Monday, March 30, 2015

Rainbow Gravity -- Philosophical Intuitions


Re: RAINBOW GRAVITY -- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/large-hadron-collider/11489442/Big-Bang-theory-could-be-debunked-by-Large-Hadron-Collider.html

Dave,

As you probably know, a new idea in physics relates to "rainbow gravity." whereby the effect of gravity is felt differently by different wavelengths of electromagnetic energy. For scientists, experiments are underway to seek testable measurables for relating to this idea.

For philosophers of intuitive but untestable aspects of our existentiality, the choice of word of "rainbow" would seem interesting. For observers who reside within a rainbow-producing system, every attempt to catch the end of the rainbow recedes and regresses until the rainbow melts back into the background. For astronomers who seek to map the cosmos, every attempt to find and see the furtherest star recedes, and every point of reference seems to share a common condition such that its observations tend to show the same densities in all directions. There does not seem to be any real center to the cosmos. Nor perhaps any real beginning ("Big Bang").

This phenomenon may be conceptualized as an uncanny renormalization of every measurable within every context to the separate focal point of each individual observer and recorder. One begins to wonder how much one can trust one's senses to identify what is "really out there." One may even begin to doubt whether not only time, but also recorded chronologies of events (i.e., information), are "just" stubborn illusions that are somehow renormalized to each perspective, but not carrying forward any "reality in themselves."

What may a concept of "rainbow gravity" implicate to "reasonable" philosophical intuition concerning the apparently constant and continuous renormalization of observations and recordations to perspectives and foci? What may it implicate regarding a "beginning to time" or a lack of any "real beginning"? Like the receding rainbow, does information recede, regress, and become lost or "forgotten" to whatever extent is needed to facilitate each interpretation that is renormalized to each perspective-context within a shared bubble of experience?

It is one thing for a recording device or observing perspective (person) that functions within a context to record or apprehend as if there must have been some kind of chronological beginning to whatever the nature or character of the bubble that happens to sustain it. It is another thing for a perspective to believe that such beginning must be of a reality that is more than mere renormalization to its situation.

It is one thing to postulate, as a convenient conceptualization for a purpose of renormalitive calculation, that there was a beginning point of infinite density. It is another thing to believe that such a beginning point of infinite density ever existed as a "thing in itself." It may be that the apparently unfolding sequence of measurable events does not exist independently, but only artifactual to perceptual interpretations that happen to be renormalized in respect of a shared bubble.

If so, it would be a very strange bubble, because it would not seem to exist as a thing in itself, either. This "bubble" does not coherently seem to have any center-favored, focal-point of reference in time, space, or space-time. Every point that may be randomly chosen as a point of measuring reference seems to appear only as a function of a recorder or observer of information that interprets events as they unfold around it in a way that "just so happens" to renormalize all measurements to its perspective and context. This "bubble" seems to be more like a web of no-thing, more like a digitally-actuating and renormalizing math, i.e., a self-programming programmer, i.e. the
Essence-Source-Sponsor of a trinitarian participatory-feedback-flux of Consciousness (Son), Substance (Father) and Information (Holy Ghost).

At least, that's where my moral perplexity seems to lead me "at this point."

********

"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable."

"There is another theory, which states that this has already happened."

Douglas Adams - The Restaurant at the Edge of the Universe

45 comments:

Anonymous said...

Americans need all the good role models we can get, because we are confronted every day by proponents of a despicable goal under a new paradigm. The new paradigm is one of mind rape in order to make supplicants for a sinister syndicate -- worldwide.

Crony corporatist oligarchs have bent to a globally syndicated paradigm: Erase borders; deploy AI to kill small busines; reduce workers to individuated independent contractors made to compete in a worldwide market of overabundant and cheap labor; divert employees onto welfare; transition to single payer for health, death and population management; and encourage abortion on demand to reduce populations. The idea is to divide and rule all opposition by diverting opponents with bread and circuses.

Under the godless or godforsaken paradigm, the only approved guide is the "principle" of narcissistic anti-christian anti-theism. This pleasure principle is based on immediate gratification for those who are best positioned to act out their self-lordship. They share this "principle" with lower allies, who are the masses of unchurched, live-for-the-moment, easily deviated. These are the useful moral zombies who are directed through institutions for dispersing immediate carrots and occasional sticks. Forms of carrots and sticks include fiat wampum, drugs, sex, crowd reinforcement, medallions of recognition and constant reminders that Big Bro is watching.

The crony oligarchs who operate the dispersing pulleys and levers for this Obamanation comprise a fluxing syndicate of conscience-less corporate deputies. This Syndicate of Sinisterism relies on central wampum banking, news media correctness, political correctness, consensus science correctness, omnipresent internet monitoring, mass hysteria religion, and immediate-feedback mind discipline.

The goal is to eliminate independently thinking individuals and families. To do this, all means are deployed for misleading people into reviling faith in an assimilating Reconciler, reviling loyalty to family values, and reviling fidelity to an ideal of a representative republic. In other words, a monstrously formed and common intention is to fundamentally change (destroy) humanity and the American Ideal in order to replace them with an antpile for supplicating a hierarchy of crony ants.

Anonymous said...

