to the point where the people farmers really don't much care what bs ideology the people believe, so long as the people devoutly pledge their loyalty to the party/sect line.

Since then, the Protestant idea has tended to evolve to one based on respect for the free will and freedom of thought of each individual. As well as respect for the idea that "He that is able bodied that will not work, neither shall he eat."

Anonymous said...

It's the job of Republicans to play the role of greedy bastards and of Police Officers to play the role of brutal bastards. It's the job of Democrats to play the role of eunuchian-third-sex bastards who mean well but are stymied because of human frailty. All are expected to work for the Establishment as goats for dividing and diverting the hatred of the masses. During the diversion, the Establishment takes it as its job to rob everyone else who has actually managed to stock anything. Oligarchic hedgers fund all bets and both parties so they can tip scales and meet thereafter behind a tree to divide spoils.

Responsible free thinkers need to wake to what is happening. Our political party system is corrupt to the core, while our republic is under attack by every godforsaken cannibal from every quarter. Our pols are not to be required to wear body cams because they are the interface for mediating graft to cronies. Meanwhile, we can be assured, because they tell us so, that they are every bit as moral as Christians. DC delenda est.

Anonymous said...

Mudman, Sharia, and ISIS walks along the sea are all fit scenes for Dante's Inferno. Nothing human can fix their advocates. The best we can do is to defend those they target, against them. At a minimum, we need to stop importing such Obaminables. If we continue to invite them into our country, they will destroy us long before we rehabilitate them. Undiscriminating Diversity is not making us better. It's making us weaker, dumber, and more depraved.

Anonymous said...

A lot of nations are not fit for representative republicanism. The goal of Progs is to make America one of those. We become what we import.

Anonymous said...

It only appears that God turned His back on America. God has not turned His back on the American Ideal. Americans have turned their backs on God. This will change, but first Americans will have to get mad at hell and its minions.

Anonymous said...

Obama is a destroyer of decency. Obama's premises are variations on the Alinsky Rule for making conservatives live up to their principles (while insulating against counter attacks by simply abandoning all principles except the one of immediate gratification). Progs use the slippery slope against Conservatives all the time, then claim the slippery slope argument is a fallacy. Progs use children as their fodder for this tactic. They claim to want no child to be unattended, no child to be left behind, and no child to be uninstructed. But what they really mean is to use children without shame as means to their pleasure. That is, no child to be unanchored, no child to unleash his full potential, and no child to go unindoctrinated.

Progs know full well that establishing a policy not to deport children is the black ice slide to inviting millions of rejects to jump our borders. Progs know full well that common core education will hold back our most talented students and keep us dependent on foreign transfusions of talent. Progs know full well that diversity ghetto indoctrination is key to a divide and rule tactic for unraveling any assimilation under an ideal of a representative republic of decent and free-thinking individuals. Progs intentionally lie when they assert the slippery slope is a fallacy, because they use it on our children every day in order to groom and corrupt our society.

The sociopathic abuse of children tends to be paid forward. Obama was abused. And now he fumes to abuse and destroy us.

Anonymous said...

Progs love minorityfolk like Muslims love womenfolk. Progs love free dope like Muslims love rampaging death. Advocates for the roads of dope and death are disciples for a utopian unity said to lie with abandoning reason. Reason can't fix the love of dope and death. These people are near beyond help. The window of opportunity for fixing them is near cemented shut. America will soon be sickened unto death if she does not stop importing these dealers in dope and death.

Anonymous said...

When our prez tells the outcasts of a failed society to come on up and just ignore our border laws, it's not the cream we'll be getting. Contrary to what Progs would have, Jesus did not instruct us to nurture, favor and arm outlaws so they can lay waste to our progeny.

Anonymous said...

See, da whiteys jus gots too much pervphobia. Nuthin diverscity won't be fixin. Da prblm is da doors jus needs to be opened wider. Da best is yet to come.

Anonymous said...

I want my reparations from the Black community for my years of serving in the Army, working, and following the rules, while anti-Whitey was out looting and undermining the country. I want reparations for my share of taxes paid to house anti-Whitey criminals in various institutions. I want reparations for the families of officers who were disabled or killed as a result of anti-Whitey shenanighans.

Not really. I just want reparation jockeys to stfu.

Anonymous said...

Obama has no mandate to lead grown ups, and even the children know it. If Congress were not filled with chestless children, Obama would be rushed out of office for the bum he is. Congress will not give Obama the bum rush because Congress is filled with bums. Bullies around the world are watching, circling, maneuvering. Meanwhile, Congress provides cover for punishing Americans for not baking cakes for gay weddings, while students beat up teachers, looters intimidate police, and Rick Perry faces charges for refusing to fund a drunken DA who claims entitlement to enforce public integrity. I no longer recognize half my countrymen.

Anonymous said...

I doubt God "saves" anyone merely because he recites John 3:16 as a talisman, without understanding or passion. God saves us as we devote our free-thinking minds and bodies. God invites us to a reasoned conversation about spiritual values. Nowadays, militant atheists try to block such conversations by trying to drive God out of the public forum and by making the public forum devoid of godliness. Those who interpret the First Amendment as imposing a "walled" block of separation are seeking to replace the freedom of each American to associate in his acts with those who in piety seek guidance directly from their maker as opposed to their interloping governor. Such a body of chestless men will not much see, much less long resist, the encroachments of despots. They will hardly foresee the tipping point, when a chestless interloper delivers them unto a millennium of evil.

Anonymous said...

The calculation is this: How likely is the recipient to be elected? How much can the recipient be counted on to kick back political favors and special licenses that can be converted to hard currency? IOW, how much power will the recipient likely acquire, and how corrupt will the recipient likely be? Cui bono, capiche?

Sad that the perception of a candidate's political viability often depends so much on her sociopathic degeneracy.

Anonymous said...

I certainly AGREE that there is a deliberate worldwide operation, even when it is not articulated. That is, there is a deliberate operation to reduce the masses so that they are individually incompetent, irresponsible, and completely dependent. This is so they can be farmed. Without doubt, this is a worldwide operation.

DIVERSITY is a trick word to try to force the destruction of individualism down more easily. It so happens that, until the recent past, European Whites tended to be the most competent and successful as free-thinking individuals.

Nothing in history recommends multi-culturalism or racial diversity, per se, for enhancing human freedom and dignity within a nation. Whatever diversity is needed to enhance cultural advances would better be accomplished by assimilable cultural (not necessarily racial) diversity -- with the emphasis on assimilable. There is no moral justification to try to force a free republic to assimilate cruelly repressive muslims. Nor to assimilate third world cultures whose peoples have been conditioned to be thoroughly unfit for non-collective, individual responsibility.

I AGREE that the racist emphasis by the oligarchy (that wants to divide, rule and farm the rest of us) on requiring white and christian countries to accept more and more black, third world, and non-christian immigrants is for an EVIL purpose, i.e., to reduce the masses to manageable and docile farm animals.

I agree that it is necessary to fight the racist operations of establishmentarian oligarchs. I agree that the establishment has pushed free thinkers to the point that counter racism may soon become unavoidable. Still, I think that is a very sad situation, and I think it should be a last resort.

To me, the primary thing is to accept the invitation of the Lord to seek to become a competent and morally responsible individual. That is, I value human freedom and dignity over any notion of trying to preserve any particular race in perpetuity. Human freedom and dignity should be sustainable, defensible, and surpassable. By surpassable, I mean we will always be pressed by competition and Nature to adapt.

If freedom and dignity can be preserved without resort to superficial markers for attracting opposing gangs, then such should be done. If not, and if oligarchs and their useful idiots continue to force the issue, then Katy bar the door.

Anonymous said...

I wish the gang bangers, race baiters, and professional victims would also agree. I mean Oprah, Obama, Sharpton, Wright, etcetera. Shame on them!

I don't think I am prejudiced for wishing they would grow up! I think they are stunted in a childish Neverland. Unfortunately, they are well paid because no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the common Prog.

But professional victims never stop with race. They graduate into militant genitalians, pushers, pimps, gangsters, sex slavers, child abusers, and excuse-making madman monsters and mus loids. Eventually, they elect and create destroyers of nations, cultures, and human decency.

Anonymous said...

I don't support any mass, sudden, demographic change, because it would almost invariably be forced by a despot or gang that wants to destroy (fundamentally change) the republic.

If the republic had happened to consist mainly of blacks who happened to be independent and republican-minded, and I, regardless of my color, were one among them, I would be opposed to any change that sought to weaken the republic by suddenly importing a lot of third world whites.

I am far more interested in the character of a person for individual competency than I am in his skin color. I would rather live among fair-minded and competent Blacks or American Indians anyday than among whites who sacrificed their children to Baal. For intelligent conversation, I am concerned ONLY with a conversant's talent for reasoning and breadth of knowledge and experience. I would much rather converse with the well-read person of any color than with the most comely (but ill-read) white person imaginable.

The unfortunate thing is this: A lot of low lifes associate, agglomerate and gang up -- based mainly on superficial markers. Like color, eyes, sexual deviancy, despotic religion, tattoos, etc.

