Tuesday, September 30, 2008

SOMETIMES THERE ARE CONSPIRACIES



(Click title above)
.
Uber-Nomenklatura (International Pirates of Opportunity):
For "Ultimate Play On Volatility" (to consolidate rule of Uber-Nomenklatura), see http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/10/bidens_generated_crisis.html.
.
BTW --- For detailed list of astonishing number of outright lies and gross misrepresentations made by Michael Moore in his “lie-u-mentary,” Fahrenheit 911, see: http://www.davekopel.org/Terror/Fiftysix-Deceits-in-Fahrenheit-911.htm.
.

SOMETIMES THERE REALLY ARE CONSPIRACIES:

(Most of the 9-11 Conspiracy Notions have been adequately debunked.
But, not this one. The only one who could clear up this discrepancy is Bush, and he has not been asked and is not saying.)
.
On the facts, can there be reconciled a least paranoid, simplest explanation regarding how much Bush knew about the attacks of 9-11 before he went into the class of children?
Might Bush simply have misremembered or misspoken, regarding his having seen on TV the first plane fly into the first of the towers of the WTC?
But, surely, before Bush went into that classroom, he had been informed of several contemporaneous hijackings.
So, how could he possibly not have apprehended that America was about to face a series of attacks?
Did he apprehend, or were he and his aides stunningly incompetent or complacent?
Might his reluctance to explain whether he had misspoken be attributable, simply, to his desire not to relive or give additional legs to old news highlighting his incompetence, but not be attributable to his or his staff’s having known of, or been involved in, any conspiracy to foster or let unwind such attacks, as prelude to justifying planned invasions of the Middle East?
Which is more believable: (a) incredibly high levels of stress, confusion, and misinformation; (b) incredibly high levels of incompetence; or (c) incredibly psychopathic ambition?
Do not subsequent events strongly suggest the prime cause of Bush’s misstatements was choice (b), i.e., stunning incompetence?
Do not the inconsistent and fudged reports and excuses subsequently given to the press likewise implicate attempts to cover up incompetence, rather than attempts to cover up conspiracy?
Insofar as Bush’s money-changing handlers saw to his election, have they now learned, for when next they install a stooge to front the throne, at least to ensure he is articulate?
Regardless, even the most articulate among money-ruling elitists seem prepared to swoop, like birds of prey, in stunningly callous and carefree ineptitude, to overreach at every apparent opportunity to push some sort of agenda that seems to have been hatched or precontrived among N.W.O. conspirators.
That agenda, brazen, if not treasonous, seems to entail secret coordination among co-conspirators, to be on watch for events of volatility that can be seized upon in order To Push Civilization, Globe Wide, Towards A System Of International Socialism, to be ruled over by such secretive elites --- regardless of votes or preferences of those to be ruled!
.

NWO -- INFLUENCE OF TOP TIER MONEY CHANGERS?
OR REASONABLE GROUNDS TO SUSPECT OR FEAR HIGH LEVEL NWO - EVIL?
OR BUSH DERANGEMENT SYNDROME?
(IT MAY BE WORTH CONSIDERING: SOMETIMES, IS WILLFUL IGNORANCE ESSENTIAL TO MAINTAIN EQUANIMITY, EVEN SANITY?)

THE FOLLOWING MAY EXPLAIN IN PART WHY SOME FOLKS FEAR BUSH IS UNDER POTENTIAL BLACKMAIL AND/OR OTHER CONTROL OF SOME SECRET GROUP:

ADVANCE KNOWLEDGE BY BUSH OF FIRST CRASH INTO WTC --- NOT DEBUNKED:

SOURCE: See
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bushflub.htm:

So Bush says that he watched on TV the first plane hit the (North) Tower while sitting outside the classroom (actually at 8:45, when the first plane hit, Bush was riding in his limousine to the Booker school). Then (some twenty or so minutes later, after he has arrived at the school) he is informed that a second plane has hit. But, as Paul Walker pointed out, prior to the first impact there was no network TV channel showing the Twin Towers live, SO WHAT WAS BUSH WATCHING? It can only have been a private transmission, arranged for Bush's benefit, by people who knew what was about to happen. Either Bush knew what was coming, or he was told to watch the TV transmission (and not go into the classroom until he'd seen what he was supposed to see). Either the President of the United States, or someone closely connected to him, knew that a disaster was about to strike the Twin Towers.

