Tuesday, August 9, 2016

ECO-POLITICS

The world unfolds as if something of innate consciousness wanted to entertain a system-simulation of feedback, to test what would assimilate.  Maybe even to test the variety of ways in which intution and empathy would rationalize credit to that something or someone.  Maybe even to participate in guiding the simulation.

***************
Beingness in purposeful feedback is. It does not need what you call your faith to be. It just is. It abides beyond your proof, logic, or faith. You can rationalize that however you like, but you cannot make it not so.

You fight your fight and I'll fight me. -- Doug Keershaw.


****************

Wanted:  Someone to wade through the fires of hell to save the ungrateful, the disrespectful, and the despicable.  Someone willing to change the diapers of 25-55 year old infant socialists that have been trained to deem it hateful to profile or be judgmental against believers in the most truly horrific.  Someone to redeem and show a better way to those who hate the good and love the bad, who would otherwise smile blissfully to bend and be beheaded.

*****************

Idealism too often outruns common sense.  Can you talk in unvarnished facts, or must you engage the patinas of PC?  If not, I understand why Trump turns you off.

HEALTH CARE:  If we had a sensible, assimilated citizenry, I would not be averse to looking at single payer health care.  However, there are two big  problems:  First, Justice Roberts fudged to find authority in the Constitution for such a thing.  Second, we do not have a sensible, assimilated citizenry.  Rather, we have kiddos run amuck who seem to think everyone has a right to invade the nation and claim various kinds of welfare.

MUSLIMS:  Regarding Muslims:  As near as I can determine, most want to follow Shariah.  Many promote second class citizenship and genital mutilation for women.  Many promote death penalties for apostates.  As Muslims tend towards a majority, they begin to ban other churches.  They begin to rape and assault single women they deem to be immodest.

Why do  you suppose Europe is in such turmoil?  Muslims do not assimilate.  Rather, they breed until they can take over the  political system.  They wage jihad by taqiyya and  breeding.  It's the radical branches that are most politically active.  Everyone else follows.  Meanwhile, Libs buy their bs and help them promote it.

ISIS:  You listed some ways you have been told about how ISIS isn't following Islam.  What you fail to mention is that ISIS is predominantly Sunni, so it views Shia as close to infidels.  And vice versa.  They don't view one another as true Muslims, hence no Koranic proscription against killing one another.

Russia and Iran uses the Syrians.  The U.S. supposedly used the Syrian rebels.  Saudi Arabia  and Turkey use ISIS.

TAQIYYA:  Apart from a taqiyya front to the common infidels, there is no real unity among Muslims to condemn what is going on.  Nor is there unity to condemn Palestinian/Hamas bombers against Israel.

Per Wikipedia:

ISIS/Daesh is a Salafi jihadist militant group that follows a fundamentalist, Wahhabi doctrine of Sunni Islam.  (My note: Wahhabism had some of its biggest funders in Saudi Arabia.   Now that ISIS threatens Saudi Arabia, they are suddenly antagonistic.  Before that, not so much.)

ISIL affiliates now control parts of Libya, Nigeria and Afghanistan and operate in other parts of the world, including North Africa and South Asia.

Some "30 percent of the senior figures" in ISIL's military command are former army and police officers from the disbanded Iraqi security forces, drawn to ISIL by the US De-Ba'athification policy and turn towards Islamism by Sunni following the US invasion of Iraq.

In some countries, such as Pakistan, there are significant minorities of the population with favorable or uncertain views.

TURKEY:  Turkey has long been accused by experts, Syrian Kurds, and even U.S. Vice-President Joe Biden of supporting or colluding with ISIL. There is evidence for a degree of collaboration" between the Turkish intelligence services and ISIL.  Saudi Arabia has created a Frankenstein's monster over which it is rapidly losing control.  Turkey is accussed of assisting ISIL, ranging "from military cooperation and weapons transfers to logistical support, financial assistance, and the provision of medical services."

Flash drives seized during the Sayyaf raid revealed links "so clear" and "undeniable" between Turkey and ISIL "that they could end up having profound policy implications for the relationship between us and Ankara".  Turkey is labelled been labelled the "Gateway to Jihad."  Private donors within Qatar, sympathetic to the aims of radical groups such as al-Nusra Frong and ISIL, are believed to be channeling their resources to support these organisations.  The Saudi state had a decade-long sponsorship of Wahhabism around the world.  It appears that the Syrian government has operatives inside ISIL.

WHY NOW:  One may reasonably suspect that many Arabic nations are uniting to oust the Iraqi government that was set up by the U.S., as well as to opportune to oust Christians and their churches from the region.  If so, it would be beyond silly to assume they would decline to resort to deception and taqiyya.  So why, now, after so long, do some seem to unite to castigate ISIS?

Well, for any number of reasons, few having to do with supposed affronts to Islam.  Reason:  To beguile the U.S.  Reason:  Out of worry about Trump.  Reason:  Out of fear of a Frankensteinian Caliphate that may devour its original sponsors.  Reason:  To generate a refugee crisis to overrun Europe and spread Islam.

As to concern  about tenets of Islam being violated -- not so much.  Indeed, persons high up in ISIS have been much more studied in Islam and what it does and does not forbid than any dupe of American Prog Profs.

Per Wikipedia:

JIHAD OPTIONS TO INFIDELS:  Christians living in areas under ISIL control faced four options: converting to Islam, paying a religious levy or jizya, leaving the "caliphate", or death.  "We offer them three choices: Islam; the dhimma contract – involving payment of jizya; if they refuse this they will have nothing but the sword", ISIL said.[475][476] ISIL leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi further noted that Christians who do not agree with those terms must "leave the borders of the Islamic Caliphate" within a specified deadline.