The consequence is that decent and well-educated members of the human race have little choice but to be aware of the demented prejudices of a lot of people that are based on superficial characteristics. It may be necessary, but it's a sad thing, and, where reasonable heads can prevail, it ought to be resisted. Meantime, it would be foolish to walk about without protection in any hood that was obviously populated by very prejudiced gang bang

Anonymous said...

Conservatives are the Party of adults. Progs are the Party of children. When adults act as children, they lose more credibility among adults than they acquire among children. We can deploy ad hominems as heuristic devices. Less so as firm beliefs. What we really need to do is stop treating children of any age as if they were adults. Once a person of years, however many, shows to be in mind a child, that person should be forfeited of any expectation of being treated as an adult.

What prevents this is the upending of law, which now requires that adults must associate with childishly behaving people. Like gays demanding a right to force a baker to make a cake, on pain of fine or forfeiture. Or demanding a right to groom school children, on pain of expelling children who are not reconditioned to their satisfaction. Or blacks demanding that their hoods be immune from being policed. Or illegals demanding that they not be required to show voter identification. Or muslims demanding a right to immigrate to establish anti-American ghettos. Or oligarchs demanding their right to buy and manage politicians with graft and paid protesting dupes. In everyway imaginable, irresponsible children have come to threaten and plunder adults, while most adults walk about dazed, confused, neutered, and enserfed.

The beginning of the end to the free republic was when adults surrendered virtually all of their freedom of association. That is what will have to be taken back. If necessary, by force of arms. The alternative is the upside-down rule by totalitarians over a permanent demographic majority of perpetual children.

Our challenge has become more one of answering with requisite force to overcome despotic force that hides behind law than of overcoming un-reason with reason. We will have to use either the force of arms or the force of numbers (Convention of States), or both.

Anonymous said...



Once those feral Blacks who have been educated to hate America de-legitimize law enforcement, and they have their support guaranteed by a welfare system, what is to prevent roving street gangs from refusing ever to comply with police instructions? Once they are free to roam and pillage without fear of force absent an entire squad of police, how will decent society be kept safe? For a breakdown of law and order among feral non-blacks, take a look at the Cottonwood Brawl and what happens when a squad of police is necessitated. http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/2....

Anonymous said...

Lincoln haters argue that the North could (like Britain?) simply have bought the slaves and then freed them. I wonder. Absent a nationally declared emergency, with whose money? Under what authority? And how would plantation owners, many of whom were black, have responded? Would they have suddenly found it economical to raise cotton without forcibly cheap labor? Would they have gone into other business? Would they have funded big science to seek a labor-eliminating breakthrough? And how would they have coaxed Southerners to provide better employment for ex-slaves? Was the economic and cultural situation of Britain really comparable?

See http://www.politifact.com/pund...
and http://www.theatlantic.com/nat....

Hindsight is 20-20. Should the North really have forseen that the the South would be so death-dealing and belligerant about giving up its slaves? Are officers solely to blame for not forseeing that law enforcement in ghettos often sparks riots? What was the sick religion-ethos-culture that "justified" the continuation of slavery? Was the conflict really about states' rights? Or was it because the South reneged on the intention set forth in the Constitution to gradually do away with slavery?

I don't know. I do know that the central gov has now gotten way out of hand. If it continues to try to corral all of us into indentured servitude and to destroy human freedom and dignity, then it needs to be thrown off. If that means convention of states, nullification, or falling apart in secession or anarchy, then so be it. If despots within try to take our freedom of association, then Katy bar the door. If Progs don't start showing more sense, then the horrific cost paid in the Civil War will be a pittance in comparison.

What is especially bothersome is that so many among the race that so many died to set free now lead the push to deploy central gov to make everyone equal by regulating everyone to the point of enslavement. My God, my God.

Anonymous said...

The problem with using the central tax apparatus to incentive good things is that it invariably festers into rot. Indeed, it leads to inflated tuition for indenturing students for the privilege of learning rot. Tax funded benefits are probably a big part of the Prog campaign for equality in tax benefits for all relationships. This is how homosexual relationships get renormalized and conflated into being equal for tax purposes to traditional marital relationships. It's how minority profs in gender and ethnic studies justify demanding equal pay with profs who teach STEM subjects. It's how Prog agitators promote commie and islamic indoctrination as being entitled to tax support.

The central gov apparatus needs to get out of the business of taking tax money from some to pay for the indoctrination of others. Let businesses, alums, charities, West Point and Annapolis provide scholarships and internships. Otherwise, get the central gov out of it. Explain to young voters that it is in their best interest to find better ways to learn trades and educate themselves than to clamor for central gov to ply them with loans so schools can inflate costs for a corrupted product in order to turn them into debt slaves for the next 20 years.

Anonymous said...

First, understand and believe there is such a thing as goodness. Then be receptive to a source of it. That is the beginning of good faith and good will. Then respect the light in each person whose acts tend to exemplify that receptiveness. Accord free thinkers with general freedom of expression, enterprise, and association. Absent good reason to the contrary, let the marketplace decide. But let no one person or oligarchy become so disproportionately powerful as essentially to own the gov that regulates the marketplace. When that system of faith is lost, "good" can no longer be "decided" because it will have been lost.

Anonymous said...

Our political-economic-social system continues to become ever more biased towards affirmatively favoring the promotion of people whose motives for wanting to climb up in a machine-hierarchy for ruling and regulating in fine detail are far from pure. Rules for Radicals tell them how to obtain power, but not what they should do with it after obtaining it. In effect, the Rules simply tell people who want to rule that all other people should be ruled.

Decent, ordinary people need to assimilate in ways for recognizing and neutering the power of people who are not decent. Such as: People who hire and pay czars to groom children to perversion. People who de-define basic institutions of decent society. People who undermine the border in order to enserf producers. People who nurture entitlement-mindedness among feral thugs and encourage them to force producers to accept their association (to be punished by the legal apparatus if denied). People who promote the use of the legal apparatus to disfavor and punish people who do not sufficiently kowtow to the radical thugocracy (which flatters itself as an organization of social justice warriors).

What principled difference is there between demented sex slavers who work across borders and demented slavers who work within borders? Consider the language of our wannabe rulers when they think the public is not watching. Consider their willingness to sacrifice numerous unwilling subjects for the "greater good" of the new world pyramid.

Until decent people begin assimilating and fighting back, indecent people will continue to consolidate their rule and make it ever harder to fight back. The world should not be one big pyramid with the most thuggish at the top.

Anonymous said...

Among forms of community organized psychopathy, the author mentioned Marxism and Islam. There is a third form that is ubiquitous: Internationally-syndicated crony-corporate oligarchism. Thus, there abides an unholy flux of "3M" trinitarian contenders: Marxists, Muslims, and Muck Marketeers, aka Crony-Corporatist Oligarchs. Among these, perhaps the most "honest about their scientific and deviant amorality" are the Oligarchs. The Marxist nomenklatura and Muslim extortionists are more like Oligarchs pretending to have scruples. The oligarchs have found they don't need John Galt so long as they have John SellHisOwnMother.

The extension of neo-con'ism abroad is an extension of neo-con rule at home. The oligarchic pyramid at home depends on defending itself against competing pyramids abroad.

Our oligarchs are not exporting democracy or republicanism. They are exporting one-world corporate-pyramidism. For that, there are other models that compete with the American model. They are from China, Russia, and Iran. (Weaker variations are found in Europe and Japan, Saudi Arabia, and the South American cartels.) Each exploits weak spots of the others. Each seeks to fester at the back doors of the others. Each hedges to form cross-contending and fluxing alliances of convenience with others.

Anonymous said...

The direction seems to be towards replacing nations with one pyramid of explosively contending corporate oligarchs and power-maddened religionists. I don't know how America can safely isolate itself from this growing powder keg.

If we did not have rule under central oligarchs at home, we would not have them consolidating power over us by extending means of control abroad. However, we would still have oligarchic fascists seeking to undermine us from abroad. The oceans no longer protect us. And oligrachs abroad prefer to deal with one American oligarchic establishment (of Rino-Dinos), rather than a lot of unruly, less predictable, decentralized small businesses. This situation sorely challenges the short-lived experiment in human freedom and dignity.

Anonymous said...

Take away all charitable tax deductions! They were sold to us on the idea that they would help society. That has become a lie. Fake church and other "charities" have become the tools of their sponsoring oligarchs! who are the tools of evil, which is the tool of the devil. The only way to give real charities a chance to compete is to take away the deductions that are used by oligarchs and their shills to farm humanity.

What we need is less secular corruption under shills for liars and more humility under the Reconciler. Otherwise, EVERY permitted "charity" will be turned into either a promotion for homosexuals or a promotion for muslims --- to the destruction of the Judeo-Christian based republic.

Anonymous said...

Normal people tend not to be much appreciated or promoted. According to George Bernard Shaw, all "progress" depends on the unreasonable man. However, one may as well say that all destructiveness depends on the abnormal person.

IAE, it is quite noticeable that a majority of influential promotions in all institutions of significance go to abnormal, deceitful, rule breaking, homosexual, deviant, corrupt, brutal, mongering, self worshipping, self chosen, people abusing, child abusing and sociopathic people. There seems to be a selective advantage whereby the people who are promoted are those who are smart, agile, beguiling, and charismatic enough to survive and compensate for their abnormality. There is a kind of breath taking inevitability in watching a ruthless Napoleon or a wretchedly lying Clinton get sponsored and promoted to power. In the perverted minds of these people, they imagine they are the State. So, if they go down, the State should go down. Meantime, no measure of depravity is beyond them in the pursuit of their purposes.

