The American Ideal is to avail common respect for the freedom, dignity, and responsibility of individuals. Freedom of expression and enterprise. As unregulated by gang-banging, special-favoring regulations as can reasonably be accomplished. Relying as much as reasonably can be done on cultural assimilations of common decency and common sense, instead of on special pleading, group reparating, or race-based unionizing. Keeping adults in charge, instead of wussie rule makers, installing wussie law makers, wussie judges, wussie profs, and wussie civil servants.
Absent good reason, Conservers of the American Ideal would not use law to favor or exclude any citizen merely on the basis of race, sex, age, origin, or orientation. Neither would they exclude any citizen from freedom to associate or disassociate with whomever he wants, hosowever he wants to profile for his friends, employees, or customers based on a possible infinitude of factors.
However, as a nation, they would assimilate to preclude immigration in quantities that defy assimilation to the American Ideal. As a nation, they would profile as necessary or helpful for selecting against liberty illiterates and unassimilables. To fail to do so would not be to avoid profiling. Rather, it would profile by erosion. By erosion, it would wear the republic down to the lowest common denominator of liberty illiterates throughout the rest of the world.
Conservers of liberty tend not to exclude anyone except liberty destroyers and liberty illiterates. That is not based on race, etc. It is based on factors that inform judgment for selecting against unassimilables. Conservers of liberty tend to welcome anyone who shows able and willing to assimilate to the American Ideal.
So, who do anti-Conservers of liberty tend to exclude? Well, once they arrive, they tend to set themselves apart and decline to respect the American Ideal. They tend at every opportunity to undermine it. They tend to replace cultural reliance on faith, family, and fidelity with phony promises made to induce unprincipled majoritarians to gang up to prey and parasite from others. They vote for a living. They seek special regulations, right down to the toenails! Arbitrary and race-based "reparations."
They pick a target group that would promote assimilation and seek to make it a goat, to promote disassimilation and predation. As it happens, that target group tends presently to consist of white men with responsible and reliably paying jobs. Once the Antis decimate that group, they will flux and find other targets. They constantly engage in unprincipled devouring of one another, because they prefer predation and parasitism to self competence and individual production. All the while, these devils project their unprincipled evil by calling others the devils. The only reason Antis do not exclude Conservers of Liberty is because they want to take from their production. This has nothing to do with superior morality among the Antis. It has more to do with the ethos of a swarm of blood suckers. Shills for people farmers.
Many minorities are Conservers of Liberty (Antis, because they like people-farming parasitism, tend to denigrate them as Uncle Toms). Other Conservers of Liberty tend not to exclude them at all. However, minorities that are not Conservers of Liberty tend, often by default, to promote predation and parasitism against Conservatives.
It's partly math based. Every attempt to promote positive change is resisted by the inertia of the system at present. Competing forces are always at work, as is necessarily the case with any system that parcels out significations based on a conserved accounting of matter and energy.
Every noble effort to assimilate towards a commonly shared principle or goal will always be beset by dregs of otherwise unprincipled opportunists. The American Ideal of individual freedom and dignity will always be beset by dregs of collectivizing people-farmers. No low-energy champion can resist the monstrous suckyness of anti-moral oligarchs.
One wonders if the number of morons ("reality incompetents") approaches the number of grains of sand. Evidently, to be in "touch with reality" is to advocate for choomerism, transgenderism, more imported Muslims, more lawless BLM, more genetic drag, more memetic drag, more critical social studies dimbulbs, more free lunches, more reparations, more race baiting, more freezing of goat targets.
Do you ever think about manning up to take adult responsibility for yourself? Is that too much out of "touch with reality"? Is everyone that advocates for personal responsibility and work ethic a white supremacist devil admirer of Adolf?
I see where you think eugenics was abandoned simply because the word is hardly used nowadays. Pull your head out of the sand! Eugenics in some form is unavoidable! Our bodies are part of nature, and the unfolding fractal patterns of nature are nothing if not about rewarding those most fit for survival to reproduce. Evolution and eugenics/dysgenics merely recognize the obvious: That some contextual niches tend to favor some patterns over others. That's how patterns come to flux.
To favor the importation of cousin-bred goat lovers is by definition the practice of genetic drag as policy. I suppose a head-in-sand stickler can beg to call it dysgenics. But it certainly is not benign, moral, good, or "progressive" -- except by bastardizing words.
