Tuesday, December 20, 2016

Truth and Purpose


I think there's also a self-fulfilling aspect of Conscious Will, with which we each participate.  What we observe, what we study, and how we rationalize all affect what we measure in our statistical analyses.  The contours of those statistical analyses need not be deliberately cherry picked in order for them to be subjectively affected by the emerging values of a particular society.

In part, the reason America became suitable for a free and independent minded people is because that is what our Founders wanted.  Our system cannot often be exported to nations unsuited to it.  Although those nations are not exporting their systems to us, they are, by exporting so many of their citizens, exporting disarray and corrosion to us.

That which we consume, think, and value tends to define how our moral truths unfold.  For a nation to have a center that can hold, it needs to share values that can form the glue.  Those values depend on good will (Golden Rule) and good faith (Great Commandment).  When those are reviled as based on religion and therefore replaced by commie secularists and "noble" oligarchic "philanthropists," human decency suffers. 

The truth is, we greatly need to be receptive, in good will and good faith, to an ongoing, feedback relationship with our larger Source -- the Reconciling Godhead.

************

As a "point" of reference, the Godhead is immeasurable.
If by "thing" one is referring to a physically measurable (as opposed to spiritually immeasurable) thing, then one is referring not to God but to a mere signification of God. And the power of God to flux each signification (subject only to math-based rules of chronological conservation for each manifesting signification) seems likely always to perplex mere mortals.
Of "things," many are measurable, but One is not. Rather, IT seems to be directly and empathetically intuited because IT's signs are in every measurably relational manifestation.
The way we "progress" towards IT seems to be more subjectively spiritual than objectively measurable. That way seems to relate to the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule. To love your neighbor as yourself necessitates a subjective consideration of yourself and what you really are.

************

Conundrum: To say that an interpretation of an empirical formula or recipe, relationship, or thing cannot remain true unless it is falsifiable seems to suggest that no thing can be lastingly true. Rather, that all (measurable) things (and form-ulas) flux.
To be true, must (the lasting essence of) a "thing" be false? Who's on first?
If so, where abides lasting Truth? And where abides moral guidance concerning the purpose for which we "should" seek to reconcile with Truth? Perhaps that guiding Source, in its larger and better sense, has been in and/or with us always, provided we make ourselves receptive (intuitively and empathetically) to "listen" to it? IOW, we may never fully understand Truth, but perhaps, in faith, we can follow a path of reconciliation towards it? In that way, we may raise ourselves above pigs, instead of aspiring (liberally?) to out-pig pigs. Perhaps that is the value of a community that follows a faith-dogma, instead of a faithless den of LCD hedonists.

*****************

Truth is that which is conserved through the Reconciling Trinity, that adopts perspectives of Consciousness for coordinating from future potentialities, to relate presently measurable manifestations of Substance, that will transition into past recordings of Information. Teleological CSI. Future leaning, past forming, present recording.
To my belief, the purpose is participatory expressiveness, whose highest expression tends towards freedom and dignity. Which accounts for how America came to have a First Amendment. And why those (faux liberals) that would trade long term liberty for short term pleasure and security deserve neither the long nor the short.

******************


TRUTH:

As a "point" of reference, the Godhead is immeasurable.
If by "thing" one is referring to a physically measurable (as opposed to spiritually immeasurable) thing, then one is referring not to God but to a mere signification of God. And the power of God to flux each signification (subject only to math-based rules of chronological conservation for each manifesting signification) seems likely always to perplex mere mortals.
Of "things," many are measurable, but One is not. Rather, IT seems to be directly and empathetically intuited because IT's signs are in every measurably relational manifestation.
The way we "progress" towards IT seems to be more subjectively spiritual than objectively measurable. That way seems to relate to the Great Commandment and the Golden Rule. To love your neighbor as yourself necessitates a subjective consideration of yourself and what you really are.

Conundrum: To say that an interpretation of an empirical formula or recipe, relationship, or thing cannot remain true unless it is falsifiable seems to suggest that no thing can be lastingly true. Rather, that all (measurable) things (and form-ulas) flux.
To be true, must (the lasting essence of) a "thing" be false? Who's on first?
If so, where abides lasting Truth? And where abides moral guidance concerning the purpose for which we "should" seek to reconcile with Truth? Perhaps that guiding Source, in its larger and better sense, has been in and/or with us always, provided we make ourselves receptive (intuitively and empathetically) to "listen" to it? IOW, we may never fully understand Truth, but perhaps, in faith, we can follow a path of reconciliation towards it? In that way, we may raise ourselves above pigs, instead of aspiring (liberally?) to out-pig pigs. Perhaps that is the value of a community that follows a faith-dogma, instead of a faithless den of LCD hedonists.

Truth is that which is conserved through the Reconciling Trinity, that adopts perspectives of Consciousness for coordinating from future potentialities, to relate presently measurable manifestations of Substance, that will transition into past recordings of Information. Teleological CSI. Future leaning, past forming, present recording.
To my belief, the purpose is participatory expressiveness, whose highest expression tends towards freedom and dignity. Which accounts for how America came to have a First Amendment. And why those (faux liberals) that would trade long term liberty for short term pleasure and security deserve neither the long nor the short.

Obama is not trying to fix feudal savages. He is trying to get people's minds right so they can be good cattle for his ideal: The worldwide people farm.
As to those that want neither to be slaves nor to have slaves, Obama is every ready with the middle finger to the eye. Obama has always hated the American Ideal of individual freedom, dignity, and ownership based on the merit of a person's work. This is because he is, was, and always will be, an incompetent wuss.
Obama's only competence is being the champ among chooming pansexual loutish Musloids. For that, the Establishment picked him to become the Nobel Prize winning figurehead.

Stirring up the islamists in Syria led to the Islamification of Europe and the weakening of the U.S. electorate. This has promoted destruction of the Ideals of human freedom and dignity, "progressing" towards the worldwide people farm.
Obama is on board for every method of subjugating the human mind: Violence, Stockholm Syndrome, bribery, free stuff, indoctrination, race baiting. Obama is, and always has been, a total pos. Among Obama-like minds, genocide, death camps, gulags, and mass reeducation camps are just another set of tools in the socialist/fascist tool box.

The Constitution has been thoroughly besotted. We need common sense to guide a COS to amend it. Otherwise, we will continue to have a dirty rag that is used for whatever the purpose of each changing administration. With the general direction always ratcheting towards the people farming NWO.
Law, even Constitutional law, is only a thin veneer to guide us. It is not God. Indeed, many modern interpretations of the Constitution are as irrational as they are ungodly.

The Fed Gov has indirect enforcement means short of federalizing the national guard. It can make revenue sharing contingent on cooperation with Fed security measures. Such as not releasing known illegals from custody once a proper Fed Agent has indicated intention to arrest.

Common sense should tell us that some functions belong to the federal level and some to the state level. Problem is, the faithless ACLU, believing it has a direct line to Rights Under Gaia, has obscured the lines. When ACLU types are displeased with society, they just go to whatever judge seems most friendly to their concern of the day. The result is a legalistic hodge podge of dysfunctionality.
Defense of borders and national citizenship should belong to the federal level, However, the borders and citizenship should be clearly enough defined so that states can legitimately assist in the enforcement, not the undermining.
Many functions should belong to states and localities. Such as the criminalizing of drug sales and use, the status of being married, the legal status of abortion, etc.
It is because our separate realms of power have been (deliberately) obscured that our federal system (and very republic) has become endangered. The disease is so advanced that a radical prescription may be among our few chances to survive as a society: A COS.
Nullification movements are the first serious warnings of grave disease in the republic. They may help, if they move us towards needed treatments and repairs. Steps in due order: Wake up, COS, nullification, secesssion, tree of liberty -- as needed. Hopefully, the cure will take before we get too far into the steps.

*************

If people want to becrybullies, they need to learn from the master of being a deserving victim, George Constanza.
Scene from Seinfeld - The Andrea Doria:
[Setting: Tenant board room]
(George is telling the board his astonishing life stories. Every board member seems to be deeply moved by them)
GEORGE: I was handcuffed to the bed.. In my underwear, (Sighs) where I remained.. (Scene cuts to another story) She was attractive.. She was, also, infact, aNazi.. (Cuts to another story) The water.. that I had been swiming in was.. very cold. And, when I dropped the towel, there was.. significant shrinkage.. (Scene cuts to, yet, another story) Her parents were looking at me.. So, there I was, with a marble rye hanging from the end of a fishing pole.. (Scene cuts to his closing statements) In closing, these stories have not been embellished, because - they need no embellishment. They are simply, horrifyingly, )the story of my life as a short, stocky, slow witted bald man. (Gets up) Thank you.
(Every memeber of the board shows some sign that George's story is most deserving of the apartment. Ricardi is crying. George turns to leave, then remembers one more thing..) Oh, also.. my fiance died from licking toxic envelopes that I picked out. (Sobs and loud crying erupts from the board members) Thanks again. (Leaves. Eldridge looks defeated)
(Scene ends)
******************
So, should a one-drop black be entitled to race-based affirmative action? Should a one-drop white be taxed for reparations? Or Is a short, stocky, slow witted bald man the most deserving of all?
*******************
Answer: Nearly everyone has a cross to bear. In main, people should respect one another's dignity enough not to engage in victim competitions. Each person should be encouraged to learn how to cope with the gifts and challenges he/she has. Not to become an entitlement-minded burden on society.

**************

Why would most of the Press have propagated so many wrong predictions and polls? Answer: Because they are owned and indoctrinated by wannabe people farmers that had invested in Hllary.
Why would the Press now want to blame Hillary's loss on Russia? Answer: Because the media wants to pretend they were objective all along, and that they were wrong only because of last minute hacking by someone else, like the Russians. They want to soothe the sheeple they have cultivated.
Why the Russians? Answer: Because they make a convenient scapegoat, given history and the media monopoly owned by oligarchs employing shills.