These people seem to imagine they are the creators of the greater good. Dostoyevsky wrote of this in his Crime and Punishment. In that novel, a poor ex-student wants to test his notion that great people have a right to relieve littler people of their existence. To conduct his test, he executes a pawnbroker. Obama is like that. To conduct his test, he seeks to destroy America and "justifies" himself as pursuing a "higher purpose."

For militant gays, the higher purpose seems to be to replace families with gov supervision under bureaucrats. For commies, oligarchs, and muslims, the higher purpose is to reduce the masses to equal servitude under despotic crony state-corporatists.

The problem is this: Once such people are selected for power, they tend to favor and bring their likenesses along with them. Thus, the entitlement minded, chooming deviant in the White House seeks to burden all of decent society to ensconce his kind in the comfort of hammocks-on-porches -- paid for courtesy of all the normal people.

Anonymous said...

There is a difference that is worth noting between homosexuals and malignantly narcissistic homosexuals. To wrap them all together is to overcompensate one's sense of tolerance. Yes, unhappy people bent on acting out by destroying others is a problem that comes in all sexualities. That does NOT mean that we ought not notice forewarnings of anti-social proclivities: Passive aggressors building towards violent explosions. And people of victim mindsets, like our prezy, who are firm in believing everyone else must change to accomodate them -- or else!

Anonymous said...

There does seem to be a touch, among militant gays (and muslims), of willingness to destroy the republic (or plane or train) and all the people in it rather than conform to prevailing precepts of normality.

Compare: If it came to be necessary for self defense, many people would be willing to pull the trigger on jihadis. The difference is, they would reserve that option for the sake of defense of self and progeny -- not for the mere sake of self pleasure. They would give the offender the option to leave. They would not require that he "fundamentally change" his mind set in order to be allowed to continue to live. They would not destroy a republic where they had other options. Among malignant narcissists, that does not appear to be the case.

Where does this lead? How safe are our children, given our society's increasing "tolerance" of malignant narcissists?

Anonymous said...

When you have a fiat economy, you soon have fiat art. People with money need new ways to sustain illusions. As long as there is little by way of business that is worth investing in, they look for alternative ways to hedge, feint, and sustain value. Sort of like bidding up stock just before a massive sell off. The grotesque bid up of "art" seems to be a symptom of economic flu.

Anonymous said...

Our republic and the faith of our fathers have been laid waste by a tsunami of depravity of our own making. What should we expect when the main concern of everyone is to get his immediate gratification? This has been the trend ever since the Greatest Generation failed to wean the Hippie Generation.

The main part of the people in government, like the rest of the Prog Base, want not to have to do anything for a living other than to vote for their own "benign" enserfment. They want to be farmed, fed, and pleasured. So they vote for their NWO masters. Just as their representatives do, and just as their puppet prezy does.

Why should any chestless person in a chestless society buck the tsunami of watered down money that is siphoned and sloshed about by the NWO Nafta Trans Pacific Partnership? Except to seek to make the TPP even worse for the republic, Progs do not really oppose it. Many among us have been reduced to a special kind of cattle. A kind that becomes very upset when the spell of the bedtime story being told by their handlers is interrupted. Many of those among us have volunteered to be the little doggies, but the misfortune is all of our own.

Anonymous said...

I don't think the oligarchs who hedge on both Rinos and Dinos are stupid. They want to decimate the Conservative base. They only pretend to care about the GOP Party. So they play the disinformation game. In reality, they could care less if the electorate is flipped to become permanently stoopid. That will just make it that much easier to misdirect and demagogue. I can see calling the Oligarch owners evil, corrupt, godless, pleasure addled, and short sighted choomers. But not stupid. They are preparing to spring a Trans Pacific Partnership that will effectively and permanently dissolve our borders and demographic. THEY WANT THIS! So, they package it as reaching out to make a bigger tent. They are PLAYING us.

Anonymous said...

Since 1952, we have had two good American Presidents: Eisehhower and Reagan. Two not categorized: Nixon and Ford. And six Progressive Presidents: LBJ, Carter, Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr., Obama.

These Six Progressive Presidents have served a Rino-Dino alliance of Oligarchs making demented promises to their base of Useful Idiots. These servants of Progressive Oligarchs have given us: Not So Great Society, Swamp Rabbit FERC Stagflation, NWO Nafta, GLAAD China Fundraising, Religion of Peace Nation Building, and Fundamental Destruction.

These ProgOlies have worked hard to flip the American demographic to form a base of Useful Idiots consisting of Ghetto Boys, Un-assimilable Hispanics, Illegals, Incorrigible Muslims, Militant Gays, and haters of the American Ideal of individual freedom and responsibility. They have multiplied because no Conservative American has been able to overcome the ProgOlie funding that has united media and academia against the American Ideal. If a Conservative American could get his message out and withstand the blistering hate speech of the ProgOlie media and academia, then I suspect, even now, he would rouse support from a majority of Americans.

Anonymous said...

I don't believe the ultimate basis for faith in the Bible was ever in the illusion (maya) of the regressively measurable physical. The infinite capacity of Heaven has always been in the immeasurable spiritual. No human has ever been able to communicate about heaven in physically measurable terms. Jesus instructed us in parables. It is the value behind the stories that is spiritually significant. Why need a separate physical miracle to appreciate the miracle of the entire cosmos that is projected before us, for us to participate in our receptive sign-ifications with the Reconciler?

The unfolding signification of the ever regressive cosmos, out of nothing more than a mathematical bubble in the mind of God, is miracle enough. The main miracle of Jesus was in His wisdom. It is the faith in that -- which "moves mountains." On earth, the value of Mormonism is in its works. How God will reward the faithful in the hereafter is in the hereafter.

When you get down to essentials, the spiritual truth of Jesus' message seems not reasonably to be denied.

Anonymous said...

Consider the power of hypnotic and repeated suggestions in reconstructing people's memories. I have seen this happen among people I know. It may tie in with poor capacity to reason in terms of cause and effect. Muslims seem not to believe in participatory cause and effect in any ultimate or morally responsible sense. Rather, they believe everything is foreordained by their moon god.

The pre-deterministic view of the cosmos is not uncommon in theology or philosophy. It seems rare for people to unite the concepts of causal determination and participatory responsibility in a reasonably consistent and coherent way. Concepts for doing that try to factor various attributes of nature, such as randomness and unfolding feedback among participating perspectives of moral consciousness.

For meaningful and participatory moral philosophy, Christianity seems to fare better than most religions, but even its adherents tend to place God beyond and above time, able both to see and to change the alpha and the omega. (Does God lack power to change His mind?) For a mortal to respect any sense of moral purposefulness, a leap of faith of some kind is unavoidable -- and it will not be empirically or logically complete, coherent and consistent. It will to some extent depend on the good faith participation of individuals. The Christians I admire apprehend that. The "Christians" who conflate gangster theft of opm for "charitable purposes" -- not so much. Christian empathy helps build strong, competent, trustworthy individuals. Marxist empathy builds louts, ghetto boys, race baiters, cut throats, and horse flies. Among true believers, Muslim empathy seems to be an oxymoron.

Scientific and materialistic empathy, unbound to the unfolding of cultures and value philosophies, misses the point. Whatever it purports to study, it is not "empathy" in any way that meaningfully advances or assimilates civilizing purposes and values. At most, it inculcates valuing the slippery slope of "do it if it feels good." Scientific empathy is the misbegotten concept that has been deployed by oligarchs and materialists to strike at every decent value of civilization, striking at spiritual faith, assimilating families, and sustainable republics. It has brought us the despotic government of experts shilling for oligarchs, the destruction of inner city families, the despoiling of the innocence of children, and the promotion of material pleasures over spiritual pursuits. Pretending to be "scientific," its promoters have provided cover for Evil.

Aside from witnessing physical facts, I think there is such a thing as appreciating moral facts through the medium of figurative stories about physicality. I think a lot of the moral facts appreciated by Mormons are real -- in a figurative, meta sense. When Romney says Mormonism has made him a better man than he otherwise would have been, I tend to believe him.

Because no mortal can entirely avoid leaps of faith, no mortal can avoid suspensions of disbelief. Some suspensions of belief are forced by a sword at the neck. Some are seduced by well meaning poets and seers. The people who meld their suspensions of disbelief into their very bodies and souls, who cannot appreciate them in a purely figurative or spiritual sense, may feel great pain and angst when their cognitive dissonance is, to their minds, rudely distrubed.

Anonymous said...

Islam: How the fits of an evil and deranged epileptic came to disfigure and imprison a billion minds under the transmogrifying guise of Stockholm Syndrome.

Anonymous said...

We are living in a regime where white and blue lives do not matter.

Anonymous said...

A race war would provide a good excuse for destruction of the American economy and replacement of the demographic with TPP immigrants.

Anonymous said...

Re: "The road ahead is not going to be easy."