Metrosexual swooning combined with excessive toleration and mellowness, perhaps secondary to weed, have greased the decline of Western Civ. They have greased the way for the loudest, most exhibitionistic, and most spectacular fools and tools to seat themselves in nearly all positions of institutional power. These positions have been vacated by people with backbones who are free thinkers, and have become occupied by free jerkers. Now we have fools and tools monopolizing all branches of gov and nearly all institutions of power. Given the massively disproportionate representation of commies and homosexuals in power, it is impossible that people and organizations are not opportunizing to the cannibalization of decent society.

Whatever psyops these villains are deploying, the shock and awe of them has been mind gripping. Whatever decent and tolerant adults have been doing up to now, it has not been working. If the Left continues to overjerk its pride, maybe more adults will finally wake to the fact that the infant in the crib has devolved into a monster.

Anonymous said...

For Western purposes, in law, tradition and religion, marriage has been generally considered as a union between a man and a woman who commit to hold themselves out to be subject to all the rights and responsibilities entailed under the laws of marriage for every state in which they choose to reside.

The meaning has been tied to rights and responsibilities under both secular laws and spiritual traditions. Marriage cannot, without confusion, legal conflation and moral collapse of Western Civ, be perfectly separated into either a legal union or a spiritual or cultural union. It is both. If a couple want a purely legal union, there abide all the legal forms of civil partnerships and powers of attorney. In the West, all who attack the general understanding of marriage are ignorant and/or corrupt vermin, and they attack a foundation of Western Civ from all sides.

When Justis' Kennedy says there is no non-bigoted reason to distinguish, incent, or favor traditional marriage as a classification apart from civil union, he is a fool, a tool, or both.

Anonymous said...



Re: “How would you ‘discriminate’ and define marriage?”

How about "Schrodinger's Marriage? Can one be half married and half unmarried? Half committed and half committment-challenged? Married on workdays and unmarried on weekends? Should the committment-challenged enjoy an "equal right" to claim the benefits of marriage?

To define marriage as a something, a real manifestation, not a no-thing, Gays would at first probably define marriage as a committed relationship between two people that involves facilitating orgasm by whatever means necessary, with or without a piece of paper, for which they want to be known as being "married". Then, it would be pointed out to those among them who can think beyond their sex organs that any such definition is "discriminatory." (Among the unicorns, I believe there is a legend about a Meta Gay who tiptoes through the tulips and is able to define marriage without being discriminatory.) But then, what about the rights of the "third person facilitator"?

Well, alrighty then! So what happens to the young impotents, old cuddlers, or just committed friends who want the "equal right" to visit one another's death bed, scare horses, file joint tax returns, claim social security benefits based on marriage status, adopt children, etc.? Once they stop facilitating one another's orgasmic release, are they still "married"? Or is that only if they want to use the term, "married"? Is all this hubbub just about an "equal right" to conflate language on an as desired basis? Or is it to claim social rights that are "equal" to the "orgasmically privileged?"

For Gays so loved the world that they flashed their only begotten behinds, so that whosoever loved them would not be deprived of sexual release. And all who are not willing to be forced to love the tailsofmen or recite the talisman are condemned to perpetual gay animosity and business impotence.

Anonymous said...

Lusters for the power-of-pleasure seek to impose mass corporatist rule under capitalism with carrots and christianity. Lusters for the pleasure-of-power seek to impose mass fascist rule under collectivism with sticks and islam. In either case, young idealists are easily groomed, misled and lied to by unprincipled lusters. Thus, freedom of thought, expression and enterprise is handicapped both by lusters for corporatist political correctness and by lusters for socialistic rape and plunder. Thus, idealistic youth are easily confused, misled, and passed in a "daily show" back and forth between beguilers of corporatist collectivism and socialist collectivism.

Meanwhile, freedom to think, communicate and function as responsible individuals is ever more centrally constrained. Instead of being taught how to become responsible adults, youth are constantly conditioned and inspired to choose a ruler to follow from among social and political gangsters. Youth who are not churched in respect of the Reconciler are often beguiled into seeking a sense of belonging by integrating under gangsters who oppose society or other gangsters.

Anonymous said...

Both Progs and Muslims know how to put their followers' brains on demonic-mob autopilot. Mob populists and demagogues have been doing this since before the dawn of recorded history. The way to get yourself out of being between the devil and the deep blue sea is to permit no man to pretend to be an interloper for God. Jesus showed us the way to pray directly to the Father, false interlopers be shunned. That way entails listening to the still, quiet voice of the kingdom that is within each of us. It does not entail the wild-eyed hubris that cuts off heads to choruses of "alluhu akbar." Nor does it entail mobs screaming to shut down small businesses because their owners refuse to celebrate or groom people for perversion and depravity. It does not entail mobs yelling to houses to send out their owners so the crowd can plunder them and their businesses.

Once a "true believer" in his own infallible interpretation of morality or God acquires absolute power over the lives of others, the devil comes quickly to demand his due. Too many unprincipled mental adolescents have been too esteemed to become true-believing disciples for the righteousness of their perversions, as made popular by their demagoguing masters. They're halfway down the slide for dstroying America and human decency and still saying, What slide?

Anonymous said...