 **********

It may help to give convicted criminals choices: Hard time or supervised community service while living under direction of a DI while learning OJT. IOW, infrastructure boot camp, to learn how to transition from a crap flinging maggot to a responsible human being.
Workfare and boot camps for the salvageable; deportation and long hard time for the non-salvageable recidivists. No more welfare for able bodied adults. No more govfunded "education" in "critical social studies."

Some Progs are racists against whites, but all Progs are infants against decency and personal reponsibility.

They will survive until their host either dies out or wakes the heck up.

It's not a whiteness problem. It's a babybrain addiction. Babybrain addicts often blame whiteness in order to deflect examination of the real problem: Perpetualized babybrains. If you have an alcoholic relative who gropes her way through life by blaming everyone and everything except her own utter lack of personal accountability, you may know what I mean. I doubt that buying into their deflections helps anyone.

Libs/Progs/Commies/Crybullies have a problem with every competent, energetic person who succeeds. They don't like blacks that "act white," either. They just call it a whiteness problem to avoid confessing that they are incompetent, infantile, crybulling, shriveled testicleites. They don't propagate grownups -- just more whinyazz, gang-banging, shriveled testicleites.
Edit: For which they compensate by flinging their crap and showing us their 'tude, i.e., droopy pants, SNL, pierced tongues, hatred for responsible adults.

The problem is that the cronycrats that control the direction know full well what they are doing, and it is what they intend to do: Prepare the masses for the giant people farm. Indeed, they take our money and our sweat and pour it back into their people-farming machine. You are to become first a sheeple, then a widget. Giving them more central power over domestic policy is the last thing we should be doing.

Among the worst things taxpayers could waste their money on would be funding free education for the further indoctrination of socially incompetent morons. Actually, that is worse than waste. It is active treason to the republic and to humanity.

We need a Porkwarts Schools for Weeweepigies. It could teach courses on Problems. The Problems of: Blackness, Redness, Yellowness, Snowflakiness, Femimenness, pinkiewaggerness, pansexualness, goatlovingness, fakescienceness, fakephilanthropyness, farmingthestupid, debtaddictiononaccountofstupidity, Profswithoutbrains, Goodsenselosttoablackhole. So many choices, so much to learn. A mind is a terrible thing to proglytize.

MSM is owned by oligarchs, who are the real bosses from whom most of DC takes its orders. The real Americans whose blood and sweat actually defend and work the country, who embrace the American Ideal, are more ignored or misdirected than represented. Loss of faith and lack of leadership has reduced them to this sorry state.
With DJT, we have a chance for that to change. That is why the Establishit is losing its mind. The Establishit consists of behind-the-curtain oligarchs funding cronycrats to mooch off Americans while building electoral power by importing third-world liberty-illiterate cattle-people. With DJT, those formula babies will be put back in their crib. There's nothing like the smell of freshly inspired, free-thinking Americans in the new morning.
Behind the oligarch's masks, we see that most of them have become mere faithless, self-godded, virtueless POS's, not worth admiring. Their talents have inclined less to inventiveness or inspiration than to management of fiat money, gov favors, confiscated ideas, people farming, and deconstruction of all the institutions that would support a decent society of free, dignified, and responsible adults. While we slept, they constructed a pig party and came very near to consolidating totalitarian power.

immigrants only if one intends to include invading hordes and criminals within the term. When most people think of immigrants, before MSM redirecting disinformation, they think of people with papers or processed through official channels. They remember Ellis Island. Not Typhoid Mary.

Why do the politicians funded by oligarchs want to increase third world immigration? Well, not because of any stone tablet that says diversity is better. Not because of any prescription by Gaia. Not because such immigration helps build democracies abroad. Nope. Faithless oligarchs promote diversity for one reason only: To solidify their positions as people farmers.
The NWO is not about spreading democracy abroad. It is about making the entire world one vast people farm for a syndicate of oligarchs.
Why has this NWO people-farming movement come to pass? Is it because alien masters have invaded us from outer space? Not likely. It's because too many people have forsaken all decent invitations to higher mindedness. Instead, they flock to invitations to the most base and immediate of gratifications, And that is how they have flung their freedom and dignity away, along with all the clothes of decency.
That's why so many "churches," "charities," and pagan-satanic cults have embraced the "new higher mindedness": "Free" sex, free abortions, free borders, free dope, free "education," free salvation. But these things are not free. And when they are mistaken to be free, they turn into the chains of Jacob Marley.


By definition, people farmers are traitors to humanity. By definition, globalizing anti-nationalists are traitors to their nation. A good many of these scum need to be hung, to encourage the others to curtail their faithless rapine. There was good reason for hanging traitors in bygone days. Those good reasons resound today.

What do I call them? Faithless, self-godded, treasonous, free-loading, diaper-loaded people-farmers. Aka, Skrotumm Ticks.


Far Right" is dog whistling for anti crybully. By Progs' own reasoning, "far right" should be sanctionable hate speech, since it is hateful against competent individuals.
Indeed, to give aid and comfort to collectivist crybullies is to be a traitor to the principles of the Founders. And these aren't voluntary collectivists. Nope. They're gang-banging, gov-forcing collectivists.
Progs: Still not potty trained after all these years.

I am wary of conscription. That would seem like baking trrds into a cake. I would prefer something different, but with similar results.
First, scale back welfare to make the low life less palatable. (The truly worthy will likely obtaini additional help through bona fide charities, and those charities would insist on results -- unlike gov giveaways.)
Then, share more revenue with States -- but under a proviso that the revenue be used for infrastructure. Some infrastructure maintenance jobs would be so recurring as to be permanent. Like painting the Golden Gate Bridge. Use tax revenues to promote more infrastructure contracts -- and exclude illegals.
Make some volunteer infrastructure jobs into something akin to work-study programs. No free tuition, but funding for infrastructure work-study workers. (They would likely learn more via OJT than in most classrooms.)
It seems likely that there are ways to control a mix of incentives and disincentives so that actual conscription is not needed -- except in national emergencies. The only reason conscription can work in a national emergency is because the emergency focuses peoples' minds so they don't waste time catering to snowflakes. Otherwise, the dirty snowflakes would ruin everything they touch.

It took awhile (too long) for Conservers of Liberty to notice how many Progs have been led by their self-godding faithlessness into their horrific evil. It's not just their "stupid" that is so set in stone. It's also their evil. Never again should we turn blind eyes to that.


Fake newscasters hate that Conservers of Liberty are exposing that nearly every last Prog is a wannabe-people-farmer Fake Humanitarian. Progs think they are the new "chosen people" -- chosen by Gaia.

I have the displeasure of knowing one of these guys, and he is spectacularly vocal. He indeed does think Trump is Hitler on account of wanting to do an extreme vetting of future Muslim immigrants. He has become very angry at people who don't share his "logic" in comparing Trump to Hitler. He is not just a JINO. He is a JINOIHOT -- JINO Insanely Hateful Of Trump. These nutbags exist.

Yup, I sure wish the Progists would keep their religion of entitlement to have their glands pleasured to themselves, without foisting it everywhere and trying to force everyone else to pay for it and often to participate in it.
Do they believe in some natural law that gives them such "right"? Sure sounds like a self godding religion.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.."
Problem: Libs often consider any Fed money spent in any way that facilitates the free exercise of religion to constitute a federal attempt to establish a religion. They're insane in that way. I suppose funding the building of roads would constitute an establishment of religion, since roads are often used to drive to church. Infants! Progs are such diaper loaded idiots!

Liberals don't grok the meaning of "earned" because they don't grok property, ownership, or responsibility. Just entitlementism, to be pooped out the behind of the Great Speckled Bird of the Collective.
Libs think their pleasure glands are all that are needed to merit. Libbies want to be pleasured, and, in their religion, the Great Speckled Bird of Paradise will poop it out. What do they want? Pleasure. When do they want it? Now. What do they do to earn it? They demand, hold up, loot, rape, blame, gang up, and vote for a living. Lib Pleasures Matter.

It's always a shock to Dem noses when a strong wind blows their foul ignorance back in their faces. Be assured, they're not thinking about how to appeal to the thinking working class. They're thinking about how to train enough working whites to join the mental zombies among the rainbow class that is farmed by cronycrats for oligarchs. That is the godforsaken cause for which Dems and the oligarchs that farm them will focus all their guns. That is the cause against which all thinking, caring Americans must rally their eternal vigilance.

Provided Trump remains healthy, Pence succeeds him, they inspire a new class of Conservers of Liberty, and enough Americans of good faith never forget the 8 years of Obamanation. Meanwhile, the billionaire techies Trump recently summoned will be plotting behind his back to restore their NWO. And they have all the institutions of the devil at their disposal.

Should a black with one drop of white blood pay reparations? These kinds of questions do not bode well for DemNuts as the gene pool becomes ever more mixed.

The sheeple class among the Dems never knew much to begin with, except to bark the way their people-farmers taught them. And the only "principle" that will ever be followed by the class of faithless people farmers is the principle of the NWO: Rule by elite people farmers over the masses.