Wth is Mooch talking about? She's talking about more welfare, reparations, quotas, entitlements. You just can never have enough porch rats.

Anonymous said...

Free flow of people and trade equals Trojan Horse for destruction of representative republicanism. Look for replacement by hubristic we-know-what-is-best-that-you-must-do NWO cronies. This is not the Free Trade that JFK would have approved. The American Ideal is being led to the altar of sacrifice to elite lying traitors.

Anonymous said...

Are Prog Oligarchs waking to the fact that Chicom State Capitalists will always put their state in their capitalism? Might they next wake to the fact that Islam cannot be reformed away from Stockholm Syndrome? Can they wake to the fact that making inner cities into permanent porch-entitlement societies and sanctuary cities will ruin their base of operations? Might ProgOlies have finally roused from a dope haze to realize that wolves have been circling while they have taken an extended holiday from reality? How much more will our ProgOlies have to be humbled before they can be wised up? They are godless and corrupt, but perhaps not as irredeemably stupid as their voter base. IAE, Conservatives need a righteous third party to espouse American Idealism, so they never again have to pray to ProgOlies to humble themselves to good faith.

Anonymous said...

It would be great if a fire breather were to start some back fires. Talk to the American people. Tell them they are living in an oligarchy. That they have at most a last chance to regain a republic. That the media and academia are in the hands of people who are selling the republic down the river. No need to go Howard Network. Just talk to the people, like Father Abraham.

Anonymous said...

The problem is systemic, because the electorate has become so "stupidized." People who can think tend to join "em because they can beat 'em only by lying to 'em. A systematic algorithm has evolved: People with the means to communicate insincere but credible promises let it be known to their hired political prostitutes that it does not matter what lies they tell to get elected, so long as they are willing to read from the script that is written by their owners. After all, promises can always be paid by changing definitions and by blaming goats. The goal is just to elect a puppet so cronies can get on with crony business. Can any candidate ever tell the truth about how DC works and still have any hope of being elected without being poisoned?

Anonymous said...

I wonder which American families contribute the most ISIS recruits. Do these recruits come mainly from (1) conservative middle class families, (2) liberal middle class families, or (3) dysfunctional broken families? Same question with regard to dopers, looters, cheats and criminals.

If 2 and 3, then what would qualify such people to make recommendations about how other people should contribute to supporting and raising the cultural offspring they have so spectacularly failed to decently raise?

People in tropical zones have sometimes learned to complain that their cultures lacked gun technology, metals, and domesticated animals, and were plagued by disease carrying insects. Ok. So, what then is the excuse of minorities who have blocked themselves off in inner cities of America and refused to "act white" in order to assimilate? Whose fault is that?

The people who have the most power to change that are the people who live it. Stop listening to defeatest gang organizers, and tell the race baiters to st*u. Vote for opportunity and individual responsibility. Stop voting for the organized theft of crony corporatists and race baiting community organizers. Stop promoting the anti-Christian messages of many radical churches.

Don't come to America or stay in America for a permanent handout. If you don't like that political philosophy, then volunteer for a banana republic of your choosing. I'm sure a lot of Americans would be happy to pay for a one way ticket upon renouncing of citizenship.

Anonymous said...

Among the people who escape ghetto towns: How many volunteer to "give back" by supporting ghetto gangs? How many ghetto gangs form neighborhood watch groups? How many want to pay increased taxes to support illegals to come to increase the populations of ghetto towns?

Race baiters and ghetto reverends need to stop telling minorities they're entitled to a hammock. Instead, they need to teach that is not wrong for responsible society to not want to entitle any able bodied person to become a burden on society.

Society offers a multitude of ways to escape ghetto culture. Ghetto culture tends to be bad. Minorities should seek to assimilate to the American Ideal. They should teach that acting white, in terms of seeking to become a worthwhile and competent and responsible citizen, is something to be admired, not denigrated. That middle class Americans tend to welcome citizens who contribute to the American Ideal. That rich Progs who claim to want to help organize them to increase gov handouts are more like plantation operators than nice guys. That race baiting and demonstrating and intimidating and looting are never going to work. That they need to renounce the victim culture and learn self respect that comes from self reliance and not from gang banging. That gold medallions and tattoos and saggy pants are for losers who will always be losers, no matter how much they whine or steal.

For most, this will not happen anytime soon. So those with any reasonable ability need to take it on themselves to divorce thug culture. If they fail, very few people who work for a living are going to be impressed with their shenanighans. Ever. That's not racist. That's just the facts.

Anonymous said...

In the lead up to WWII, America's industrialists traded extensively with Hitler. During WWII, America's White House (especially Hopkins and Hiss) conveyed nuclear secrets to Stalin. Hitler got tanks, usable petroleum, and rubber because of Western oligarchs.

In the lead up to WWIII, the Clintons have dealt military technology to China and uranium to Russia, while Obama has opened wide our borders to Islamic infiltration. China (and Iran?) have gotten (or will get) nukes, drones, EMP and space technology because of Western oligarchs.

It's as if our oligarchs and their oz monkeys wanted to sacrifice Americans and liberty on the altar of their quest for the most toys. In pursuit of that, godless American crony-corporatists will sell to China, et al, all the rope they need to hang us.

Western oligarchs imagine a race in which NWO psychology will motivate the Chinese to trade nationalism for oligarchism and likewise motivate Muslims to trade death worship for materialism. In this, our ProgOligarchs are morally insane. They are as dangerous as, if not more dangerous than, the Chinese nationalists and Muslim death worshippers.

Anonymous said...

The task before us is two-fold: Preserve the American republic. Work with like minded republics to defend and promote Western values.

The terrible problem before us is that we are not promoting Western values. Instead, we are being used as dupes, mainly to promote every kind of oligarchy -- so we can be used as pawns in a grand game between oligarchs: to see who can die with the most toys.

Anonymous said...

It's not just conflicts of interest between contending gangs of oligarchs. It's also unified interests among all oligarchs to live off their effectively indentured, debt servicing citizens. Yes, the outlaws compete, but they all parasite off working society.

The clearest example for this may be in the willingness of Rinos and Dinos to hedge and work together to ensure Conservers of Liberty never acquire effective power. Rinos will almost never support a Reagan Conservative over a Democrat. And people like the Clintons and Obamas get much of their campaign riches from kickback deals with the Chinese and Saudis. Not to mention that our industries, like Google, help the Chinese monitor and keep their citizens under tight control.

The game in which they compete to "win" is this: He who dies with the most toys wins. By itself, that is an uninspiring and hollow philosophy under which to try to "win." When old Progs die, their evil doings do not fade away. They tend to endow "charitable" Foundations. And these Foundations tend to morph into institutions bent on advancing Progressivism at the expense of the most important qualities that made America great: Faith, Family, and Fidelity to Country. So Christianity is confined to a corner. Government overseers replace much of the work of parents and churches. And national borders are effectively erased. This is so our chestless billionaires, such "wonderful Americans," can bequeath to us their idea of "Progressivism."

For this reason, hollow "Progressives" unite with Muslims to undermine Christians. Because Progs are zeros at heart, they cannot prevail over what is morally evil -- but they will unite with it to try to destroy what is morally good. Once the last vestige of representative republicanism is destroyed, the system of oligarchy will have "won" -- regardless of whatever flags or oligarchs may at any particular time be most dominant.

Anonymous said...

We won't win a war to avoid becoming ruled by oligarchs merely by enlisting to serve oligarchs. Sorry if that's above your comprehension. In case you hadn't noticed, we're already in a war at home, against our own oligarchs. I am trying to focus on all fronts of the war, without being blinded by saber rattling among contending oligarchs.

Anonymous said...

Imagine neighboring table-service shops that compete via a series of incremental thefts of high stacked and unstable china. One final mis-step and ... kablooie. Oligarchs tend not to have gotten where they are by worrying that much about the little people. So long as godless, ruling oligarchs think they are safe or winning, the risk of a fatal mis-step tends to grow higher and higher.

Anonymous said...

Re: "whip up nationalism"

The more things change, the more they stay the same. When the citizenry of a representative republic lose their manhood and spiritual good faith, the rulers who rise tend to be the ones who care much more about their power than about their people (or whatever spiritual guide they have renounced). These rulers need armies. Heretofore, armies have always meant assimilations of nations. However, when people are divided enough, national loyalties dissolve. Then, despots and oligarchs need private, volunteer armies. Mercenaries. However, the more technologically advanced armies become, the more the ruling oligarchs substitute scientists and drone operators. Except for acquiring and agitating human intelligence and conducting tip-of-the-spear operations, fewer front line warriors are needed. Even so, when a people become disconsolate because of abuses of their rulers, it often becomes necessary to commit masses to brutal conflicts in order to inspire the assimilating fear that is needed to concentrate their attention away from the depredations against them at home. This is sometimes called "wagging the dog."

