Sunday, October 6, 2013

Dance of Feedback


DANCE OF FEEDBACK BETWEEN PERSPECTIVES OF THE WHOLE AND OF THE PARTS:Formulas that avail the unfolding of measurable signification, by thus, perhaps also avail the qualitative apprehension of perspectives of consciousness.Thus, the unfoldment is in respect of a perpetual, present, qualitative apprehension of quantitatives.If there were only quantitative, with no dance with qualitatives, then there would be an uncommunicated, predetermined unfoldment, of no meaningful existentiality. Thus, quantitatives avail limits for each next unfoldment, while apprehensions of qualitatitives feed back, to participate in choice making.Thus, limits of quantitatives and participations of qualitatives are reconciled.Thus, there is neither free will, nor predetermination.Rather, there abides a“dance” of contemporaneous participation in respect of a reconciling holism.

EXPERIENTIAL PRESERVATION:By what Mechanism or Field, if any, may Information about previous vibrations be recorded, preserved, accumulated, spread out, remembered, forgotten, or recycled into the Perpetual Present?It does not seem that a Source Unit would“flux” in any meaningful way, without simultaneously availing Signifying expression of a Field of numerous, vibrational, Vector Values, i.e., Locally Relational Vibrational Vector Units. Is a Meta Aspect of Field necessarily associated with a Meta UNIT of Form?May such Field mediate and accumulate Vibrations, as Iterations of a Combinatory Singularity?Does some Substratum of Math avail such Field, and Vibrations within it, to be Aspects of a Singularity, without de-unitizing the Singularity?Is THE UNITY, in aspects, like a TRINITY, being expressive of (1) Unit of Form (God Perspective?), (2) Unit of Field (Holy Ghost Context?), and (3) Unit of Iterations of Vibrations (Jesus Purposefulness?)?Are the vibrations Continuously Degreed across one dimension, while being Discretely separate and Digitally Leaping across another?Depending on point of view, context, and purpose, may aspects of the Trinity be reasonably intuited to be both meta-qualitative and significatorily-quantitative?When quantitative, may Information be subject to limiting Conservation, to be Recycling between manifestiality and potentiality?May previous preservations of Information about Vibrations of the Source Unit, by being preserved as Information in the Field, necessarily and continuously take on changing and Recycling Qualities (or Personalities) for availing changing dimensional representations?

CAN GOD FORGET:May quantitative information in the Manifest be converted and stored as qualitative information in the Potential?Perhaps, in that way, God can in the temporal “remember” all the information that is manifest, and “forget” all the information that is potential.

WAY STATION: Without present consciousness, there is no meaningful world of manifestation.That which is recorded into present manifestation, with no experiential consciousness, seems like a WAY STATION, for transitioning in the flux of feedback between a world of present manifest consciousness and a world of apprehension of potential unfolding.

THE CLOUD:May the next intermediate formula be beyond our easy senses, but not beyond our eventual empiricism, via an organization of Baconian Organon into “The Cloud?”May The Cloud divine means, itself, to birth and express New Perspectives, for expressing, measuring and experiencing new derivatives of qualities and colors, and reporting back?May it find and organize with Other Clouds, via projective polarities?Is there a Meta Cloud that abides over all, beyond and higher?A Cloud of Clouds of Clouds?Like Choirs of Angels, Substrata of Substrata, Organizations of Organizations, Formulas of Formulas?

INNATE EMPATHY: Vibrating projections of Iterations are subject to organizing with sub-formulas, for Organizing and Conserving their projections.Thus, vibrating projections carry innate capacity to be organized, to seek and feel their associates.Thus, a Quality of vibrational pressure is derivative of organizations of innate empathies and appreciations.Thus, Organization of small vibrations of innate empathy leads to feelings of qualities and perceptions regarding the organizations-- i.e.,, causal forms of pressure, representation, sensation, light, differentiation, perspectives, apprehension, ART.