How removed from competency with reality are you? Your "argumentation" is not principled. It is merely convenient to your favored form of beggary, scapegoating, and gang bangery. IOW, what is done by those that lack competence as individuals or moral principles as human beings.
I doubt you ever did ascribe to the American Ideal of individual freedom, dignity, responsibility. I suspect you have been a collectivist (whether or not bouncing between communistic collectivism and fascist collectivism) all your life.
****************
Every aggressor seeks to change the status quo. A direct aggressor tends to do so honestly or fearlessly. An indirect aggressor tends to do so dishonestly or secretly. Neither wants to tolerate the status quo.
By passive aggression, the indirect aggressor seeks to deceive, by feigning tolerance and fair mindedness. Libs want to be perceived as being fair minded, even when they are single mindedly pursuing fundamental change because they find the status quo to be intolerable.
Passive aggressive Libs pretend to be fair minded in order to gain an edge, so they don't have to tolerate their opponents. Indeed, they use their passivity as jujitsu to set up and frame their opponents as being the ones that are intolerant. They fuss to frame every narrative with specialized editing and lying.
Scratch a wuss, find an intolerant lying dishonest whining wannabe dictator that relishes sticking his/her hinny into everyone else's business. Our professoriates, law schools, gov jobs, safe spaces, think tanks, foundations, and churches are now filled with wusses. And they do not stop there. They are "moving on" to infest our military and law enforcement.
A wuss's pathological "solution" to every changing challenge is to write a new law or regulation or to get the ACLU to file a new federal case. Wusses are so much less pathological than the KKK. Not!
The consequence of wussworld is the elimination of human freedom and dignity.
**************
How long before it's a crime to contradict the elitist pc that is ordained by our New Wussie Oligarchy (NWO)?
When we can no longer insult our political leaders, it will soon follow that every disagreement with them is an insult to them. It's time to put the wussies back in their places. With all reasonably necessary insults.
I watched Spiawn's vidoe showing the Canadian prof trying to explain to another why society is better off without diktat of 5, 10, 50. or more gender pronouns (cow lover, cat comforter, goat stroker, earthworm fondler, etc,. for as many kinds of animals and entities as can be listed). His logic was irrefutable and obvious. Yet, the wuss against him always had one more question and one more demand, to infinity.
There comes a time when wusses must simply be told that not everyone should be required to entertain their wussieness. If truth hurts their feelings, well, truth is often more important to human freedom and dignity than phony kindness. If wusses were kind, they would not make themselves such burdens on decent society.
Re: "The Constitution itself is unconstitutional."
No doubt, had a Planet Evangelist been elected, the Constitution would eventually have been declared an abominatory and intolerable contradiction to Planetary Progress. Representative Republicanism was well on its way to being replaced by Cronycrat Elitist Diktat. For phony statist promises of wuss security and economic equality, humanity would have lost its last best hope for freedom and dignity, Trump is probably our last chance to put wussies back in the crib and return the republic to adult supervision.
The establishment, almost to a man, was lined up for Hillary and against Trump. The Chamber of Commerce was with them to keep importing the cheap labor and eventually guaranteed Dem votes. The Dem voters warehoused in projects continued to vote for cheap bribes and phony promises by Dems.
The middle class endured a stunning right left sucker punch combination against its political influence. The think tanks figured out how to coopt and get cheap laborers to believe corporate shills were on the side of general fairness. Meanwhile, the middle class sat around projecting its good faith and good will as if it applied equally well to pathological corporatists and hold up artists. Hopefully, Trump is throwing water on the faces of the stunned middle class.
A person that wants to force gov to provide him with special benefits for little reason other than his race is a racist.
To be a racist is to show or feel discrimination or prejudice against
people of other races, or to believe that a particular race is superior
to another.
To be a racist farmer is to use racists to agglomerate political power in order to rule others.
Al Sharpton is a racist. Hillary, Soros, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, de Blasio are racist farmers. BLM, La Raza, NAACP, and ACLU are racist organizations, bent on farming gov to obtain special benefits based on little more than race.
Most Progs are die hard racists. They are inheritors of a long history of Dem racism. They tend not to compete well off the plantation, so they are receptive to invitations by cronycrat globalists to line up to get back into the plantation. They want one vast global plantation that will regulate them and everyone else to ensure equal distribution right down to the toenails. Because this is impossible, it always leads to tragedy and eventually genocide. Progs are in the business of farming for envy and hate, while they pretend to be loving and tolerant. This is a direct result of their focus on racism instead of on growing up.
