3-D STOOGES --- Dingbat Pelosi, Dipdoowa Frank, and Drip Reid, whistling while they work:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3Vg8eqHans.
Anyone who doubts that Globalists and their puppet-meisters are forcefully pushing the N.W.O. agenda and failing to defend the American Republic and our Constitution should check this out:
“THE ROYAL Bank of Scotland is to be one of the biggest beneficiaries of the planned $700 billion bail-out that comes courtesy of the American tax-payer if the US Congress gives the financial rescue package the go-ahead this weekend.”
****
Comments:
Bush and his crony Globalists are not really Republicans. A Republican would defend our Republic, i.e., the U.S.A.
But Globalists are pushing as fast and hard as they can to erase our borders, internationalize our law, globalize our currency, and reduce us all to debt slaves to money masters.
Whatever their “vision,” GLOBALISTS ARE BLATANTLY GIVING THE FINGER TO THEIR OATHS TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION.
I can hardly guess whether their purpose is to try to win some top-tier, skull-and-bones frat game, serve high-money elites, or to try to save us from inter-national destruction in their own perverse way.
But, it does not matter. I do not want to be a pawn in their silly game; I do not think the world is safely ready for world wide government; I do not want to be tied too closely to Communist or Islamic blocs; and I think the world would be safer were the U.S. to right itself and seek to be true to its best traditions.
As things stand, I quite doubt that continued encroachment of anything-goes liberal-style depravity into Eastern venues is calculated to encourage or preserve peace or harmony in the world.
Blame for Meltdown --- let the record show: Democrats dishonest in denials --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs.
Solution --- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wwC7q_gdex0.
Globalists should be flushed out with fire hoses!
****
EYEOPENER --- http://www.energybulletin.net/node/23259.
14 comments:
What is the disgusting fact behind symbolism: that the trinity of our present “leadership” consists of Bush, Pelosi, and Reid, accompanied by Barney Frank? Drunk, Ding-Bat, Drip, and Dip-Doo-Wa: What a frolicking band!
Whoever may be the puppet-meisters pulling the strings and curtains, they evidently have quite little respect or regard for the rest of us.
If we are to regain any semblance of self-respect, we must account for why and how we have allowed ourselves to become reduced to being led by this bunch of clowns being strung before us. Then, we must resolve to rededicate ourselves to American fundamentals, as espoused by Lincoln.
As things stand, this show just ain’t funny anymore.
Forward to Reps (maybe a few still have some macho and hembra):
SUBJECT: ENOUGH!
Because our fractional reserve requirements for our banking system allowed credit institutions to lend up to ten times their deposits, and because bad loans were encouraged and sometimes even mandated, we have now reached a point where lenders could be exposed to losses up to ten times the amount of their deposits.
If taxpayers are to be charged to bail them out, may the scammers yet profit, even if only a portion of what they lent is recouped? If so: heads, they win; tails, taxpayers bail them out. Quite a scam!
Do our Representatives now seriously expect to mandate, out of taxpayers’ future blood, sweat, and tears, that we must pick up the tab for up to ten times the amount of bad bets made for Ponzi scammers, worldwide? And they have the gall to pretend to be “our Representatives?” Who are they kidding?
The magnitude of such gall is, at first, stunning. Then, maddening. But, we need to get past the madness. We may need to do some actual “physical stuff:” Like, get out some fire hoses and flush out some rats.
No more rule by secret societies, with members loyal mainly to each other, instead of to God and Country. Back to basics! Enough of political correctness! Enough of public degeneracy! Enough of snooty, cosmopolitan assholes and elitists! Less tut tut, more shame; and more Second Amendment!
To Ivy Leaguers, Elitists, Bush, Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Money Changers, and George Soros, et al: At long last, have you no shame?!
Subject: N.W.O.
Question:
Do we feel lucky? Do we expect that people who have risen to the top, based mainly on dog-eat-dog shenanigans, really have our best interests at heart?
Do our hearts warm for people practiced in Orwellian deceit, for pulling wool over our eyes with words that stun thinking while actually meaning their opposite, with words like: Fairness Doctrine, Center for American Progress, MoveOn.Org, Human Rights Watch, Media Matters, Democracy Alliance, Air America, ACORN, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, Media Matters, and ProPublica?