RELATIONSHIPS WITH COSMIC EMPATHY:A main issue would seem to pertain to relationships with Cosmic Empathy.What cosmos of relationships would an interested, apprehensive, Reconciler of consciousness seek to coax into manifestation?In reconciling empathies, how would a Reconciling Agency factor local expressions of competition and cooperation? Note that both competition and cooperation would be aspects of empathy, i.e., of perspectivistic organization and iteration of intuitive caring between Cosmic Empathy and local Perspectives.

FEEDBACK OF MIND: Mind may be conceptualized as a correlative coordinator of experience.Mathematical truths limit parameters within which sub-organizations for perspectives of mindful Will can evolve. Constant mathematical relationships among sub-significations of physical forms are a priori functions of Truth, which often waits to present on mindful formulations. The Logic of Will (of desire) is constrained by the Math law of Conservation, which reconciles among the many, to the one unfoldment, from among many qualities of perspective. Sensory experience emerges to our conscious apprehension, in association with how our sense detectors present to our organizations of brain.In what respect may mere reason and logic help divine how such relationships and associations came to be, or how they came to experience qualities?



 

49 comments:

Anonymous said...

Obama does his best to stir up the rainbow rabble, while Cruz tries to wake us to that fact. The American people are prostrate while being pummeled military martial arts style, and Harkin is concerned that Cruz is leading us to hit the rabbles' fists too hard with our heads. If we don't lie still and take our licking, we must be virtual racists and verbal bullies. Every thinking person knows the Progs will do their double damn utmost to demonize Ted Cruz as Joe McCarthy. Ted needs to be squeaky clean in every respect, or he will be ripped and torn asunder by the pink-anti-bullying, all-we-need-is-love, ferociously-cannibalistic, baby-ripping Left. May the mandate of heaven help him. Leftists handle the responsibility of voting about as well as they handle the responsibility of owning guns and raising their children. They know they cannot be trusted with freedom, so they want no one else to be trusted with it, either. If it comes to that, I would rather that we simply stop entrusting Leftists. It may come to this: Those who show not to be fit, must be severed quick. Carve out a blue mass and exile them there en masse. Call it Diversity Heaven and let Obungo be their King. Let them fornicate to their hearts' content with every living and unliving thing.

Anonymous said...

Apparently, when people collectivize, it's not bullying to use the force of the collective. So it's not bullying to use lawfare to cram same sex marriage down the throat of an unwilling population. It's not bullying to force people to sign up for a health care program that will cost more and deliver less. It's not bullying to trump parents and use schools to sexualize children. It's not bullying to forfeit someone's business because they don't want to cater to homosexual marriage. It's not bullying to forfeit a farmer's land to illegals who trespass on it. It's not bullying to bring the force of federal and state governments, naked of probable cause, to prosecute someone for defending himself. It's not even bullying when you commit mass murder for the purpose of jihad. Nope, It's just workplace violence or man made disaster. So when is it bullying? Well, if you hit someone of the same sex for groping you, that would probably be bullying. Or if you tell a whiner he needs to grow up. Or if you defend yourself from someone who throws a first punch, that may be mutual bullying, leading to suspension of both people involved. So, anytime you stand up for your values, as an individual rather than as a parade or gang, you are a bully. I think I get it: Individualists are bullies; collectivists are freedom fighters; and slavery is freedom.

Anonymous said...

Liberty is much more threatened today than ever. Yes, as the Civil War approached, the nation was very divided, but it was NOT multi divided into such a polyglot. Each side still valued liberty, even though one side had come to deem its slaves as being forever unfit for liberty. However, both sides still sought to preserve liberty of a sort. Our situation has changed. The entire nation has become the sort of polyglot that Orleans was at the time of Jefferson. Jefferson did not think that Orleans could soon be organized into a state. He expected Orleans would need to be more authoritatively ruled, because he did not think its mix could handle the responsibility to govern itself as a republican state. Louisiana law is not based on English common law. It is based more on the Napoleonic Code and non-Anglophone sources. Now, most of the nation seems to have become a polyglot, and the majority seems to want equality of distribution and rule under elites much more than it wants liberty. In that sense, I think liberty is much MORE threatened today than it ever was during either the Revolutionary War or the Civil War. To Jefferson, liberty was the thing. Whether the nation split was less important, since the spirit of liberty would continue, nonetheless. He was mistaken, perhaps because he did not foresee that we would commit cultural suicide under an onslaught of third world immigration. The polyglot has now so grossly diluted the spirit of liberty that far fewer of the progeny of the founders remain inclined to raising families --- much less spreading liberty. The modern divide is between those who cherish individual liberty versus those who cherish collectively redistributed equality. The bloodshed may be less, but the stakes are higher.