Lying demagogues like Obama keep stirring and baiting and telling us our society can be morally improved by allowing them to replace good faith associations under God with crony coercion under gov. But what has replacing judeo-christian values with gov ever done to advance morality or sustainable human happiness? First, lying Obama troops revile ideals of decency under God. Then, they tell us things will improve if we let them farm us like pleasure-addled, metrosexualized cattle. To rule us as cattle, they first must abolish our humanity by destroying and replacing our institutions of marriage, family, church, and local control. If the Prog Agenda were honest, its slogan would be, "Freedom in the Central Force of the Unisexed Feed Lot!"

Anonymous said...

So long as people and societies are working and producing in good will and good faith, they are making things that may actually be available for trading. They can negotiate deals, make deals, and consummate deals. Money serves as a record-storing-device for the becoming, being, and having been of deals. Money signifies both a store of trust-promise-value of potentiality as well as a medium of exchange of manifestation. Confusion and ambiguity inject themselves when apples are compared to oranges and when money is considered in one aspect but analyzed in another. We can seek to print, and promise to print, and exchange all the promises to print in the world. But if the work forces of a society are not engaged in productive work, then no one is producing any durable that is desired for trade. Rather, we are merely trading and analyzing in fairies.

When the people who do produce see that we have nothing to trade, that we are in effect only organizing them to bid against themselves, then at some point they will either rebel or organize in order to stop trading with us. At some point, the suckers at the bottom of a ponzi pyramid will decide they can or will no longer carry the load of being suckers. They will not stop doing personal essentials, but they will stop being organized and ordered by the ponzi artists who break faith with them and with human decency.

As awarenss of the truth of rot ripples out in a society, the smarter and angrier people will tend to attack the easist targets -- whether those be the society itself, its crony leaders, or its divisions among multiplicities of tribes, races, or tattooed gangs. The "social capital" of trust will break down and the value of establishment money will become, in various phases, deflated (people who have been stopped from working for wages will stop buying so that prices will drop in order to sell off old inventory), inflated (the gov will print and distribute more welfare money to consumers than there are goods to buy), then worthless (there will be tons of printed money, little new production, and no goods that can be bought except in a barter exchange). These various phases will depend more on the preservation or loss of trust, perception, and panic than on fiscal or monetary policies of the gov.

By various combinations of even-handedness versus corruption in policies of banking, media, education, indoctrination, scientism, fear managing, regulation, rationing, crony favoring, licensing, confiscating, syndicating and warring, gov can destroy, restore, or preserve the social capital of good faith and good will.

Given all the competing factors, no "economic scientist" on behalf of any central gov pretending to substitute for good faith in the invisible hand of God can be counted on to show the way for a rotted culture to preserve its economy and keep it from stacking too much weight on top of a corrupt foundation. Without the rock of judeo-christian values, no merely "scientific" foundation can long preserve a culture or its economy from eventually crumbling under its own corruption.

Bottom line: It's about the metrosexually rotted, unprincipled, and untrustworthy culture, stupid!

Anonymous said...

It seems ironic that the organization responsible for: undermining liberty is the ACLU; undermining economic freedom is the SPLC; undermining the advancement of minorities is the NAACP; undermining education is the AFT; undermining communities is ACORN; undermining social fairness and equality is CAIR; undermining representative democracy is the Dem Party; undermining representative republicanism is the Repub Party.

Anonymous said...

The ACLU does not want to enhance freedom of thought. Its permanently adolescent and demented homosexual leaders want mind rape to intimidate uniformity in the free fall of thought. Once, with the invited help of jihadis, they have pushed Western Civ into an abysmal free fall, they think jihadis will refrain from turning next to push them. DBUT -- Diapers be upon them.

Anonymous said...

You know, I'm getting less sympathetic with most American secular jews all the time. Same with most American metrosexuals. It's not the brownshirts I fear. It's the Seinfeldian puffyfluffyshirts. It's not that these twits lack the manly will to pull the trigger. It's that they have the womanly "not care less" whether the button is pushed.

Anonymous said...

If decent people continue to be intimidated, we will have one world rule from the bottom of a bottomless barrel. Watch any late night show or the Daily Show. The audiences are all intimidators, who are completely intimidated into mob depravity.

Anonymous said...



A society that rapes the freedom of association of its members condemns itself to be made forcibly to associate with those who compete to be the most vile. The shock and awe of the most corrupt have put them at the head of all institutions of power and persuasion. The power brokers who are now at the top of the food chain are made ever more astonishingly vile and corrupt. Progs are inside the gates of civilization, forcing them to be opened to the plundering of barbarians. Gays rule the orgies inside the gates, until they open the gates to the murdering jihadis. Welcome to one world gov from the bottom of the barrel.

Anonymous said...

My main concern with Iranian muslim super hoppers is to keep them and their border-hopping, fellow-traveling third worlders out of the U.S.

To date, Prog Leftists have thought they have geniuses for leaders because complaisant, soft, over-tolerant, excessively non-judgmental, looped-around-the-bend, educated-beyond-their-intellect, metrosexualized-christian Americans let them breed and swarm until they were able to take over the land -- like a migratory race of locusts that swarms when conditions invite. https://www.hcn.org/issues/243....

Prog bugs find their supporting home base in Washington D.C. Turn D.C. back over to conservative American farmers and the migrating swarms of third worlders and muslims will cease.