Tolstoy (who knew a few things about war and peace) noted much of this in his The Kingdom of God is Within You. He said (italics added):

The division of men into two castes, like the violence of the state and of the army, is repugnant to all those moral principles by which our world lives, and at the same time the leading men of culture of our time do not seem to see it.
....
The basis of power is bodily violence.
....
The possibility of exerting bodily violence against people is first of all given by an organization of armed men in which all the armed men act in agreement, submitting to one will. Such assemblies of armed men, who submit to one will, are formed by the army. The army has always stood at the base of power. Power is always found in the hands of those who command an army, and all potentates — from the Roman C├Žsars to the Russian and German emperors — are more than anything else concerned about the army, knowing that if the army is with them, the power will remain in their hands.
....
The governmental power, even if it destroys inner violence, invariably introduces new forms of violence into the lives of men, and this grows greater and greater in proportion with its continuance and intensification.
....
This cannot be otherwise, because the possession of power not only corrupts men, but the purpose or even unconscious tendency of the violators will consist in bringing the violated to the greatest degree of weakening, since, the weaker the violated man is, the less effort will it take to suppress him.
....
In spite of all the hypocritical endeavors of the higher classes to alleviate the condition of the working people, all the working people of our world are subject to an invariable iron law, according to which they have only as much as they need to be always incited by necessity to work and to have the strength for working for their masters, that is, for the conquerors.
....
People generally think that the armies are increased by the governments for the purpose of defending the states against other states, forgetting the fact that armies are needed by the governments for the purpose of protecting themselves against their own crushed and enslaved subjects.

Anonymous said...

America's Founders preferred a well armed militia to a standing army. While a standing army is nowadays vital, it has become very dangerous to America and the world that the republic it should serve is now in the hands of godless and contending oligarchs. America now has a syndicate of international crony-corporatist oligarchs. China has a syndicate of crony-state-capitalist princelings. Whether this new kind of economic competition is called crony-capitalism or crony-socialism, it bodes very ill for human decency.

If Americans fail to show the world a better way, a way to turn away the Beasts and return to human decency and representative republicanism, guided by receptivity to the inviting spiritual Guide, then the mask of politeness and diplomacy will be cast aside as ever it was.

We need a strong West. But its military needs to serve the ideals of the West, without succumbing to be itself ruled.

Anonymous said...

Conservatives tend less to talk to media because they know the media are owned mainly by manipulative oligarchs who take themselves to be their own gods.

Anonymous said...

The oligarchy hates the idea of an independent representative republic. It gets in the way of crony trade among internationally syndicated corporatists. They are not content to enrich and empower Islamists who want to subjugate the world. They want to enrich and empower every kind of international collectivizing despot. They see a future in which America is put out of the way, and they want to be on the ground floor for opportunizing from this new kind of "capitalism." The way is being greased for those who are the most slimy, vicious, immoderate, indecent and sociopathic. And many churches are now participating.

Anonymous said...

Marcellus would smell something rotten. Bush Sr. headed the CIA. Now, Jr. and Slick are "brothers from another mother." The New Generation Jalisco Cartel has become a power in Mexico. Politicians are on the take as brazenly as ever before, with staffs of consiglieres (Lanny Davis, Sandy Berger, the Podesta Group (http://joeforamerica.com/2014/..., Astroturf Axelrod, Karl Christian Rove). Our Prez is completely twisted towards flipping the demographic, heedless of national defense. ISIS claims to have operatives in country. Imagine how political insiders could deploy ISIS by twisting it to its purposes. Both ISIS and the Cartel well know the uses of terror. The regime salivates for excuses to impose martial law.

So, what ethic would preclude any participant in the regime from cashing in with the cartel? Youse scratch my back, I scratch youse, see? And what is Huckabee's role? Is he a nice guy, or is his role to hand the nomination to JEB? How wide-winked is the cannibalization of America? How many skeletons does Hillary have the goods on? Where has she stored her inside info? Events that would put any other person in prison just roll off the insiders. The more nefarious the suspicions, the more the evildoers seem to prosper. Capone was a celebrity until a way was finally found to convict him. Publicity attracts its funders. It's about offering them deals they can't refuse.

Ghetto boys across the nation support the corruption, so long as the people spinning the narrative keep promising and delivering the EBT hammock. Many "journalists" are just insider wannabes. It's all about the narrative. No facts can convince or convict the proponents of the narrative, because their livelihoods (or lives?) would then be threatened. It's as if Rinos and Dinos had gotten together to entertain the public with a grand traveling kabuki show, to divert the everyday workers while their pockets are picked, their country is raided, and their children are fitted with permanent debt servitude and shackles.

The Prog-Left-Cloward-Piven-Cannibals are right about one thing: The nation is rotted. It is rotted because of the Prog-Left-Cloward-Piven-Cannibals. It may be that secession could not be enough. These scum would have to be frog marched out of whatever remnant can be reclaimed as America. Since secession is not likely do-able, the alternatives are convention of states and nullification. The sooner the better. Meanwhile, it's rotter and rotterer. Obama is doing a helluva job.

Anonymous said...

I much doubt that on-site reporters want objective, fair minded witnesses as much as they want sensationalism that sells. Given two somewhat articulate witnesses, one being careful and precise and the other playing to emotions, which one would be chosen to be interviewed on air?

I suspect it's like making a movie. There are behind camera people and in front of camera people. The product is about the sales. If a witness enhances ratings, the reporter gets more gigs. The stories start to select themselves.

Accuracy in reporting? I give you Brian Williams, Mike Tobin, Tiffany, Shepard Smith, and on and on and on. The reporters are not punished for parlaying distortions so long as they stay within the realm of plausible innocence. "News" stations select their audience niches before they select their reporters or stories. What Rachel Maddow and Jon Stewart "report" is what their audiences ask for. Fox is no different, especially O'Reilly.

The public is programmed to select for narrative over truth because that is what media and academia have taught them all their lives. Given a controversial subject, it tends to be difficult and rare for people to investigate enough to reasonably hope to ascertain truth. Messengers often learn to keep unpopular facts to themselves.

In terms of what sells, the interview of Tiffany indeed was "great journalism." Kudos for your observations! Students of Journalism and just about anything, really, should get grade enhancements if they become regular readers of the A.T. blog and comments!

Anonymous said...

Re: " trying to explain the Lord as "our Father". But to make it work, he had to get into some pretty detailed and painful discussions of what a father is"

No wonder so many people are completely contemptuous of faith! Given that "father" for many thugs means a thug progenitor, no wonder so many are attracted to ISIS! The destruction of the family pushes people either towards replacing fathers with commie gov or with head cutting allah. This is why the "caring" of Progs is really hate. But they project their hate as if it were coming from Whitey. Once beyond a window of opportunity to raise a decent child, the best that can be done tends to be to keep him well supervised. Which, of course, he will resist by all means available. Which Progs will project to blame on Whitey and the police.

Anonymous said...

For Progs, "law" tends to be just a bedtime story told by rulers to dupes. As such, Conservatives often need to nullify so-called ProgLaw (when they cannot rescind it).

Problem is, Conservatives want rule under law, not under despotic men. However, Progs want law only as a means to dictate their pleasures. IOW, Conservatives want law to facilitate decent society, while Progs are beholden not to decency but to pleasure.

Ultimately, the resolution between Progs and Conservatives is less about devising the best system of laws than about how to assimilate society while excreting waste. That is a very messy process, filled with noise, cognitive dissonance and barriers to communication.

From Emerson, I would take it to be a foolish consistency for Conservatives to try to restrain Progs by confining themselves to laws. Especially since Progs are poised to irredeemably prostitute the fundamental idea of law under a representative republic by thoroughly polluting the electorate. We are at a point where legal niceties will not be enough to revive the all-but-unconscious republic. I say this as a recently retired (Thank God!) lawyer. We need a truer North Star than mere manmade law. That North Star abides in an inviting Reconciler who appeals to the conscience of each person, as an individual.

Anonymous said...

Problem is, the ignorant and corrupt Left stays with its initial impressions -- which are very hard to reverse. The Left values the narrative. The facts really don't matter very much. Indeed, if the salient facts were routinely and promptly reported, the Left could not survive. The reliable base of the Progs consists in the most ignorant of the Dinos and the most corrupt, double-speaking, and double-hedging of the Rinos.

Anonymous said...

But for a self-evident meta Reconciler, the cosmos itself would be nothing but a temporal exercise in sequences of non-cognitive dissonance, like an infinity of dominos falling after a perpetually elusive restoration to a shrouded zero point. The beginning of mental instability and the surrender of individual moral irresponsibility is to believe the Reconciler has been killed or replaced by oligarchs, profs, nomenklatura, priests, reverends, mullahs, imams, or mad men.

Anonymous said...

Nearly every event on which social commentary is made is twisted to a war between Oligarchs who want to rule and Conservatives who want to retain their liberty. The mass of people who are unaware of this are pushed along by the Oligarchs' hirelings, and the Conservatives are losing. Every person and institution that can be bought has been bought. No opportunity to grind Conservatives into dust is neglected. Every evil that can be twisted against them is summoned. Books are openly dedicated to the Devil. Assembly line beheaders are funded and encouraged. Anti-humanity is propagandized as a "religion of peace." Against Conservative Jews, even America's secular Jews are in the forefront of funding the destruction of personal conscience and liberty.