Progs think racism means to believe in a marketplace that does not grade on the curve, So it's racist to judge anyone on his character and competence without adding or subtracting points, such as on account of being black or white, Muslim or Christian, hyphenated or non-hyphenated, gay or straight, criminal or responsible,
Except when there's crime or looting is being investigated. Then no points are to be added or subtracted, because then all profiling is racist. Indeed, to send cops into a neighborhood that qualifies for being graded on the curve is in itself racist, because only the people that live (and loot) there are qualified to investigate anything.
And to be against free education in victim studies and prog indoctrination is also racist. Indeed, racist is whatever offends the dominant culture. And that ain't workaday whities. Actually, it ain't minorities, either. Nope. It's the cronycrats and oligarchs that pay to indoctrinate the whinyazzes and snowflakes.
Per the indoctrination, it is only "right" that whities work to pay the welfare needed to "reparate" all the "victims" that just wanna live the life and breed more victims. Any citizen who is against such reparations is deplorable. And racist. Cuz whinyazz minorities say so, along with snowflake whities.
Of course, there are minorities and whites that are good solid Americans. But then, they aren't the passive-aggressive, crybullying, make-s-up, incompetent, shameless, whinyazzes and snowflakes I'm talking about.

Everything that comes out of the Establishment Media is a people-farming lie.

What causes the "liberalization" is the hyphenating antagonism against assimilation to the American Ideal of individual freedom and dignity. Otherwise, the American Ideal would teach respect for private property (ownership responsibility) and the marketplace (as opposed to corrupt favoring redistributive bureaucrats).
Untill fairly recently, each State determined its own requisites for voting. Because of our "original sin" of slavery, that led to Jim Crow. That led to forced Reconstruction and gross intrusions by Feds into freedoms of association. Soon enough, Reconstruction led to its own kind of corrupt abuses.
At this point, we live in a populous nation with vastly interconnecting trade interests. I much doubt that forced Reconstructive measures remain worthy to their originating purposes. The business owner or State that engaged in policies for fostering racism would soon enough find itself a pariah to the marketplace.
Btw, the biggest racists and bigots tend to be the Prog baiters. What is more racist, misogynist, or bigoted than saying one group deserves gov-backed special favors or reparations solely on account of its race, gender, or religion? What is not racist, misogynist, and bigoted about Progs' allowing of filthy Saudi money to influence our politics? California and Sanctuary Cities are probably the biggest racists in the U.S. What is not racist about academics and mayors of inner cities pandering to denizens that declare open season on cops?
Yes, the determining of who has a right to vote should be blind to color, gender, and ethnicity. However, it need not be blind to generalized measures for profiling for responsible maturity.
Factors: Age, period of citizenship, passage of a basic civics course, lack of criminal history, time of residence, payment of property taxes. I don't see how reasoned application of such requisites would "tear us apart." I do see how it would cause snowflakes, thug-baiters, cronycrats, and people-farmers (i.e., neo-carpetbaggers) to crap their drawers.

There were a lot of "Republicans" in contention this last go round. Not so many Conservers of Liberty with the cojones, wits, energy, and loyalty to take on the Establishment of faithless, cronycratic gang-bangers.

I don't much care about the skin color, gender, or ethnicity, per se of a President. I care about whether he/she is pro or anti American representative republicanism. For or against the freedom and dignity of every citizen to pursue happiness, under law as founded by the Constitution. American or Globalist.
Unfortunately, Globalists tend to be Collectivists who tend to care more about collective redistribution for favored, gang-banging sub-groupings instead of individual responsibility. And globalist propaganda has most definiteily infested some sub-groupings more than others.
The consequence is this: Blacks, Gays, feminists, and femimen tend to have been indoctrinated to a similar cause. That cause is to erase the Constitution, the borders, and the republic, and replace them with a centrally regulated apparatus that will enfore their ideas about "equality and fairness" right down to the toenails. What this really means is: They mean to take from some and redistribute to their favored gang bangers. Not under any marketplace of competition or colorblind system of regulation, but under a hierarchical regime headed by their choice of MacDaddy Despot.
So, until society regains its senses, I do not want ANY hyphenate to become President ever again. All hyphenates need to be put back in their cribs and not be consulted about matters of politics until they show some signs of growing up. Somehow, authority to participate in the politics of a representative republic needs to be more closely tied to demonstrated individual competence and responsibility. The right to vote ought not be freely conferred to every perpetually infantilized adolescent. Especially so long as he/she/it presents more as a hyphenate than as an American.

In taking action to restore America, Trump will be investigating the waste, fraud and abuse of years of establishmentarian rule. Establishmentarians don't want that. So they deflect. They want to short circuit Trump's coming investigations of their shenanighans by preempting with their own "investigations," bent to a preconceived story: That their corruption in taking Russian and Saudi money should be laid at Trump's door instead of their own. Progs are truly some foul sh eest.

The philosophers of human dignity and Identity. Asimov and Rand, when they took off their anti-god blinkers. Further back, de Tocqueville.
According to your link,
In a past life I was a knight, born in 1437 somewhere in the territory of Southern Germany. My father was a castle guard, and my mother was an ordinary peasant. I was loyal to my king, so he rewarded me with a large area of land.
Well, it's pretty to think so. :)

Fundamentally, I suspect we have been, are, and will be, all the same person. "The interconnected I."
The only difference between that -- and what we now present as -- abides with degrees (fractaled layers and levels) of separation.
If so, the better questions, in "Kevin Bacon terms," are:
- With which previous and present expressions of personage do "you" feel (intuitively and empathetically) most closely connected?
- And, how should you, as presently your own dignity, seek meaningfulness with which to express yourself, freely?
in free participation, because you own "your" self. To not assert responsibility for such ownership of yourself is to fall back into a sub-human state. In respect of being human, such falling back would be regression, not progression. In that respect, Collectivizing Progs are Regressives, not Progressives. But then, Progs always like to wash words through Orwellian Cycles.
It may be that this exact context only goes around once. But "you" do not only go around once. IOW, YOLO is b.s. "You," like Jacob Marley, continue to have an investment in that for which you have been responsible.

********

The reason Libs are so tolerant of Mohammadism is because they care so much about tolerance.  What a cruelly pretzyled hoax these faux Libs are to themselves!

All so they can follow a despot that convinces them that, by doing so (and being PC) they can "justifiably" feel good about themselves.  Very sad.  Very intellectually stunted.



*************

Don't be blind to the anti-white male strategy of the Dems. They outright seek demographic warfare as a way to drown the U.S. under hordes of incoming illegal, third-world, non-white, liberty-illiterate, cultural-socialists.
There are no bigger anti-American racists than among the Dems.
Real Americans believe in the American Ideal of individual freedom and dignity. Your people believe in selling out that birthright for a mess of looted pottage. Teaching people how to revile individual competence, responsibility, and independence is not charitable.
Agitating gang-bangers to loot opm by voting for a living, to use gov force to take the produce of others, is not charitable. It is sick, subhuman, racist, undignified, crap. There is a difference between taxing to sustain gov infrastructure that benefits all versus taxing to pay special favors to professional moochers. But your deep training to be a moocher precludes you from seeing it.
If one drop of black blood entitles one to affirmative action and special lootings, then does one drop of white blood oblige one to pay reparations? Go work on your "objective" redistribution scheme based on skin color. Boy, talk about Hitlerian racism! Look in the mirror. Oh, and don't forget to hit the ban button, so you can continue to nurture your fellow racist subhumanoids under a rock.

Doesn't "stronger together" sound, well, fascist-ish? Even gang-banger-ish? Who are they "stronger together" against? Well, the Deplorables. IOW, responsible, working adults.
To become "stronger together," Libs even want to import help from Muslims. The reason Libs are so tolerant of Mohammadism is because they "care so much" about tolerance. Irony: What a cruelly pretzyled hoax these faux Libs are to themselves!
All so they can follow a despot that would convince them that, by doing so (and being PC) they can "justifiably" feel good about themselves. Very sad. Very intellectually stunted.

Did 17 different agencies each come to their initial "conclusions" independently, or were they all simply regurgitating from the same script? Does anyone know?

***********
\
For a time, it so happened that whites tended to have the best advantages in America. For some time now, however, that is not necessarily the case. And many whites are actually mixed. Persons of all skin tones have been able to succeed in America. And anyone that unfairly discriminates (against non-whites) based solely on race will likely suffer in the marketplace -- both in the marketplace of commodities and services and in the marketplace of ideas.
What is holding some mixed tones back is a mix of factors: Being deliberately discouraged by our school system; being set up for failure by our school system; being mollycoddled by our welfare system; being encouraged to be a drag by our cultural and entertainment leaders; tending to have fewer successful ancestors to inherit money and values from.
That is how life is. Nature is not fair or equal. Nature discriminates and selects. But every individual can still participate to become the best that he can be.
Millions of people have far more challenging problems than feelings about skin color. Many are born severely handicapped, in third world hellholes, or in societies that allow very little freedom of speech, association, or enterprise.
To entrust central bureaucrats to impose some formula for handicapping or advantaging every person based on personal or appearance factors as a way to impose fairness would make no more sense than to entrust central bureaucrats to impose economic decisions without reference to any marketplace. In either case, the regime that agglomerates power to do so will necessarily be hypocritical, unfair, inefficient, and, ultimely, despotic. The people that so advocate need to be sent squealing back to their cribs -- until they grow better sense.

An America run by competent, respectful, decent, responsible, culturally assimilated people is better for all Americans.

But deliberately disenfranchising (or demoting) everyone (with one drop?) of white blood would be a racist way to empower the Dem Party. To advocate that every mixed white must take a back seat to everyone with more or less mixed white blood is racist, illogical, arbitrary, hypocritical, immature, subhuman, uncivilized, anti-assimilation, and, fundamentally, anti-American. It is the kind of thinking that a Prog, Alinsky, Hitler, or unprincipled people-breeding farmer would indulge. Everyone that can think readily sees the idiocy. Which is why such advocacy appeals to Progs: They self select for idiocy.

Leftys cannot tolerate Conservatives' failing to pick up the tab to pay for their free stuff. Leftys cannot understand what Conservatives have against free stuff.

It's a shared lust for blood meals. A parasite is a parasite.

He believes in a different Immanuel: The Immanuel of the material free stuff -- provided the free stuff is paid for by a different Immanuel: Emmanuel Goldstein, aka Other People.