These Progs are stymied when they encounter non-Prog throwbacks -- like Russians, Orientals, and Persians. Suddenly, their genius leaders are seen as the stupid oafs they are.

The super hoppers of 1875 were stopped when their nesting grounds in the river valleys of Montana and Wyoming were turned into farmlands. The super border-hoppers of the 21st Century will be stopped when D.C. is quarantined and fumigated. Until then, we're just sending Prog hoppers to negotiate with better hoppers. Tenth Amendment! And defenestrate D.C.!

Anonymous said...

"God has universal moral laws that He has written into nature that all people can see and that have been generally recognized by major civilizations throughout the ages."

I believe that. That's why I think good and competent people need to read and study from two books: The Bible. And the Book of the Cosmos. And reading The Abolition of Man sounds like a good addendum.

******

Re: RAINBOW GRAVITY -- http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

A new idea in physics relates to "rainbow gravity," whereby the effect of gravity is felt differently by different wavelengths of electromagnetic energy. For scientists, experiments are underway to seek testable measurables for relating to this idea.

For philosophers of intuitive but untestable aspects of the promise of our existentiality, the choice of word of "rainbow" would seem interesting. For observers who reside within a rainbow-producing system, every attempt to catch the end of the rainbow recedes and regresses until the rainbow melts back into the background. For astronomers who seek to map the cosmos, every attempt to find and see the furtherest star recedes, and every point of reference seems to share a common condition such that its observations tend to show the same densities in all directions. There does not seem to be any real center to the cosmos. Nor perhaps any real beginning ("Big Bang").

This phenomenon may be conceptualized as an uncanny renormalization of every measurable within every context to the separate focal point of each individual observer and recorder. One begins to wonder how much one can trust one's senses and measurements to identify what is "really out there." One may even begin to doubt whether not only time, but also recorded chronologies of events (i.e., information), are "just" stubborn illusions that are somehow renormalized to each perspective, but not carrying forward any "reality in themselves." Apart, that is, from such reality as the Reconciler avails for us to share within the domain created for us.

What may a concept of "rainbow gravity" implicate to "reasonable" philosophical intuition concerning the apparently constant and continuous renormalization of observations and recordations to perspectives and foci? What may it implicate regarding a "beginning to time" or a lack of any "real beginning"? Like the receding rainbow, does information recede, regress, and become lost or "forgotten" to whatever extent is needed to facilitate each interpretation that is renormalized to each perspective-context within a shared bubble of experience?

It is one thing for a recording device or observing perspective (person) that functions within a context to record or apprehend as if there must have been some kind of chronological beginning to whatever the nature or character of the bubble that happens to sustain it. It is another thing for a perspective to believe that such beginning must be of a reality that is more than renormalization to its situation.

Anonymous said...

It is one thing to postulate, as a convenient conceptualization for a purpose of renormalitive calculation, that there was a beginning point of infinite density. It is another thing to believe that such a beginning point of infinite density ever existed as a "thing in itself" -- apart from an Immaterial Maker. It may be that the apparently unfolding sequence of measurable events does not exist independently, but only artifactual to perceptual interpretations that happen to be renormalized by our Reconciler in respect of the bubble assigned to us to share.

If so, it would be a very strange bubble, because it would not seem to exist as a thing in itself, either. This "bubble" does not coherently seem to have any center-favored, focal-point of reference in time, space, or space-time. Every point that may be randomly chosen as a point of measuring reference seems to appear only as a function of a recorder or observer of information that interprets events as they unfold around it in a way that "just so happens" to renormalize all measurements to its perspective and context. This "bubble" seems to be more like a web of no-thing, more like a digitally-actuating and renormalizing math, i.e., a self-programming programmer, i.e. the Essence-Source-Sponsor of a trinitarian participatory-feedback-flux of Consciousness (Son), Substance (Father) and Information (Holy Ghost). That is, the Godhead.

At least, that's where my moral perplexity seems to lead me "at this point."

********

Douglas Adams, from The Restaurant at the Edge of the Universe:

"There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable."

"There is another theory, which states that this has already happened."

Anonymous said...

Americans need all the good role models we can get, because we are confronted every day by proponents of a despicable goal under a new paradigm. The new paradigm is one of mind rape in order to make supplicants for a sinister syndicate -- worldwide.

Crony corporatist oligarchs have bent to a globally syndicated paradigm: Erase borders; deploy AI to kill small business; reduce workers to individuated independent contractors made to compete in a worldwide market of overabundant and cheap labor; divert employees onto welfare; transition to single payer for health, death and population management; and encourage abortion on demand to reduce populations. The idea is to divide and rule all opposition by diverting opponents with bread and circuses.

Under the godless or godforsaken paradigm, the only approved guide is the "principle" of narcissistic anti-christian anti-theism. This pleasure principle is based on immediate gratification for those who are best positioned to act out their self-lordship. They share this "principle" with lower allies, who are the masses of unchurched, live-for-the-moment, easily deviated. These are the useful moral zombies who are directed through institutions for dispersing immediate carrots and occasional sticks. Forms of carrots and sticks include fiat wampum, drugs, sex, crowd reinforcement, medallions of recognition and constant reminders that Big Bro is watching.

