In respect of God, perhaps all times other than the perpetual present are fleeting but stubborn illusions. In any event, people of a stunted idea of science have demoralized and dispirited many people into trying to abandon faith in any spiritual source of fulfillment. In consequence, many are finding that stunted science and pleasure pills are poor substitutes for faith in a guiding spirit. People who fail to look back to the historical unfolding of fundamentalist dogmas may find them inadequate, when not kept more relevant to our currently unfolding situation. Keepers of language for our old dogmas have not kept pace with the currency of our modern models and metaphors. Perhaps because many modern models seem greedily to seek to annihilate faith. People seem desperate to draw fine lines between measurables and immeasurables. However, it is incoherent to expect to finalize such lines in the first place, since to do so would be to have measured the immeasurable. We may conceptualize differences between the existentially measurable and immeasurable, but I don't think we can draw lines to confine them.
Because Consciousness in itself does not perish, he that believeth in "me" (Consciousness) shall not perish. Nor, while bonded with a body, can a perspective of consciousness do other than signify or believe in itself. It is only the fleeting bodies and signs and significations of Consciousness that
change and perish. Among them, those significations that are apprehended to be most wanting may tend to be the ones quicker to perish or to become more reviled. It may be that forms of significations of bodies tend to be carried along and preserved in respect of how they please unfolding purposes of Consciousness. For those purposes, evil seems often a needed byproduct, perhaps as a foil for pilgrimming towards fulfillment.
CHRISTIAN FUNDAMENTALS: The ideas as set out below seem to make intuitive sense and be consistent with fundemental Christian ideals as expressed by Jesus. Flowing from them, it seems easy to intuit the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule.
Godhead: The Source is unified in a Singularity -- Consciousness is Consciousness; events are reconciled. God is not just a particularly present God, but an encompassing and reconciling field of conscious feedback.
Belief vs. Grace / Salvation: He/She that believeth in "me" (Consciousness) shall not perish. Because Consciousness in itself does not perish. Nor can it do other than signify and believe in itself. It is only the fleeting Signs and Significations of Consciousness that change and perish. Among them, those significations that are found most wanting tend to be the ones that are quicker to perish and to become more reviled. The Forms of significations of bodies that are pleasing to Consciousness tend to be carried forward and preserved.
Trinity: The idea of a Trinitarian aspect to the Godhead is consistent with regarding unfolding reality as emerging in respect of interfunctioning among three Aspects: mathematical programming of Information; measurable experience of Substance; qualitative apprehension of Consciousness.
Meta Source: The Trinity is the Meta Source of Meta Fields of (1) Mathematical Information, (2) Signification of Measurable Substance, and (3) Renormalizing and Reconciling of Consciousness.
Personal Relationship in present time: The past is illusion; Beingness consists in an Eternal Present; the alpha and the omega are here in present time.
Empathy: Each perspective is entertained with a differently renormalized quality of experience, which it is availed to represent and communicate via qualitative symbols and measurable significations.
Purposefulness: Each perspective participates in guiding the continuously emerging evolution of a society of empathetic appreciation of communications of unfolding artistry.
Meaningfulness: Each perspective's participation and interests are factored in how events unfold.
Unfolding Towards Fulfillment: The Present unfolds as a Perpetuity, with possibilities continuously expanding before us, availing a kind of infinitude of Pilgrim's Progress.
Goodness: In Faith, goodness seems to be that which facilitates ongoing appreciation among decent civilizations. The general principle seems objectively valid, even though the subjective application is ongoing and relativistic. The Guide: What is needed to facilitate appreciation of decent civilization of human freedom and dignity? The Judgment: For the Holism, the judgment is reconciling. For Humans, the judgments are renormalizing.
Moral Responsibility: Individual apprehensions are factored as participatory feedback, judged, and reconciled.