Anonymous said...

The practical reality, however, has come to be that there is no law except that of the law of the hierarchy, through the ethereal common law, limited only by such legislatively enacted law as the elitist judiciary deems, through interpretation of the "living Constitution," not to violate what it is told to deem best. This is a battle that has been raging since Jefferson. As means for monitoring, tracking, enticing, and misleading people continue to accelerate, the institution of the judiciary will fall ever further and faster under hierarchical elitist control. The tip to Constitutional oblivion will come if or when Obama or Hilary appoints the fifth arse of scotus. Forget the 12th Imam. The 5th Arse of Scotus is the tipping point. At that point, the entire law, not just the Constitution, will become what well-rewarded (or threatened), "wise elites" say it is. And who will say what these judges shall say? Why the Executive (chief-executive-ordering-regulating-dictator of the land), of course. We will be as turkeys, telling the chuckling farmer that he works for us, as he leads us to the axe. The 5th Arse of Scrotus, aye, that's the sign.

There is no best legal model that can save us, because no legal model can really mean anything to a people who have fallen into depravity. Hey, legalistic libertarians -- thanks, guys. Way to conserve liberty. Not.

Anonymous said...

The money that funds pols does not like enticers of liberty. It takes heroes to rise in this soil, and they are rare. So we don't get risers. We get floaters. Did Obama rise on merit, or did he float on crap? Obama and all his supporters are floaters on crap. Our political soil is so filled with rot that it may take nature a millennium to repair it. A worthy people may be able to repair it sooner, artificially, but finding guidance to do that would require humble good faith before a patient but tough-loving God. We will get our miracle when we summon the will to march for it, in God's good time. As things stand, most people just want entitlement to equal rights in trinkets, without having to work or earn them, and certainly without having to pay thanks to anyone, not even God.

Anonymous said...

The definitive conflict now underway is between a culture that no longer has meaningful values versus a culture whose values are obscenely evil. The people who retain hope of meaningful values, Western conservers of liberty, in terms of political representation, find themselves in a desert with few leaders. Most Western men seem no longer inclined or competent to commit to a family and take on responsibility to raise children. They do not believe any Author of any higher purposefulness seeks to guide the unfolding development of their progeny. So they seek solace and diversion in effervescent pleasures as they abandon the field of purposeful endeavor to benighted dupes of an evil image of a false god. They push Western conservers of liberty to the fringes, into the desert. That is, they push away the only people who could summon the will and moral fiber to defend them against mindless agents of evil who at least have purpose enough to fill a vacuum. Given this sad fall of Western manhood, to whom do the women flock, to fulfill their "entitlement" to be fertilized and provided for? Why, they become Obama's girls, of course! Things get so upside down that men, to compete for attention, compete to cast themselves as fawning acolytes of Obama. Is this subversion on a grand scale? You betcha. Where does it lead? Well, its not like this is the first rodeo for the pursuit of liberty.

Anonymous said...

Re: "We now know that the Clinton Center is a conduit for funneling money from the Muslim Brotherhood to the Hillary campaign."

People tend to be slow to accept (in denial about) that something can be pure evil when it comes wrapped in smiles (especially when the smiles are backed by media backed by billions in oil money). But a smile is an effective front for a trained killer. And we know the world has plenty of trained and sociopathic killers. They are adept at finding and funding one another, the better to prey on the people who have consciences. Sociopaths cannot relate to people who have consciences, but they surely can prey on them. Yoda knows, wake up we must.

Anonymous said...