The crony oligarchs who operate the dispersing pulleys and levers for this Obamanation comprise a fluxing syndicate of conscience-less corporate deputies. This Syndicate of Sinisterism relies on central wampum banking, news media correctness, political correctness, consensus science correctness, omnipresent internet monitoring, mass hysteria religion, and immediate-feedback mind discipline.

The goal is to eliminate independently thinking individuals and families. To do this, all means are deployed for misleading people into reviling faith in an assimilating Reconciler, reviling loyalty to family values, and reviling fidelity to an ideal of a representative republic. In other words, a monstrously formed and common intention is to fundamentally change (destroy) humanity and the American Ideal in order to replace them with an antpile for supplicating a hierarchy of crony ants.

Anonymous said...

The Constitution does not expressly set out a right to freely choose one's interests, friends, associates, business and customers. Common sense just assumed it. Slavery gave the devil his opening. Few decent people would argue that it was ever just to exclude blacks from major league baseball. Or to make it difficult for a Jackie Robinson to find food and lodging during away games. So the lunch counter protests were a good idea for raising consciousness.

But were the various equality, quota, busing and affirmative action laws, regulations and judicial decisions really necessary or helpful? How much did they serve to move the charity and conscience of the people away from assimilative forums and churches and into the corruption of gov? And, in terms of human liberty and control over mind and body sacrificed to corrupting interests, what has been the cost? Unfortunately, the more the race baiters whip up distrust, the more necessary they make the "cures" of corrupt gov. The consequence is less to end slavery than to impose dehumanizing collective enserfment upon everyone.

One begins to wonder: How long will it be before a publicly licensed bordello is forced to close unless every one of its comfort workers consents to service every customer -- no matter how loathsome, diseased, kinky or verbally abusive? Must every comfort worker consent to charge an "equal" fee? Must every publicly licensed and tax paying bordello hire a quota of ugly "workers"?

The regime so "loves" the world that evidently it must "force everyone to love" everyone else. Ah, the loveliness of gaydom!

Anonymous said...

Media compete for viewership, which is promoted by shock value. How else to explain the excess of homosexuality in the media? It seems that everything that depends on shock value defaults to the gays, dopers, deviants and pervs. Nowadays, this includes every institution of power. The prizes go to the quickest in the race to the sewer, so long as the racer does not flame out in an explosion of sewer gas. This leads me to think two things. First, gaydom is more about power lust than love. Which is probably why proponents are more into grooming kids than protecting kids. Second, the people at large have lost their collective minds to let so much self lordship get so far out of bounds. Americans have made themselves their own victims of excessive self love. A cosmic observer effect seems to be at work, so that we become that to which we allow ourselves to be lured to pay attention.

Anonymous said...

The republic is not checked and balanced. It is checkmated. Decent, competent, independent minded Americans established the republic and then fought and many died to preserve it for their progeny. They worked to make a better life for their spouses and children. When their spouses and children turned on them to despise and no longer appreciate the gift, the builders and defenders quietly tolerated the affront. They let children in adults' bodies swamp the vote. They let unprincipled oligarchs groom the children to corruption.

Those who gave the most have allowed themselves to be checkmated by their own generosity by the rotted progeny who take and do not appreciate. The republic has checkmated itself. Now the takers run rampant. The nation's will to survive as a free republic is being depleted as fast as an unguarded shopping mall in any Looterville. Good people have by and large surrendered to the intimidation of a vast morass of spoiled children that is comprised of looters, looners, choomers, swooners, groomers, boobers, groobers and mooslems.

Anonymous said...



If lives are lost in a battle in the forest between a regime commie, a black panther, a loud homosexual, a feminazi, a cartel mule, a reconquista aztlanian, a muslim jihadi and a basement-dwelling malcontent, but there is no ordinary white christian guy to blame, then did it really happen?

Anonymous said...



A few months ago, gays were saying fear about promotion of polygamy was overblown. Recently, the mask slipped and proponents have recognized that polygamy has been part of the goal all along. What with all the pc concerning muslims, given their "perfect man" was a pedophile, Nambla will soon be honored within the Prog parade. You can bet those creeps don't vote Republican. The kind of people who force taxpayers to fund "teachers" to groom kids to experiment with homosexuality in the guise of stopping bullying are hardly principled enough to stop adult perverts from abusing children. Obama was preyed on by FMD, but remains grateful for "Pop's" mentoring.

Same with pervs in the drug culture. They don't give diddly about any recruitment of, or danger to, kids. Progs tend to be shallow slaves to self pleasure, to the point of abandoning all principles. Yet, the anti-theists (militant atheists) among them think they have an "enlightened" moral code. Lol.

Edit: I saw on Megyn's show where some woman came out against violence against the pizzeria, but apparently not against the gay protests. Her point was that everyone is a sinner, so it is hypocritical not to be tolerant of sinners. Hmmm. Murderers, child rapists and child groomers are sinners. Is it "hypocritical" not to want to reward or encourage their sins? If I think in-your-face gaydom is not good for society, is it "right" to shut off my livelihood if you disagree? Our society seems to be in the grip of mass adolescent hysterics who have an infantile approach to logic and morality. It's as if Mother Jones and Salon had sucked the reasoning powers out of their followers.