My comment:   I much doubt that this proscription violates anything in the Koran, notwithstanding metrosexual handwringing to the contrary about Islam being a "religion of  peace."   Rather, it appears to belifted straight from the Koran.  See e.g. K 9:029.

For example, what sane person believes respected Islamic scholars forbid armed or violent jihad against, say, Israel?

 IAE, as and if ISIS continues to succeed, more and more Islamists will legitimize it.    As recognized by Ayman S. Ibrahim, the Muslim caliphate and its restoration is a real Muslim commitment, and only needs an agreement among the Muslims in order to reestablish it.  See https://www.firstthings.com/web-exclusives/2014/10/is-the-muslim-scholars-open-letter-to-isis-really-enough.

Jihadi groups regularly denounce the Saudi rulers of being  apostates-not true Muslims-mostly for their close relationship with  non-Muslim powers like America; this charge goes all the way back to  Osama bin Laden, who, though radicalized by Saudi education, ended up  denouncing the monarchy for allowing the U.S. military to be stationed  in the Peninsula.

IBRIHIM:  Per Raymond Ibrihim, 8-9-16, at http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/how-muslims-justify-killing-other-muslims-in-islams-name?f=troops:

In short, to Sunni jihadis, non-Sunnis are heretics and thus free  game.  As for fellow Sunnis who get in the way, they can be pronounced  apostates and attacked accordingly.   As for true Sunni Muslims, the  jihadis should try to separate them from the intended infidel target-as happened in Bangladesh and elsewhere-but if they die accidentally, they are martyrs ("and the obligatory jihad should never be abandoned because it creates martyrs").

The argument that jihadi organizations kill fellow Muslims proves  nothing.   Muslims have been slaughtering Muslims on any number of  justifications and rationalizations from the start: So what can the  open non-Muslim-such as the Western infidel-expect?

The arc of Islam's war against Christianity is hardly limited to the Middle East.  It extends well into therest of the world and Sub-Saharan Africa.  See http://www.catholicjournal.us/2014/04/23/war-christians-africa/.

For a list of Koranic passages that justify violence, see http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Themes/jihad_passages.html.

A SMALL SAMPLING:

[2.216] Fighting is enjoined on you

[3.152]...you slew them by His [Allah's] permission [during a Jihad battle]

[4.89] ...take not from among them friends until they fly (their homes) in Allah’s way; but if they turn back [to their homes], then seize them and kill them wherever you find them

K 8:012   ...make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them.

[8.65] O Prophet! urge the believers to war

K 9:005  ...slay the idolaters wherever you find them...take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush...

K 9:029   Fight those who do not believe in Allah...nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

K 9:036  ..fight the polytheists (Christians) all together as they fight you all together.

[9.38] ...Go forth in Allah's way [to Jihad]... [9.39] If you do not go forth [to go on Jihad], He will chastise you with a painful chastisement and bring in your place a people other than you [to go on Jihad]...

K 9:073  ..strive hard [Jihad] against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them...

K 24:055  Allah has promised to those of you who believe and do good that He will most certainly make them rulers in the earth [as a reward for going on Jihad (see K 024:053)]...

K 63:004  ..they think every cry to be against them. They are the enemy, therefore beware of them; may Allah destroy them, whence are they turned back? [This verse speaks of internecine Jihad against Muslims deemed infidels or "hypocrites."]

BOTTOM LINE:  Islamic scholars now denouncing ISIS have as much good faith as the Rinos denouncing Trump.  The Islamists just don't want ISIS spoiling their game.  The Rinos don't want Trump getting in the way of their people farming.  To say I am unimpressed would be a yuge understatement.

*************************
*************************

There is good reason to be anti-Islamic.  Islam gives that video much material to work with.  Do you see hordes of modern Christians behaving that way?  Wake up.

******************

Re:  I hate the idea of a country run by a misogynistic, racist, xenophobic, psychopath

Well then, stop carrying water for Elitist Socialists like Bernie and Hillary.

********************

PM Erdogan: "The Term ‘Moderate Islam’ Is Ugly And Offensive; There Is No Moderate Islam; Islam Is Islam."

Erdogan is helping ISIS against the Kurds, and threatening to release hordes of Muslims into the West.  Your defense of him and Islam is juvenile and uninformed.   In 2014, Erdogan threatened to “root out” the social media network after wiretapped recordings were leaked that were deemed damaging to the government’s reputation ahead of local elections. Access to Twitter was then restricted.  See http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/erdogan-tightens-iron-grip-on-power/.

*********************

Your list makes my case.  ISIS sees itself as the caliphate.  It deems the failure to swear allegiance to it as being un-islamic.  If it acquires more power, other Muslims will come more and more to agree.  You are looking for some principle by which to separate jihadis from other Muslims where none exists.  That is delusion.  Convenient for an Elitist Socialist, but delusion nonetheless.

***********************

Tell me:  Are you able to reform  the Koran?  Is Ayaan Hirsi Ali ridiculous?

************************

You are now quibbling about "goes up against them."  Do you not know that Mohammad fought many aggressive battles?  In how many do you suppose he took time to offer options?  See https://death2islamofascism.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/muhammads-massacres-and-sex-slaves/

Why are you trying to exhonerate utter barbarity?  What is wrong with your soul?

