Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Money in Flattering Morons

.
Yes, the only effective way to reach the feeling and non-thinking Left is with catchy commercials.  Just don't weigh them down with too much analysis.  The media run off advertising, and messages that appeal to hipsters attract minds that are prone to advertising.  The market for media, advertising, and political commercials is driven by those who are most anxious to feel good, cool, fashionable, and hip.  It's far less driven by those who are principled or who think more for themselves.  Indeed, among hip, feeling, non-thinkers, it's quite easy to convince them that they are actually "smart."  They actually believe advertisers target them because they're so smart.  That's why Obama's commercials are so chock fully of substantive analysis!  (Hope and change and all that.  Yeah, right.  Lol!)
.
Problem:  Because media make money mostly by taking advantage of and selling to simpletons, simpletons are the ones media most cultivate.  I suspect journalists tend to be Leftists not because they themselves are all simpletons, but because they see that's the target demographic for the sheep most easily sheared.  There's big money in cultivating simpletons while praising them for how smart they are!  Especially in registering them to vote while making cheap promises to them.  Whatta deal!  You can make big bucks while you sell your country down the river!  How cool is that for a nihilist hipster?  You go, Billie, Jonny, Rachel, Chrissy, and Soledad.
.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Re: "It should be learned at an early age that one cannot resort to reason with a bully"
Bingo. Principle and merit have nothing to do with Obama or his die hard supporters. Obama is about self, race, and tribe --- in that order. His higher morality and spirituality is a con. Like La Raza, it's all about racial entitlements, by hook or by crook. The way Obama defines himself and his purpose has nothing to do with principles for humanity, but it has everything to do with war of tribe against tribe within humanity. Obama is Not About Establishing An Exemplar Of Broad Freedom For All. Why should he be? Freedom rewards merit, and Obama does not believe in rewarding merit. He believes in redistributing to cronies. He is about redistributing spoils to his homies, and that means taking from the whities he calls colonialists. Humanity will never succeed to quarantine racists and establish broad freedom so long as we try to win the day by debating with racists and bullies. We need to recognize the racists, bullies, and jihadis ... and then quarantine them. Quarantine them by not opening borders to them, by not trading in their products, by not dignifying them with debate, and by ridicule. Set aside their own plantation for them and help them pack to get to it. It's easy to spot them. They and their elites (Marx and Mohammed) and their useful dolts are the ones who resort almost exclusively to proofs that attempt to divide morality by zero. In that way, there's no eye-poke that they cannot "justify" and laugh about ... in your face ("LIYF," per Maher, Stewart, Colbert, ad nauseum). Soon, Ivy eggheads will be dividing by zero to justify public sex and teaching bestiality to children. They're already laying the groundwork. Maybe we'll have a new jingle: What the world needs now is more interspecies love. Why do we see so much of this dividing by zero? Answer: To condition the sheeple to accept whatever the hell elites for bullies want to rationalize.

Anonymous said...

Those among the ignorant used to say that being born black was the mark of Cain. Now, many among the ignorant are willing to be led to believe that being born white is the mark of original racial sin. There is common sense profiling that is willing to be shown to be wrong in individual cases, and then there is unrelenting prejudicial profiling that is unwilling to believe that a person of a different race or color of skin or eyes can ever be trusted. Example: To vote for Obama without needing any reason more than his skin color is unrelenting racist profiling. Under this analysis, the preponderance of racists appears to be far greater on the Left. This observation is not prejudicial profiling. It is simply a common sense statement of apparent fact. I am willing to be shown to be wrong. Simply give me evidence that a significant percentage of the 95% of blacks who voted for Obama are willing to be shown to have been wrong. I don't think this situation is primarily caused by race. I think it is primarily caused by culture, poverty pimps, and those who make money by breeding and bribing for cheap and illiterate votes. There will always be those who are quick to sense fast buck opportunity under the populist pretense of wanting to help you by organizing your community of persons of like color under their sponsorship.