Show me where they have indicated to be white supremacists? Do you think they are white supremacists because they deal in historical facts and are not rap-happy, wussy-whining, cry bullies? Because they believe in the American Ideal of defending an oasis that is devoted to human freedom and dignity? Because they believe the marketplace should generally reward energy, talent, competence, and work?
Where have they indicated any desire to use race to deprive any American citizen from lawfully pursuing his individual employment, happiness, and the American Ideal?
Are you "probibly" a reparation-claiming equality-in-outcomes redistributionist? Are you an anti-American-supremacist?
Because they're competent Americans and not adolescent prancing en-tit-lement-minded warmist-commie gay basement-dwelling parasites? So, they must be Nazis, right? S/
In Congress, as in the rest of the nation, there is not so much commonly shared moral sense. Obama was selected and favored because his hatred for representative republicanism is convenient to the globalist interests of the NWO.
Like Obama, Representatives beholden to their main campaign contributors dance to the globalist tune they call. Many think resistance is futile, so they may as well cash in. They think Trumpism is a fluke that is unlikely to be repeated, since it would require finding another billionaire to run in the future who did not make himself beholden to the NWO.
Absent some kind of moral reawakening to the Source of human freedom and dignity, they would probably be correct in that assessment. We are in the midst of a far greater trial.
****************
Add H20 melon. And t for tat. After awhile, you just learn workarounds.
Pretty soon, the "feelings police" will want to change the list of banned words to fit the political season. Periodic and continuing pc education will be mandated for everyone.
Lazy may go on and off the verboten list, for offending the energy challenged. Ignorant, for offending those that are naturally inclined not to like to learn or read. Unicornish, for offending globalists. Sensitive, for offending sheltered limp wrists. Limp wrists,for offending the work challenged.
If collectivism remains ascendent, words of insult will still be ok, but only if they offend the out group (white male Christians with jobs). So, homophobe, islamophobe, nativist, redneck, patriotic, macho, thumper, cracker, bluenose, etc., will remain more or less acceptable among the socialist crowd.
However, words of insult will be disfavored for doing their First Amendment work when they challenge the powers that are politically ascendent during any particular "season of silliness." Err, "progress."
When Big Momma ain't happy, nobody's happy. That's not fascism. It's femcism. And it's brutal.
***************
A person that wants to force gov to provide him with special benefits for little reason other than his race is a racist.
To be a racist is to show or feel discrimination or prejudice against
people of other races, or to believe that a particular race is superior
to another.
To be a racist farmer is to use racists to agglomerate political power in order to rule others.
Al Sharpton is a racist. Hillary, Soros, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, de Blasio are racist farmers. BLM, La Raza, NAACP, and ACLU are racist organizations, bent on farming gov to obtain special benefits based on little more than race.
Most Progs are die hard racists. They are inheritors of a long history of Dem racism. They tend not to compete well off the plantation, so they are receptive to invitations by cronycrat globalists to line up to get back into the plantation. They want one vast global plantation that will regulate them and everyone else to ensure equal distribution right down to the toenails. Because this is impossible, it always leads to tragedy and eventually genocide. Progs are in the business of farming for envy and hate, while they pretend to be loving and tolerant. This is a direct result of their focus on racism instead of on growing up.
******************
OK, show me where they have indicated to be white supremacists? Do you think they are white supremacists because they deal in historical facts and are not rap-happy, wussy-whining, cry bullies? Because they believe in the American Ideal of defending an oasis that is devoted to human freedom and dignity? Because they believe the marketplace should generally reward energy, talent, competence, and work?
Where have they indicated any desire to use race to deprive any American citizen from lawfully pursuing his individual employment, happiness, and the American Ideal?
Are you "probibly" a reparation-claiming equality-in-outcomes redistributionist? Are you an anti-American-supremacist?
******************
Because they're competent Americans and not adolescent prancing en-tit-lement-minded warmist-commie gay basement-dwelling parasites? So, they must be Nazis, right? S/
Hard questions without clear answers: Is Trump more than a showman? Is there any there, there? Is he playing rope a dope so he can more effectively spend his political capital? How much deceit is needed to get the American people moving in a better direction?
Why was the establishment so unified against him and against the American middle class?
My take: Trump's strong base is in the middle class. I see him working to expand that, not to unravel it. We shall soon enough see.