….

… according to Bush (in his first Town Hall meeting) Card said: "A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack." If Bush had seen the South Tower impact before entering the classroom, but was ignorant of the (prior) North Tower impact, then Bush would assume that there was a second hit after the one he had just seen ….

….

… if Bush was waiting not in a room with a TV, but rather in the corridor, with the TV in an adjacent room, then perhaps he got a look at it only as he was passing the room on his way to the classroom at 9:03 a.m.

….

This theory does not imply that Bush was unaware of the preparations for 9/11, or that he lacked "prior knowledge" (if there is proof of this, e.g., a video of Bush being prepared, then it is probably in the hands of Mossad), but suggests that he was not informed in advance as to exactly which day the attacks were to occur. (Perhaps he was informed, by his National Security Advisor, only after the 9/11 operation had already begun.) Like
Timothy McVeigh Bush may have been seen by the planners of 9/11 as a useful idiot, and one does not invite idiots to participate in the planning of operations which must be carried out with care and precision to succeed. One tells them only enough about what is going to happen to ensure that this knowledge can be used later to frame them or to control them.


SOURCE: See
http://www.historycommons.org/essay.jsp?article=essayaninterestingday.

….
Bush’s appearance at the Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida, on September 11, 2001 had been in the planning stages since August [
Booker web site], but was only publicly announced on the morning of September 7.
….
On the night of September 10th, Bush stayed at the Colony Beach Resort—“an upscale and relatively pristine tropical island enclave located directly on the Gulf of Mexico, a spindly coral island… off Sarasota, Florida.” [
AP, 07/29/01] Zainlabdeen Omer, a Sudanese native living in Sarasota, told the local police that night that someone he knew who had made violent threats against Bush was in town and Omer was worried about Bush’s safety. The man was identified only as “Ghandi.” A police report states the Secret Service was informed immediately. [Hopsicker, 7/22/02]
….
Bush awoke a little before 6:00 a.m. on September 11, pulled on shorts and an old T-shirt and laced up his running shoes. [
CBS, 11/1/02] At 6:30 a.m., Bush, a reporter friend, and his Secret Service crew took a four-mile jog in the half-light of dawn around a nearby golf course. [Washington Post, 1/27/02, Washington Post, 09/11/01]
….
At about the same time Bush was getting ready for his jog, a van carrying several Middle Eastern men pulled up to the Colony’s guard station. The men said they were a television news crew with a scheduled “poolside” interview with the president. They asked for a certain Secret Service agent by name. The message was relayed to a Secret Service agent inside the resort, who hadn’t heard of the agent mentioned or of plans for an interview. He told the men to contact the president’s public relations office in Washington, DC, and had the van turned away. [
Longboat Observer, 9/26/01]
….
The Secret Service may have foiled an assassination attempt. Two days earlier, Ahmed Shah Massoud, leader of Afghanistan’s Northern Alliance, had been murdered by a similar ruse. Two North African men, posing as journalists from “Arabic News International,” had been requesting an interview with Massoud since late August. Ahmad Jamsheed, Massoud’s secretary, said that by the night of September 8, “they were so worried and excitable, they were begging us.” An interview was arranged for the following day. As it began, a bomb hidden in the video camera exploded, killing the two journalists. Massoud was rushed by helicopter to a hospital in Tajikistan, but was pronounced dead on arrival (although his death was not acknowledged until September 15).
….
Accounts of when Bush’s motorcade left for the school vary from 8:30 to 8:39.
….
… Bush arrived shortly before 9:00.
….
Why does it matter when Bush left the resort and arrived at the school? Because this is the crucial time when Bush was first told, or should have been told, of the attacks. Official accounts, including the words of Bush himself, say Bush was first told of what was happening in New York City after he arrived at the school. [
Telegraph, 12/16/01, CBS, 9/11/02] However, this statement does not stand up to scrutiny. There are at least four reports that Bush was told of the first crash before he arrived at the school.
….
The first media reports of Flight 11’s crash into the World Trade Center began around 8:48, two minutes after the crash happened. [
New York Times, 9/15/01] CNN broke into its regular programming at that time [CNN, 9/11/01], though other networks, such as ABC, took a few more minutes to begin reporting. [ABC, 9/14/02] So within minutes, millions were aware of the story, yet Bush supposedly remained unaware for about another ten minutes.
….
… Kia Baskerville, a CBS News producer traveling with Bush that morning, received a message about a plane crash “as the presidential motorcade headed to President Bush’s first event.” Baskerville said, “Fifteen minutes later I was standing in a second grade classroom [waiting for Bush’s entrance]”—which means she got the news at about 8:47—right as the story was first being reported. [
CBS, 8/19/02] A news photographer in the motorcade overheard a radio transmission that Press Secretary Ari Fleischer would be needed on arrival at the school to discuss reports of some sort of crash.
….
Florida Congressman Dan Miller, waiting in front of the school as part of the official greeting party, was told by an aide about the crash at 8:55, before Bush arrived. [