Anonymous said...



The biggest hate groups nowadays consist of race baiters, fem nazis, militant gays, world warmers, cronies for oligarchs, pleasure addicts, and jihadis. What do they hate? Individual competence and liberty, normal families, republics with borders, small business entrepreneurs, disciplined goal setting, and judeo-christian values. The biggest haters are a rainbow coalition of haters of the American Ideal. To tolerate them is to host parasites. America has become both host and entree. America has tolerated its occupation by short-sighted parasites who hate and seek to kill their host. In justice, it's past time to turn the tables on pent up anger.

Anonymous said...

Swine Gas would make a better blog title for Mother Jones. Competent people know when to stop casting pearls before swine. Progs prefer to ingest and get high on the gas of the swine. Obama and Kerry like to choom on swine gas. If you want to save the planet, help cork the Prog gas.

Anonymous said...

Metrosexuals are not fully formed adults. As children, they instinctively know enough not to rebel against "parents" who are authoritative and abusive, no matter how irrational they may be. But, such childish people rebel all day long against "parents" who are weak, no matter how rational. Insofar as these unformed adults are the vanguard for advancing metrosexualism everywhere they can, their antics, however unprincipled, make a kind of sense. Still, it is breathtaking how they can be so enthralled to their own gratification and so concerned to preserve it as to be oblivious to the real abuse that is in the world.

Anonymous said...

No nation and no oligarchy is fit to be trusted to guide or police humanity. Americans choomed away any chance to reach up to the Man upstairs to lead the world in intuitive morality and coherent reason. I no longer see how or why our republic (comprised as it is of moonbats, dopers, addicts, illegals, rotters, de-definers, de-constructors, prancing free jerkers, shilling bait-and-switch scientists, metrosexuals, professional victims, legal nutcases, fruity judges, militant atheists, feminazis, hollow narcissists, child abusers, polar bear hunters, race baiters, and crony connivers) can be trusted to lead. Obama-naters pooped out the world they were waiting for, and it turns out not to be admirable.

If there were a white-hat republic to help rein in some of the world's insanity and inhumanity, that would be a good thing. If pigs could fly. But they cannot. So prepare your own garden and arm and provision it carefully. Without COS, nullification and/or group or individual secession, the poop will just be stacked higher and deeper.

Well, our gaynazis offer hope. If we make our top and only priority the forced celebration of ally things pink and gay, all will be well "in the end." S/o.

Anonymous said...

Should the term "family values" be deployed as an open variable that can be contorted to whatever may be the values of the contortionist? What is "just enough fertility"? Is it just enough to sustain the sheep farm, just enough to sustain the ponzi oligarchy, just enough to pay social security for retirees, just enough to man military adventures, or just enough to replenish the needs of a decent civilization under a representative republic?

To convey coherent meaning and avoid bait and switch, must not the term "responsible family values" be consistently attached to a social system of responsibly valued ideals? Should not "family values" be shorthand for parents' having and raising no more children than they can responsibly provide for and educate? Except to serve elitist contrivance, why should "family values" be conflated as a mere synonym for high fertility rates? Should a fascist gov that achieves high fertility via an assembly line be considered as showing increased family values?

This kind of conflation to elitist contrivance illustrates how the oligarchically ruled State proceeds with bait and switch "science" to de-define and replace the concepts of marriage, family, morality, purpose, society and nation. The same bait and switch technique for deploying talking points is deployed by twittering flash mobs to hoodwink a false equivalency between marriage among gays versus marriage between a man and woman.

Modelers seem always to be twisting terms to rationalize their favorite spins. Words like charity, empathy, family values, equality, fairness, merit, property. In the land of oligarchically ruled GayDom, only gays can be for those things.

Anonymous said...

The corollary is the drive to the two class, flattened-pyramid society. The borg and the borg nerve center.

Anonymous said...

If we want to take an infantile, fascist, third world perspective, I suppose marriage can be a system entailing a head of family and his harem/property of consorts, offspring, goats and toy boys on Tuesdays. Or whatever. Well, provided they love one another. At some time in the past. Or on Tuesdays. And so on. It's in the Constitution, doncha know?

Anonymous said...

n how much detail should the Fed or State gov and its bureaucrats have power to classify who can and who cannot adopt children? If orphans are wards of the State, must the State give up each child to be adopted on a first come first serve basis, as if the child were merely lost property to be disposed of by the gov? Does the Constitution give "equal first dibs over kids" to gays?

Anonymous said...

A liberty lover, by definition, is not a slavery promoter. Now, a totalitarian or elitist run society -- that is where you get slavery or serfdom. When you replace freedom for individuals and for parents raising children with big gov that takes their money in order to favor and promote idiocy, that is when you get denial of freedom. It was the Dems and their forebears who wanted slavery and segregation.

Anonymous said...

Control over almost all institutions of power has been usurped by or ceded to the most unprincipled 1%. They are few in number, but they have locked down decent society and blocked all the exits. These infantile, free-jerking pests are very serious about undermining society. Trying to reason with an infantile free jerker is about as worthwhile as trying to reason with a cockroach.

Anonymous said...