The middle class endured a stunning right left sucker punch combination against its political influence. The think tanks figured out how to coopt and get cheap laborers to believe corporate shills were on the side of general fairness. Meanwhile, the middle class sat around projecting its good faith and good will as if it applied equally well to pathological corporatists and hold up artists. Hopefully, Trump is throwing water on the faces of the stunned middle class.
Everytime I see a wussie, it triggers me. It triggers me with feelings of being unsafe and fearing for my country. It conjures up visions of goosesteppers and gov inspections house to house to register anti-wussies and to confiscate guns. It makes me scared to go into inner cities. I feel wussiewierdos owe me reparations.
S/
In Congress, as in the rest of the nation, there is not so much commonly shared moral sense. Obama was selected and favored because his hatred for representative republicanism is convenient to the globalist interests of the NWO.
Like Obama, Representatives beholden to their main campaign contributors dance to the globalist tune they call. Many think resistance is futile, so they may as well cash in. They think Trumpism is a fluke that is unlikely to be repeated, since it would require finding another billionaire to run in the future who did not make himself beholden to the NWO.
Absent some kind of moral reawakening to the Source of human freedom and dignity, they would probably be correct in that assessment. We are in the midst of a far greater trial.
To think Obama would not dare make a recess appointment to Scotus would be the height of stupidity, corruption, or both. Obama loathes mainstream America. He would most certainly take the opportunity to put a parting finger in the eye of the republic. To give him that opportunity would be tantamount to giving jihadis the keys to our major cities. Treason to the founding ideals.
Catch 22 is how cronycrats train the system to train themselves and their victims for the funny people farm.
The most important rule is this: If you think you DO need psychological help, you don't. If you think you DON'T need psychological help, you do.
That Rule has numerous sub-permutations:
If you think you need a loan, you don't. If you think you don't need a loan, you do.
If you want to get out of combat duty, you're sane, so you can't. If you don't want to get out of combat duty, you're crazy, but you have to apply, so you still can't.
If you mislead investors, you will be driven out of business, unless you mislead so many so much that the gov wants in on the act, so it bails you out.
Per Catch 22, if Orr flew combat missions, he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to, he was sane and had to.
"They don't have to show us Catch-22," the old woman answered. "The law says they don't have to."
"What law says they don't have to?"
"Catch-22."
The law apparently says psychologists don't have to prove you're crazy to prescribe regulations for the funny farm. Because if you claim not to need their funny farm, you obviously do.
Absent good reason, Conservers of the American Ideal would not use law to favor or exclude any citizen merely on the basis of race, sex, age, origin, or orientation. Neither would they exclude any citizen from freedom to associate or disassociate with whomever he wants, hosowever he wants to profile for his friends, employees, or customers based on a possible infinitude of factors.
However, as a nation, they would assimilate to preclude immigration in quantities that defy assimilation to the American Ideal. As a nation, they would profile as necessary or helpful for selecting against liberty illiterates and unassimilables. To fail to do so would not be to avoid profiling. Rather, it would profile by erosion. By erosion, it would wear the republic down to the lowest common denominator of liberty illiterates throughout the rest of the world.
Conservers of liberty tend not to exclude anyone except liberty destroyers and liberty illiterates. That is not based on race, etc. It is based on factors that inform judgment for selecting against unassimilables. Conservers of liberty tend to welcome anyone who shows able and willing to assimilate to the American Ideal.
So, who do anti-Conservers of liberty tend to exclude? Well, once they arrive, they tend to set themselves apart and decline to respect the American Ideal. They tend at every opportunity to undermine it. They tend to replace cultural reliance on faith, family, and fidelity with phony promises made to induce unprincipled majoritarians to gang up to prey and parasite from others. They vote for a living. They seek special regulations, right down to the toenails! Arbitrary and race-based "reparations."
They pick a target group that would promote assimilation and seek to make it a goat, to promote disassimilation and predation. As it happens, that target group tends presently to consist of white men with responsible and reliably paying jobs. Once the Antis decimate that group, they will flux and find other targets. They constantly engage in unprincipled devouring of one another, because they prefer predation and parasitism to self competence and individual production. All the while, these devils project their unprincipled evil by calling others the devils. The only reason Antis do not exclude Conservers of Liberty is because they want to take from their production. This has nothing to do with superior morality among the Antis. It has more to do with the ethos of a swarm of blood suckers. Shills for people farmers.