The new electorate has been trained from Kindergarten to be ruled by its feelings, which can be easily twisted by well funded deconstructors of America. There is no substantive common sense to assimilate the electorate or to armor it against the depravities of wannabe rulers who are beholden to nothing except their immediate gratifications and their ruling paymasters. The muscles of our political system, as it is, have been rotted to the core, filled with necrotic tissue. Compare http://mashable.com/2015/05/05... The system, as it is, cannot endure. Much of it is beyond salvage and will have to be amputated.

Whether any remnant can be salvaged depends on whether it can rally again to a nation built on faith, family, and individual responsibility. All the undisciplined evil of the world has found unity in only one thing: Being against the best ideals of America and Israel. Like a spoiled child who comes to rule and thus despise his parents, the undisciplined evil of the world has come to rule and despise all that is good and decent. Like the spoiled child, it will become its own victim. Matthew 16: For what will it profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul?

Anonymous said...

College is about identifying, networking, and fast tracking the quickest studies at becoming useful idiots. Like, way beyond the merely profane and deeply into the really offensive. https://video.search.yahoo.com...

They want to learn how to feel as beautiful to their masters as their masters want them to feel. Except among free thinkers, substantive argumentation has little chance against the well funded appetites of masters buying followers.

Anonymous said...

Things will continue to get curioser and curioser regarding ways the Reconciler opportunes conservation sinks among alternatives within the cosmos.

I am no physicist by a long shot! but as best I gather, the prevailing idea seems to be that gravity is a force, but not an energy. That there is no such thing as "pure energy," even though calculations can be made concerning energy. That photons and other fundamental force carriers (excepting the weak force) carry energy, but they do not have mass. That energy can radiate along gravitational disturbances in space-time. That energy can be directed to push, or be absorbed by, a mass. That the surrounding system preserves a balance at all times. Has anyone ever "seen" a photon? http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

EDIT: A force field, like a gravitational, electromagnetic, or strong nuclear field, seems to be conceptualized as a force, not an energy. To push, pull, deflect, absorb, divide, charge, or jump a mass within a field is conceptualized to entail a balanced exchange of energy. To create or sustain a force field seems to entail a balancing exchange of energy. The concept of a big bang entails a concept of a force and anti-force, energy and anti-energy, mass and anti-mass.

So, I wonder what may such Conceptualization entail? What may practical Conceptualization that is renormalized among varying perspectives within varying contexts entail? May our cosmos signify some kind of self programming programmer? What is the character of our participatory responsibility, for participating in the unfolding design of our civilization?

One thing seems clear: There is no morality in abdicating one's responsibility to "man up" to think for oneself, without accepting intimidation by Mohmadmen or their slavish femiProgs. I wish more of the West's girlymen had half the fortitude of Pamela Gellar!

Anonymous said...

I actually agree with this: "Economic disaster happens in America when wealth is concentrated at the top, and we are at an all time high for wealth concentration."

People can play with stats all day long. At the end of the day, America has done better under Eisenhower, Kennedy, Reagan, and Gingrich (Contract with America). Under Progs (Carter, Bush Sr., Bush Jr., and Obama, not so much. Clinton was a caretaker, prodded along by Gingrich. Had his admin not been dogged by Conservatives, it is much to be doubted that there would have been any surplus.

In any event, the growing deficits started in the year of the last Clinton budget, not in the first year of the Bush administration. http://finance.townhall.com/co...

Moreover, much of the surplus was a dot-com myth. That said, I agree that Prog Bush Jr.'s tax givaway was a pile of dog crap. As I said, I am not a Republican. I am a Conserver of Liberty.

Anonymous said...

So long as crony corporatists use gov pull to cheat and obtain unearned redistributions (via special and restrictive permits, licenses and regulations), political parties will pretend to balance the unfairness by using gov pull to cheat and redistribute unearned welfare.

It is far too late to stop the momentum of these forces. I think the best that can be done is to deflect and redirect them.

For example, as corporations advantage themselves at the expense of the nation and general citizenry by importing foreign labor in order to bid labor down, it's a little unfair of them then to tell ordinary workers that they ought not likewise use gov.

A way to deflect much of this abuse is to decentralize gov and send much of its functions back to states, cities, churches, and charities. This can be done with a Convention of States.

Anonymous said...

Presumably, it is the role of charities to provide a civilized safety net that is not a porch hammock for the able bodied. However, various forces lead charities to conflate taking opm with charity. How can churches be convinced to stop leading communities to force gov to redistribute opm under the guise of charity?

From what I see, churches are trying to make themselves as irrelevant as Scotus. Once all power and charity are delegated to the departmental arms of the regime, what role is left for churches, Congress, or Scotus?

Anonymous said...

The Muslim Brotherhood is Pan-Islamic. Its slogan is "God is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. The Qur'an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of God is our highest hope. God is great! Its first priority is to install Sharia law. Until then, Sunni and Shia are brothers. Once Sharia law is installed, the fight between Sunni and Shia can proceed.

Valerie Jarrett, who runs Obama, is Commie, Muslim Brotherhood, Shia, born in Iran. Her father-in-law is Vernon Jarrett, who worked with Communist Party member and Obama mentor Frank Marshall Davis. Huma, who is Hillary's right hand, is Sunni.

ISIS believes Shias are apostates who must die to forge a purer Islam.

Does Obama favor Shia or Sunni, or does he just seek to stir the pot by promoting the Muslim Brotherhood? His parent's marriage fits NIKAH MUT'AH. That is Shia doctrine for temporary marriage, under which a Shia Muslim man may marry a Jew or Christian for a specific period.

While Shia Islam is a minority in Kenya, it is well rooted in Mombasa, where Shia have run schools and hospitals. Common Shia names tend to be Ali, Hussain, Hussein, Hassan, and Abbas. Shias and Sunnis pray in different ways. Sunnis fold hands or cross arms in front of their stomachs, and Shias rest their palms on their thighs.

But most Kenyans tend to be Sunni. Indonesians tend to be Sunni. Malcolm X was a convert to Sunni. Supposedly, Obama learned how to be black from Malcolm X. Louis Farrakhan is closer to Sunni theology. Obama appears to have been financed in his schooling by Saudi Sunni Islam.

I think Obama is primarily a Marxist. He is very sympathetic to Islam. Apart from using its totalitarian methods, he may not care that much whether Shia or Sunni prevail in the Middle East. He is no friend of Israel or representative republicanism. He is a despotic elitist who thinks the masses need to be made equal under the rule of their betters and should learn to say, Thank you. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i... So incredibly funny! (Sarc.)

Obama is willing to put humanity under worldwide strife until a system of worldwide despotic control can be installed. Hillary is down with that.

Anonymous said...

I don't believe this is the best of all possible worlds. Nor do I believe there is a cosmic scale for weighing which world is better than any other. Nor for saying what survivor is really fittest. We take what happens to survive and the world as it happens to unfold and make the best interpretation of it that we can appreciate for our situation.

Evolution does not "progress." It unfolds. What is *"best" makes sense only in respect of a niche and a purpose. We don't create our niche, but we participate in how we appreciate it and try to manage it. We tend our gardens.

If our goal is to raise up a generation that can preserve human liberty, we tend to sacrifice the best among us to foreign wars and then import the worst of dregs to replace them.

Eventually, the Great Wheel turns and brings back the worst of the systems that oppose human dignity. Faith, family and fidelity can forestall that. But the destruction of faith, family and fidelity hurries it along. Or so it seems to me.

Anonymous said...

In polygamous societies, unsuccessful males seek relief by alternative means. And the women in a harem get tired of waiting in long lines to service just one person. Homosexuality may go well with polygamy. Which is probably next up on the Gay Agenda. I doubt a polygamous society can sustain a political system based on representative republicanism. Thus, homosexuals seem to want to usher us to neo-fascistic despotism. So long as they can convert to goats, their coming Islamic masters may not mind.

Anonymous said...

Genetic tendencies are not excuses for immorality because the brain is neuroplastic. It can work around and modify tendencies. Legal rewards and punishments can serve as part of the inducement to such modifications. In hard cases, where incorrigibility and stupidity just cannot be fixed, there is always the needle and the quarantine. Those who are given the needle also serve ... to focus the minds of their fellow travelers. If neuroplasticity did not work, Islamic Stockholm Insanity Syndrome (ISIS) would not have become nearly so successful. IAE, there are better and more humane ways to apply principles of neuroplasticity to help most brains rewire themselves. The problem is, elitagarchs have their own social program agendas.

Anonymous said...

Why do the people who cringe at the idea of eugenics celebrate dysgenics? I get the danger of applying eugenics on the scale of the individual. But why must our so-called enlightened people be so insistent on burdening us with dysgenics on a massive scale? What is to be celebrated about importing genes for violence, laziness, ignorance, and voting to undermine representative republicanism and "genetic capital"? Is there some kind of dystopian gene for being Ivy smart about being massively stupid?

Anonymous said...

I think a good society should provide its citizens with a safety net that is not turned into a porch hammock. Preferably, the safety net should be provided by volunteer organizations. This is because bureaucrats want to build empires out of poor clients and fiat money, while volunteer organizations need to work within budgets. Making church contributions and tuition payments deductible tends to turn priests and profs into assistants to empire builders. When the safety net is turned into a gov entitlement, those who provide it tend to be despised for not providing more, and not appreciated for providing what they can.

Anonymous said...