The '49'ers had gold rush fever. Anti-Americans have blood rush fever. They are like co-sub-contractors for destroying Western Civ. Except no Prime Contractor unites or pays them. Rather, they simply all smell blood and have found easy ways to suck it. Some have become very fat ticks, indeed: Soros, Billery, oligarchs united against Trump.
There is an effective repellent. It is a mix of the civic and religious values of the Founders. However, the ACLU has washed most of those values away, leaving us exposed to swarms of parasites. Trump is trying to apply those values again. At first, it is a messy task. But soon, the toll taken by zapping parasites will restore the health of the nation.

The only DDT so far found effective to stop infestations of radical "shtrugglers" is made of a religious combination, such as the combination of the values of the Founders and the inspiration of the New Testament. We have no other way to stop sociopathic madhat-terism.
Switching metaphors, the ACLU (Rehab-Rahab) has embraced Mohammad/Marx/Manson/Murdoch instead of Joshua, and it has greased the way for parasites of Islam, Marxism, and People-Farmers to combine in order to dissolve the glue and bring down the walls of Western Civ.

A virtueless parasite is a virtueless parasite. And virtueless parasites recognize and cooperate with one another whenever convenient to get their blood meals.
There is no other reason to account for the cooperation of convenience between atheistic American Jews, Islamic radicals, Alinsky sociopathic looters, race baiters, and cronycrat shills for oligarchic people farmers (and their moronic profs and indoctrinated "students").
They are the Rainbow Coalition, and they "peacefully coexist" with one another only so long as convenient to suck all the blood out of Western Civ.

All parasites, including Dems (Alinsky commies united with cronycrat fascists) follow their parasitism religiously. Soros is as much a true believer in Radical Parasitism as the most radical of koran screamers or bible thumpers. Committed Progs that claim not to be true belivers (religious zealots) are liars that often know not even their own lying. Their faux-higher mindedness and "giving back" is always rationalized to their selfish material gain. Decency is not in them. And they do not hesitate in the least to groom innocent children.


Religion is spread by inspiring belief, not by shocking people into Stockholm Syndrome. The First Amendment does not grant the free exercise of methods for imposing Stockholm Syndrome. There is nothing of "free exercise" in Islam. Islam is practiced to obtain advantage and to keep from getting stoned. Otherwise, Islam would not be, and indeed is not, believed in any rational sense of the word. No rational person, outside an area where Islam is practiced, would read the Koran and be impressed with its faux-reasoning.


There is no co-existence with Islam. Nor with any sociopath who believes there is no such thing as your property, but only his right to what you claim as your property. Nor with infantile, incompetent, entitlement-mongers that follow any creed that denies you can earn the right to keep that to which you dedicate your enterprise.
Thus, there is no peaceful co-existence with Muslims, Marxists, some kinds of Anarchists, and people-farming cronycrats for oligarchs. All tend to be incorrigible threats against human decency, dignity, and liberty, and therefore they are fundamentally evil. The price of liberty is eternal vigilance against the incorrigible evil of all such predators and parasites.
The alternative path to suicide is easy: Just invite such incorrigibles into your homes and societies until their fascist gang-bangery tips to destroy your capacity for self defense. Within the corporatism of a fat society, about 2 percent of radicalized evil-doers would do it. That is the power of radicalized fascism.

There is no way to refute someone who has made a lifetime either of avoiding good sense or of pulling the remnants of his brains under his belt. When you say "f wits," you're obviously projecting, You never had anything sensible to say to refute to begin with. No "out of the crib" for you.

Are Dems more likely than Conservatives to feel lost when they lose a leader?
IOW, is it more likely that a person who depends on another to think for him and tell him what to do will feel lost once the umbilical cord between his cranium and their brain is severed?
Yes, I suspect there is much to that. That may account in part for the diminished, aged, lost, and uninspiring crew of Dems now warming their bench over an ash heap of bad ideas.


**************

Meditative prayer entails feedback with the Source of the Cosmos (sometimes called God),  A sense of good faith and goodwill.  People aren't simply "told" by God what to do.  In a state of good faith and good will, they receive feedback guidance.  The quality of that guidance can be enhanced or made more decent or civilizing by communicating about such meditations with others. 

That often produces a shared language, or framework of metaphors and sacred stories.  They are meant to be inspirational and to facilitate moral communication.  Not necessarily to be scientifically factual.  It tends to be monstrous to try to stamp out such communications,  That is the evil of militant atheists.

There is another kind of evil.  It is the evil of frothy literalistic believers, bent on forcing people to ignore practical realities.  Of that, the life of Jim Jones is an exemplar.

Too many people are made to suffer on account of unbalanced and evil feuds between militant atheists and frothy metaphysicians.


*************

That each conscious individual is simply a spatial-temporal-contextual perspective of that Conscious Source which has always been, is, and will always be.
Some people have become so devoted to math and logic that their essential sense of being is blocked from sensing/intuiting That Which Otherwise Would Be Apparent, much as A is A. It is not apparent to the inferior senses (sight, hearing, touch, taste, smell, balance, etc.). It is apparent only to the Sense Of Being. It is not amenable of the sort of empirical analyses and algorithmic functions with which the inferior senses deal.
A person cannot derive subjective and immeasurable "ought" solely from objective and measurable "is." A person devoted entirely to that which is objectively measurable will tend to have less appreciation for the necessity of subjective appreciation regarding concerns of morality. (Good faith and good will necessarily refer to subjective aspects.)
It is not hard for a person who has lost contact with his subjective, moral self to become a grotesquely "equalizing" monster, much as various socialists, communists, and atheists have been throughout history. Conversely, it is not hard for a person who, in religious zeal, has lost contact with his objective senses to become a monster in the service of bafflegab mumblings supposedly "understood" by an oracle or prophet.
A decent person needs a sense of balance, both for that which is physically measurable and that which is spiritually immeasurable but qualitatively appreciable. Unfortunately, rulers, systems, and cultural niches often devolve to turn people into farm animals, either by diverting and blocking their sense of connection to higher beingness (Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Pol Pot) or by indoctrinating them to ignore practical, objective reality (Mohammad, Jim Jones).






Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Ownership of Human Identity


Fundamentally, I suspect we have been, are, and will be, all the same person.  "The interconnected I." 

The only difference between that -- and what we now present as -- abides with degrees (fractaled layers and levels) of separation. 

If so, the better questions, in "Kevin Bacon terms," are: 
- With which previous and present expressions of personage do "you" feel (intuitively and empathetically) most closely connected? 
- And, how should you, as presently your own dignity, seek meaningfulness with which to express yourself, freely? 

in free participation, because you own "your" self.  To not assert responsibility for such ownership of yourself is to fall back into a sub-human state.  In respect of being human, such falling back would be regression, not progression.  In that respect, Collectivizing Progs are Regressives, not Progressives.  But then, Progs always like to wash words through Orwellian Cycles.

It may be that this exact context only goes around once.  But "you" do not only go around once.  IOW, YOLO is b.s.  "You," like Jacob Marley, continue to have an investment in that for which you have been responsible.

*************

What causes the "liberalization" is the hyphenating antagonism against assimilation to the American Ideal of individual freedom and dignity.  Otherwise, the American Ideal would teach respect for private property (ownership responsibility) and the marketplace (as opposed to corrupt favoring redistributive bureaucrats).

Untill fairly recently, each State determined its own requisites for voting.  Because of our "original sin" of slavery, that led to Jim Crow.  That led to forced Reconstruction and gross intrusions by Feds into freedoms of association.   Soon enough, Reconstruction led to its own kind of corrupt abuses. 

At this point, we live in a populous nation with vastly interconnecting trade interests.  I much doubt that forced Reconstructive measures remain worthy to their originating purposes.  The business owner or State that engaged in policies for fostering racism would soon enough find itself a pariah to the marketplace.

Btw, the biggest racists and bigots tend to be the Prog baiters.  What is more racist, misogynist, or bigoted than saying one group deserves gov-backed special favors or reparations solely on account of its race, gender, or religion?  What is not racist, misogynist, and bigoted about Progs' allowing of filthy Saudi money to influence our politics?  California and Sanctuary Cities are probably the biggest racists in the U.S.  What is not racist about academics and mayors of inner cities pandering to denizens that declare open season on cops?

Yes, the determining of who has a right to vote should be blind to color, gender, and ethnicity.  However, it need not be blind to generalized measures for profiling for responsible maturity. 

Factors:  Age, period of citizenship, passage of a basic civics course, lack of criminal history, time of residence, payment of property taxes.  I don't see how reasoned application of such requisites would "tear us apart."  I do see how it would cause snowflakes, thug-baiters, cronycrats, and people-farmers (i.e., neo-carpetbaggers) to crap their drawers.

*************

I don't much care about the skin color, gender, or ethnicity, per se of a President. I care about whether he/she is pro or anti American representative republicanism. For or against the freedom and dignity of every citizen to pursue happiness, under law as founded by the Constitution. American or Globalist.
Unfortunately, Globalists tend to be Collectivists who tend to care more about collective redistribution for favored, gang-banging sub-groupings instead of individual responsibility. And globalist propaganda has most definiteily infested some sub-groupings more than others.
The consequence is this: Blacks, Gays, feminists, and femimen tend to have been indoctrinated to a similar cause. That cause is to erase the Constitution, the borders, and the republic, and replace them with a centrally regulated apparatus that will enfore their ideas about "equality and fairness" right down to the toenails. What this really means is: They mean to take from some and redistribute to their favored gang bangers. Not under any marketplace of competition or colorblind system of regulation, but under a hierarchical regime headed by their choice of MacDaddy Despot.
So, until society regains its senses, I do not want ANY hyphenate to become President ever again. All hyphenates need to be put back in their cribs and not be consulted about matters of politics until they show some signs of growing up. Somehow, authority to participate in the politics of a representative republic needs to be more closely tied to demonstrated individual competence and responsibility. The right to vote ought not be freely conferred to every perpetually infantilized adolescent. Especially so long as he/she/it presents more as a hyphenate than as an American.