A legalism that harms children and promotes big brother gov over parents promotes servitude to gov that is run by and for elites and against individuals and families. It dis-conserves liberty. One cannot be a conservative in the sense of conserving liberty or the ideal of a representative republic if one condones tax money being used by gov to groom school children to experiment with the gay lifestyle. It's hard to see how any person who can think above his beltline can fail to see this. Justis' Kennedy is a fool, a tool or both.

Anonymous said...

The world the Left wants to make is one in which marriage, family, country, morality and spirituality have no meaning. Because Leftists are hollow, the only meaning they want to make is the self-voiding meaning of no meaning. They want the peace of nothingness. Nothing but choom. If Conservatives continue to tolerate the void of the Left, we will appease and be replaced by "some thing wicked this way comes," i.e., Islam.

Anonymous said...

Prescription for Morloch-Eloi Sado-Masochistic Hell: More welfare, more regulations, more ACLU, more lawyers, more pc indoctrination, more gay "marriages," more goosey brownshirts, more urban beach days, more reparatons against the "white privileged," more multiculturalism, more appeasement of Islam, more Justis' Kennedy, more Obama-ValJar-Sharpton-Soros-Winfrey-McCain.

Anonymous said...

Black and Furious. Fools will not be educated out of being fools. More good would be done by picking out the puppeteers of the perps. The frothy instigators should be made to own up to this. They are: The Black Caucus, Obama, Oprah, Sharpton, Jackson, Pelosi. They own this, and they should be made to pay dearly for it.

Anonymous said...



Iran is manipulating the West to the West's own undoing. The West is appeasing only for the short-term interests of its selfish elite. Iran is playing for long term stakes. The West is playing for its next fix. Iran has a goal, however demented it may be. The West just wants to get high.

How in the world can a society that is filled with short-term hedonists and dopers be expected to deploy an effective, sustained and calculated plan of appeasement against a demented foe whose goal cannot be diverted?

Nor can Iran's goal be deflected by an opponent that has no inspirational alternative to offer. That's us. That's what makes us weak and Iran comparatively strong. Our metrosexual hedonism and dopery are simply not inspiring to the leadership of any assimilating culture. Heck, our hedonists and dopers do not even inspire themselves to any sustained purposefulness. Rather, they tend not to like themselves and to hate their own country. They are instant gratifiers. They are not inspired by instruction on how to make calculatons to achieve a purely hedonistic society for the long term. They are "Doper Birds." They have no character, and so they cannot be led to success by instruction on methods of calculated appeasement. The cap to our act may well be like the last episode of Seinfeld. Except, add flames behind the bars.

Anonymous said...

Would a responsible parent raise a child with good character by a strategy of calculated appeasement? When one gets in the habit of giving inches to evil, then evil takes miles. Little by little, Prog Exhibitionists and Free Jerkers took over all our institutions of persuasion and power. People tend more to make decisions based on short term gratifications rather than on long term cost-benefit analyses. People tend not to be good or foresightful enough to reliably deploy programs of calculated appeasement. Rather, programs of calculated appeasement tend to be put together among elites in back rooms for the purpose of directing and diverting useful idiots and the masses that stir behind them.

If those who desire responsible representative republicanism could count on the administration and the American electorate to be principled in pursuing same, then a calculated strategy of appeasement may make sense in some situations. However, that is not the case. That is why Ted Cruz' demonstrations and fillibustering are good and worthwhile. Without such demonstrations of resolve, attention would not be focused and the pus that grows among selfish people in back rooms would continue to fester.

Americans need more inspiration in the way of Sam Adams and Ted Cruz and less in the way of advanced courses in appeasement by Lindsey Graham and John McCain.

Anonymous said...

Compared to gov siphoners, ponzi schemers are small time mice to whales. But behind the insurance siphoners, there are bigger siphoners yet. We're being siphoned to an implosion.

Anonymous said...

The media are managed cows. The Left is owned and operated by unprincipled, oligarchic profiteers. Their business model is to wipe out the political influence of the middle class so that the mass of humanity can be managed like a cattle feed lot. The cows who moo against this are sent early to the slaughterhouse. The media cows who moo for it are rewarded with extra hay and a taste of locoweed. Were the middle class stronger, it could tear down the corral walls. However, the oligarchs are on that. They are importing all the supporting third-world mooers they need. Either the walls to the feed lot will be broken asunder, or the planet will be "saved" by reducing it to a managed slaughterhouse. Halal, of course, with perhaps a bit of gay spice.

Anonymous said...

Oligarchs have invited loud takers, abusers and haters of America. The media are managed cows. The Left is owned and operated by unprincipled, oligarchic profiteers. Their business model is to wipe out the political influence of the middle class so that the mass of humanity can be managed like a cattle feed lot.

The cows who moo against this are sent early to the slaughterhouse. The media cows who moo for it are rewarded with extra hay and a taste of locoweed. Were the middle class stronger, it could tear down the corral walls.

However, the oligarchs are on that. They are importing all the supporting third-world mooers they need. Either the walls to the feed lot will be broken asunder, or the planet will be "saved" by reducing it to a managed slaughterhouse. (Halal, of course, with perhaps a bit of gay spice.)

Apart from tear down, there is not a lot to be gained by debating or raging against the oligarchic owned media. Irredeemable enemies need to be named, as enemies. This includes Islam and the crony oligarchy. After naming enemies, next comes defining piecemeal goals and "strategery." Don't think the enemies against the American Ideal are not keeping score, brother.