Or did we just let "democracy" get redefined as control by elitists?
Do the atheistic Soros’ of the world really envision beneficent rule over the proletariat, or are we just become sheep to be shorn? Is their “faith” in survival of the most cynical and vicious, rather than in Lincoln’s regard for survival of civilizing freedom and dignity?
Behind both Obama and Bush lies Soros, et al. Behind Soros, who are the “et al”?
****
Snippets from http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/how_allies_of_george_soros_hel.html:
The Sandlers have started to invest their billions of dollars politically, in the manner of George Soros, sugar daddy of many far-left wing groups and an early and prominent supporter of Presidential candidate Barack Obama. Soros has developed an empire of so-called 527 groups, putatively independent political activists groups that have influence within the Democratic Party. These 527 groups include the Center for American Progress, MoveOn.Org, Human Rights Watch, Media Matters and a slew of other like-minded groups .
This set of political organizations also includes the International Crisis Group, whose foreign policy staff is likely to contain the embryonic future of the State Department in an Obama Administration . Eli Pariser, who heads MoveOn.Org, boasts about his group's role in the Democratic Party:
"Now it's our party: we bought it, we own it, and we are going to take it back."
....
Soros, Lewis, and the Sandlers form a core group of billionaire activists and Democrat partisans who have formed a group called The Democracy Alliance. They realized that they could magnify their power by working in unison and tapping other wealthy donors to further their agenda (the superb Boston Globe article "Follow the money" is a good primer on how money and 527 groups have come together to have a huge impact on politics in America).
The Democracy Alliance is a major avenue to help them achieve their goals. The roster of its growing membership consists of a list of billionaires and mere multi-millionaires who collectively hope to give upwards of 500 million dollars each year to further promote a left-wing agenda. A partial roster of the Democracy Alliance membership can be found here.
Half a billion dollars a year can purchase a great deal of influence.
The Sandlers certainly know quite a bit about leverage from their savings and loan days.
Among the beneficiaries of their largesse: Air America, ACORN (a group that has very close and long lasting ties to Barack Obama and has a long history of engaging in voter fraud. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (basically a private detective group focused on the private faults and foibles of Republicans), Media Matters, a media watchdog group that engages in harsh partisan attacks against media figures and articles it considers supportive of Republicans). The list goes on and on.
They are not merely out to elect Democrats, but to also permanently realign U.S. politics and shift our society and culture in a far-left wing direction.
One of the steps the Sandlers have taken on their own is to start ProPublica with a 10 million dollar donation, a sum which they promise to replenish annually. This is an outfit that will engage in investigative journalism and will provide its "findings" to larger media outlets for greater impact at no cost.
****
Quote snippets from Interesting Commenter -- C Roberts:
....
Our nation can overcome any hurdle if we are united, however we've been willingly divided by the liberals and their associates in Washington DC and the media. We have all focused on our own interests almost to a point beyond reason. How better to secure control than divide a nation, balkanize the personal interests and ideologies of the citizens? Simply look at the number of anti's. Anti fur, anti hunting, anti fishing, anti gun, anti Judeo Christian ethic and anti on and on. These were all acceptable 40 years ago. The nation's population has been distracted with petty arguments over 'wearing fur' 'going green', you name the cause celeb, while the powerful political and financial shell movers are hiding the pea.
....
The Sandlers knew what they were doing and new that the 'first time home buyer' and the 'minority buyer' (with full Democrat support from DC) were the perfect marks for their deception. They reflect the ideology of personal wealth at any cost........they have insulated themselves from economic fluctuations while the balance of American's will pick up the pieces while opening their wallets.
****
Quote snippets from Interesting Commenter -- Jonathan Cohen:
....
The people who are funding the 527's are extremely wealthy and while their interests are superficially liberal, as this article points out, their behavior certainly isn't. There is nothing liberal about making billions of dollars at the expense of borrowers who can't really afford their high interest loans and then sticking unwitting stockholders with worthless mortgages as they are able to fool others into purchasing their worthless assets.
The bonuses and golden parachutes of CEO's is disgraceful but is order of magnitudes less corrupt than walking away with 2.4 billion dollars and leaving the rest of the country to assume the loss in cleaning up the mess of the companies that they have sold to a gullible public.