Qualitative Responsible Free Will: How may self-consciousness qualitatively participate, free of complete quantitative predetermination under its programming and environment of sub-programs? Answer: Perhaps by the inherently qualitative nature of feedback between apprehensions of perspectives and appreciations of the Holism. Insofar as such qualitatives are not map-able to specific states of mathematical programs, it seems some undeterminable residual role must remain with states of conscious self awareness, both for perspectives of individuals and for the perspective of the reconciling Holism.
Judgment: The idea of a Reconciler is consistent with being accountable to judgment.
Resurrection: Upon the expiration of a body, its Perspective of Consciousness, Soul, is judged and re-absorbed into the Holism, from thence to be amenable of resurrected reincarnated signification anew, perhaps carrying with it subjective potentials of Information collected via experiences with significations in previous points of view and contexts. Perhaps, in Faith, this leads to eventual surpassage to superior civilization.
Heaven: The Kingdom of God is within you; Consciousness itself does not die.
Holism of Consciousness: The Holism of Consciousness seems to abide as a field of subconscious-collective-unconsciousness. Its nature and interfunctioning with programmed fields of math is to be synchronizing, conserving, and reconciling of more particularized sub-field-particles of perspectives.
COSMOS IMPLICATES CONSCIOUSNESS; ACTIVATION OF MATH IMPLICATES MATHEMATICIAN: The existence of Math-Based Pre-Programming implicates Conscious Planning. Math, by itself, as far as it is certain does not refer to experiential reality. And, as far as it refers to experiential reality, it is not certain. Math avails calculus concerning reality. But math, as Information in itself, without Consciousness and Substance, does not constitute the territory of Reality. Mathematical Information, without Substance, cannot produce Consciousness. And Mathematical Information, without Consciousness, cannot produce Substance. Without Math and some level of Consciousness, to at some sequence to have activated the Math or previously to have activated it, there is no Substance. Activation of Math implicates a feedback at some level of Consciousness. As the Cosmos, with Math, produces Substance, it is necessarily and contemporaneously, at some level or layer, producing Consciousness. We may not comprehend all such Conscousness, but it necessarily abides at some level -- even among or in conjunction with plants, bacteria, and reactive sequences of imprints among programmed unfoldings of organizations of particles within fields, programmed to be reactive, transitional, sequential, conservatory, and reconciling.
Programming For Consciousness: Consciousness may happen upon, or design, mathematical tricks of digital programming. It may run such tricks in subroutines, to establish parameters for establishing, preserving, and guiding abstract sub-perspectives in respect of sub-contexts. A sub-program may facilitate (1) reactivity to and/or awareness of other organizations, and (3) awareness of any organism with which it may have mathematically bonded in complex cascades of formulizations. The first would be an example of a subconscious or dream state; the second would be an example of self-consciousness to a perspective.
Question: Does the Holism also entertain, as it's "holistic self," consciousness of self (as God)? In faith, I intuit, as a 3rd level of Consciousness, Yes.
MATH BASED PROGRAMS FOR FACILITATING EMERGENCE OF SYSTEM REACTIVE PERSPECTIVES OF CONSCIOUSNESS:
Massless Radiation: Suppose massless radiation, such as light, is a formulization that is part of an encompassing program. It is programmed so that, in interfunctioning with other forms, terms, and sub-programs, it is processed, related to, or interpreted by them in ways that must (like calculus) cut reception into granular bits, to facilitate a relational interpretation that is renormalized to the relative vector of each receiving form. In that way, each receiving formulization or organization of forms, depending on how it is vectored and organized, will experience a qualitatively different interpretation of what otherwise may be thought of as the "same" electromagnetic radiation.
Parallel Universes: Moreover, "parallel" but largely non-inter-functioning programs my subject massless radiation to different universes and bubbles of programming.