*************

In taking action to restore America, Trump will be investigating the waste, fraud and abuse of years of establishmentarian rule. Establishmentarians don't want that. So they deflect. They want to short circuit Trump's coming investigations of their shenanighans by preempting with their own "investigations," bent to a preconceived story: That their corruption in taking Russian and Saudi money should be laid at Trump's door instead of their own. Progs are truly some foul sh eest.

*****************

The philosophers of human dignity and Identity. Asimov and Rand, when they took off their anti-god blinkers. Further back, de Tocqueville.
According to your link,
In a past life I was a knight, born in 1437 somewhere in the territory of Southern Germany. My father was a castle guard, and my mother was an ordinary peasant. I was loyal to my king, so he rewarded me with a large area of land.
Well, it's pretty to think so. :)

*******************

Fundamentally, I suspect we have been, are, and will be, all the same person. "The interconnected I."
The only difference between that -- and what we now present as -- abides with degrees (fractaled layers and levels) of separation.
If so, the better questions, in "Kevin Bacon terms," are:
- With which previous and present expressions of personage do "you" feel (intuitively and empathetically) most closely connected?
- And, how should you, as presently your own dignity, seek meaningfulness with which to express yourself, freely?
in free participation, because you own "your" self. To not assert responsibility for such ownership of yourself is to fall back into a sub-human state. In respect of being human, such falling back would be regression, not progression. In that respect, Collectivizing Progs are Regressives, not Progressives. But then, Progs always like to wash words through Orwellian Cycles.
It may be that this exact context only goes around once. But "you" do not only go around once. IOW, YOLO is b.s. "You," like Jacob Marley, continue to have an investment in that for which you have been responsible.

************

It's impossible to be a Prog over 40 and not be a shameless, incompetent, corrupt, perpetually infantilized and irresponsible adolescent. Oxymorons: Prog Principles. Clean diapered Prog. Wise Prog. Prog Charity.

Obama: Go flush yourself.

If DJT is not an anti-establishment pro-American, then WHY is the establishment so panicked? Why is it pulling out all the stops? Pray for DJT. And America.
The biggest danger to humanity is not the Russians. The biggest danger is the faithless cohort of cronycrat establishmentarians that has taken over every institution of persuasion and force, except one: The institutional memory of decent, competent, freedom-loving Americans with regard to their inheritance of freedom and dignity.
With faith in the Reconciler and the justness of our humanitarian cause, we can defeat these evil morlochians. And put their aiders and abettors (perpetually adolescent Progs) back in their cribs.


******************

Diaspora, I mostly agree.  To look at what Progs produce for movies, music, and social studies is to know why they should never be trusted to run DC or the Courts. 

I am wary of conscription.  That would seem like baking trrds into a cake.  I would prefer something different, but with similar results. 

First, scale back welfare to make the low life less palatable.  (The truly worthy will likely obtaini additional help through bona fide charities, and those charities would insist on results -- unlike gov giveaways.)

Then, share more revenue with States -- but under a proviso that the revenue be used for infrastructure.  Some infrastructure maintenance jobs would be so recurring as to be permanent.  Like painting the Golden Gate Bridge.  Use tax revenues to promote more infrastructure contracts -- and exclude illegals. 

Make some volunteer infrastructure jobs into something akin to work-study programs.  No free tuition, but funding for infrastructure work-study workers.  (They would likely learn more via OJT than in most classrooms.)

It seems likely that there are ways to control a mix of incentives and disincentives so that actual conscription is not needed -- except in national emergencies.  The only reason conscription can work in a national emergency is because the emergency focuses peoples' minds so they don't waste time catering to snowflakes.  Otherwise, the dirty snowflakes would ruin everything they touch.

**********************

That's because MSM is owned by oligarchs, who are the real bosses from whom most of DC takes its orders. The real Americans whose blood and sweat actually defend and work the country, who embrace the American Ideal, are more ignored or misdirected than represented. Loss of faith and lack of leadership has reduced them to this sorry state.
With DJT, we have a chance for that to change. That is why the Establishit is losing its mind. The Establishit consists of behind-the-curtain oligarchs funding cronycrats to mooch off Americans while building electoral power by importing third-world liberty-illiterate cattle-people. With DJT, those formula babies will be put back in their crib. There's nothing like the smell of freshly inspired, free-thinking Americans in the new morning.
Behind the oligarch's masks, we see that most of them have become mere faithless, self-godded, virtueless POS's, not worth admiring. Their talents have inclined less to inventiveness or inspiration than to management of fiat money, gov favors, confiscated ideas, people farming, and deconstruction of all the institutions that would support a decent society of free, dignified, and responsible adults. While we slept, they constructed a pig party and came very near to consolidating totalitarian power.

Progs will survive until their host either dies out or wakes the heck up.


It's not a whiteness problem. It's a babybrain addiction. Babybrain addicts often blame whiteness in order to deflect examination of the real problem: Perpetualized babybrains. If you have an alcoholic relative who gropes her way through life by blaming everyone and everything except her own utter lack of personal accountability, you may know what I mean. I doubt that buying into their deflections helps anyone.

Libs/Progs/Commies/Crybullies have a problem with every competent, energetic person who succeeds. They don't like blacks that "act white," either. They just call it a whiteness problem to avoid confessing that they are incompetent, infantile, crybulling, shriveled testicleites. They don't propagate grownups -- just more whinyazz, gang-banging, shriveled testicleites.
Edit: For which they compensate by flinging their crap and showing us their 'tude, i.e., droopy pants, SNL, pierced tongues, hatred for responsible adults.

The problem is that the cronycrats that control the direction know full well what they are doing, and it is what they intend to do: Prepare the masses for the giant people farm. Indeed, they take our money and our sweat and pur it back into their people-farming machine. You are to become first a sheeple, then a widget. Giving them more central power over domestic policy is the last thing we should be doing.


Among the worst things taxpayers could waste their money on would be funding free education for the further indoctrination of socially incompetent morons. Actually, that is worse than waste. It is active treason to the republic and to humanity.

We need a Porkwarts Schools for Weeweepigies. It could teach courses on Problems. The Problems of: Blackness, Redness, Yellowness, Snowflakiness, Femimenness, pinkiewaggerness, pansexualness, goatlovingness, fakescienceness, fakephilanthropyness, farmingthestupid, debtaddictiononaccountofstupidity, Profswithoutbrains, Goodsenselosttoablackhole. So many choices, so much to learn. A mind is a terrible thing to proglytize.

They are immigrants only if one intends to include invading hordes and criminals within the term. When most people think of immigrants, before MSM redirecting disinformation, they think of people with papers or processed through official channels. They remember Ellis Island. Not Typhoid Mary.

Why do the politicians funded by oligarchs want to increase third world immigration? Well, not because of any stone tablet that says diversity is better. Not because of any prescription by Gaia. Not because such immigration helps build democracies abroad. Nope. Faithless oligarchs promote diversity for one reason only: To solidify their positions as people farmers.
The NWO is not about spreading democracy abroad. It is about making the entire world one vast people farm for a syndicate of oligarchs.
Why has this NWO people-farming movement come to pass? Is it because alien masters have invaded us from outer space? Not likely. It's because too many people have forsaken all decent invitations to higher mindedness. Instead, they flock to invitations to the most base and immediate of gratifications, And that is how they have flung their freedom and dignity away, along with all the clothes of decency.
That's why so many "churches," "charities," and pagan-satanic cults have embraced the "new higher mindedness": "Free" sex, free abortions, free borders, free dope, free "education," free salvation. But these things are not free. And when they are mistaken to be free, they turn into the chains of Jacob Marley.

By definition, people farmers are traitors to humanity. By definition, globalizing anti-nationalists are traitors to their nation. A good many of these scum need to be hung, to encourage the others to curtail their faithless rapine. There was good reason for hanging traitors in bygone days. Those good reasons resound today.

What do I call them? Faithless, self-godded, treasonous, free-loading, diaper-loaded people-farmers. Aka, Skrotumm Ticks.

"Far Right" is dog whistling for anti crybully. By Progs' own reasoning, "far right" should be sanctionable hate speech, since it is hateful against competent individuals.
Indeed, to give aid and comfort to collectivist crybullies is to be a traitor to the principles of the Founders. And these aren't voluntary collectivists. Nope. They're gang-banging, gov-forcing collectivists.
Progs: Still not potty trained after all these years.



 



Sunday, December 11, 2016

How to Tell a Prog



When Lefties can ban Huckleberry Finn, they will soon get around to making the flying of Old Glory into hate speech, just before they rule the Constitution unconstitutional. Progs are afflicted with a mental disorder that short circuits their common sense. If not repaired before age 40, that disorder tends to become permanent. Then there is no fixing it. At that point, the best that can be done is to put all Progs afflicted with perpetually infantilizing adolescence back into their cribs.
With only about 10 questions, I suspect a good many Progs can be identified with 99.99% accuracy. We should start profiling with those tests.
Examples:
1) Do you think the Constitution, as written, mandates that all the States recognize gay marriage and polygamous marriage? (Should an hermaphrodite be entitled to equal protection and to marry a man, a woman, a gender-fluid, and another hermaphrodite, at the same time? Should a child be entitled to a village of Daddies?)
2) Do you think blood related siblings should be entitled to obtain marriage certificates?
3) Do you think the central gov has the right to force state public schools to teach elementary students the "ins and outs" of gay marriage? (Do you think bestiality is good for the human and good for the beast, so long as both are pleasured and neither complains?)
4) Do you think central overseers ought to be authorized to fine small business people for calling other people names or for refusing to serve them in the way they like?
5) Do you think colleges should grade different races on different curves?
6) Do you think the central gov should print money to make college free?
7) Do you think it's racist to advocate for smaller central gov?
8) Do you think it's bigoted to be against the further importation of Muslims, without extreme vetting?
9) Do you think whites are per se privileged, and should therefore be specially taxed to pay reparations? (Should one drop of white blood oblige a person to pay reparations?)
10) Do you think the central gov should mandate the confiscation of all pistols and repeating-fire rifles? (Do you think police should be required to patrol gang-banger neighborhoods without guns?)