In the end, politics for the Soros's and the Sandlers is about power. Having become rich beyond their wildest imagination they wish to use it to exercise their will. Traditionally the wealthy have always given money to a variety of causes, from hospitals and symphonies to universities and churches. The charitable contributions of the funders of the 527's is fundamentally different. It is about giving themselves power. It is money given to influence the cultural and political life of America. It is about control and not about government by the people.
****
Quote snippets from Interesting Commenter -- Walter:
I have always felt that George Soros is the puppet master behind Obama...and I have always felt that his plan all along in supporting Obama was to get his hands on America's secrets to sell them to the highest bidder.
This man needs to be investigated, his citizenship taken away and then send him back to a jail cell in France where he was convicted of embezzlement.
****
See also http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/the_financial_mess_how_we_got.html.
****
COMMENT –Dlanor:
Bush is more a N.W.O., International-Socialist kind of guy than even Obama. And McCain is no cinch for not being just as susceptible to elitist control.
Regardless of electoral outcome, real change will require that Americans take more muscular action. Electing Obama is not change; it is surrender. And, given the currency meltdown, Obama and his handlers now have all the excuse they need to impose draconian "socialism" (i.e., international gulag).
Americans of reasonable intellect, education, experience, and good faith have for too long trusted our formal system of checks and balances, expecting it would, by itself, see us through, without need to actively engage our representatives and to take stands, to put skins on the line, physically, to counter the snowballing, indecent gulf in wealth and power towards the most cynical and callous of market-busters among us.
Will we revolt in time?
See http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/who_owns_our_debt.html:
THEN, ASK:
How can the American economy reasonably hope to survive, so long as it is being run and kept afloat only by undisciplined “hope” in taking on, and eventually likewise sinking, other nations’ economies? The question becomes: Are some folks actually trying to sink us?
The fundamental cause of the present meltdown of market based economies was not too little regulation, but too much of regulation, which mandated an undisciplined, foundation-less Ponzi economy, built on requiring bad loans, as plotted by vicious financiers, bent on scamming and dividing us until we tipped into panic.
Now the question is: What next do they have in mind, en route to collapsing our market based economy? Chinese currency?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080929/ap_on_bi_ge/financial_meltdown:
Republicans blamed Pelosi's scathing speech near the close of the debate — which attacked Bush's economic policies and a "right-wing ideology of anything goes, no supervision, no discipline, no regulation" of financial markets — for the vote's failure.
"We could have gotten there today had it not been for the partisan speech that the speaker gave on the floor of the House," Minority Leader John Boehner said. Pelosi's words, the Ohio Republican said, "poisoned our conference, caused a number of members that we thought we could get, to go south."
See http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/bailout_bill_fails.html.
See interesting comment, by Mad Puppy:
Right before the vote on the biggest bailout in American history; on a vote that she needs the Republicans to vote "yes" on the bill; on the pre-vote "pep talk" to get the Republicans on board: what does this stupid, lying, idiot do? She rips Bush for his chaotic economic policies, and not continuing Clinton's surpluses. Not a word about 9-11; not a word about the slew of Democrats who ran Fannie Mae into the ground and stole from it; not a word about Dodd and Obama and other Dems being the top money grabbers of Fannie contributions. She is a total, lying, incompetent, stupid, fool. You want their votes so right before asking for them you rip them to shreds? Even if what she said is true - it isn't and is non-inclusive - how stupid do you have to be to go rip them and their policies and their president?
She surely has to be the worst Speaker ever...
****
See interesting comment, by DaveC:
Pelosi is not only a moron she's an arrogant moron. It's time someone stands up and puts the blame where it belongs....we can start with Carter, Clinton, Dodd, Frank, and the various thieves who ran Fannie and Freddy. And let's not forget Obama. I say hearings first and then bailout discussions.
****
See interesting comment, by Nan Sequitur:
Nancy Pelosi's well-known hostility towards even the concept of bipartisanship that doesn't solely serve to float her showboat should now be emphasized by the Republican Party spending a little time this weekend focusing also on what all was in that bill, and the history of the Democrats' and their cronies' involvement and foreknowledge of not only the methods, but the results they would cause?