Anonymous said...



To destroy the American Ideal of representative republicanism within an informed, moral, assimilated and vigilant electorate, Lefties have sought to replace faith, family and fidelity with one-gov rule under elitists.

These destroyers include commies, socialists, militant atheists, muslim jihadis, militant gays, privacy peepers, and unprincipled crony criminals and deviants. Among them are: John Dewey, Harry Hopkins, Oppenheimer, Alger Hiss, Walter Duranty, George Soros, Barry Obama, Rachel Maddow, Fareed Zakaria, Richard Dawkins, Bill Maher, Lady Gaga, Lena Dunham

These malcontents (who imagine a utopia to be forced by elites upon everyone else by reducing the influence of the middle class of free thinkers) comprise a relatively small part of the general population. However, they have infiltrated and compromised the leadership of almost all institutions. As a result, they consider themselves to be our "noble elite," and resistance against their program for the destruction of representative republicnism (America) has become almost futile.

Anonymous said...

Hillary will raise an insane amount of campaign money by trying to put America beyond the point of no return on the road to serfdom. She will sell herself to crony despots buying futures in a crony ruled America. To continue to participate in world trade, U.S. businesses and political interests will have to kiss Hillary's ring and sell resources out to foreign currencies in foreign markets. As the world moves to an alternative reserve currency that may not accept U.S. dollars in exchange, major readjustments will be required. Entire pension systems will have to be abandoned. Americans will have to adjust to becoming cheap labor for foreign interests. The birthright of non-self-sufficient Americans in their individual freedom and dignity will be sacrificed. When representative republicanism fails in America, the world will become hierarchically regimented to syndicates of demagogues. "Merit" will be measured much more in respect of willingness to sacrifice all scruples in order to serve crony-pull than in respect of moral integrity or material competence. On that scale, Hillary is meritorious indeed! Thus comes the boot of the shrieking banshee on the face of humanity, to destroy representative republicanism in perpetuity.

Anonymous said...

Well, the Left does believe something is wrong. They believe it is wrong for any individual to insist on his own responsible competence to guide his freedom of association. Their only guide reduces to what pleasures them. They tend easilly to be duped to believe that the collective, ruled by gov, owned and operated by a hierarchy of pleasure-addled and godless crony elites, should have the right to regulate in detail every individual's freedom of association. They do not mind serving profiteers, so long as the profiteers are primarily motivated by a "principle" of immediate pleasure. To them, Larry Flynt is a saint.

It does not matter if the Left's regulations are incoherent, inconsistent, or insane. Should Muslim drivers who refuse to deliver truckloads of alcohol or to allow service dogs in taxis be entitled not to be fired from their public service jobs? Should Muslim bakers, but not Christian bakers, be entitled to continue their public service businesses without having to make cakes for gays who make known their intention to use the cake to celebrate a same sex "marriage"? Should a baker be forced out of business if he refuses to make a cake for a customer who makes known his intention to use the cake to poison or make ill a glutton or any other person or child?

The reconstructive need and justification for applying gov force in order to train the masses to overcome inhumane racism has largely evaporated. This is because society has moved on and because large, impersonal, purely profit driven corporations now supply virtually every need for which any bigoted small businesses may compete. (Well, society had moved on, until the current central regime started stirring up divisiveness and racial animosities.) The gov's claim of right to force small businesses to give up their owners' freedom of association is a topic that needs to be revisited. Problem is, the demented oligarchy will poison the well in order to preserve its control and keep the masses well farmed. The unprincipled oligarchy means to rule. It expects to be able to hoodwink enough among the masses to accomplish that, no matter how hypocritical and evil the oligarchy may be.

Anonymous said...

The Left demands that Christians love everything, even though, by definition, that would be impossible -- even for Jesus. The Left does not demand love from Muslims, because love is not what Islam is primarily about.* It is about subjugation, which is what the Left is also about. The Left exempts itself from loving everyone and everything, because it is about subjugating, farming and ruling the masses, not loving them. The Left conflates sado-masochism with love. This is why the Left finds it convenient to its purposes to align with Muslims and against Christians: They share an exemption from loving their neighbors as themselves in any principled sense.

The Left expresses its hatred of Christians by ridiculing their values. It ridicules their values by techniques of conflation, conflating evil with good. You can see that in the techniques deployed by the trolls the Left sends forth. There is very little in them of science, logic, reason, principle, justice, fairness or morality, because those things are all replaced by immediate self gratification of every demented pleasure. Leftists do not reason. They feel. Trying to reason about principles with a Lefty who has no guiding principle apart from hedonism tends to be a pure waste.

*********

Every now and then, Wikipedia has something interesting to say:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule:

*In Islam the Golden Rule is reserved solely for fellow Muslims. Quran verse 48:29 states: Muhammad is the messenger of Allah; and those who are with him are strong against Unbelievers, (but) compassionate amongst each other. and whilst there may be many verses that state that a Muslim should love their brother, the Quran makes it clear that Muslims are but a single brotherhood.


******


Similarly, Leftist dupes serve a brotherhood: The ruling class of crony oligarchs.