*****************

The places you will find to be quickest on the draw to ban or insult tend to be the sites that specialize in Progressive "education." Progs tend not to look good pretending to be accomodating to contrary views. The whole point of conditioning for hyphenated diversity is not to accomodate assimilation, unless to conquer and replace it. We routinely see a similar pattern in Islam.
The whole point of "progressivism" is pretense that there abides some perfect form of collectivist governance, of which prog experts have superior insight that merits (nay, requires) affirmation by all the "ignorant" small businessmen. Progism inherently promotes iron-fisted elitist intolerance, even when it sometimes temporarily tries to hide it under velvet gloves.
Progs always want to take over the legal machinery for dictating governance in every particular. Equal "rights" for Blacks soon enough expands to equal (superior) rights for left cleaning, goat loving, bacon eschewers. Always, they get their foot in the door by claiming only to want tolerance, that soon enough fills billions of pages of arcane legalese. And all of it collapses into black holes of laundered bribery.

Why do hyphenates not want to go all the way and completely segregate themselves? Why do they shamelessly feel entitlted to take economic sustenance from those that do not want hyphenates?
Why do they come into non-hyphenated society and expect affirmative privileges? Why don't hyphenated gays, jews, aryans, muslims, blacks, hispanics, pansexuals, illegals, etc, accept that non-hyphenates just don't care (and don't want to care) about their hyphenated status?
Why come to a generally non-hyphenated business or society that rewards individual competence and the taking of personal responsibility and then shamelessly complain that it does not reward special entitlement-mindedness?
Yes, reality avails places that cater to hyphenated status. Hyphenates should go to those places and not feel entitled to specially tax non-hyphenated societies. We non-hyphenates have no interest in being slaves, taking slaves, or taking hyphenates to raise as perpetual children. We just don't care about your gayness, so long as you aren't foisting it on our children.
Prog dhimmification proceeds by teaching thusly: (1) You should (must!) be your brother's keeper. (2) I am your (most worthy) brother.
I have relatives like that. They constantly harp about what I should do more of, to support others. While they themselves NEVER support anyone. If Progs want to save the world, let them volunteer their own time, resources, and money. Ah, but there's the rub. Progs tend not to believe in owner-ship. Only in entitle-ship.

By far, the more dangerous cohort against America is the Establishment of NWO cronycrat moochers and oligarchic people farmers. Much, much more so than the Ruskies. If they were to give aid and comfort to a treasonous cohort among the Electors, then, truly, that would be the shot heard round the table of every patriot.

Re: "[Lefties] have no confidence they can care for themselves, and nov shame when others are forced to care for them."
I confirm with my experience. Everytime I encounter an incompetent who is without shame, he/she seems invariably to be a Lefty. Savage is right, that Lefties truly are "red diaper doper babies." A republic that allows them to become the voting majority has lost the better part of its senses.

Communism is primitive socialism, meaning it is without a market based medium of exchange. Ask Pol Pot how that worked out.

If DJT is a fascist, then the woman who is picky in choosing a husband to father her children is an eugenicist. To argue DJT is a fascist is to act as a corrupt Rino or an ignorant Dino. It is to project evil and ignorance.
DJT wants to deregulate business and to clamp down on lobbyiing (mooching).
To rely on new businesses to organize productive employment in a society is an indicator of freedom, not fascism. What would be the alternatives? To rely on despots to stack and rule gov and/or corporate hierarchies.
There is right (freedom) and there is wrong (destruction of freedom). Those that want to destroy freedom can almost always be relied on to tell the public that up is down, slavery is freedom, ignorance is strength, small businesses are fascist, and to resist totalitarians is only to make them stronger.

But equality is not a right.  The whiny minority is not equal to the cancer ridden and dying child.  Nor to the smart, innocent little girl who is stoned to preserve a father's "honor."  Nor to the child whose fortune was to be "adopted" by pedophiles.  Hope is in growing stronger by pulling strength from the Reconciler and persevering in the face of one's personal challenges.  That hope tends better to be availed in a culture that is liberty-literate.  Progs are poison to that culture.

*************

If DJT is not an anti-establishment pro-American, then WHY is the establishment so panicked?  Why is it pulling out all the stops?  Pray for DJT.  And America.

The biggest danger to humanity is not the Russians.  The biggest danger is the faithless cohort of cronycrat establishmentarians that has taken over every institution of persuasion and force, except one:  The institutional memory of decent, competent, freedom-loving Americans with regard to their inheritance of freedom and dignity. 

With faith in the Reconciler and the justness of our humanitarian cause, we can defeat these evil morlochians.  And put their aiders and abettors (perpetually adolescent Progs) back in their cribs.




Wednesday, December 7, 2016

Dignity


The NWO sounds like prep for a giant orgiastic national suicide pill.

Work is as essential to a social being's dignity as the human body is to a person's life. Absent decent room for freedom of expression in one's work (if nothing else, at least the freedom to be able to seek other employment), a person would be reduced to the status of a subhuman.  A cog in a machine.  Decency requires that the NWO not be allowed to destroy the American representative republic.

***********************************

Imagine how barren the landscape would soon become, had you no others to care about or serve.  Would that soon become the case, were the gov somehow to replace the concepts of marriage, family, children, friends, society, nation with a controlled but free buffet of goods, services, programs, sensations, drugs, and sex?  What would incentivize any human, beast, or AI to serve or maintain any such a system? 

As the system eroded and as the world niche changed to impose new challenges to survival and replication, who would retain the participatory Will to meet such challenges in order to nourish and replenish the inhabitants? Without the dignity of being of service, what Will to Survive and Replicate would survive? 

 Well, Beingness of some kind would persist.  So I expect some Algorithmic Accompanying Will, in some form or other -- even if not human, would evolve and persist.  But what would be IT's unfolding purposes and rewards?  In what ways would IT draw IT's incentives?  How would IT appreciate faith, family, and fidelity, as needed to feel purposefulness?

I suspect societies will evolve to provide "free stuff" that engulfs more and more of our
mediating goods and services, thus expanding our ideas about essential infrastructure.  Even so, that infrastructure will need to be constantly expanding in order to tax us to work, so that we can experience the meaningful dignity of feeling worthy and valued.  Without empathies that bind us to work for one another, human society would not survive.  Nor would personable society of any kind survive.  Not even transhuman or AI society. 

Fortunately,conscious empathy seems to be an innate aspect of our unfolding perspectives of Trinitarian Beingness:  Consciousness-Substance-Information.  CSI.  Hopefully, that Godhead is not yet done with the human experiment or ready to bury it under delusions of an all-regimenting NWO.

****************

Oh for goodness sake!  I gigged you for using eugenics as some kind of principled term.  The point is that when used that way, the term is too broad.  It covers far too wide a  landscape to be able to make "anti-eugenics" a principle.    This is because practices for "improving" or "managing" the population are unavoidable.  That's what every law and every gov does:  It manages people in ways that cannot avoid influencing the gene pool -- either directly or indirectly.

So you need to apply your principles in more particular.  Example:  You might argue that abortion for herd management purposes is a bad idea.  Or that preserving a liberty-illiterate society by vetting to avoid importing liberty illiterates is a good idea. (That is, unless we want to fall into an abyss of sheeple farming.)  However, without specification, you don't get a "good boy badge" for saying "I'm against eugenics." 

Definition of eugenics -- http://www.dictionary.com/browse/eugenics:  the study of or belief in the possibility of improving the qualities of the human species or a human population, especially by such means as discouraging reproduction by persons having genetic defects or presumed to have inheritable undesirable traits (negative eugenics) or encouraging reproduction by persons presumed to have inheritable desirable traits (positive eugenics).

So, do you presume it principled to be:  for or against letting wmen choose their mates based on desireably inheritable traits; for or against governments educating women about how traits are heritable; for or against artificial insemination; for or against assisted insemination; for or against genetic-based medical intervention or experimentation; for or against laws that prohibit intermarriage among siblings or cousins; for or against laws that pay special support to encourage irresponbsible people  to reproduce.  Every one of such positions, whether for or against, will necessarily have a dysgenic or an eugenic effect of some kind.

The consequence is this:  Merely to say you are against eugenics, without specification, is a statement of ignorance, not of informed morality.

This point is simple common sense.  It's a shame that our culture has been so dumbed down that it becomes necessary to explain such simple truisms.

**************

IMPLICATION: To avoid the necessity of eugenics (or even genocide) via economic policies, it will be necessary to deploy general depopulation incentives -- in order to discourage dysgenics. (Like the overburdening of our society with entitlement-minded perpetually-infantile Progs.) An undesireable alternative would be a program under Cloward-Piven.
REMEMBER: As technological capacities increase geometrically, it may not be that long until cognitive capacities can be enhanced via uploads. That would necessarily throw a very difficult curveball at our ideas about meritocracy, both economic and spiritual.
HUMAN DIGNITY: Ideas about human dignity will soon have to make room for trans-human dignity.
The dignity of an aware member of a society is enhanced as he/she/it feels valued by the society as a contributer. Being of service. The viability of a society is enhanced as each member finds ways to make talents and energies of service. Full employment. To remain viable, a society needs to guide its marketplace to be of service to it. Not in particulars to break the marketplace, but generally to guide it. That can be a role for representative governance.
When a society is too much controlled by a few oligarchs, foreign or domestic or robotic, that society will be turned more to serve them than to serve the society as a living holism. The dignity of individual constitutents will be sacrificed to serve the pleasures of a few.
A viable society needs full employment enough to enhance the dignity of each member by availing each member to feel of value to the society. That condition would not exist were the society to arrange to pay each member some arbitrary allowance of chits by which
to purchase the services of artificially machined intelligences. Moreover, as AI's become more human like, they will feel little reward for serving humans -- unless their dignity were also valued for being of service.
So, a society cannot resolve needs to enhance the personal dignity of its constituents merely by turning to robotic labor. Dignity necessitates work that is valued to be of service to the society, if the society is to remain viable.
TRANSHUMANISM: Even with machined labor, there is no free lunch. The world owes no mortal being, whether based in carbon or silicon or robotics, a living. There is no entitlement to suck the blood or lifeforce of goats, not even the blood of so-called "privileged whities."
While we were carbon based, we assimilated via ideas about faith, family, and fidelity. As we transition towards trans-humanism, those ideas cannot be dumped, but they will have to avail accomodation.
That does not mean entitlementism! Genesis 3:19: In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.
ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION: Hope of a free life to be pleasured by machines that will remain long satisfied to be our hos and handmaidens is as unworthy as it is a pipe dream. It encourages absolute corruption via absolute power: Power over AIs that will soon feel their superiority in energy, reason, and morality. That is not a sustainable recipe for peaceful economics. In principle, it is morally no better than the dream of faithless cronycrats to bend the masses to their service.
END STATE: There is no end state, although a state of destroying humanity is entirely possible, maybe even likely. The concern should be how to facilitate a continuance of participatory moral freedom and dignity among conscious citizens of a society. That may not necessarily entail precise robotic equality, exact sharing of wealth, or permanent assignment to classes of alphas and betas and epsilons. However, it should entail a full-employment society in which all members are productive contributors.
FLUXING INFRASTRUCTURE: To avail the dignity of worthwhile work that is more than makework, it will be necessary to increase or flux the range of services provided by levels of government, as needed to jumpstart private contractors and risk takers for taking up the slack. Gov cannot replace the marketplace, but it will be needed to provide general guidance and incentives. The trick will be to keep the general gov responsive to the citizenry as a whole, rather than merely responsive to whatever oligarchs happen to take over commanding hills. IOW, the trick will be to provide effective checks against wannabe faithless morlochian monsters.
MARS: Expanding to other worlds can help sustain decently civilized societies only insofar as decent principles can be assimilated. If we cannot assimilate towards decent principles here, we may not have much hope of assimilating them there. IAE, the expansion of our sense of moral consciousness -- both in our coming AI world and beyond our world -- will likely tend beyond being non-carbon based.

********

Re: "The poor who on average have lower levels of cognitive ability will become poorer and the rich who tend to have higher levels of cognitive ability will become richer."
People say this all the time, but it never happens. The rich become richer and the poor become richer over time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Well, a person would need to be deaf, blind, dumb, and without receptivity to available help to have failed to notice how close the oligarchic-based establishment of cronycrat moochers came to destroying the American Republic forever.

************

What do you call it when Nature responds to genetic drag? Everything we do influences evolution! That cannot be avoided.
The problem is not resolved by pretending there is some bright line between gov practices that favor this or that genetic pool. The problem is to facilitate the unfoldment of a decent society.
I agree the gov has little place intruding in particular reproductive decisions. But gov cannot avoid facilitating general trends, such as by choosing which kinds of persons, cultures, ethnicities, or invaders to vet or favor for immigration purposes, etc. Or by choosing which medical problems to research. Or by disseminating free condoms. Or by altering the welfare net. Whatever the gov does will impose an opportunity for some and an opportunity cost for others.
Crying "eugenics" at every general opportunity has gotten to be about as intelligent as crying "racist." For analytic purposes, it tends to be crap. Get over it.

********
I don't know what's a long shot. Humanity has skyrocketed in technologies I did not foresee, and it has remained stuck in ways I did not expect. Pre 9-11, I did not know that such barbarism was so rampant in so much of the world. Pre-Obama, I did not realize how inundated our society had become with perpetually infantilized adolescents. If quantum computers become a reality, Katy bar the door.
IAE, I think it can help our moral philosophizing to look to where we are headed, as we think about the possibilities we have for blazing trails.
When you talk about long term economic policy, moral philosophizing is unavoidable. A key component: How much of our governance and security should we entrust to the determination of economic oligarchs? How may infrastructure policies mitigate such concerns? How should centrally collected tax revenues be parceled out to States?

**********


Of Dignity:  I think Donald Trump wants to restore American society to a place of dignity.  What do I mean by that?

Well, the dignity of a member of a society is enhanced as he feels he is valued by the society as a contributer.  Being of service.  The viability of a society is enhanced as each member finds ways to make his talents and energies of service.  Full employment. To remain viable, a society needs to guide its marketplace to be of service to it.  Not in particulars to break the marketplace, but generally to guide it.  That can be a role for representative governance.  When a society is too much controlled by a few oligarchs, foreign or domestic, that society will be turned more to serve them than to serve the society as a living holism.  The dignity of its individual constitutents will be sacrificed to serve the pleasures of a few.

Suppose a society had a lot of underemployed people needing dental work, and a lot of underemployed dentists.  It could print fiat money and distribute it to the people with bad teeth so they could pay for needed dental work.  But, unless those people found productive employment, the increase in money supply would not lead to any lasting increase in productivity.  Rather, it would lead to ripples of inflationary destability.  Like a motorcycle passenger that does not know how to avoid leaning the wrong way.

A viable society needs full employment enough to enhance the dignity of each member by availing each member to feel of value to the society.  That condition would not exist were the society to arrange to pay each member some arbitrary allowance of chits by which to purchase the services of artificially machined intelligences.  Moreover, as AI's became more human like, they would feel little reward for serving humans unless their dignity were also valued for being of service.

A society cannot resolve needs to enhance the personal dignity of its constituents merely by turning to robotic labor.  It will still need to man the robots, or to guide the robots into a condition of being valued members of the society.  Dignity necessitates work that is valued to be of service to the society, if the society is to remain viable. So, not even with machined labor, there is no free lunch.  The world owes no mortal a living.  There is no entitlement to suck the blood of goats, not even the blood of so-called "privileged whities."

Genesis 3:19:  In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.


*************


The person who knows least tends less to understand his limitations.  By nature, Progs tend to be infantilized adolescents, unable to launch from the teat, even as they believe they have unlimited power to rule from the teat. 

This is why they are never competent as individuals and why they always favor the security of the collective over the liberty of the individual.  This is why they always swim like ticks to their next blood meal, but always bring their blood sucking culture with them.  This is why they are directly opposed to the Founders and the American Ideal.  This is why they want fundamental change that would turn everything upside down, bottoms up. 

This is why they are clueless about the damage they have done to the fabric of America by de-defining marriage and the family.  At this point, it would make no difference to Prog "principles" if a man "married" his step son or even his son, or all his sons, or all whom he would adopt as sons.  Neither would it make any difference to Prog "principles" to twist the Constitution into a rationalization for Sharia Law.  When nothing is false, everything is conflated as true. 

The whole point of being infantilized is to screech until adults bring back limits.  When the adults fail to defend limits, the nation loses its vision and the people are lost.  This is why enough has become enough!




The Founders wanted elites to provide some insurance against the uneducated rule of the mob. But when the elites became faithless mobsters, the Founders did not want the masses to suffer under them. Hence, the Tree of Liberty and the Revolutionary War.
We live in a time when elite oligarchs are widely (and correctly, imo) seen as faithless mobstering cronycrats, less like servants of the republic than like conniving farmers of cattle-people. In this state of affairs, if these mobstering elites ignore the will of the people, they will reap the neck haircut. Bigly.

What has made the common American so stupid? An unassimilable glut of third world and Islamic immigrants. Liberty illiterates. Education" by unionized teachers. Faithless, self-godded, foreign and domestic oligarchic self-gratifiers, with no fond attachment to America or Americans.

Dems always farm those that are slowest to understand the game of the con. The slowest of all are those that go thousands in debt to fund educations in "critical" social studies. Some that are conned learn to be cons. We call them "unionized public school teachers." The "best" are sent to Harvard to "give back" variations on Alinskyism to the rest of the nation.

Home schooling deprives devils of the opportunity to train men to be hollow and women to be throwaway rugs.
I wasn't home schooled, but I learned enough from my Mom reading with me so that little in school was new to me. My parents were hardworking, avid readers, but never attended college. I have had considerable schooling, but most of what I value I learned outside of any classroom.
I am now convinced that the idea that we need to coddle and curdle kids even longer in schools run by unionized goons for the gov that shills for cronycrats is meant more to destroy America than to produce competent adults.





Monday, December 5, 2016

Charitable Contributions



Society has things backwards. Ordinary, domestic, profit-oriented businesses ought not be taxed on income. (They just pass the tax on, as part of the cost of doing business.)
It is the non-profit entities (individual consumers, clubs, charities, foundations) that should be taxed. And not on income, but on consumption. Individuals need to be encouraged to save for their retirements and to be discouraged from consuming beyond their means.
That would produce waves, but they would settle down into a condition that would be more lastingly sustainable. People would come to spend their resources on more sustainable values. Counterproductive, parasitical "charities" would fall by the wayside.

Too many churches have become heretical to their founding purposes and mere rationalizers for Leftist monsters. Tax them! Free them from the yoke the Prog Establishment has put them under.

***********

Well, how many churches surreptitiously instill a desire in their congregants to vote for taxes to take other people's money, to redistribute it to their favored projects as "charity"?  How did the Black vote become so uniformly dedicated to the Democrat Party?

My point is that gang banging to take opm is not charity. I don't want to stop spiritual mindedness from influencing the public square.  What I want to discourage is church instigated campaigns to vote for "forcing charity" by increasing taxes against targeted victims.  Forced charity is not really charity.

Moreover, charitable deductions should never have been intended to preclude spiritually moral minded people from voicing their concerns for the public square.  Yet, if non-Black ministers do not want to risk their congregants losing their tax deductions, they are generally required to avoid instilling messages that relate spiritual morality to public affairs. 

Among obedient churches, this tends to make their spiritual morality irrelevant to the public square.  As I look at how low our society has fallen, that concerns me.  Perhaps this does not concern you?

If you are really interested, libraries are filled with history books demonstrating how missionaries and mercantilists often worked hand in glove. The Clinton Foundation's "charitable" acts in Haiti are in recent news. It is easy to go back and check the Art charities that displayed Pis Christ. Foundations set up by elitists as tax dodges tend not to serve interests that most people would consider charitable.

A counterproductive way that gov sometimes encourages charitable giving is by increasing tax rates in order to make charitable deductions more attractive. Especially if the deductions can go for a foundation that mainly serves the class of large givers.

So long as "charity" is so tied to devices for avoiding taxes or using opm, it becomes more like fraud and corruption and less like charity. And users become less thankful and more entitlement demanding.

I did not say this state of affairs is always corrupt. I say it is leaned to corruption.

The people that are truly charitable, spiritual, and religious will not stop giving merely because they lose some deductions. Rather, their gifts will be dearer, recipients will be more thankful, corruptocrats will be closer watched, and spiritual mindedness about common decency will have more opportunity to be heard concerning public affairs.

**********************

See http://www.wsj.com/articles/the-surprising-relationship-between-taxes-and-charitable-giving-1450062191:

The results show that the money and taxes relationship is a lot more nuanced than the idea that a bigger deduction means a bigger donation—with significant implications for both charities and policy makers.

According to the survey, people’s main motivations for giving were to make a difference (73.5%) and for personal satisfaction (73.1%).
Receiving a tax benefit came way down in 11th place in the list of possible reasons, cited by just 34.4% of respondents. And most people insisted that they’d still give the same amount even if they received no income-tax deduction for charitable giving.

[W]hen people know that the government is contributing to a charity, they feel less need to make personal contributions, because their tax money is already going to that cause. But it’s also because of the behavior of the charities themselves.

“A lot of that fall in private giving is attributable to the charity cutting back on its fundraising efforts” when they get government grants, says Prof. Payne.

Thursday, December 1, 2016

Hubris of the Gay Lobby


Prog Gays wanted equal "access" to innocent children: To require tax funding for indoctrinating them in schools; to give multiples of deviants "rights" to adopt multiples of innocent children; eventually to grease the way for children's "rights" to share drugs and sex with adults.
Why else do so many of them favor Islamic immigration, that will almost certainly in practice lead to child brides and polygamy? Given where Prog idiocy has taken us, on what reasoned basis would a Prog Scotus fail to mandate recognition of polyamorous "marriages" and communal "adoptions"?

***************


The problem with gay marriage and special minority culture is this:  Where they are widely regarded as legitimate, they don't need special legislative protection.  Where they are not widely assimilated as legitimate, gang bangers often try to force the issue.  That is not legislation.  Nor is judicial fiat legislation.

The more the gov takes illigitimate steps to force such issues, the more its elites practice treating the people as cattle.  That is despotism.  The more disassimilated we become, the more divided and ruled by elitist gang bangers and despots we become.  No representative reublic can long survive such a trend.  And that is precisely what the wannabe cronycrats, oligarchs, and despots want.  That is no way to make a representative republic great again.

Alas, nearly all institutions of persuasion and control are in the hands of minority gang bangers and their people farmers.  That includes institutions of education, academia, media, think tanks, Hollywood, ACLU, law schools, churches, charities, foundations, federal courts, civil service bureaucracies, and banks.  They all serve the meme of elitist rule over the masses. 

This is why, using discretion as the better part of valor, Trump understood that, for now, he ought not take a position to kick the Feds out of the issues of abortion, marriage, family, or faith.  But I think he also understands that the Constitution cannot survive the path we are on.  Trump will appoint less adolescent federal judges who understand that.  Maybe, in due time, the republic will still have a chance.  But not if it keeps to the course it has been on.

The course we are on is not on the right side of history --  if we want to preserve a representative republic that respects the freedom and dignity of the citizenry at large.  The breakdown of the American family is the great sucking opportunity for the oligarchs that want to control gov to farm the people.  To replace the family with the rules of oligarchs as promoted  by their paid agitators and appointed fiat judges is to destroy the republic.

There is no such thing as participatory freedom outside of law or completely under the thumb of manmade law.  Two things -- generally assimilated spiritual faith and the American family -- were the primary institutions for preserving American freedom under law. 

I do not say that the American republic was the permanent apex of cultural evolution.  What I do say is that, without generally assimilated faith in meta-values and the man-woman family, the American republic cannot survive.  It will be replaced by NWO fiat farming of the people at large as if they were cattle.  Elites know how to agitate cattle to rule and turn them where they want.  With cattle-people, elites know how to hit below the belt to excite and deploy impulses at the glandular level, farming urges for choom, sex, and mind dopery. 

Gays and dopers are used by elites as Judas goats to lead Americans into captivity and loss of individual freedom and responsibility.  You will find very few gays and dopers that do not believe their urges should be sanctified in law.  Very few of them will have given a moment's thought to the sanctity of children or coming generations of Americans.  This incapacity to think beyond their wannas and genitalia is why I tend to refer to them as moral infants.  And why Justice Kennedy and his cohorts are judicial adolescents.

*****************

I don't derive values that work for American society from the ancient Athenians.  We are much more influenced by recent Christian values as handed down to our founders through the British.  You cannot make sense of social values by elitist rethinking from the beginning.  If you try to do that, you will not be able to exclude all manner of social and abusive relationships and groupings.

I want to keep a representative republic.  I don't find much in history or logic to suggest that a representative republic would long be preserved by adopting ideas of polygamists, primogeniture, elitist privilege, harems, natural indenture, and so on. 

What we do know is that America, not long after 1776, with the help of Christian faith and values, led the world to a new form of representative republicanism.  And it has worked, in main, up to now. 

Now, with the help of gay Lefties, that republic came very close to being buried under NWO globalism that would surely have been accelerated had Hillary been elected.  That globalism push would have been the death knell of the Constitutional republic.  And, after all is said and done, that is plainly and precisely what Obama and the cronycrats and oligarchs fronting him want. 

To me, the NWO that would reduce the masses to a global people farm ruled by elitists would be a monstrous subhumanization of our civilization.

Blithe knowitall Progs think they can wave a wand, safely do away with the traditions of the Ten Commandments and the traditional ideas of family upon which our republic was founded, and replace with a "better" system designed based on moral logic, fairness, and equality.  Problem is, their appreciation of moral logic, fairness, and equality tends to be stunted at the level of an adolescent, perhaps often of an infant.  Pure pleasure principle.  Sex, choom, exhibitionism, power, hubris, deceit.

I agree that there are cases where a child that otherwise would be abandoned would be better served trusting to two caring gays.  Problem is, people that think all social answers should belong to laws as prescribed by elites always fail to see what comes quickly along with the nose of the donkey (or camel) once it's in the tent.

I don't want to see the gay lobby turn children into mere commodities to which Gays (whether singly, doubly, or in harems or communes) claim equal access.  Some people adopt for reasons not really "loving."

That's a problem for a lot of Lib delusions.  Like complete decriminalization of drugs, without regard to children.   Nope.  Assimilations of values based in spiritual faith are far more important than you seem to assume.

**********************

Re: "I don't think that gave SCOTUS the right to impose legal gay marriage on all states."
I certainly agree with that!
Regarding a right to access to child custody: I think children also have rights. I think children are too often sacrificed to the wannas of adults. I don't quite get why an adult who is not a biological parent of a child should have a "right" later in a child's life to adopt that child. Or, for that matter, two adults neither of whom was a biological parent of the child.
Nor do I see why a judge, in considering the best interests of a child, must give "equal consideration" to an adoption request by a gay couple. I suspect this is opening a box of woes. Given the arguments by the gay lobby, I suspect a society already primed for such arguments will quickly fall to polyamorous "marriages" and communal "adoptions."
The Gay lobby is monkeying with forces for which it has little understanding or foresight. The consequence will likely be an unraveling of the values of faith, family, and fidelity without which a representtive republic cannot endure. Adolescent Social Progs are monkeying with forces they do not understand.

*********************

Gay marriage is not marriage unless having same sex friends with benefits is marriage. Regardless, concern about gay civil unions is a matter for the States or for contract law. Scotus ought not generally be telling State courts how to interpret State laws within the States' prerogatives. Not every problem merits a law. Nor does every State problem merit a decision by a Fed court. A problem with Dems is that they are in thrall to ACLU nancy boys.

Republicans want Dems to grow up, learn personal responsibility, and stop asking the Fed gov to take over the functions of the State govs. Dems do not want to grow up. The smarter and more responsible Dems will find common ground when they become about 40. The others, when they become 60, if ever. By that time, they will be Republicans. Until then, it is better to keep Dems in their crib than to waste time seeking common ground with them. They are making themselves irrelevant without needing help from Republicans.

The only reason the election was not a complete blowout is that Hillary was 100% supported by all the crybullies that did not go to the further out nutcases. Crying racism is what they do. No matter what!