Priests filling pews and profs filling schools. Make excuses for all deviants, addicts, idiots and illegals and they will come. Let them borrow money from the treasury that is funded by a captive and subjugated people. Let these newly blessed parishoners and students receive their charity and tuition from opm. Sow the wind and reap the whirlwind.

Anonymous said...

I suspect the part of Africa that is the most Islamic tends to produce more of the negative of what Thomas Sowell would call "social capital" (which entails the kind of decency, goodwill, trust and public transparency among social networks and tribes that is conducive to economic development). Compare inner American cities, where black, negative, parasitical, social capital seems to be applied more to promoting porch-welfare-tribal societies than economic viability. If Islamic nations lacked oil reserves and Western investment, would they remain stuck in pre-modernity?

Anonymous said...

Put Islam in the same room as criminal conspiracy. Islam has been successful only because it is perhaps the most vicious form of despotic patriarchy imaginable. It is as successful as a marauding caravan of bedouins would be, were its only moral guide to consist in what pleasured its epileptic leader. Musloidism masquerades as a religion only to mask its despotic criminals. If a person's religion consists in what that person really believes about God, then by definition a person who professes a criminal creed merely to save his head or serve his patriarchy is not an adherent of such "religion." Although he is a co-conspirator in crime.

Anonymous said...

The problem with Islam is that it covers, hides away from, and severs so many artistic possibilities under blankets and mutilations.

All that we experience is tied together, connected under a single system of mathematically evolving functions. Whatever the character of that which ties us and our cosmos together, IT seems to be the only thing-in-itself -- the immeasurable, perplexing, changeless author of all the changes that we can substantively measure in our limiting dimensionality. This Thing-In-Itself is charged with capacity to give expression to variously conserving systems of interfunctioning relationships. As to our measures of "substantive reality," there seems to be no end to IT -- just regressing infinity. Whatever the alpha or the omega of IT, such is metaphysically beyond our measuring kin. We can detect no true, tiniest, building-block of reality-in-itself. No smallest part-icle, no system of closed loops of tiny vibrating strings. For a single connector, there seems to be only an immeasurable thing (The Word), which avails expression of math-based models of substance -- AS IF such regressively receding substance "really" exists as its own independent author.

Since we cannot confine The Word to our measure, what may we intuit regarding the quality of IT's character? What seems to be the character of a meta Thing-in-itself, which in itself is not measurable, but which sponsors and produces the system of math-based relationships by which all measurable appearances of substance under our part-icipation are expressed and unfolded before us?

What is the nature and purpose of IT's fluxing artistry, as renormalized to our sensations and experiences? Intuitively, IT's moral aspect seems to be fairly represented in the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule. Under those rules, if we want to preserve human civilization, our best guide seems mostly to be found in the Sermon on the Mount.

A main question presented to each of us, having before us the model of the Conscious Author of the Cosmos, seems to be: What is the artistic potential for what Pure Consciousness can create and appreciate? Imagine the man who is color blind, who is presented with special glasses, who is then for the first time able to see the colors of his children's eyes and their clothing, in all their glory? https://www.youtube.com/watch?.... Then imagine the man who realizes for the first time that the existentiality of the conscious Creator of the Cosmos is not the fanciful contradiction so many people have always supposed Him to be. That awakening would seem to be like the "beginning of infinity," as well as the dawn of artistic possibilities to unfold before us ever after.

The problem with Islam is that it covers, hides away from, and severs so many artistic possibilities under blankets and mutilations.

Anonymous said...

If a string loop is postulated to be so tiny that it can by no means ever be seen or measured, then does it make a vibration? Inquiring fairies want to know.

Anonymous said...

Muslims have the means (Saudi financing), the motivation (72 raisins), and the opportunity (Prog slackers) to rise to the highest levels of power. Look what the commies did with far less during the FDR admin. And look what the Gay Hollywood Mafia has done with just 2% of the public for practitioners. Look what has been done to the world economy by a small number of financiers. Islam has a billion committed looney tunes. The famous last words of our republic may be: Nothing to worry about here.

Anonymous said...

How do we win the propaganda war that is being waged against all decent people of the middle class? First, know the enemy. The enemy consists not just in uniformed Leftists. The enemy also consists in Prog elitists who like to use the uniformed elitists. The Rinos who pose as Republicans. The enemy consists of all who wish to impose a two-class society. They are the godless statists, the morally corrupt, and the self-willingly non-competent. Once they own and operate the media means of broadcasting deceit in order to persuade, they will be as resistent as ticks at being dislodged.

You can't pull a tick out by its body, because its head will just burrow deeper into your skin. You have to hold a hot stick close to them until they back out. When you find a nest of ticks, you can't just cut it up. You have to burn it. A tick does not want to be reasoned with. It has to be burned. A child's character tends to be formed by age three. After that, it is very difficult to remold the basic orientation of the child for becoming a responsible individual versus a human tick. To pay for the shelter, clothing, feeding, entertaining, and self esteem of ticks is to cover the land with them. We have to recognize human ticks for what they are. We have to stop nurturing and paying them to produce more of the same.

We have to take our children out of their schools, out of their brainwashing nests, out of their fake religions, and out of their fake sciences. We will have to discredit their institutions of "education" and "information" at every opportunity. Nullify their host-farming regulations, ridicule their certificates, tar their leaders. Most especially, we will have to stop letting foreign muslims and commies buy our pols to shut down our energy production to sell us their oil and propaganda. Of the pols and cronies who have sold out, we need to stop the tax-free funding of their libraries and foundations. We have to stop letting Congress pour mandates on our heads while exempting themselves. We will have to stop being nice about it. You have to ask yourself: Would Jesus be nice to a human tick?

Anonymous said...

Interpretative relates easily with capacity for abstract, free thinking. Literalistic relates to discomfort with departure from the concrete. Traditionalistic relates to extent of being psychologically hidebound. Modernistic relates to capacity to be adaptive. Such selective categorization could as well be applied to various other anti-social groupings, such as Nazis, Commies, Crony Corporatists, and Crony Socialists. The various subcategories could perhaps be expanded, like a multiphasic personality inventory chart. This could lead to an industry, with branch offices for MMP!, -2, -A,-2-RF, and so on. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M....

Representative Republics may find interest in x-line graphing of scales that phase between orientation towards collective herd-mindedness versus individual free-thinking and y-line graphing of scales that phase between childish dependence versus individual competence. Maybe a third z-dimension could be added for empathy.

However, when the point becomes less about seeking truth than about studying people so they can be categorized, then what is the value of the information or the debate? Well, I suppose there would be value for people farmers and advertising targeters. The more each of us is monitored and categorized, the more we can be managed by our masters or divided and defeated by opposing syndicates of oligarchs.

Just be aware that the "enemy" is likely applying similar x,y,z types of analysis to us. IOW, the value of such analysis is to target those who can be useful to a new world paradigm versus those who must probably be eliminated.

I think there is a simpler, better way: Don't try to understand them. Just rope and throw and brand them. Dhimmi or deport all musloids. In any event, do not import any more of them. If the West did not support Muslims, their societies would gradually fade away.

Anonymous said...

Death taxes fail in their one legitimate purpose: to prevent an oligarchy. And, as you say, to add insult to injury, they actually make the few who are in the oligarchy more powerful and less open to competition! Typical non-thinking Americans are being had! Black American families have been had perhaps worst of all. Yet, the media and academia go merrily along, pandering, lying, and obfuscating all the way. Evil reigns by pretending to feel pain!

The Clinton Foundation makes a good example. It escapes taxation even as it facilitates the living large lives of the Clintons. Even as it is largely a political slush fund. While we have a corporate income tax, these foundations ought not be tax exempt.

Eventually, the income tax needs to be killed. But once it is, means will be all the more needed to reduce the usage of these kinds of foundations for greasing their investors in the ways of crony politics and lobbying. https://www.clintonfoundation....

Socialism means becoming the horse that pulls the carriage class. Socialism, progressivism, post-modern liberalism, communism, fascism, feudalism, metrosexual feel-you-and-your-pain'ism, crony corporatism, state capitalism -- they're all just alternatives of two-class oligarchism.

Anonymous said...

An oligarchy is destroying the republic. Aside from dampening the development of a perpetual class of oligarchs that would otherwise rule the republic in place of its people, there is no other legitimate purpose for death transfer taxes. However, that legitimate purpose does not necessitate a tax on business income that is not taken out or distributed as wages. But it would necessitate that businesses either be barred from engaging in political lobbying and campaign contributions or that they be dissuaded from such activities by some kind of special progressive scheme.

So, amend the Constitution to allow the national government to eliminate national business and income taxes and replace those taxes with a national sales tax that is collected and paid only by retailers, maybe with aid of a progressive tax on consumption against individuals, lobbyists, and money transfers out of country.

This would be hard to accomplish because oligarchs want to rule and political operatives want to tempt their rule. Operatives like the temptation of corruption and would be loath to part with it because it nurtures their crony kickback threats, promises, and schemes. Such temptations provide endless entertainment for system-gaming jockeys. Without system-gamers, how would we ever serve our politically gaming addictions?

Anonymous said...