Many minorities are Conservers of Liberty (Antis, because they like people-farming parasitism, tend to denigrate them as Uncle Toms). Other Conservers of Liberty tend not to exclude them at all. However, minorities that are not Conservers of Liberty tend, often by default, to promote predation and parasitism against Conservatives.
It's partly math based. Every attempt to promote positive change is resisted by the inertia of the system at present. Competing forces are always at work, as is necessarily the case with any system that parcels out significations based on a conserved accounting of matter and energy.
Every noble effort to assimilate towards a commonly shared principle or goal will always be beset by dregs of otherwise unprincipled opportunists. The American Ideal of individual freedom and dignity will always be beset by dregs of collectivizing people-farmers. No low-energy champion can resist the monstrous suckyness of anti-moral oligarchs.
One wonders if the number of morons ("reality incompetents") approaches the number of grains of sand. Evidently, to be in "touch with reality" is to advocate for choomerism, transgenderism, more imported Muslims, more lawless BLM, more genetic drag, more memetic drag, more critical social studies dimbulbs, more free lunches, more reparations, more race baiting, more freezing of goat targets.
Do you ever think about manning up to take adult responsibility for yourself? Is that too much out of "touch with reality"? Is everyone that advocates for personal responsibility and work ethic a white supremacist devil admirer of Adolf?
I see where you think eugenics was abandoned simply because the word is hardly used nowadays. Pull your head out of the sand! Eugenics in some form is unavoidable! Our bodies are part of nature, and the unfolding fractal patterns of nature are nothing if not about rewarding those most fit for survival to reproduce. Evolution and eugenics/dysgenics merely recognize the obvious: That some contextual niches tend to favor some patterns over others. That's how patterns come to flux.
To favor the importation of cousin-bred goat lovers is by definition the practice of genetic drag as policy. I suppose a head-in-sand stickler can beg to call it dysgenics. But it certainly is not benign, moral, good, or "progressive" -- except by bastardizing words.
How removed from competency with reality are you? Your "argumentation" is not principled. It is merely convenient to your favored form of beggary, scapegoating, and gang bangery. IOW, what is done by those that lack competence as individuals or moral principles as human beings.
I doubt you ever did ascribe to the American Ideal of individual freedom, dignity, responsibility. I suspect you have been a collectivist (whether or not bouncing between communistic collectivism and fascist collectivism) all your life.
****************
Every aggressor seeks to change the status quo. A direct aggressor tends to do so honestly or fearlessly. An indirect aggressor tends to do so dishonestly or secretly. Neither wants to tolerate the status quo.
By passive aggression, the indirect aggressor seeks to deceive, by feigning tolerance and fair mindedness. Libs want to be perceived as being fair minded, even when they are single mindedly pursuing fundamental change because they find the status quo to be intolerable.
Passive aggressive Libs pretend to be fair minded in order to gain an edge, so they don't have to tolerate their opponents. Indeed, they use their passivity as jujitsu to set up and frame their opponents as being the ones that are intolerant. They fuss to frame every narrative with specialized editing and lying.
Scratch a wuss, find an intolerant lying dishonest whining wannabe dictator that relishes sticking his/her hinny into everyone else's business. Our professoriates, law schools, gov jobs, safe spaces, think tanks, foundations, and churches are now filled with wusses. And they do not stop there. They are "moving on" to infest our military and law enforcement.
A wuss's pathological "solution" to every changing challenge is to write a new law or regulation or to get the ACLU to file a new federal case. Wusses are so much less pathological than the KKK. Not!
The consequence of wussworld is the elimination of human freedom and dignity.
**************
How long before it's a crime to contradict the elitist pc that is ordained by our New Wussie Oligarchy (NWO)?
When we can no longer insult our political leaders, it will soon follow that every disagreement with them is an insult to them. It's time to put the wussies back in their places. With all reasonably necessary insults.
I watched Spiawn's vidoe showing the Canadian prof trying to explain to another why society is better off without diktat of 5, 10, 50. or more gender pronouns (cow lover, cat comforter, goat stroker, earthworm fondler, etc,. for as many kinds of animals and entities as can be listed). His logic was irrefutable and obvious. Yet, the wuss against him always had one more question and one more demand, to infinity.
There comes a time when wusses must simply be told that not everyone should be required to entertain their wussieness. If truth hurts their feelings, well, truth is often more important to human freedom and dignity than phony kindness. If wusses were kind, they would not make themselves such burdens on decent society.