*************************

Re: "all religions are written in parables and figures of speech"

No biblical scholar claims to have the original speech of God.   Muslims consider Mohammad to have conveyed God's message through Mohammad's tongue.  It is considered that God made the Qur'an Arabic, but man may make it Persian (or other languages).  The Koran is taken to be quite literal and specific with regard to numerous injunctions of violence.

As to evil that is conflated with godliness, I am not "looking for" a reason to disregard such evil.  I have reason to disregard such evil. 

My reason is this:  For God to be sensibly relevant to humanity, then each human being needs to be amenable of sensible intuition, empathy, and feedback concerning God.  That means the word of God is written in the cosmos, not just in books.  For human beings to assimilate and enjoy sensible civilization, they need to be mindful (intuitive and empathetic) of their relation to God and to one another, as perspectives of God.  This is alternatively expressable as the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule. 

That implicates  respect among human beings for the freedom, dignity, work, investment, and property of each of them.  That means none should be chattel or slaves to be ruled by elitists.  And that means that Elitist Socialists and Islamists who mean to agglomerate rule over every person are "un-good."

*******************

Re:  Cruz's role in TPP

Your blinders are showing again.  TPP is an attack on U.S. sovereignty, to sell it to extra-national, elitist, cronies.  Of course, I get it, that does not bother you.  But it  probably bothered the people who booed Cruz off the stage for  declining to support the only candidate in the race who supports the freedom, dignity, and property of U.S. citizens as individuals, as opposed to the chattel of Elitist Socialists pretending (or duped) to be caring for the little people.

*******************

Bill Maher is an outlier. He, like George Carlin, probably recognizes that political correctness is mainly fascism pretending to have manners.

********************

Many are simply clueless and in the habit of believing the elitists that now profess from every formal institution. There is little reason to marvel that people born under elitist despotism will tend not to question it. It's much easier to just keep taking the blue pill.
.......................

This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill -- the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill -- you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. -- Morpheus

********************

There are enough atheists to have brought every formal institution of significance under the NWO rule of treasonous cronies. There is no formal institution that they have not profaned, one way or another.

********************

The Prog/LGBT/Atheist/Elitist argument seems to be that some ineffable, immeasurable (spiritual) basis abides for authenticating the values of collectivistic hedonism, but not for authenticating the values of those who preach that each of us who longs for freedom, dignity, and property as an individual should do unto others as we would have them do unto us.
Elitists who want to rule collectives under force of government hate when individuals prefer to rule themselves under love of spirituality. Like pre-Reformation priests, "scientific" elitists don't like for the lower masses to presume to think (and pray) for themselves. So they insult Christians for their spiritual faith, even as they pretend (falsely) not to indulge any faith (elitist based socialism) of their own.
So why do Elitist Socialists (ES) expressly denounce Christians, but not Muslims? Several reasons. For one, many ES are metrosexualized, androgynous cowards who fear the violent reputation of Muslims. For another, Muslims, like ES, tend to be socialists, but they remain apart and unassimilated -- so they seem to be a less significant threat to ES. But there is a main reason. The main reason is that ES want to ally with Muslims to tear down Christianity. Thereafter, they imagine Marxism or Scientific Socialism, if forceful enough, will have the resources to defeat Islam, if needed.
ES laugh at affronts by Islam against civilized Christians, by telling Christians that their religion is "no better." That is indicative of the moral bankruptcy of ES. ES, instead of lording that their God is greater, lord that their (so called) "scientific moraliy" is better. And they are as willing as Muslims to consign the rest of the world to hellfire to prove it.
ES are morally numbed by their mincing worship of elitist-led hedonism. That is why they are so proud ("gay") and willing to groom, profane, and abuse children. The fact that ES are willing to give Muslims license to impose horror on much of the world, even the West, is indicative of how hollow and uncaring ES, apart from their NWO cause, really are. If convenient to their cause, there is nothing of innocence or Christianity that ES, like most collectivized mobs, would hesitate to degrade or burn. In that, they compete for the apex of evil.

*********************

Wanted: Someone to wade through the fires of hell to save the ungrateful, the disrespectful, and the despicable. Someone willing to change the diapers of 25-55 year old infant socialists that have been trained to deem it hateful to profile or be judgmental against believers in the most truly horrific. Someone to redeem and show a better way to those who hate the good and love the bad, who would otherwise smile blissfully to bend and be beheaded.

*********************

The political parties are realigning as adult Americans v. childish and grubering Globalists. Autonomous Human Beings v. Automaton Pleasure Widgets.

*********************

The typical Elitist Socialist's faith is in Pagan Gaia, whose priests are knowitall noseinair whineyboys.  They are quick to bring out the whine of racist, xenophobe, blah blah.  To hear them, they don't hate.  They just want to run everyone's life, and they hate when others prefer not to abide by their silly pc or regulations. I detest childish incompetents presuming they or their lying leaders ought to be running my life. They need to go join a mosque or peddle their nonsense elsewhere.  Preferably beyond Pluto.

Do you have faith in progressively pursuing better governance under programs laid out by educated elites?  If no, then as an atheist, you have no point.  If yes, then that is faith, however demented.  Nothing in empiricism can prove the moral legitimacy of such faith.  No real adult needs to have that explained.

I don't dance and spin.  Atheists do act on faith.  So the lot of them peddle bs.  That is self evident.  It takes a dunce educated beyond the power of his intellect not to see it.

What is self evident does not need to be proven, nor can it be proven  It just is.  That which defines cannot itself be defined.  Rather, it is inextricably interwoven in the cosmos, to be empathetically intuited by all who can remove blinders.  But you have to remove the blinders you have allowed to be forged for yourself.  You either see that, or you don't. Trillions of words could be wasted on it.  If atheists' wastage of words does not constitute its own kind of faith, however, demented, then faith has no meaning.  I can't fix that for you.

The power of dunces is more in their conditioned feelings than in any intelligent reasoning.  I have little time for them.  Once I see a person tends to militant atheistic socialistic fascism, I just don't have the patience to try to "save" them.  Go and save yourself. 

All I ask is that you not oppress or regulate me based on your unintelligible "feelings" about "fairness."  If you lack faith in the innate freedom and dignity of individuals apart from the central appratus of knowitall elitists, go social-justice-warrior-jihad to someone else.  I don't buy what you're selling.  Be gone.

*************

Push come to shove, I doubt you have much of a clue what you are.  Clue:  To try to tolerate everything, including that which does not tolerate yourself,  is to nullify yourself. 

In case you have not noticed, there are millions of people bent on agglomerating power that would not tolerate your position.  Examples:  Knowitall socialists, jihadi Muslims, militant atheists, treacherous oligarchic crony corporatists, phony priests, phony "moral scientists."  If you stand for nothing, you fall for everything.

The test for what I stand for is based on this concern:  What system of checks, balances, and moral forums is needed to establish, defend, and nourish decent civilization that will accord freedom, dignity, opportunity, and  property to individuals, and that will limit such freedom only where needed to preclude individuals from putting the survival of such system in peril?

That test, in specific applications, is not amenable of scientifically detailed prescription.  Rather, it depends on the inspired competency of a liberty-literate people of good will and good faith.  But you say you lack faith, so not much is expected from you.

****************

I tend to identify with people who are not elitist socialists, regardless of how they like to label themselves. Provided they are not elitist fascists or traitors to the representative republic. Of them, it tends to be a minor point to me whether or not they want to admit they take their own leaps of faith. Unless, that is, they are giving aid and comfort to the knowitall militant atheists who do exist and do want to impose their own kind of grinding rule or who do want to invite into our borders those cultures that are bent to destroy us.

Provided their atheism is where they are in their own personal journey, that is one thing. I was once there myself. But when they advocate for the general destruction of religious faith, that is another thing altogether.
In many respects, I appreciate the wit of the Four Horsemen. Where I think they go off the beam is where they (especially Sam Harris) cross over from science to "moral science." I think that is a giant camel nose advance for elitist diktat. But for that, my appreciation of the "Old One" may not be that far removed from theirs.

*************
I respect the right of anyone to believe anything they want and I don't hate them for it.  What I don't respect and what I do hate is when they act on their religion or belief system in ways that undermine the freedom and dignity of others.  If I see their purpose is to undermine the freedom and dignity of others or of the legal system of our country, then I don't want to invite them in.  They can believe what they want, make of their own country what they will, but I do not want them to be undermining the system, documents, and laws that define my country.

You say you support the Constitution.  To a lot of socialists and SJW people, that does not mean much because they tend to find whatever they want to find in the Constitution. 

But if there are principles in the Constitution to which you truly adhere, then ask yourself why.  Is it because those principles are scientifically and empirically proven true in nature?  Is it because you have been indoctrinated so to adhere?  Or is it because you have weighed the concerns and sought in good faith to determine whether, when, and how you should or should not support the Constitution?  If so, how do you come by that process of weighing in good faith, if not in feedback respect for something of the cosmos that speaks to your fundamental intuition and empathy?



Do you understand how hard it is to restore a land of freedom once freedom is lost, either by being conquered or by inviting parasites to come and take it?  A lot of people have bled and sweated to provide your freedom.  What would give you or anyone else the "moral right" to sell it out to a mess of parasites for a mess of pottage, in a way that would harm the progeny of those who bled and sweated for it?

*****************

Liberals come in two flavors:  Corrupt amd incompetent.  As such, they want everyone to be either a people farper or a people farmee.  They hate the very idea of any land where people by and large are competent to do for themselves.  The vey existence of such a land is an affront to their assurances to their captives in lands of socialism, communism, and Islamism. 

Similarly, realms where Christianity flourishes, at least where distinctions are held between voluntary charity and governmental force, are affronts to wannabe people farmers and farmees.  This is why they and their cronies work so hard to infest every institution to try to bring down every independent, representative republic. 

This is why they call you names, like nationalist, thumper, Trumper, phobe, redneck, racist, misogynist, privileged, colonialist, etc.  As to racism, misogyny, special privileges, etc, those tend to abide far more with liberals, progs, radical gays, socialists, fascists, communists, feminazis, femimen, militant atheists, and jihadis than with ordinary Americans.  They should be sent back to their cribs and told:  Bite it!

*******************
You can label IT as you like, but it is what it is, and there is no good reason to believe it is much at all like the way Allah is described. Nor that it has as its purpose to impose perpetual hellfire on the spirits or bodies of all who fail to live up any of the injunctions as set out in the Koran. Nor that it wants women to be second class citizens, infidels to be slaughtered, of girls to be mutilated. Nothing of the cosmos or good sense makes any of that virtuous or sensible.
Edit: Nor can PC make it virtuous, sensible, or even tolerable.

Will someone who thinks it can be done please clarify the differences between moderate Shia and immoderate Shia, and between radical Sunni and non-radical Sunni?
Frankly, the whole idea of a Frankenstein God that gets his rocks off by sending people to hellfire for failing to acknowledge bs stories about him, even though he made them that way in the first place, is disgusting to every mind that is not sick. Yes, I do mean to infer that Proggies are sick in the head.
Apparently, Allah, playing with dollies, deliberately made some so ugly he could jolly himself by burning them forever, over and over. Is he mad because Mrs. God shamed him? What's his problem, anyway? What is there about this obscene "religion" among men who wear dresses that entitles it to the PC protection of fascists who want to pretend to have manners?

For Pagan Elitists, ethics is a cover tale told by idiots. What really matters is making a killing --- and making sure to pay the right people.
The more Elitist Socialists (and SJW's) twist gov to "help" us, the more they injure us. Let charities do charity. Let gov set rules. But let gov stay away from new charities unless the nation is in peril. We need to stop confusing force with charity.

Forget methane trapped in frozen ground. Think about political favors trapped in secretive banks, and elitism trapped in corruption. In politicians, crap floats faster than methane seeps. Hillary's up to her eyeballs in it.

Wanted: Someone to wade through the fires of hell to save the ungrateful, the disrespectful, and the despicable. Someone willing to change the diapers of 25-55 year old infant socialists that have been trained to deem it hateful to profile or be judgmental against believers in the most truly horrific. Someone to redeem and show a better way to those who hate the good and love the bad, who would otherwise smile blissfully to bend and be beheaded.

The political parties are realigning as adult Americans v. childish and grubering Globalists. Autonomous Human Beings v. Automaton Pleasure Widgets.

For what non- circular reason do you deem the Constitution entitled to respect? Do you have one? Do you have faith that there is one?

I respect the right of anyone to believe anything they want and I don't hate them for it. What I don't respect and what I do hate is when they act on their religion or belief system in ways that undermine the freedom and dignity of others. If I see their purpose is to undermine the freedom and dignity of others or of the legal system of our country, then I don't want to invite them in. They can believe what they want, make of their own country what they will, but I do not want them to be undermining the system, documents, and laws that define my country.
You say you support the Constitution. To a lot of socialists and SJW people, that does not mean much because they tend to find whatever they want to find in the Constitution.
But if there are principles in the Constitution to which you truly adhere, then ask yourself why. Is it because those principles are scientifically and empirically proven true in nature? Is it because you have been indoctrinated so to adhere? Or is it because you have weighed the concerns and sought in good faith to determine whether, when, and how you should or should not support the Constitution? If so, how do you come by that process of weighing in good faith, if not in feedback respect for something of the cosmos that speaks to your fundamental intuition and empathy?
Do you understand how hard it is to restore a land of freedom once freedom is lost, either by being conquered or by inviting parasites to come and take it? A lot of people have bled and sweated to provide your freedom. What would give you or anyone else the "moral right" to sell it out to a mess of parasites for a mess of pottage, in a way that would harm the progeny of those who bled and sweated for it?

I tend to identify with people who are not elitist socialists, regardless of how they like to label themselves. Provided they are not elitist fascists or traitors to the representative republic. Of them, it tends to be a minor point to me whether or not they want to admit they take their own leaps of faith. Unless, that is, they are giving aid and comfort to the knowitall militant atheists who do exist and do want to impose their own kind of grinding rule or who do want to invite into our borders those cultures that are bent to destroy us. Provided their atheism is where they are in their own personal journey, that is one thing. I was once there myself. But when they advocate for the general destruction of religious faith, that is another thing altogether.
In many respects, I appreciate the wit of the Four Horsemen. Where I think they go off the beam is where they (especially Sam Harris) cross over from science to "moral science." I think that is a giant camel nose advance for elitist diktat. But for that, my appreciation of the "Old One" may not be that far removed from theirs.

Hubristic Elistist Socialists who want to impose bs regulations against the little people, who just want to be left alone to assimilate their own appreciation of the moral universe, need to be smacked around enough to understand their "help" is not wanted.

The test for what I stand for is based on this concern: What system of checks, balances, and moral forums is needed to establish, defend, and nourish decent civilization that will accord freedom, dignity, opportunity, and property to individuals, and that will limit such freedom only where needed to preclude individuals from putting the survival of such system in peril?
That test, in specific applications, is not amenable of scientifically detailed prescription. Rather, it depends on the inspired competency of a liberty-literate people of good will and good faith. But you say you lack faith, so not much is expected from you.

Do you have faith in progressively pursuing better governance under programs laid out by educated elites? If no, then as an atheist, you have no point. If yes, then that is faith, however demented. Nothing in empiricism can prove the moral legitimacy of such faith. No real adult needs to have that explained.
I don't dance and spin. Atheists do act on faith. So the lot of them peddle bs. That is self evident. It takes a dunce educated beyond the power of his intellect not to see it.
What is self evident does not need to be proven, nor can it be proven. It just is. That which defines cannot itself be defined. Rather, it is inextricably interwoven in the cosmos, to be empathetically intuited by all who can remove blinders. But you have to remove the blinders you have allowed to be forged for yourself. You either see that, or you don't. Trillions of words could be wasted on it. If atheists' wastage of words does not constitute its own kind of faith, however, demented, then faith has no meaning. I can't fix that for you.
The power of dunces is more in their conditioned feelings than in any intelligent reasoning. I have little time for them. Once I see a person tends to militant atheistic socialistic fascism, I just don't have the patience to try to "save" them. Go and save yourself.
All I ask is that you not oppress or regulate me based on your unintelligible "feelings" about "fairness." If you lack faith in the innate freedom and dignity of individuals apart from the central appratus of knowitall elitists, go social-justice-warrior-jihad to someone else. I don't buy what you're selling. Be gone.

Grey eminences are fascist busybodies. They come in flavors of crony corporatists, socialists, communists, and new central idealists. They don't much like trusting the little folk to think or do for themselves. Instead, they want to mold the little people to serve their ideal of a "more perfect state." That is their own kind of religion. As someone who prefers mostly to think and do for himself, I loathe them and the religion they ride in on.

Beingness in purposeful feedback is. It does not need what you call your faith to be. It just is. It abides beyond your proof, logic, or faith. You can rationalize that however you like, but you cannot make it not so.

You fight your fight and I'll fight me. -- Doug Keershaw.

*********************

Trump:  "Those who are guests in our country that are preaching hate will be asked to return home immediately."

With that statement, Trump grabbed the jugular of the main concern of Metro-Femi-Lefties, even though they themselves have been incompetent to state it. 

That statement makes sense under our documents of foundational liberty --- provided Trump means to protect the safety of minorities, Muslims, and Gays, but not to eviscerate the First Amendment to do so. 

It is one thing to express concern for protecting such minorities.  It is another to make them superior.  Thus far, minorities and their metro-hubristic elitists have sought to enact national provisions to guarantee protection of self esteem.  Thus, they have sought to hobble everyone else with regulations against "hate speech," cultural assimilation, and white privilege.  Instead, they have sought to establish special minority privilege and to provide for special reparations and affirmative action.  This program has been their Trojan Horse for destroying and rendering meaningless (fundamentally changing) the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Once elected, Trump ought to advocate for Immigration policies for preseving a liberty-literate citizenry.  Not an anti-liberty electorate of Metro-Femi-Lefties and knowitall Elitist Socialists.  For too long, Lefties have been blind to the main consequence of their anti-First Amendment stance, which is this:  To justify feel-good limitations on freedom of expression and enterprise is to promote elitist authoritarians.  To promote elitist authoritarians is to grease the way for Islamists, Communists, Sociopaths, and People Farmers. 

The more the Cattle People allow themselves to be persuaded to compromise the First Amendment, the more they are reduced to tender veal for the owners of the means of persuasion (media, movies, academia, etc.).    That Femi Lefties tend unwittingly to vounteer for the ovens is indicated by their support for all the measures that have done so much destruction to inner-city families.  Metro-Femi-Lefties might be forgiven for knowing not what they have been doing to America and its innocent progeny.  They cannot be forgiven for caring not what they do.



8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Elvis was a great American. He sang:

As her young man dies,
On a cold and gray Chicago mornin',
Another little baby child is born
In the ghetto
And his mama cries.

The diff now is that the mamas don't cry when a mouth is born that they can't feed. First, if they were concerned about that, they aborted. Second, if they didn't abort, it was because they're counting on the welfare. So they're not crying.

Rather, they're producing fatherless families to perpetuate black no-go ghetto zones, to guarantee the cyclic reelection of phony "caring" Dem political hoods and hacks. This is how Progs and Jihadis win by changing the demography. The more the stupid Progs and Profs, the easier to fflip to a third world demography.

So Progs go on abusing children, blaming producing Americans, and demanding more "charity" from the gov. Except they believe they are entitled. Reparations. On account of "white privilege." To support their black privilege to be gangsta.

I suspect ghetto people "cry" nowadays on account of new mouths to feed about as often as Muslim parents cry when they send their children out on suicide missions. (How many "moderate" Iranian Muslims allowed their children to be recruited as human-mine-clearers during the Iran-Iraq conflict during Reagan's administration? I wonder how many Progs consider those children not to have been practicing "true jihad"?)

Prog PC taqiyya has learned much from Islamic taqiyya. Progs consider looters and police shooters to be "social justice warriors," but do not consider head cutters to be true jihadis. Go figure.

The thing about Lefties is that there is no lie they are unwilling to embrace if they think it will advance their cause: Elitist diktated socialism, worldwide. Their protests have all the "truth" of a phony Palestianian funeral.

Obama, otoh, is the father of ISIS, of the Islamic destruction of Europe, of BLM, of Black no-go zones, of the perverted grooming of America's youth, of the destruction of the American family, of the feminization of the military, of the sell off of America, of the nuclear enabling of Iran, and of the coming crash of the American dollar. And Hillary is his next in line to continue the work. Forward, to hell.

Anonymous said...

White progressive femimen and feminazis have somehow convnced Blacks raised on affirmative action and entitlement handouts that the reason their ghettos suck is because of "white privilege." This is what comes of punishing the good and rewarding the bad. So now these phony do-gooder Progs have converted many Black neighborhoods into crime infested no-go zones. And they have the gall, instead of looking in the mirror, to blame ordinary working American producers, both white and black ("acting white"). This will not be fixed by continuing with more of the recipe that produced it. Indeed, Progs have made things so bad that it will take a few generations to sort things out.

Meantime, whites will need to stop patrolling black neighborhoods. Section 8 projects will need to be stopped. Welfare will need to be changed to workfare. The war by flipping the demographic with illegal and refugee "immigrants" must be stopped in its tracks. Hedge monsters bent on selling out America must be identified, rounded up, dispossessed, and imprisoned. Decent Americans of all colors will need to grow backbone to stand up to the femimen, feminazis, child abusing groomers, entitlement mongers, and nutcase profs and roar at them, "Freaking enough, you stinking morons!"

It's so simple a caveman could get it, but not Democrats. A political system of Islam, once it's members hold a majority in a country (either outright or through dupes), does not tolerate either representative republicanism or the First Amendment. It would not tolerate the Constitution Khan flipped on about.

To tolerate the massing of those people and systems that mean to destroy you or yours is not enlightened tolerance. It is suicidal stupidity. Again, a caveman would get it.

Khan works to mass more Muslims into the U.S. That's how he makes a substantial part of his living. In that capacity, he is working diligently to bring about the destruction ("fundamental transformation") of the Constituton and the U.S. To accord him respect as a Constitutionalist is to be an idiot. Or Dem. But then, that is redundant.

It is often said that most Muslims favor democracy and the free exercise of religion. Given an agenda of promotiong Islam, I suppose a lot of things can be rationalized to constitute a "democracy." See generally http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/: "While Muslims widely embrace democracy and religious freedom, many also want religion to play a prominent role in politics. Medians of at least six-in-ten in Southeast Asia (79%), South Asia (69%), and the Middle East and North Africa (65%) say religious leaders should have at least some influence over political matters."

What does that mean, when Muslims say they want religion to play a prominent role in politics? Does it not mean that they want Islam it be the established religion of the State?

"Egypt is the only country in which more than one-tenth (12%) of the total Muslim population says it is a good thing that non-Muslims are not free to practice their faith."

What does that mean, to say only a few Muslims think non-Muslims ought not be free to practice their faith? Consider: What did it mean to say only a few Germans wanted to establish Naziism, or only a few Russians wanted to establish Bolshevism?

By definition, Islam is not compatible with the Constitituion or its First Amendment. Even a caveman would know this. But not a Dem. Khan knows it. But then, he also understands taqiyya. And we know how "honest" Hillary is.

Anonymous said...

Whenever a publication starts making sense to decent, responsible, thinking people in a way that might threaten the Worldwide People Farm, the Monsters of Global Elitism simply buy it out. They are working to fine tune control over the Internet and to confiscate guns. Resistence is Human.

The people who own the media do not want to in-form the masses. They want to in-farm the masses. They are working hard every day to make the masses more farm-able.

Their policies for immigration, refugee sanctuaries, border enforcement (lack of), and welfare scream their intention to flip the demographics of every liberty-literate representative-republic. Metro people are running to heed the adhan call to line up for the cattle farm. They consider it a "beautiful sound." They can't be pulled from Cyclops' cave because they are overpowered by their urge to don orange suits and run into it. A Cyclops Orange. Metros find it very fashionable.

Trump: "Those who are guests in our country that are preaching hate will be asked to return home immediately."

With that statement, Trump grabbed the jugular of the main concern of Metro-Femi-Lefties, even though they themselves have been incompetent to state it.

That statement makes sense under our documents of foundational liberty --- provided Trump means to protect the safety of minorities, Muslims, and Gays, but not to eviscerate the First Amendment to do so.

It is one thing to express concern for protecting such minorities. It is another to make them superior. Thus far, minorities and their metro-hubristic elitists have sought to enact national provisions to guarantee protection of self esteem. Thus, they have sought to hobble everyone else with regulations against "hate speech," cultural assimilation, and white privilege. Instead, they have sought to establish special minority privilege and to provide for special reparations and affirmative action. This program has been their Trojan Horse for destroying and rendering meaningless (fundamentally changing) the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Once elected, Trump ought to advocate for Immigration policies for preseving a liberty-literate citizenry. Not an anti-liberty electorate of Metro-Femi-Lefties and knowitall Elitist Socialists. For too long, Lefties have been blind to the main consequence of their anti-First Amendment stance, which is this: To justify feel-good limitations on freedom of expression and enterprise is to promote elitist authoritarians. To promote elitist authoritarians is to grease the way for Islamists, Communists, Sociopaths, and People Farmers.

The more the Cattle People allow themselves to be persuaded to compromise the First Amendment, the more they are reduced to tender veal for the owners of the means of persuasion (media, movies, academia, etc.). That Femi Lefties tend unwittingly to vounteer for the ovens is indicated by their support for all the measures that have done so much destruction to inner-city families. Metro-Femi-Lefties might be forgiven for knowing not what they have been doing to America and its innocent progeny. They cannot be forgiven for caring not what they do.


Anonymous said...

Because Progs believe in the right to vote so much that they want to give it to enough cartoons, dead people, lofos, sell-outs, seniles, felons, and indoctrinated students to ensure the results are determined by elitists that control the propaganda and the counting. IOW, Progs love democracy so much they have to kill it with socialism (aka elitist diktat). Indians can get biometric voter ID's, but that's too much trouble for Progs of America. Perv Progs: Proof that bots, zombies, and rage-holics are real. And they want to "educate" and control your kids. Rat Management 101.

***********

Soros does not love free-thinking masses. Rather, he loves bilking and controlling them, by taking away their freedom. He loves his cause and the planet for his cause. For the masses, he has his own "final solution" in mind: Farm them (or if necessary, eliminate them). He's a pied piper for rats, and he pipes to enough rats to push most others along in their pell mell. Once "fundamental change" is accomplished, there is no reason the rats should believe Soros and his ilk give a fig about them. But of that they are too stupid to have a clue. Whether decent people want it or not, Soros-ilk have declared war on them. Headquarters is DC.

***********



Socialists are such traitors to truth! Promise them "free equality" in results and they will fall over themselves getting in line to give up their freedom, even their very souls. They convince themselves their do-gooderism makes up for their flagrant dishonesty and subterfuge. Given the horrors of WWII and the Killing Fields, no sane person need doubt that gov-do-gooders will cheat individual voters every which way they can. If they can do it, they will do it. And once they do it (fundamentally change the republic), there will be no resuscitation for America. Have you effed a socialist today?

************

DC is an s factory, not a c factory. The DC system has NOT been maintained to allow cream to compete to rise. Rather, it's now designed to encourage s to float -- effortlessly. In DC, moral filth has congealed everywhere. In effect, crony oligarchs have taken over the anal apex of the world. But it's a "hateful" violation of PC to say so.


Anonymous said...


Decent people can readily define good and evil in human terms.

Good: That which facilitates civilized governance in ways that do not needlessly impede human freedom of expression and enterprise. IOW, that which allows human beings in a society a reasonable opportunity to function as free-thinking human beings.

Evil: That which sacrifices human freedom and dignity in trade for promises by sociopaths and liars of safe spaces and equal distribution of material wealth. IOW, that which needlessly impedes people from growing from dependent toddlers into responsible, functioning adults.

In respect of all that is most important for becoming an adult human being, Dems-Progs-Commies-BLM-SJW-Jihadis are evil. Pretty simple, really. To say that such evil-doers make mendacious promises while lusting for power to rule the common herd is obvious to everyone who is not stupid or corrupt.

Yes, you can define a word however you like. But if you define "good" as that which facilitates the farming of the masses as perpetual, easily-duped, toddlers (moral barbarians), you merely make my point. Which is: TAFFAARD.

**********

Dems like to claim Jefferson as their counterweight to the Repubs' Lincoln. It's eye opening that Jefferson is closer to Trump than to modern Libs, while Hillary is closer to Burr than to Jefferson.

Apart from Truman and FDR, the Prez who kept us in a depression, who have the Dems got? Little more than failure and corruption after failure.and corruption. Repubs, on the other hand, have Lincoln, TR, Eisenhower, and Reagan.

Moreover, there can be little doubt that Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe would not align with modern Libs. Rather, modern Libs are bent to destroy the Constitution and Bill of Rights of the Founders as fast as they can. They pretend to be pursuing an affirmative utopia, when in reality everyone of any sense readily sees they are pursuing rule of the herd under not-so-benign elitists. When moral monsters control all the formal institutions of persuasion, that tends to be the consequence.

If Trump loses, corruption will have talked while Americans will have lost.


Anonymous said...

If the NWO were really about erasing borders and if TPP were really about free trade, they would take a couple of pages to describe, not thousands of pages to regulate. The NWO/TPP is not about human freedom or dignity. It is about tightly harnessing the masses under the yoke of elitist rule.

The erasing of borders (for islands of freedom and dignity) ought not be confused with Libertarianism. The more the erasing of national borders establishes syndicalist rule of elitists, the more it disestablishes liberty for the masses and sucks in control freaks that will groom all children in order to regulate out the wazoo.

Too many Libertarians lack the discipline to moderate their socially exhibitionistic desires that could avoid the recruiting and grooming of innocent children. Responsible parents do not want rights conferred in Libertarians to groom their children into lifestyles that are age inappropriate, character defroming, socially dangerous, or nationally suicidal.

To damage the character of youth is not to conserve the liberty of a society. It is to create a vacuum of moral authority that will suck in terrible repression. The way for a country to conserve Liberty is to conserve decent faith, family values, and national fidelity.

The Prog prescription of "do as you wanna" (sex, drugs, perversion) is not a wise way to preserve a society. It is, however, an effective way to divert, occupy, and placate the masses while elitists cinch up harnesses. As the demography flips, Prog children will never vote for the adults who could save them: The ones who want to show them how to grow up.

Anonymous said...

It's understandable, given how divided and fearful people have become. They see fundamentals shifting under their feet. They see obvious dangers and want others to see them, too. But reason seems to be failing. Maybe because duplicity and flattery tend to be more profitable for short terms.


People breach trust all the time, but then turn around and do the bravest and most thoughtful things. The human condition: trying to walk between humility and righteousness. Everyone seems to need some well-timed hugs between character-building smack downs.


Even among people who try to follow principles, too often it seems their principles don't add up, while most of their arguments seem to reduce to rationalizations of convenience. We need good leaders, but people have lost faith in most of our leaders.


If it weren't for Truth behind the Serenity Prayer, more people would probably be jumping out of their skins. Sometimes, you just have to leave it to the Big Guy up there.

Anonymous said...

Well, many Jews believe in one God, yet Muslims often hate them most of all.

What Muslims hate is the idea of an inviting God that accords enough dignity to lesser beings to care about more than imposing perpetual fire and brimstone in order to humiliate and enslave every mind that presumes to follow reason.

More than anything, Muslims want to be relieved of any duty or necessity to think for themselves. Some seem to have forever stunted their brains under towels too tightly wrapped.

Because Muslims tend not to think for themselves, there can be little virtue in what they profess to believe. To believe without thinking is beyond oxymoronic. It is subhumanizing mind enslavement. To a Muslim who is paralyzed from thinking, it is a supreme affront to come upon another being that would presume itself superior by requiring sense before belief. Simply put, they hate any person who would require more argument than a sword held aloft a head. To say they have subhumanized themselves would be too kind. They have monstered themselves.

To notice they have been made unfit for civilized, representative republicanism is more obvious than to say that hyenas learn little more than treachery and trickery.