In 1940, anyone who was not Naziphobic was nuts. I feel about Islam about the same way I feel about Naziism. Yoda: “Named must your fear be before banish it you can.” Except I am not Islamophobic. I am Islamodisgustednauseatedrevoltedcheesedoff

Anonymous said...

Rinos aren't caving. They're following their business plan. They aren't Americans, not in any ideal or meaningful sense. They're in the sheeple managing business. There is no party that represents Americans. To address a problem, it really helps to identify it. Rinos are part of the problem. No American solution will ever come of them. The blue pill seems to have been perfected, for putting people in the cloud. Now, is there some kind of red pill that can wake people up?

Anonymous said...

When we were a rural nation, people could size one another up personally. Now, it s mainly about image and astroturf managers. These managers tend to be hired gun sociopaths. Give them a good actor or a sociopath who can learn to act (or read lines from totus) and there's very little they cannot sell. As to conditioning the electorate to be reliably and easily misled, both parties invest in that. Advertisers for both want access to the easiest minds they can sell to. The corporate advertisers who pull strings for both parties do not want an independent, thinking electorate. That would be bad for all their business and sheeple-raising interests. The reason Conservers of Liberty lose over the long run is because the easy money is in duping sheeple. And Rinos and Dinos can never get their fill of sheeple. The sad thing is, they paint Conservatives as being racists, while they, to the bone, seek to turn sheeple into the equivalents of indentured, dependent servants --- with little hope of ever lifting the heavy thumb of the advertising corporatists and collectivists whose interest it is to hold them down. And the clincher is, the sheeple never learn until it is too late. Modern education is considerably about mushing minds to make them easy to sell to. The line Rinos and Dinos want is that we need ever more collectivization. The Rino party is not about promoting individualism. It wants collectivism, but wants it under the domination of international corporatism. Frankly, it doesn't mind if that is achieved indirectly, as by convincing sheeple that the Aino owned government is "really" looking out for them. Collectivism, whether under corporatism or under governments owned by corporatists, has become an international corporate syndicate.

Anonymous said...

Why would anyone want to go out in public in an outfit that could be converted to the garb of a witch merely by adding a pointy hat? I took pity on some rabbits and interfered with my cats' hunting. Now neighbors say the multiplying rabbits have attracted rattlesnakes. What will these MBO's who want to garb themselves in such fashion attract? Who are they calling to?

Anonymous said...

Was she unattended? Driving herself? The shame! The dishonor! Sounds like she needs remedial instruction from your friendly neighborhood Taliban. I wonder if the prettiest sound in Kenya is still the Islamic call to prayer.

Anonymous said...

Out of misplaced Christian charity, Americans have made themselves pigeons for otherwise incompetent predators. In the natural world, crows will band together to run off a golden eagle, so it does not invade their territory. The third world multi culti who have overrun America, however, have not the sense to protect their territory. They seem unable to get enough third world "immigrants" to add to the load. They have not the competence of a crow to consider: what happens when the territory (gullible Christians confusing tax redistribution with charity) gets over farmed? Who then can teach incompetent freeloaders to fend for themselves? Answer: Noone. The most competent will move on to steal from another territory, and the remainder will wither in place. Meantime, the soil of liberty will have been despoiled for generations.

Anonymous said...

For anyone who was thinking and watching, it was the goal of Obama and Soros to reduce America, to make America just one among nations, to make spreading wealth globally more important than making wealth. The Plane of State has been taken over by such muckers, and the glide path is set. Until Conservers of Liberty take (not re-take) the Senate, that is the heading that will not change. Whether or not Obamacare is funded, the Regime will continue to spiral America into ever deeper and unsustainable debt. If Obamacare and the government are funded, we will fall deeper into unsustainable debt. If Obamacare and the government are defunded, we will fall deeper into unsustainable debt. Bush was trying to stop "this sucker" from going down. Obama is the twilight monster on the wing, forcing it down. And it is going down, whether Obamacare is funded or not. Obama is not alone. He is assisted by all manner of Rinos, Dinos, Cannibals, and media astro-turfers and grabber accomplices. Obama can put up a backdrop of cheering monkeys at a moment's notice. What is important now is for Conservers of Liberty to stand and identify themselves, to prepare to lead us out of the coming rubble.

