Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Peaceful Protestors

A lot of Lefties are more like infants, looking to force the gov to take the place of parents that over-indulged them. Their tactics are not that far from temper tantrums. Some toddlers aren't used to having to articulate their concerns. They expect their parents to read their body language, i.e., frowns, wailings, tantrums, fits, feces throwing. They increase the protest volume when that is rewarded. So it comes to pass that thugs are given space to destroy. They haven't learned about t for tat.

Mathematically, the best strategy tends to be this: Start out nice, then exchange t for tat -- subject to forgiveness. Or a smiley face. :)


Not so good is to give out participation trophies or to pass out rewards for nothing. Watch The Miracle Worker sometime, about Helen Keller.

This is basic. But it seems to have escaped most teachers and profs. Have they been educated into stupidity? Given the damage they have done to the society at large, I don't see the point in trying to put it more politely. They have earned far, far worse.

This seems not that much different from what God/Nature does to us, over the long run. Like Karma.

The peaceful protestors are those supporting Trump. The people spraying pepper, shouting down speakers, undermining free speech, banning books, faking affronts, and vandalizing property are Dems.

Who is more corrupt and has the lower IQ: The typical Klansman, or the typical BLM Looter/Vandal? Well, check the crime stats.

I suspect the stock of genes that indulged the lynchings of the past is similar to the stock of genes that presently provides useful idiots, agitators, and thugs for the Paymasters who profit from divisiveness.

Genes and Memes that made Klansmen now make Progsmen. Still working for the corrupt Paymaster. An incompetent, infantile, incorrigible, blood-sucking Dem is a blood-sucking Dem.

This is the double-plus double-standard of double-thinking disciples of Marcuse. This is rationalized as necessary, to even the playing field. Even though the playing field (most of the institutions of persuasion, bribery, seduction, and force) is largely owned and operated by godless and godforsaken paymasters of Proggies (who nevertheless cherish membership in their fellow gang-banging tribes). Why do secular atheistic Jews cherish their Jewish membership? Why do Blacks want to exclude Whites? And so on.

There is nothing good or decent about perpetual infantilism or gang-banging rationalization. They are little more than rationalization for evil parasitism and predation. Infants, after all, start off as parasites. If they do not grow out of that phase, they remain parasites indefinitely. You cannot fix Proggies or talk them out of parasitism by rewarding parasitism or by being nice to it.

First, you seem to target Conservatives. Then you want to target Whites. Then to imply White Klansmen are more likely serial killers. I don't trust your notions.

I suspect you want to claim to be fair minded and not a racist, yet want to blame some kind of "white gene" for an increased propensity for mass crime. I was talking about the distribution of corruption, intellect, and crime at the fringes of both Political Parties.

I do suspect that the more indoctrinated a person is, the more likely he is to take his violence outside of his family and community.

With regard to your race-based notion, I checked https://www.fbi.gov/stats-s..., to see if there was any substance in support.

Some pertinent quotes from that source are:

"The racial diversification of serial killers generally mirrors that of the overall U.S. population."

"The difference between these types of offenders [killers] and other serial murderers is the nature of their traveling lifestyle, which provides them with many zones of comfort in which to operate."

"Serial murderers, like all human beings, are the product of their heredity, their upbringing, and the choices they make throughout development."

"Neglect and abuse in childhood have been shown to contribute to an increased risk of future violence. Substance abuse can and does lead to increased aggression and violence."

"The development of a serial killer involves a combination of these factors, which exist together in a rare confluence in certain individuals. They have the appropriate biological predisposition, molded by their psychological makeup, which is present at a critical time in their social development."

"The majority of serial killers who are sexually motivated erotized violence during development. For them, violence and sexual gratification are inexplicably intertwined in their psyche."

"Attendees did identify certain traits common to some serial murderers, including sensation seeking, a lack of remorse or guilt, impulsivity, the need for control, and predatory behavior."

"Psychopathy is a personality disorder manifested in people who use a mixture of charm, manipulation, intimidation, and occasionally violence to control others, in order to satisfy their own selfish needs."

"The lifestyle behaviors include stimulation-seeking behavior, impulsivity, irresponsibility, parasitic orientation, and a lack of realistic life goals. The anti-social behaviors include poor behavioral controls, early childhood behavior problems, juvenile delinquency, revocation of conditional release, and criminal versatility."

"Psychopaths are not sensitive to altruistic interview themes, such as sympathy for their victims or remorse/guilt over their crimes. They do possess certain personality traits that can be exploited, particularly their inherent narcissism, selfishness, and vanity."

"Ideology is a motivation to commit murders in order to further the goals and ideas of a specific individual or group. Examples of these include terrorist groups or an individual(s) who attacks a specific racial, gender, or ethnic group."


See also https://www.scientificameri...

"African-Americans comprise the largest racial minority group among serial killers, representing approximately 20 percent of the total. Significantly, however, only white, and normally male, serial killers such as Ted Bundy become popular culture icons."


At bottom, we are all human beings. The more we focus on race and other superficialities, the more we miss the more important social issue, which is: Do we as a society want to retain a decent respect for the freedom and dignity of individuals, as availed under a representative republic? Or do we want to subjugate the republic to a new, lowest common denominator, globalism -- to be ruled by "morally beneficent" (fair minded and equal) elitists and their oligarchic paymasters?

With regard to taxes and regulations, it's complicated to say what we should worry about.  My take would be this:
We should worry about our tax incentives that are perverse.  We need incentives and ways to gradually trim population, trim gov size, trim gov expenditures, delegate gov functions to states and localities.
If power players are not to evolve and devise ways of divisiveness and technology to kill us all, we need less stress.  More assimilation of a kind of empathy that is strong enough to pre-emptively defend its liberty against sociopathic people abusers.  Less meekness and more strength in social values related to Christianity.
Less race baiting.  More tolerance for the spiritual value of each person.  Less tolerance for sociopathic gang-bangers, fascists, and narcissistic despots.  Less tolerance for the idea that it's ok for societies of proven fascists and despots to use gov funds to indoctrinate populations with tribal based hatreds and to acquire dangerous technologies.  Less tolerance for sub-humanizing cultures seeking to acquire instruments of mass destruction.
We should not allow sub-humans to grow technologically strong.  We should not allow oligarchs to gain absolute or worldwide power.
Problem is, our schools and institutions are teaching and promoting opposites:  Weakness, toleration of monsters, political correctness as defined by despotic oligarchs, safe spaces, delusionary free stuff, doped up vacations from reality, gender fluidity, family de-definition, polyamory, gov as nanny, social and individual irresponsibility, undue faith in the noblesse oblige of people abusing elitists, and so on.

No comments: