Of Gays, Glands, Gaia, and God:
Gays seem to imagine a time when dna can be machine produced to specs. Thus, sex will no longer be needed. Nor, for that matter, will Gays any longer be needed. Rather, machines will be one flesh, one writhing Borg. When the Borg gets that efficient, I wonder how much "tolerance" and "fairness" it will extend to deviants? When the machine has potential simply to redirect or turn the switch on or off with regard to the desires of its components, I wonder what will become of the fairness argument? I rather doubt Gays will be writing the program for the Borg. In their zeal to destroy liberty to refuse their coercing programming, Gays are writing a program that will destroy their own liberty.
.
Regarding “equality” in tax treatments between marriages and gay unions: The private Fed deploys money policy against the world, to induce governments to tax and spend under polices and laws that reach into and affect nearly every aspect of human life. To suggest that tax policy must or should be “equal” or neutral in every, or any, aspect is to ignore reality.
.
Regarding gay absolutism: I'm not advocating a one-size-fits-all notion about sexuality. Indeed, for some countries, I would endorse arguments for the gay agenda, especially to push totalitarian societies towards more tolerance. That would be for Iran and China. For top-down societies, it’s natural for people who believe they have the absolutely best moral code to gravitate towards totalitarianism. Problem is, gayness for the masses, when perceived as an absolute right for the masses, once absolute rule is established, tends to impede the absolute rule of the controllers. After all, rulers are ensconced claiming to know best. A gay agenda among the masses, once it were to undermine a republic, would never be tolerated to weaken a replacing rule by elites. How much gayness is tolerated in Iran, where the regime knows best?
Regarding America: If the U.S. becomes a top-down nation run by those-who-know-best, and — except for sex, porn, and drugs— abandons the ideal of a framework for availing individual liberty, then the gay agenda, for some, may also become advisable for the U.S. But that would only be as a temporary stepping stone. For sustaining America as a republic that respects an ideal of individual liberty, the absolutist gay agenda lives on borrowed time. The more the gay agenda relies on absolutism rather than on grace, the sooner its time draws to a close, and the sooner America as a land of liberty falls.
I have gay and bi friends, although they tend not to be gay absolutists. My problem with gay absolutists is their frequent unwillingness to think about more than their glands and their oft insistence on a “right” to require everyone else to watch their parades of gland glows. I don’t see many intimate PDA’s by married couples in restaurants or other public places, and I don’t quite see why “rights” to treat the public to such PDA’s should be such a political or public priority.
Regarding false logic of Glands, Gaia, and God: One’s identity is tied to more than merely one’s expression of entranced sexuality or drug stupor. One’s genes do not dictate every aspect of one’s self expression. Rather, the unfolding context of one’s experiences have much to do with training one’s genes and establishing the grooves for how one’s impulses eventually become set in the chemistry and electrical wiring of synaptic connections that become associated with one’s habits. The body chemistry of individuals tends to become consistent with the range of expression their societies avail. We become what we do. Moral character consists in willing what one does in order to better guide what one becomes.
To an idealist for the freedom of the human mind, the test of moral character is to ask: Given a context, what moral framework or code would best establish and sustain a decent civilization for lovers of liberty? That test will not produce the same answers for every culture, time, and place. That test can be appropriate to an Idealist, but is often discounted by overawed worshipers. Those who are overawed by Glands, Gaia, or God tend to fall too deep into wannas and traumas to be amenable to logic, reason, or consistent moral principle.
Like every other material-based know-it-all philosophy and agenda, the absolutist gay agenda promotes itself by justifying the subjugation of the masses ... "for their own good." Consider: How would the next generation be shaped, were the gay agenda to be uncritically adopted? To my lights, hope to sustain The American Ideal already grows faint. Putting a know-it-all agenda in charge would just bring us that much closer to snuffing out the lamp of liberty and the hopes of the next generation.
Excepting interpretations of sequences of apparently material based interactions, there are very few non-trivial "facts" of which I purport to "know it all." Rather, I have ideal-based beliefs, based on receptivity to feedback, intuition, insight, perhaps innate instinct of consciousness. I purport no philosophy of knowledge of morality flowing from Glands, Gaia, or God, but only beliefs, flowing from innate, spiritual idealism of consciousness.
Gays seem to imagine a time when dna can be machine produced to specs. Thus, sex will no longer be needed. Nor, for that matter, will Gays any longer be needed. Rather, machines will be one flesh, one writhing Borg. When the Borg gets that efficient, I wonder how much "tolerance" and "fairness" it will extend to deviants? When the machine has potential simply to redirect or turn the switch on or off with regard to the desires of its components, I wonder what will become of the fairness argument? I rather doubt Gays will be writing the program for the Borg. In their zeal to destroy liberty to refuse their coercing programming, Gays are writing a program that will destroy their own liberty.
.
Regarding “equality” in tax treatments between marriages and gay unions: The private Fed deploys money policy against the world, to induce governments to tax and spend under polices and laws that reach into and affect nearly every aspect of human life. To suggest that tax policy must or should be “equal” or neutral in every, or any, aspect is to ignore reality.
.
Regarding gay absolutism: I'm not advocating a one-size-fits-all notion about sexuality. Indeed, for some countries, I would endorse arguments for the gay agenda, especially to push totalitarian societies towards more tolerance. That would be for Iran and China. For top-down societies, it’s natural for people who believe they have the absolutely best moral code to gravitate towards totalitarianism. Problem is, gayness for the masses, when perceived as an absolute right for the masses, once absolute rule is established, tends to impede the absolute rule of the controllers. After all, rulers are ensconced claiming to know best. A gay agenda among the masses, once it were to undermine a republic, would never be tolerated to weaken a replacing rule by elites. How much gayness is tolerated in Iran, where the regime knows best?
Regarding America: If the U.S. becomes a top-down nation run by those-who-know-best, and — except for sex, porn, and drugs— abandons the ideal of a framework for availing individual liberty, then the gay agenda, for some, may also become advisable for the U.S. But that would only be as a temporary stepping stone. For sustaining America as a republic that respects an ideal of individual liberty, the absolutist gay agenda lives on borrowed time. The more the gay agenda relies on absolutism rather than on grace, the sooner its time draws to a close, and the sooner America as a land of liberty falls.
I have gay and bi friends, although they tend not to be gay absolutists. My problem with gay absolutists is their frequent unwillingness to think about more than their glands and their oft insistence on a “right” to require everyone else to watch their parades of gland glows. I don’t see many intimate PDA’s by married couples in restaurants or other public places, and I don’t quite see why “rights” to treat the public to such PDA’s should be such a political or public priority.
Regarding false logic of Glands, Gaia, and God: One’s identity is tied to more than merely one’s expression of entranced sexuality or drug stupor. One’s genes do not dictate every aspect of one’s self expression. Rather, the unfolding context of one’s experiences have much to do with training one’s genes and establishing the grooves for how one’s impulses eventually become set in the chemistry and electrical wiring of synaptic connections that become associated with one’s habits. The body chemistry of individuals tends to become consistent with the range of expression their societies avail. We become what we do. Moral character consists in willing what one does in order to better guide what one becomes.
To an idealist for the freedom of the human mind, the test of moral character is to ask: Given a context, what moral framework or code would best establish and sustain a decent civilization for lovers of liberty? That test will not produce the same answers for every culture, time, and place. That test can be appropriate to an Idealist, but is often discounted by overawed worshipers. Those who are overawed by Glands, Gaia, or God tend to fall too deep into wannas and traumas to be amenable to logic, reason, or consistent moral principle.
Like every other material-based know-it-all philosophy and agenda, the absolutist gay agenda promotes itself by justifying the subjugation of the masses ... "for their own good." Consider: How would the next generation be shaped, were the gay agenda to be uncritically adopted? To my lights, hope to sustain The American Ideal already grows faint. Putting a know-it-all agenda in charge would just bring us that much closer to snuffing out the lamp of liberty and the hopes of the next generation.
Excepting interpretations of sequences of apparently material based interactions, there are very few non-trivial "facts" of which I purport to "know it all." Rather, I have ideal-based beliefs, based on receptivity to feedback, intuition, insight, perhaps innate instinct of consciousness. I purport no philosophy of knowledge of morality flowing from Glands, Gaia, or God, but only beliefs, flowing from innate, spiritual idealism of consciousness.
1 comment:
End-times and new-times fascists, whether secular or sectarian, Che or Osama, always want to indoctrinate their "new man." However, there abides an alternative ideology, apart from state collectivism or religious fanaticism, that would promote a different sort of new citizen: the citizen who, in mind and muscle, would be educated and encouraged to differentiate between that which succeeds and that which fails in respect of establishing and sustaining decent civilization, i.e., civilization that avails its citizens with a reasonable framework for encouraging their empathies for freedom of expression and enterprise. That ideology would not seek to subjugate all to a fascist-state notion of god or economic determininsm, nor would it seek to tip scales towards outright atheism or anarchy. Variants of that ideology used to be assimilated to the American ideal. Now, that ideal is faltering, and many say it already has been defunded and denuded by the NWO.
Tragic-Comedic Delphi of the NWO: After a century of tragedy and now the makings of one of farce, what does the NWO bode? Will the Google boys leak to Jullian Assange, who will link and leak to every leering looker the complete document-scan and internet-search history of every identifiable person? Will NWO-paid, psych-empath-harriers then be deployed to hack and blare all-seeing media to rout every pilgrim in search of principles, but who has a blemished history, from running for dogcatcher? Will all political power be forfeited to the most sold-out agents of the most corrupt and degenerate pit of the grotesque? I suspect rewards will flow to the most in-your-face shamelessly comedic. Deliverance may cycle back only when things get so bad that nearly everyone, simultaneously, yields to, and enlists in the service of, hope from on high. When they do, perhaps a few will discover a way to repel shameless, leering, fascist, succubi for collectivists.
Post a Comment