Anonymous said...

The thing to do with Jefferson is to try to understand him. Learn from the path he trod and the challenges he faced. That does not require that we make him a saint. Nor does it require that we accept as gospel his notion of a wall of separation between church and state. It does not require that we turn our backs on the Declaration of Independence. Learn how Jefferson tried to make a way for liberty. Learn why he thought liberty would be hard pressed to find a home in societies that are too mixed in cultures of dependence. Learn how liberty is drowned by elitist authoritarianism of promoters of "fundamental change." I suspect Progs have distanced themselves from Jefferson because he was no multiculturalist. They were slow to learn that, but now they have, and so they are poised to throw him under the bus. For Progs, the bus of hyphenated multiculturalism must not be stopped, even if it must kill liberty.

Anonymous said...

Gigo has its uses, as does Ockam's razor. But what of art? You can pin a temporary value on art by auctioning it. However, any attempt to pin an item of art to a static, permanent value would be garbage. But that does not mean that art itself is garbage, any more than any human being or perspective of consciousness would be fairly or entirely described as garbage.
You are right that a lot of people remain imprisoned within a narrow set of basic assumptions. I think these tend to be the people who do not value other people as free beings, but as pawns to a game of control. The Progs who cry tears about the people on welfare want a lot of people to be on welfare, and many of them would fry thousands of people in a New York minute to obtain their ends. Few can seem more caring than a practiced sociopath. Look at Obama, using backdrops of dumb people to make it seem he has more broad based support than he does, even as his intention is to keep them dependent. Not altogether unlike a sheik, I suppose, showing off his harem.

Anonymous said...

Wasn't there a time when liberals were evangelists of liberty? When Americans enlisted abroad to promote liberty, as opposed to clogging at home to promote collective dependence? How is it that metrosexuals and femimen seem to have destroyed that? What happened to Thomas Paine and Common Sense? How is it that "liberal" has come to mean adolescent dependence? With apologies to Rosseau, how is it that liberals recognize that man is born free, but everywhere they wish to put him in chains?

Anonymous said...

Say you have a pack of dogs, and you always feed the most whinny first. Pretty soon, you have a howling, whinny pack of dogs. You may even get some stars --rap artist dogs. Say you're a doc who is authorized to pass out disability evaluations, and there are financial rewards for persons who are evaluated as being disabled. Won't the disabilities inflate, much the same as grades given by teachers inflate, to a point of being the opposite of fair? Say you have a Fed, and you can more or less grow money out of thin air .... Say you have idiot Dems in Congress. But I repeat myself. I don't know a solution. I do know that hopey-changey government is not a solution.

Anonymous said...

Yaakov and Yisrael, mortal Jacob and soulful Israel. Trickster striving with God, with name given to a nation. Einstein, a Jew, said God is not a Trickster. Yet, many people who were perhaps as smart as Einstein in fact believe that the forms of the material world are illusions, maya, formed of or by Consciousness (or God). I suspect people who see only the tricks often blame only the Jews, without intuiting the God behind the illusions. The people who see only the tricks seem often to believe only materialsm is real and that morality is the illusion, the trick. So materialists tend to see nothing wrong with tricking (taquia) people in order to collect them, and they resent people who do intuit that there is something wrong with them. They trick the vote by cheating it, trick the electorate by intentionally dumbing it down, cheat to put cheaters in charge, and then they say, Trust us to take care of the environment and to do the right thing. Maybe this is where Yiddish comes in, all the better to spit on them.

Anonymous said...

