WHAT IT IS: Everything that can be represented can be represented and deciphered in digital Morse Code or computer zeros and ones. This begs a question: Can every thing-that-exists be represented, or is there a behind-the-scenes Entity that can only be projected in caricatures? For a person of perspective to represent and/or decipher, such a person must adopt a point of view in respect of a frame of reference. In so doing, one presumes to withdraw one's perspectivistic Consciousness apart from the holism in order to study the holism. However, simultaneously with such withdrawal, one is no longer studying the holism, but only a representation of its remainder. From the standpoint of the System, perhaps a fluxing Circle of Dovetailing perspectives may represent the holism. However, such a circle is not able to convey at any present time a complete understanding to any one mortal member of the circle. In itself, the Holism cannot be represented or deciphered in math or digital code. Everything of the Entity that can be represented can be represented in, and reduced to, digital math. Of the Entity, we can know nothing more than what can be represented by math. It sometimes seems we have only to work with equations acting-upon-equations, code acting upon code, even as we intuit that there must abide a mathematician-entity behind "the curtain," which, so long as we remain apart from the Holism, we cannot perceive or be.
.
.
OF DIGITAL COMMUNICATION BETWEEN WHOLES AND PARTS:
.
The most basic mathematical model for Beingness seems to be accessed by conceptualizing DIGITAL RELATIONS that are represented by “meta-vibrations” — that is, VIBRATIONS of vibrations (... of vibrations). These vibrations can avail conscious experiences that can be translated, counted, leveraged, and interpretatively twisted. It seems the Reconciling Holism has power/capacity/will/purpose to emit various cones of cohabiting, vibrational experience (parallel universes). Each separately vibrating universe (cone of shared experience) is subject to inherent, innate rules of mathematical conservation. Such conservational math yields logic (either-or analysis, on-off, positive-negative-neutral analysis).
.
Every separate cone of experience must be subject to recordation to potential experience of severable perspectives of consciousness. No particular perspective can “split” from the holism in order to identify and bond with a limited avatar of particular experience, unless its entire contextual cone is subject to being potentially experienced among such ITERATIVE perspectives of consciousness as are needed in order to capacitate the shared cone of vibrational experience. This is because what is being vibrated is the consciousness of the holistic Entity Itself. In other words, no cone of apparent substantive experience (universe) can be brought and sustained into beingness without sufficient particular perspectives of consciousness to capacitate its unfoldment. For my person-perspective to come into being, it is required that multitudinous iterations of perspectivism “CRACK SYMMETRY” in order to come into vibrational focus and manifest being. Only by vibrating conservational circularity among iterative perspectives does the Holistic Entity create and sustain the experience of Universe that seems to dovetail before us.
.
That seems to be “how” the consciousness of the Holism “becomes associated with flesh,” to DIGITALLY SPLIT into, adopt, or become imbued with separately-defined, empowered, and limited perspectives. The Entity “participates with its parts” to “write” parameters for its musically vibrating scores; then the Entity tunes, seeks fulfillment from, perfects, and iteratively INHABITS such parts.
.
The meta-source, the Holism, the Entity Itself, cannot be “known” to be particularly related to from an inferior position. The Holism receives feedback from the iterative parts; both qualitatively and quantitatively. However, the consciousness of the iterative parts cannot quantitatively measure the consciousness of the Holism. The Holism, occupying the superior directionality, cannot be “known” except through direct experience or qualitative, empathetic INTUITION. While I live apart, I can intuit IT; once I am no longer apart, “I” will EXPERIENCE IT (and perhaps review my life while I was apart). I suspect that any iterative perspective that would more fully experience IT must be RE-ABSORBED into it, so as no longer to abide apart.
.
The most basic mathematical model for Beingness seems to be accessed by conceptualizing DIGITAL RELATIONS that are represented by “meta-vibrations” — that is, VIBRATIONS of vibrations (... of vibrations). These vibrations can avail conscious experiences that can be translated, counted, leveraged, and interpretatively twisted. It seems the Reconciling Holism has power/capacity/will/purpose to emit various cones of cohabiting, vibrational experience (parallel universes). Each separately vibrating universe (cone of shared experience) is subject to inherent, innate rules of mathematical conservation. Such conservational math yields logic (either-or analysis, on-off, positive-negative-neutral analysis).
.
Every separate cone of experience must be subject to recordation to potential experience of severable perspectives of consciousness. No particular perspective can “split” from the holism in order to identify and bond with a limited avatar of particular experience, unless its entire contextual cone is subject to being potentially experienced among such ITERATIVE perspectives of consciousness as are needed in order to capacitate the shared cone of vibrational experience. This is because what is being vibrated is the consciousness of the holistic Entity Itself. In other words, no cone of apparent substantive experience (universe) can be brought and sustained into beingness without sufficient particular perspectives of consciousness to capacitate its unfoldment. For my person-perspective to come into being, it is required that multitudinous iterations of perspectivism “CRACK SYMMETRY” in order to come into vibrational focus and manifest being. Only by vibrating conservational circularity among iterative perspectives does the Holistic Entity create and sustain the experience of Universe that seems to dovetail before us.
.
That seems to be “how” the consciousness of the Holism “becomes associated with flesh,” to DIGITALLY SPLIT into, adopt, or become imbued with separately-defined, empowered, and limited perspectives. The Entity “participates with its parts” to “write” parameters for its musically vibrating scores; then the Entity tunes, seeks fulfillment from, perfects, and iteratively INHABITS such parts.
.
The meta-source, the Holism, the Entity Itself, cannot be “known” to be particularly related to from an inferior position. The Holism receives feedback from the iterative parts; both qualitatively and quantitatively. However, the consciousness of the iterative parts cannot quantitatively measure the consciousness of the Holism. The Holism, occupying the superior directionality, cannot be “known” except through direct experience or qualitative, empathetic INTUITION. While I live apart, I can intuit IT; once I am no longer apart, “I” will EXPERIENCE IT (and perhaps review my life while I was apart). I suspect that any iterative perspective that would more fully experience IT must be RE-ABSORBED into it, so as no longer to abide apart.
.
CONSCIOUSNESS both expresses and empowers VIBRATION (physical representation of math); vibration both expresses and empowers consciousness (qualitative experience of beingness). Consciousness apprehends and appreciates vibrations; vibrations mark consciousness (subject to selection of point of view and frame of reference). Quality of consciousness "CAUSES" (experiences participation in effecting contemporaneous determinations) quantity of vibration; quantity of vibration "causes" quality of consciousness. Conscious meta-imaging (active verb) causes meta-vibration (state of being); vibration (state of being) causes conscious imaging (active verb).
.
1 comment:
There abide characters or aspects of the qualitatively experienceable non-quantitative. One cannot quantitatively measure the character of the non-quantitatively measurable. How then may one relate to the experienceable non-quantitative? Why, through direct conscious experience, i.e., intuitive empathy. How may one "measure" or interpret the "depth," direction, and quality of another person's belief, character, habit, inclination, and will? Well, by "getting to know" how the person tends to relate over time to similar situations and challenges, while always remaining wary that the personality may learn, grow, or change.
Post a Comment