No doubt, had a Planet Evangelist been elected, the Constitution would eventually have been declared an abominatory and intolerable contradiction to Planetary Progress. Representative Republicanism was well on its way to being replaced by Cronycrat Elitist Diktat. For phony statist promises of wuss security and economic equality, humanity would have lost its last best hope for freedom and dignity, Trump is probably our last chance to put wussies back in the crib and return the republic to adult supervision.
The establishment, almost to a man, was lined up for Hillary and against Trump. The Chamber of Commerce was with them to keep importing the cheap labor and eventually guaranteed Dem votes. The Dem voters warehoused in projects continued to vote for cheap bribes and phony promises by Dems.
The middle class endured a stunning right left sucker punch combination against its political influence. The think tanks figured out how to coopt and get cheap laborers to believe corporate shills were on the side of general fairness. Meanwhile, the middle class sat around projecting its good faith and good will as if it applied equally well to pathological corporatists and hold up artists. Hopefully, Trump is throwing water on the faces of the stunned middle class.
A person that wants to force gov to provide him with special benefits for little reason other than his race is a racist.
To be a racist is to show or feel discrimination or prejudice against
people of other races, or to believe that a particular race is superior
to another.
To be a racist farmer is to use racists to agglomerate political power in order to rule others.
Al Sharpton is a racist. Hillary, Soros, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, de Blasio are racist farmers. BLM, La Raza, NAACP, and ACLU are racist organizations, bent on farming gov to obtain special benefits based on little more than race.
Most Progs are die hard racists. They are inheritors of a long history of Dem racism. They tend not to compete well off the plantation, so they are receptive to invitations by cronycrat globalists to line up to get back into the plantation. They want one vast global plantation that will regulate them and everyone else to ensure equal distribution right down to the toenails. Because this is impossible, it always leads to tragedy and eventually genocide. Progs are in the business of farming for envy and hate, while they pretend to be loving and tolerant. This is a direct result of their focus on racism instead of on growing up.
Show me where they have indicated to be white supremacists? Do you think they are white supremacists because they deal in historical facts and are not rap-happy, wussy-whining, cry bullies? Because they believe in the American Ideal of defending an oasis that is devoted to human freedom and dignity? Because they believe the marketplace should generally reward energy, talent, competence, and work?
Where have they indicated any desire to use race to deprive any American citizen from lawfully pursuing his individual employment, happiness, and the American Ideal?
Are you "probibly" a reparation-claiming equality-in-outcomes redistributionist? Are you an anti-American-supremacist?
Because they're competent Americans and not adolescent prancing en-tit-lement-minded warmist-commie gay basement-dwelling parasites? So, they must be Nazis, right? S/
In Congress, as in the rest of the nation, there is not so much commonly shared moral sense. Obama was selected and favored because his hatred for representative republicanism is convenient to the globalist interests of the NWO.
Like Obama, Representatives beholden to their main campaign contributors dance to the globalist tune they call. Many think resistance is futile, so they may as well cash in. They think Trumpism is a fluke that is unlikely to be repeated, since it would require finding another billionaire to run in the future who did not make himself beholden to the NWO.
Absent some kind of moral reawakening to the Source of human freedom and dignity, they would probably be correct in that assessment. We are in the midst of a far greater trial.
****************
Add H20 melon. And t for tat. After awhile, you just learn workarounds.
Pretty soon, the "feelings police" will want to change the list of banned words to fit the political season. Periodic and continuing pc education will be mandated for everyone.
Lazy may go on and off the verboten list, for offending the energy challenged. Ignorant, for offending those that are naturally inclined not to like to learn or read. Unicornish, for offending globalists. Sensitive, for offending sheltered limp wrists. Limp wrists,for offending the work challenged.
If collectivism remains ascendent, words of insult will still be ok, but only if they offend the out group (white male Christians with jobs). So, homophobe, islamophobe, nativist, redneck, patriotic, macho, thumper, cracker, bluenose, etc., will remain more or less acceptable among the socialist crowd.
However, words of insult will be disfavored for doing their First Amendment work when they challenge the powers that are politically ascendent during any particular "season of silliness." Err, "progress."
When Big Momma ain't happy, nobody's happy. That's not fascism. It's femcism. And it's brutal.
***************
A person that wants to force gov to provide him with special benefits for little reason other than his race is a racist.
To be a racist is to show or feel discrimination or prejudice against
people of other races, or to believe that a particular race is superior
to another.
To be a racist farmer is to use racists to agglomerate political power in order to rule others.