MSM will do all it can to prop up Obamacare because it is down for the struggle to bring in a single payer system. From there, msm is down for the struggle to put us all under the rule of elites. Journalists know they're stupid, and they know they need to be ruled. They're begging for it. They're begging to join Obama's family and to ride on his bus. When they get thrown from the bus, they will prostrate themselves and do whatever is desired for them to regain approval. When they no longer produce enough to sustain themselves, they will look for kulaks and Jews to blame and pillage. Journalists will recycle this ugly story, time and again. Obamanauts use their base like wolfpacks guard their territory of dhimmis. Journalists, dhimmis, and idiots, oh my.

Anonymous said...

Charlie Manson cultivated followers who would stop thinking and hang on his words. (Obama has cultivated the MSM to parse his words.) Charlie expected his idiot followers to help him find a bottomless hole in the desert. (Obama has found a bottomless hole in the deficit.) Charlies's idiots were to follow him into a hole until civilization destroyed itself in helter skelter. Then he would emerge hundreds of years later and rule. The difference I see between Charlie and Barry is that Charlie rationalized his confusion out of Revelations, while Barry rationalizes his out of some combination of Marxist historical necessity and the Twelfth Imam. A commonality is the followers of both think they're sane and geniuses. Another commonality is that friends of both remain in deep denial just about right up until they see actual shots from smoking guns. (Compare Phil Kaufman and Maureen Dowd.) A difference is that Obama is actually succeeding in the helter skelter (Cloward-Piven) part. Another difference is that Charlie probably has a higher IQ. http://www.chacha.com/question...
Every so often, the crazies really do rise, and then the world takes an extended holiday from sanity.

Anonymous said...

Caliph-so Calypso (aka Barky) wants Muslim outreach. Evidently, he wants Muslims to feel at home when they go into our parks to wage jihad by arson.

"al-Qaeda’s English-language online magazine, Inspire, published an article called “It Is of Your Freedom to Ignite a Firebomb,” which featured instructions on how to build an incendiary bomb to light forests on fire." http://www.algemeiner.com/2013...

Anonymous said...

It seems like every month there's a new film to ratchet up black grievances. It was entertaining for awhile. The Help. Django. The Butler (filled with lies, guaranteed to be taken by lofos as truths). There's a new one out or coming soon. Money follows money, grievance follows grievance. Generations are aggrieved with grievances that are all in their minds. Whites who have never been racists are made to feel they must be racists because the don't feel guilty enough. This stuff has spun off into madness. Race baiting opportunists are always ready to let no racial madness go wasted, and Obama is always ready to throw gas on the madness. How does America recover her sanity?

Anonymous said...

Frederick Douglass, Thomas Sowell, Clarence Thomas, Allen West. There's hope. However, the education system does not turn Blacks to such people. So the hope is faint until the government is brought down. That seems to be the plan. The idea seems to be to topple governments, to bring in the NWO that is being readied. That may depend on how, and how far, we topple. When it comes to managing unintended consequences, it's not like the Obama kind of people are anywhere near as smart as they think they are. I suspect the people who love the American ideal need to start thinking about how to confront the "post-topple" NWO planners.

Anonymous said...

The more the government taxes, the more useless "work" it does. The more useless work the government does, the more it needs to tax. This is a cancer that out consumes what its host can provide. If we had intelligent government, there could be discussion of the best way to tax. If pigs could fly. So how do we get back to intelligent government? I see only one way: Idiots will have to be left to reap what they sow. Tough love will have to let idiocy fail. The more it's subsidized, the less likely the patient is to recover. Giving government more money for it to redistribute wealth is like giving alcohol to an alcoholic. Let it fail. Stop the continuing resolutions. Let the sucker go down. Let the school of hard knocks sort out the sucker fish, because government cannot rehabilitate them. Let government redistribute empty chairs.

Anonymous said...