The Democrats have just finished a 25-minute press junket, mostly blaming the dozen cross-party votes they couldn't get rather than the dozen votes from their own party they couldn't budge. So what will the Republicans have to say to give the American people insight as to what's really going on?
Mark to market vs. mark to model vs. mark to maturity: See http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/the_trilliondollar_question_ar.html.
....
Should we consider a solution that requires no money, or at least a lot less? Here's one. Have the SEC suspend the accounting rule called mark-to-market. By a relatively simple accounting adjustment, troubled banks' assets and capital could be increased and credit kept available. Accounting purists, cover your ears. Eyes glaze and minds wander when I say balance sheet, so let's use the acronym BS, a more appropriate description. BS's have two sides: assets on the left, liabilities and capital on the right. Banks are required to maintain certain levels of capital (the difference between assets and liabilities) in order to make loans. When assets shrink, capital shrinks. When the ratio of capital to assets drops to a certain level, (think ten-to-one), banks are not allowed to make loans. And if it drops too low, they can be classified as insolvent. This can happen overnight, and it did.
Why? Wall Street is essentially driven by emotion and the news of the day, so when nobody wants a particular security, the price falls fast and hard. Do I believe in efficient markets? Yes, eventually, but markets are often wrong for periods of time ... think years. Therefore, we are marking assets down to near zero based on markets that fluctuate wildly from minute to minute. The media have hammered us with news about drops in home prices and increases in mortgage delinquencies to the point that nobody wants to own these assets. A few rotten apples have spoiled the whole barrel. Sub-prime loans and the securities they are bundled into have plummeted in value, sometimes to zero, because nobody wants to touch that barrel, even if most of the apples are still good. Banks marked them to their current value, billions in capital disappeared with the stroke of a pen (excuse me, stroke of a key.)
....
Suspending the mark-to-market rule would allow banks and accountants to revalue their assets based on more sound criteria than the euphoria or panic that pervades the floor of the New York Stock Exchange minute-by-minute. Sub-prime mortgages will likely have much higher values if considered in a longer-term perspective -- such as hold-to-maturity. I believe that the vast majority of mortgages will perform in the long term.
Presto. Up goes assets; up goes capital; banks can make loans again.
****
Interesting Comment by Triguy:
Brilliant! Now just add one thing: lengthen the term of each mortgage to 40 years instead of the current 30. That will automatically lower the monthly nut each homeowner has to meet and make them more likely to be able to meet it. Banks get their money back, people get to keep their homes and money is injected into the economy for other to borrow. Of course congress won't do this because then they would have nothing to control or play with (and that means no favors to repay to them).
****
Comment: Eliminate the Capital Gains tax for several years?
****
Snippet from interesting comment by James:
Arnold Kling explains the "game" in question:
Think of the mortgage securities market as the World Series of Poker. In fact, a great book about it is Liar's Poker, by Michael Lewis. Lewis was a trainee at Salomon Brothers, and he learned phrases like "Big Swinging D___," which describes a swaggering, aggressive mortgage banker. Henry Paulson fits the model.
The best players in this World Series of Poker are the folks at Goldman. They hired Fischer Black and other geniuses back when the markets were first getting going. They have typically had the best squad of geeks around.
Buffett just bought a stake in Goldman. That stake would be a lot more valuable if there were actually a poker game--that is, if mortgage securities were still trading. Right now, they're not trading. So Goldman is sitting there ready to play and no one is ready to play with them.
Along comes Uncle Sam, who wants to take a one-hour lesson in poker and then sit down and play in the World Series with $700 billion in chips. And whaddaya know? Warren Buffett thinks Uncle Sam really has to get in the game.
....
The Japanese tried to prop up failed banks in the aftermath of the bursting of their twin bubbles and the result was 15 years of stagnation.
****
Snippet from interesting comment by Bruce Campbell:
It took years to get us in the pit of financial despair and we have to spend the time and effort to dig our way out. The free ride is over. Get over it. Will this hurt? Yes, yes it will, a great deal. They don't call us Baby Boomers for nothing. It's time we stop the whining. Our tomorrow will not look like today. We will have to return to a more fiscally responsible way of live. The upheavals of this change will not be easy. Companies that are over leveraged will be wiped out and a significant number of people will lose their jobs. That is the reality of the situation. Putting 700 Billion dollars worth of lipstick on this pig is to expensive price to pay.