Al Sharpton is a racist. Hillary, Soros, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, de Blasio are racist farmers. BLM, La Raza, NAACP, and ACLU are racist organizations, bent on farming gov to obtain special benefits based on little more than race.
Most Progs are die hard racists. They are inheritors of a long history of Dem racism. They tend not to compete well off the plantation, so they are receptive to invitations by cronycrat globalists to line up to get back into the plantation. They want one vast global plantation that will regulate them and everyone else to ensure equal distribution right down to the toenails. Because this is impossible, it always leads to tragedy and eventually genocide. Progs are in the business of farming for envy and hate, while they pretend to be loving and tolerant. This is a direct result of their focus on racism instead of on growing up.
******************
OK, show me where they have indicated to be white supremacists? Do you think they are white supremacists because they deal in historical facts and are not rap-happy, wussy-whining, cry bullies? Because they believe in the American Ideal of defending an oasis that is devoted to human freedom and dignity? Because they believe the marketplace should generally reward energy, talent, competence, and work?
Where have they indicated any desire to use race to deprive any American citizen from lawfully pursuing his individual employment, happiness, and the American Ideal?
Are you "probibly" a reparation-claiming equality-in-outcomes redistributionist? Are you an anti-American-supremacist?
******************
Because they're competent Americans and not adolescent prancing en-tit-lement-minded warmist-commie gay basement-dwelling parasites? So, they must be Nazis, right? S/
Hard questions without clear answers: Is Trump more than a showman? Is there any there, there? Is he playing rope a dope so he can more effectively spend his political capital? How much deceit is needed to get the American people moving in a better direction?
Why was the establishment so unified against him and against the American middle class?
My take: Trump's strong base is in the middle class. I see him working to expand that, not to unravel it. We shall soon enough see.
The middle class endured a stunning right left sucker punch combination against its political influence. The think tanks figured out how to coopt and get cheap laborers to believe corporate shills were on the side of general fairness. Meanwhile, the middle class sat around projecting its good faith and good will as if it applied equally well to pathological corporatists and hold up artists. Hopefully, Trump is throwing water on the faces of the stunned middle class.
Everytime I see a wussie, it triggers me. It triggers me with feelings of being unsafe and fearing for my country. It conjures up visions of goosesteppers and gov inspections house to house to register anti-wussies and to confiscate guns. It makes me scared to go into inner cities. I feel wussiewierdos owe me reparations.
S/
In Congress, as in the rest of the nation, there is not so much commonly shared moral sense. Obama was selected and favored because his hatred for representative republicanism is convenient to the globalist interests of the NWO.
Like Obama, Representatives beholden to their main campaign contributors dance to the globalist tune they call. Many think resistance is futile, so they may as well cash in. They think Trumpism is a fluke that is unlikely to be repeated, since it would require finding another billionaire to run in the future who did not make himself beholden to the NWO.
Absent some kind of moral reawakening to the Source of human freedom and dignity, they would probably be correct in that assessment. We are in the midst of a far greater trial.
To think Obama would not dare make a recess appointment to Scotus would be the height of stupidity, corruption, or both. Obama loathes mainstream America. He would most certainly take the opportunity to put a parting finger in the eye of the republic. To give him that opportunity would be tantamount to giving jihadis the keys to our major cities. Treason to the founding ideals.
Catch 22 is how cronycrats train the system to train themselves and their victims for the funny people farm.
The most important rule is this: If you think you DO need psychological help, you don't. If you think you DON'T need psychological help, you do.
That Rule has numerous sub-permutations:
If you think you need a loan, you don't. If you think you don't need a loan, you do.
If you want to get out of combat duty, you're sane, so you can't. If you don't want to get out of combat duty, you're crazy, but you have to apply, so you still can't.
If you mislead investors, you will be driven out of business, unless you mislead so many so much that the gov wants in on the act, so it bails you out.
Per Catch 22, if Orr flew combat missions, he was crazy and didn't have to; but if he didn't want to, he was sane and had to.
"They don't have to show us Catch-22," the old woman answered. "The law says they don't have to."
"What law says they don't have to?"
"Catch-22."
The law apparently says psychologists don't have to prove you're crazy to prescribe regulations for the funny farm. Because if you claim not to need their funny farm, you obviously do.
Prog agents of the Borg want to elevate themselves by accusing Conservers of Liberty of being agents of the commie Borg. Now that's hubris!