No formal study. Life experience. Mixed marriages among near relatives. Lived in Genoa, Texas 1956-58, grades 3-5. Father base fire chief. Various Air Force bases around the world. I enlisted 1967. OCS 1968. Non-college degree lieutenant. Korea 1969. Had Black company commander and sergeants. Aware of racial animosities that era. Minor reading GWTW, TKAM, UTC, Black Like Me. Aware of disturbing racist talk growing up. Parents born 1925 and 1927. Dirt poor. Did not tolerate begging or whining. Expected work. In 65 years, heard a lot of stupid ugly racist talk. Know a lot of racial animosity existed in Houston in 1956. Know a lot of racial discipline problems in Army in 67-70. Idea then was "we're all green." But you could see hatred in eyes in 69-70. I associate now with judges and lawyers of all races. I don't talk race with them. Tried to talk about Obama with a few. Not much two-way on that. I doubt much conversation will help. I think what may help is when some Black leaders begin demanding that people grow up and quit whining. Lots of people have had a rough time. Whining about it doesn't help. Welfare hurts more than it helps. Quotas cause animosity, especially when recipients begrudge hard work. I was in Japan in 1954, Okinawa in 1960, and Korea in 1969. At those times, I suspect those people were far poorer than any minority you will find in any inner city of America today. You didn't find them doing graffiti or refusing to act white. You found them, even in advanced years, carrying amazing loads on their heads, scurrying and working. Now, they have switched places with Detroit. I want all Americans to have a chance, not a handout. No mas. Recommend My Grandfather's Son. Not sure of the title. Good book by Clarence Thomas. Good role model, for human beings of all races.

Anonymous said...

I suspect there is a difference in average IQ's among different groups, and I do not believe it should be a subject "that dare not speak its name." Unfortunately, a lot of emotionally overwrought people do seem unable to handle such discussions. For example, the Harvard women who can never see past Larry Summers' speculation about why there is a gap in high-end achievements in hard sciences between men and women. I would hope that reasoned discussion may someday dilute some of the poison, but that day does not seem to have arrived. The fact that one group may presently display lower average IQ's is not evidence that the gene pool for such group, given competition over time, must always produce such a result. Nor is it evidence of superioriy in virtue of one group over another. However, group differences in IQ's may correlate with increased group susceptibility to manipulative promises of smiling despots. I would not go so far as to say that an IQ difference necessarily would produce more crime, although it seems ntuitive that it would produce more criminals who get caught. I suspect Chicago has a goodly share of white criminals, many of whom do not get caught.

Anonymous said...

I suspect you're right, which is why I qualified with the word "mainly." Habits of study probably also factor. As more Blacks are valued for academic prowess, more of that prowess will be paid forward. Intelligence and capacity to learn are more important in some jobs. The goal should be to let people compete as individuals, not as quota marks. Yes, unfairness will remain, but governmental intrusiveness easily causes more unfairness. Regardless, IQ is not the measure of a person's worth or virtue. Nor is it necessarily a measure of likely intellectual development. I suspect GPA, in comparisons where grades matter, is often a more reliable indicator. Persistence and energy count (i.e., acting white" -- regardless of skin color). Every reasonable effort should be made to vote for President on grounds that are deeper than race or gender. Now, if a person is a Muslim, I would also think it pertinent to examine him and his record closely on his ideas about sharia, jihad, burkas, genital mutilation, infidel dhimmis, apostasy, and honor killings. Ask him if the words of the Koran or Hadith on any such subjects are perfect.

Anonymous said...

Progs are hell bent to fill tne country with minority racists who are incorrigible in their hatred of America. How then is it that the people who actually produce and sustain America are the "racists?" Un-hyphenated Americans of all origins need to assimilate and stop sitting still for this nonsense. Yes, we have racists. Most of them are among those who want to hyphenate and divide us, so they can "come together as a community" to collect from those who actually sustain the republic. Enough.

Anonymous said...

Note also the IQ "argument." It gets creepy. Many of the worst villains in history have had high IQ's. IQ is mainly a matter of inheritance, so it doesn't have a lot to do with ordinary notions of merit. Rightists often point out the tendency to lower IQ's among Blacks. So Leftists get in an uproar. Then Leftists argue residents of Eastern States tend to have higher IQ's than those of Southern States. Of course, they neglect to mention that Southern States have higher concentrations of Blacks. So, both Rightists and Leftists abuse the argument. What the devil does racial tendency for IQ have to do with any close evaluation of a person as an INDIVIDUAL? Rightists like individuality, right? There will probably come a day, as in The Matrix, when IQ can be enhanced with add on's, sort of like adding onto a computer. When that day comes, how will "merit" be determined for the best add ons?