Sarasota Magazine, 11/01]
….
If Bush wasn’t told while in his limousine, he certainly was told immediately after he got out of it. US Navy Captain Deborah Loewer, the director of the White House Situation Room, was traveling in the motorcade when she received a message from an assistant back in Washington about the first crash. Loewer said that as soon as the car arrived at Booker, she ran quickly over to Bush. “It’s a very good thing the Secret Service knows who I am,” Loewer later said. She told Bush that an aircraft had “impacted the World Trade Center. This is all we know.” [
Catholic Telegraph, 12/7/01, AP, 11/26/01]
….
Flight 93 wasn’t hijacked until about 9:16, but by about 8:50, it was clear that at least three planes had been hijacked.
….
Dan Bartlett, White House Communications Director, says he was there when Bush was told: “ [Bush] being a former pilot, had kind of the same reaction, going, was it bad weather? And I said no, apparently not.” [
ABC News, 9/11/02] A reporter who was standing nearby later said, “From the demeanor of the President, grinning at the children, it appeared that the enormity of what he had been told was taking a while to sink in.” [Daily Mail, 9/8/02]
….
Booker principal Gwen Tose-Rigell was waiting for Bush outside the school. “The limousine stops and the president comes out. He walks toward me. I’m standing there in a lineup; there are about five people. He walks over and says he has to make a phone call, and he’ll be right back.” [
MSNBC, 09/02, Telegraph, 12/16/01] The phone call was with National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. From a room with secure communications, Rice updated Bush on the situation. [Christian Science Monitor, 9/17/01, Time, 9/12/01] The fact that Bush immediately said he had to make an important call strongly suggests he was told about the situation while in the motorcade. But some accounts have Andrew Card saying to Bush as he gets out of his limousine, “Mr. President, you really need to take this phone call,” thereby implying that Card knows what’s going on, but Bush doesn’t. [St. Petersburg Times, 9/8/02 (B)]
….
Tose-Rigell was then summoned to a room to talk with Bush: “He said a commercial plane has hit the World Trade Center, and we’re going to go ahead and go on, we’re going on to do the reading thing anyway.” [
AP, 8/19/02 (D)]
….
So supposedly, 15 minutes after the first crash, none of Bush’s aides, not even Rice back in Washington, DC, knew a thing about the hijackings that had been reported to NORAD 20 minutes earlier? This simply is not plausible.
….
So supposedly, 15 minutes after the first crash, none of Bush’s aides, not even Rice back in Washington, DC, knew a thing about the hijackings that had been reported to NORAD 20 minutes earlier? This simply is not plausible.
….
Bush’s remark implies he saw the first plane hit the tower. But we all know that video of the first plane hitting did not surface until the next day. Could Bush have meant he saw the second plane hit—which many Americans witnessed? No, because he said that he was in the classroom when Card whispered in his ear that a second plane hit.”
….
Unfortunately, BUSH HAS NEVER BEEN ASKED—not even once—to explain these statements. His memory not only contradicts every single media report, it also contradicts what he said that evening. In his speech to the nation that evening, Bush said: “Immediately following the first attack, I implemented our government’s emergency response plans.” [
White House, 9/11/01] It’s not known what these emergency plans were, because neither Bush nor anyone in his administration mentioned this immediate response again. Implementing “emergency response plans” seems to completely contradict Bush’s “by the way” recollection of a small airplane accident.
….
At 9:03, Flight 175 crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center. News of this traveled extremely rapidly. In fact, some of Bush’s Secret Service agents watched the second crash live on television in an adjacent room. [
Sarasota Herald-Tribune, 9/10/02] Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, in the same room as Bush but not near him, immediately received the news on his pager. [CBS, 9/11/02]
….
Chief of Staff Andrew Card was in a nearby room when he heard the news. He waited until there was a pause in the reading drill to walk in and tell Bush.
….
ABC News reporter Ann Compton, who was in the room, said she was surprised by the interruption and “wrote [the time] down in my reporter’s notebook, by my watch, 9:07 a.m.” [
ABC News, 9/11/02]
….
He did not know who (or which country) was attacking, whether there would be more attacks, what military plans had been taken, what military actions should be taken—indeed, he knew virtually nothing about what was going on outside the room. He just sat there. Bush later recalled: “There was no time for discussion or anything.” [Fighting Back: The War on Terrorism—From Inside the Bush White House, by Bill Sammon, 10/02, pp. 83-84] Even stranger, as one newspaper put it, although the nation was under terrorist attack, “for some reason, Secret Service agents [did] not bustle him away.” [
Globe and Mail, 9/12/01]
….
One newspaper suggested he remained “for eight or nine minutes”—sometime between 9:13 and 9:16, since Card’s arrival is uncertain. [
Tampa Tribune, 9/1/02]
….
The many accounts of what happened to Bush on 9/11 are riddled with disinformation of false threats, omitted details, fudged timing, and more. But around September 11, 2002, the heavily publicized first anniversary of the attacks, there was an obvious attempt to further rewrite the story.
********