I would add one additional observation to your comments. Would that we could take the political cookie jar away from the politicians. We as the voting public have to stop electing officials that offer us the most goodies.
****
Snippet from interesting comment by mneelt:
Simple answer. The goal is to have the financial problem become a political one. This whole mess is the drive to turn housing into an entitlement. Move the bad mortgage debt to government and it becomes an entitlement. Dems will never throw the deadbeats out of the houses and the deadbeats will continue to elect their Dem protectors. The problem was created by the politics of entitlement and no one has the power to change it. An old saying is what we are living thorough.
"Rome was destroyed when the plebes learned they could vote themselves bread and circuses."
The Dems have their base voting for entitlements and it is just time until we end as Rome did.
****
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/the_trilliondollar_question_ar.html:
Comment by Dlanor – October Greed:
Responding to Dr. Gregory Young:
“Democrats want disruption, confusion, crisis, panic... often secretly causing it themselves, only so that they then can blame the Republicans for their own mess, and then swoop in like saviors to enact new laws in their own image giving them even more power and money. It's all part of being a "community change agent," straight from the works of Saul Alinksy.”
....
“That's not putting "Country First."”
Responding to mneelt:
“The Dems have their base voting for entitlements and it is just time until we end as Rome did.”
RESPONSE:
If Soros, et al, own the Dems, how do they benefit by tipping us into decline or international socialism (or gulag)? Why do they want to do that? This seems to be prelude to considerably more scamming, scheming, and soulless shapeshifting!
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Something_Wicked_This_Way_Comes_(novel):
“Something Wicked This Way Comes is a 1962 novel by Ray Bradbury. It is about two thirteen-year-old boys, Jim Nightshade and William Halloway, who have a harrowing experience with a nightmarish carnival that comes to their Midwestern town one October. The carnival's leader is the mysterious "Mr. Dark" who bears a tattoo for each person who, lured by the offer to live out their secret fantasies, has become bound in service to the carnival. Mr. Dark's malevolent presence is countered by that of Will's father, Charles Halloway, who harbors his own secret desire to regain his youth.”
....
...the nature of the carnival, and how it preys on weak, sinful souls for energy. He says that the carnival was created by the "autumn people" to feed on the greediness and unhappiness of people; they entice people to ride the carousel by exploiting their fear of death. When the newly young (and miserable) people realize that they want to return back to their normal age, the carnival employs them to their line of freaks, probably for eternity.
....
...when Will tells him that he doesn't care if he's old, he suddenly understands who he is, and professes his acceptance with a laugh, which shatters the Mirror Maze.
***
BTW: Neither Bush nor Pelosi puts “Country first.” Neither is primarily concerned with America or individual freedom or dignity. Bush wants N.W.O.; Pelosi wants international socialism. Each does as his/her real handlers require. The real handlers seem to be top-tier, money-changing competitors, and I do not think their agenda is about preserving America, freedom, or individual dignity — apart from pretense, that is.
WILL TO MATH:
All physics is based on spiritual faith in “Will-To-Math.”
Were we not divided by cheap diversions and petty disputes, all angst could be reconciled merely by agreeing to effect some simple bookkeeping entries.
INTERNATIONAL CURRENCIES:
For a member nation to subordinate its trade to the international currency of a group of nations is to expose itself to increased impotency in event any one of such member nations so lives beyond its means, so borrows against its posterity, or so irresponsibly conducts its banking as to pull all other members together into financial ruin.
Snippets from http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=14011:
Right now Soros recommends going short on the American dollar and long on China, India, and the Persian Gulf oil sheikdoms. "Saturday Night Live" satirized him for this vulture position last week but it probably isn't a bad bet. Americans must recognize we are going through our inheritance by ignoring technologies such as nuclear energy and living off foreign oil.
....
Imagine that, the Secretary of the Treasury trying to reduce the deficit by speculating against the U.S. dollar.
Liberty or Wimpery?