Take away all charitable tax deductions! They were sold to us on the idea that they would help society. That has become a lie. Fake church and other "charities" have become the tools of their sponsoring oligarchs! who are the tools of evil, which is the tool of the devil. The only way to give real charities a chance to compete is to take away the deductions that are used by oligarchs and their shills to farm humanity.

What we need is less secular corruption under shills for liars and more humility under the Reconciler. Otherwise, EVERY permitted "charity" will be turned into either a promotion for homosexuals or a promotion for muslims --- to the destruction of the Judeo-Christian based republic.

Anonymous said...

Normal people tend not to be much appreciated or promoted. According to George Bernard Shaw, all "progress" depends on the unreasonable man. However, one may as well say that all destructiveness depends on the abnormal person.

IAE, it is quite noticeable that a majority of influential promotions in all institutions of significance go to abnormal, deceitful, rule breaking, homosexual, deviant, corrupt, brutal, mongering, self worshipping, self chosen, people abusing, child abusing and sociopathic people. There seems to be a selective advantage whereby the people who are promoted are those who are smart, agile, beguiling, and charismatic enough to survive and compensate for their abnormality. There is a kind of breath taking inevitability in watching a ruthless Napoleon or a wretchedly lying Clinton get sponsored and promoted to power. In the perverted minds of these people, they imagine they are the State. So, if they go down, the State should go down. Meantime, no measure of depravity is beyond them in the pursuit of their purposes.

These people seem to imagine they are the creators of the greater good. Dostoyevsky wrote of this in his Crime and Punishment. In that novel, a poor ex-student wants to test his notion that great people have a right to relieve littler people of their existence. To conduct his test, he executes a pawnbroker. Obama is like that. To conduct his test, he seeks to destroy America and "justifies" himself as pursuing a "higher purpose."

For militant gays, the higher purpose seems to be to replace families with gov supervision under bureaucrats. For commies, oligarchs, and muslims, the higher purpose is to reduce the masses to equal servitude under despotic crony state-corporatists.

The problem is this: Once such people are selected for power, they tend to favor and bring their likenesses along with them. Thus, the entitlement minded, chooming deviant in the White House seeks to burden all of decent society to ensconce his kind in the comfort of hammocks-on-porches -- paid for courtesy of all the normal people.

Anonymous said...

There is a difference that is worth noting between homosexuals and malignantly narcissistic homosexuals. To wrap them all together is to overcompensate one's sense of tolerance. Yes, unhappy people bent on acting out by destroying others is a problem that comes in all sexualities. That does NOT mean that we ought not notice forewarnings of anti-social proclivities: Passive aggressors building towards violent explosions. And people of victim mindsets, like our prezy, who are firm in believing everyone else must change to accomodate them -- or else!

Anonymous said...

There does seem to be a touch, among militant gays (and muslims), of willingness to destroy the republic (or plane or train) and all the people in it rather than conform to prevailing precepts of normality.

Compare: If it came to be necessary for self defense, many people would be willing to pull the trigger on jihadis. The difference is, they would reserve that option for the sake of defense of self and progeny -- not for the mere sake of self pleasure. They would give the offender the option to leave. They would not require that he "fundamentally change" his mind set in order to be allowed to continue to live. They would not destroy a republic where they had other options. Among malignant narcissists, that does not appear to be the case.

Where does this lead? How safe are our children, given our society's increasing "tolerance" of malignant narcissists?

Anonymous said...

Our republic and the faith of our fathers have been laid waste by a tsunami of depravity of our own making. What should we expect when the main concern of everyone is to get his immediate gratification? This has been the trend ever since the Greatest Generation failed to wean the Hippie Generation.

The main part of the people in government, like the rest of the Prog Base, want not to have to do anything for a living other than to vote for their own "benign" enserfment. They want to be farmed, fed, and pleasured. So they vote for their NWO masters. Just as their representatives do, and just as their puppet prezy does.

Why should any chestless person in a chestless society buck the tsunami of watered down money that is siphoned and sloshed about by the NWO Nafta Trans Pacific Partnership? Except to seek to make the TPP even worse for the republic, Progs do not really oppose it. Many among us have been reduced to a special kind of cattle. A kind that becomes very upset when the spell of the bedtime story being told by their handlers is interrupted. Many of those among us have volunteered to be the little doggies, but the misfortune is all of our own.

Anonymous said...

I don't think the oligarchs who hedge on both Rinos and Dinos are stupid. They want to decimate the Conservative base. They only pretend to care about the GOP Party. So they play the disinformation game. In reality, they could care less if the electorate is flipped to become permanently stoopid. That will just make it that much easier to misdirect and demagogue. I can see calling the Oligarch owners evil, corrupt, godless, pleasure addled, and short sighted choomers. But not stupid. They are preparing to spring a Trans Pacific Partnership that will effectively and permanently dissolve our borders and demographic. THEY WANT THIS! So, they package it as reaching out to make a bigger tent. They are PLAYING us.

Anonymous said...

At some future time, when AI robots do most of the work, single payer via regional agreements among states may make more sense. It makes no sense at this time. This is because there is no Constitutional authority for it. And because our power grabbing regime is intent on flooding the demographic to destroy all political literacy for responsible republicanism.

Indeed, the unsustainable complexity of Obamacare seems to be just one more insult meant to help topple the republic. We need candidates who canclearly and forcibly articulate this, so they can demonstrate to all but the most ignorant that the truly uncaring miscreants are all among the lying, two-faced Dems. Evil needs to be called for what it is, with no uncertain mewling.

We don't need a fed fix. We need the fed gov to get out of the way.

Anonymous said...

At some point, you may learn that there is no such thing as freedom without law. Nor of a free society without a culture that can defend it. Whatever else they may be, libertarians who cannot conserve and preserve their culture are not RR libertarians. I much doubt that RR would support the Justice Kennedy Scotus style of gov-forced social libertarianism of today. But rather than analyze that, you play 3 card monty.

What have Archie Bunker or GHWB got to do with anything under discussion? I have always been against the US trying to build nations where the cultural soil for it is barren.

But the idea that the US could sustain itself as a mere hodge podge of multicultural inner cities would be laughable.

Apparently, you believe that I -- a person who espouses a small fed gov, respect for the 10th Amendment, who declines to favor fed funding for gay czars to groom kids, who thinks kids need a base of sustainable cultural values, who believes in the importance of faith, family and fidelity, who believes strong churches that do not rely on tax-based or gov charity are important for helping to keep gov intrusion at a minimum -- am a non-libertarian.

In that case, I accept your label, with pride. As I said, I am not a "whatever libertarian." I am a conserver of liberty. Maybe you're too enamored with your labels and 3 card monty to get it?

Anonymous said...

Are you a right, left, capitalist, socialist, or whatever libertarian? Is there some well-defined notion you have in mind regarding libertarianism? Define your terms.

Do parents have a right in your scheme to defend their children from groomers? Do you have a philosophy concerning what values a society needs to assimilate to be able to defend liberty going forward?

Once you define your terms and clarify your thinking, do your own research. Perhaps the next time there is an AT article concerning "gay marriage," ask the various trolls whether they consider themselves libertarians, socialists, or liberals.

From there, examine what liberty means. Does it mean free will, pre-determined will, or participatory will? At what level of age or maturity should society respect the "free will" of its members? What do you mean by liberty? Do citizens owe an obligation to obey a draft if they are needed to defend the nation?

Anonymous said...

Well, by your definition. I suspect a whole lot of three-card-monty shape- shifting goes on among the varieties of people who call themselves libertarians. Or conservatives, for that matter. I found I could no longer categorize myself among the popular labels, so I came up with my own: Conserver of Liberty.

Anonymous said...

I don't want gov imposing on or grooming my grandchildren. I don't care what adults do in their bedrooms. I don't care what adults choose to ingest. I do care when gov specially licenses judges and drones to groom kids to values that cannot sustain a free republic. I want to be free to not have my kids constantly hammered with choom gov propaganda for lifestyles that cannot sustain responsible citizenry. Is that too much to ask from Whatever Libertarians?

Anonymous said...

I am a Conserver of Liberty. Not a social conservative, not a prog, commie, doper, anarchist, child groomer, or Whatever Libertarian. More like a Randian who believes in the Reconciler. I want that system of minimal gov intrusion that is needed to establish and DEFEND liberty. I doubt that free-love, free-dope, popular libertarians are of much practical use in establishing liberty or defending it against simple-minded, crazed jihadis and anarchists. By "Whatever Libertarian" I mean someone who is tolerant of those who want to take his stuff and deprave his children.

Anonymous said...

The idea of liberty conservation necessitates the minimal law making and assimilation of mores without which there would be neither law nor morality. The alternative is not the noble savage of anarchy but the short, nasty and brutish tribe. When no one feels fidelity to any shared community values, then the community becomes easy prey for tribal jihadis. A savory stew of hedonistic peace and love for cannibals. This is rather simple, actually, but it seems beyond the kin of the popular, assmodean, libertarian mind.

Anonymous said...

It seems the "Whatever-Libertarian" mind gives no thought to what is needed in faith, family and republic to raise a good and responsible child. Because it cannot perpetuate itself beyond a generation, it is as unsustainable as a society of shakers or homosexuals. "Whatever" is not a worthy prescription for raising a child.