See also
http://www.voxfux.com/features/timeline.html; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KlWSv0NZBRw; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUXglJU2w6U; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wobKUZN7dDg.

.
CONSPIRACY THEORISTS:

Americans might be considerably less prone to conspiracy theories if there were any significant evidence or experience of our government actually paying heed to what the citizenry as a whole needs or votes for.

As things stand, we just keep getting hosed by special pork dealers and money ruling, N.W.O. minded elitists. We seem to be on a greased track towards undisciplined free fall into despotism, with competent leadership not in sight — not in mainstream politics, not in mainstream academia, not in mainstream media.

.



5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Real Thought Censors:

Someone needs to get Palin ready to slam this back at 'em, when she is asked at upcoming debates about her alleged library censorship:
See http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/you_tube_pulls_a_popular_antid.html:

Burning Down The House:
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/you_tube_pulls_a_popular_antid.html
See http://www.breitbart.tv/html/184803.html.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NU6fuFrdCJY
"Burning down the house":
http://www.darkskiesblog.com/2008/09/28/easy-to-understand-video-explanation-of-what-and-who-caused-the-financial-meltdown-video-embed/
I found two videos on youtube. "democrats covering up fannie ........."
one from nakedemperornews and the other from themouthpeace
http://www.youtube.com/TheMouthPeace
http://doctorbulldog.wordpress.com/2008/09/29/watch-this-video-before-youtube-obamites-censor-it/.