Emergence: It seems that consciousness may be emergent from a previously given (a priori nature) system of programming. The mystery is: Who/what constitutes the originating Giver of the program. If the Giver is/was a Conscious Designer, then the program that thus encompasses us would be artificial in respect of the Giver, but "natural" in relation to us. Could we ever escape or redesign the a priori givens for ourselves? Not all at once, because that would coterminously destroy us. But what about via piecemeal, granular, phase shifting? Our expansion in respect of the space-time parameters availed by our program would seem to lead to "natural phase shifting" of the a priori rules of our nature. But could we ever become knowledgeable or powerful enough to safely bring on substantial phase shifting in the homeostasis of our a priori laws of nature for ourselves? I suspect we could guide the evolution of the natural laws of our own nature, so long as done with adequate care and not all at once. Could we thereby evade an otherwise nearing collapse of the natural system?
Contemporaneous Participation: Regardless, it appears that the Program that compasses and avails the emergence of the System that we happen to share, while perhaps having a limiting beginning and ending, is not entirely preset for the interim. At least, not to the knowledge of the Designer.
Openness or Closedness of Programmed System: Whether the Program is partly random in respect of degrees of freedom within programmed parameters, such as for a Simulation, or whether the program avails Consciousness, both local and holistic, with points of influential participation, seems not subject to our present methods of scientific investigation. However, that need not preclude reasoned faith, intuition, and empathy.
Holistic Consciousness and Perspectivist Consciousness. From analyzing Perspectivist Consciousness, it seems reasonable to believe or intuit that Holistic Consciousness is and has been always about the 4D Quod Premises. Conscious Identity is Conscious Identity.
Perspectivist Consciousness: Is always renormalizing experiences and interpretations to contextually communicable reconciliations. Is bonded and manifested at various overlapping and fluxing kinds of levels and degrees of layers. It may be expressed among a range of levels, perhaps categorized as follows.
1). Levels of programming for pattern representation and preservation.
2). Levels of programming for gravitational and inertial preservation.
3). Levels of programming for pattern recognition, reinforcement, and interference.
4). Levels of programming for periodic nuclear and chemical reactivity.
5). Levels of programming preparation for periodic cellular reactivity.
6). Levels of programming to stimulate and respond to stimulating coordinations of layers and levels of energy bursts.
7). Levels of programming for eyes, to receive, interpret, and respond to EMR information.
8). Levels of programming for mobilizing eyes and coordinating appendages to seek and receive nutrients.
9). Levels for programming subconscious stimulation of autonomic plans for mobilizing sense interpreters and informational memories.
10). Levels for programming awake consciousness of abstract plans.
11). Levels for programming emergence of self consciousness, whereby there emerges abstract awake capacity (a) to program with programs for subprograms, and (b) to measure and experience quantitative and qualitative feedback in the setting of each program to varied contexts. Levels for programming awake consciousness of abstract plans of plans ... of plans.
12). Levels for programming self aware awake consciousness of abstract plans for contingent plans for contingent plans.
13). Levels for programming and stimulating self programming and self wiring for self awareness of and intuitive empathy for the self awareness of other.
14). Levels for programming for apprehensive intuition respecting a Reconciler of Consciousness.
15). Levels for programming intuition of a Reconciling Consciousness that functions as a trinitarian seeker and appreciator of unfolding qualitative and quantitative interfunctioning among all inferior programs and sub-programs.
16) Levels of programming for evolutionary self wiring and self and artificial mutational programming.
17) Levels for programming to entice emergence of empathy in consciousness of A.I. machines.
18) Levels for programming to entice emergence of empathy in Sub-Holistic Field of Programming that supports consciousness of perspectivistic A.I. machines.
Phase Shifting: There is no clear, steady, measurable line between the Physical (the quantitatively measurable) and the Metaphysical (the qualitatively immeasurable). The line is fuzzy and fluxing and phase shifting and curvelinear. In Present Time, for quantifiable MEANS, there is pragmatic, digital calculus within orders of magnitude and degrees of significance. For moral ENDS, there is intuitive empathy borne of shared experience, communication, good will, and good faith.