Social Leftists are wonderers, lost in the grip of their own chosen vise or paradox. With one side of their artificial vise grip, they proclaim that absolute determination of the morality of any concern is completely beyond objective or empirical verification, and, therefore (non-sequitur), completely without relevant value. With the other side of their self-vise, they herald the scientific method as savior-sufficient to lead us to “move on,” beyond old, sacred metaphors and values.
So, which is it: Are moral values irrelevant, or are we on the scent of better, newer values? Have social Leftists (i.e., Blueblood Republicans, Libertarians, Democrats, Liberals, and Libertines), as headless chickens, lost their heads in their own vise? Like chickens, have they been reduced by conditioning of media and academia to be easily led by any Big Government Controlling Demagogue with access to enough chicken feed (i.e., Mainstream Media Ministry of Truth)?
Suppose, instead of throwing tantrums because we are required to engage (our subjective free will) in moral choices, and instead of adolescently being unwilling to settle for anything less than a complete, perfect, and comforting explanation (or hijacking?) of the Mind of God, we instead listened receptively, using our God-given intuition to appreciate our history of experience. Then, ask: For offering freedom, dignity, autonomy, self-expression, self reliance, and pursuit of happiness, which nation’s fundamental values have served better than those of America? Ask: What have been the essential, sustaining values of America? Ask: Are we really ready to toss those values out? In trade for … what?
****
Patterns, such as for fads and values, compete, morph, evolve, and emerge. For a nation, the concern with patterns pertains not to whether mores and values should be cultivated, because VALUES WILL BE CULTIVATED. Rather, the concern pertains to how to cultivate the values we wish to engage.
Presently, we have social competition among (a) traditional family values, (b) governmentally sponsored (political correct, secular, or sharia) values, and (c) anarchic (anything goes) “values.” If social conservatives surrender on the issue of social values, the issue will not vanish. Rather, the issue will morph, to governmentally induced (often dictated) values.
Libertines are sorely misguided Pinocchio’s to expect that resisting family-based standards will further their “rights” to engage in “anything goes” behavior. And, Secular Humanists are misguided to expect that savaging Christianity will save them from Islamofascism.
No doubt, standards will change, but newly intrusive standards will simply and promptly fill any moral vacuum. Libertines are not unlike children, running from the embrace of their parents into the embrace of Big Government Intrusive Dictate.
After all, “it takes a village.” So, liberty-defilers (Leftists and fellow Jihadists) are urged, essentially, to “jihad in your face.” And Big Dictate knows best (at least, for the responsibility-surrendering, weak-minded, heavily-conditioned, and corrupt).
Bottom line: Will autonomous lovers of liberty wimp out, in surrender to secular Borg-dom and/or Dhimminitude?
Comment by Dlanor, at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/11/how_the_nyt_could_save_itself.html:
Re: Fascist Romance
Lee -- Missouri Ozarks ("This fascist romance of "Big Government" and "Giant Multi National Corporations" (the Mussilini Fascism model) was first aired by President Dwight D Eisenhower speaking of the then "Military-Industrial Complex). It is alive and well, take a good look at what has led up to, and what is going on, between the US government and big business.")
I agree. If we could recognize and restrain the real enemy (the "fascist romance"), we would be able to do more than shadow box. But, so long as MEDIA, academia, and government are in the tanks of fascist international corporatism, it will be far from easy to escape that crab tank. (Although, that just makes the challenge more interesting!)
Escape would entail: (1) Identifying the problem; (2) better educating the public (including college students)about the "American Idea"; and (3) progressively restoring control of the propagation of goods and ideas either to real MARKETS or to some more direct form of oversight by the people (maybe some sort of aggressively progressive, confiscatory tax on the consumption of political influence).
But, what could inspire such a new Great Awakening?
Until then, fascist international corporatism will continue to erode America until most of the world is reduced to whimpering milk cows.
Ocean Acidification — see http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/opinion/12fri4.html?th&emc=th.
From http://townhall.com/columnists/CalThomas/2008/12/11/think_globally;_act_globally:
Maybe, but if we get too many "global" crises happening at once, the clamor for a one-world government to bring order, even at the expense of liberty, may be too strong for some politicians to resist.
So, yes, I'm starting to believe in the possibility of one-world government and it should be vigorously opposed if America, as we know it, is to be preserved.
Post a Comment