Anonymous said...

Good Will and Doodad:

HOW CAN PARENTS TEACH CHILDREN NOT TO SINK TO GANG LEVEL TACTICS WHEN OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM LOOKS THE OTHER WAY AND OFTEN PROVIDES ENCOURAGEMENT FOR SUCH TACTICS?

http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/Obama_fundraising_illegal/2008/09/29/135718.html?s=al&promo_code=6BD9-1:

In a letter dated June 25, 2008, the FEC asked the Obama campaign to verify a series of $25 donations from a contributor identified as “Will, Good” from Austin, Texas.

Mr. Good Will listed his employer as “Loving” and his profession as “You.”

A Newsmax analysis of the 1.4 million individual contributions in the latest master file for the Obama campaign discovered 1,000 separate entries for Mr. Good Will, most of them for $25.
In total, Mr. Good Will gave $17,375.
....
Similarly, a donor identified as “Pro, Doodad,” from “Nando, NY,” gave $19,500 in 786 separate donations, most of them for $25. For most of these donations, Mr. Doodad Pro listed his employer as “Loving” and his profession as “You,” just as Good Will had done.

....
Following FEC requests, the Obama campaign began refunding money to Doodad Pro in February 2008. In all, about $8,425 was charged back to a credit card. But that still left a net total of $11,165 as of Sept. 20, way over the individual limit of $4,600.

....
The FEC has compiled a separate database of potentially questionable overseas donations that contains more than 11,500 contributions totaling $33.8 million. More than 520 listed their “state” as “IR,” often an abbreviation for Iran. Another 63 listed it as “UK,” the United Kingdom.

....
Unlike McCain’s or Sen. Hillary Clinton’s online donation pages, the Obama site did not ask for proof of citizenship until just recently. Clinton’s presidential campaign required U.S. citizens living abroad to actually fax a copy of their passport before a donation would be accepted.
With such lax vetting of foreign contributions, the Obama campaign may have indirectly contributed to questionable fundraising by foreigners.

....
In July and August, the head of the Nigeria’s stock market held a series of pro-Obama fundraisers in Lagos, Nigeria’s largest city. The events attracted local Nigerian business owners.
At one event, a table for eight at one fundraising dinner went for $16,800. Nigerian press reports claimed sponsors raked in an estimated $900,000.


....
Though Gadhafi asserted that fundraising from Arab and African nations were “legitimate,” the fact is that U.S. federal law bans any foreigner from donating to a U.S. election campaign.
The rise of the Internet and use of credit cards have made it easier for foreign nationals to donate to American campaigns, especially if they claim their donation is less than $200.

****

This begs a question: Was the Snopes-faux-Dowd article prescient?

Anonymous said...

http://moneynews.newsmax.com/headlines/forbes_economy_crisis/2008/09/29/135732.html?s=al&promo_code=6BE0-1:

“The government had a big role in this,” Forbes said. “Yes, there was bad behavior on Wall Street. But by golly it couldn’t have reached the disastrous proportion it has without the crazy policies of Washington, the Federal Reserve, Congress, and I must say the White House.”


COMMENT: B.S.!!! Who believes Congress does anything to conflict with what its topmost tiers of Big Swinging D***’s and business and money puppeteers requires! The puppeteers actively promoted all this volatility and divisiveness, greased it, took advantage of it, and now complains that the government it greases gave it what it asked for! Chutzpah!

Anonymous said...

Campaign donor fraud: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/10/us/politics/10donate.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

Anonymous said...

WORK-A-PHOBIA:

Socialism is a lie, promised most to those derelicts among the multitudes who suffer debilitation from work-a-phobia, to trick them into voting into power such thugs as will not easily ever be voted out.

Of course, once thugs are in power, there becomes little to incentive anyone to resist siren calls of work-a-phobia.

After all, should we not use our tax money to express our compassion for ALL who are debilitated by work-a-phobia?