It is important for a board to try to avoid becoming cluttered with racial animosities. Such clutter makes it hard for anyone to speak up against purely racial animosity. People tended to be silent against racial animosity in 1939 Germany. Yes, it's offensive that 95 percent of Blacks voted for Obama because he was Black, and it's offensive that many young people followed, out of peer pressure. In such a culture, it gets to be that much harder for a Black or young person to speak against prejudice against ordinary Americans. It is important on this board that individual merit be prized. Were it otherwise, it would be more understandable why individual merit is more rarely prized in the Black Community, filled as it is with even more peer pressure.

Anonymous said...

To make big money, it helps to have big money. To cannibalize a nation, it helps to have big money. Nothing goes in a straight linear line forever. A republic, to conserve itself, needs enough gravitas to pull those who would end it back into its curve. Some can have more mass, but all must obey the gravity. Once easy money is to be had by destroying a nation, the nation quickly blows to smithereens. There is too much linear thinking about wealth, and not enough thinking about what is needed to conserve a republic of liberty-loving individuals.

Anonymous said...

There is a point worth making that all Americans who are willing to help with the American Dream need to be fully accepted. There's also a point worth making that Americans need to stop taking unwarranted racist accusations. Drawing the line is not always clear, but the effort needs to be made. America needs her great minority people, now more than ever. On the other hand: I don't watch Oprah's show, but I ran across a snippet where she more or less indicated that if you don't see her blackness, you don't see her. The point seems to be this: To minorities, the regalia they wear (hardware in the mouth, tattoos, strange names, loud rap, saggy pants, black lipstick, etc.) is just to celebrate their diversity, not to insult whitey. Nope nope nope. So, minorities can celebrate their cultures (however recently contrived their regalia may be). Un-hyphenated Americans, on the other hand, are presumed more or less to have no culture (plain vanilla), and if they do celebrate a culture (Stars and Bars, flag on lapel, respectful speech, work ethic), why, then they're racists or acting white. The problem is urgent: To stop being a patsy to those who holler "racist," without becoming a racist; to shame people who are too quick to holler racist, without becoming a shameful racist. There's so much background noise (Cloward-Piven, Helter Skelter) that it's becoming ever harder to walk that line. And the background noise often wears "well creased pants."

Anonymous said...

America's Odysseus (full of wrath) has been gone far too long and needs to come home. Odysseus has been afield in an ultimately fruitless quest of a Trojan War (War on Terror, come to naught). Cyclops (OBL) has been buried. Aeolus' bag of wind has been scattered (crazy talk of Alinsky, Ayers, Wright, Sharpton, Cloward-Piven, Helter-Skelter). A few cannibal beheaders of MB have been captured (Khalid Sheikh Mohammed). Circe has turned men into spouses of men (Justice Kennedy). Sirens have consolidated control over most media (shriHillaries). Scylla and Charybdis have been temporarily evaded (now incarnated in Kim Jong-un and Hassan Rouhani). A femme actuelle, Calypso, currently binds America (Obama). Antinous is strutting at large (Harry Reid and John McCain). It is time for Odysseus' son, fighting from afar (Ted Cruz), with help of Athena (Sarah Palin), to come home and put an end to America's false suitors.

Anonymous said...

The Regime grows money on trees, tells the country to screw its brains out, does nothing about Iranians with nukes, and has no idea what to do about Al Qaeda inciting jihad into our borders. It's getting harder to tell whether Obama's platform is Cloward-Piven or Helter-Skelter. Americans need to reinstate Bedtime for Sweet Barrylocks, while the house is still standing.

Anonymous said...

Crony corporatists often like governmental regulation. If we want to get government off corporate backs, we need to get crony corporatists off the government's back. In this age, factory work is going to machines. Human jobs will be high end or service connected. Most of the entities working for corporations will be machines, not people. We need ways to incent a redistribution of work that will preserve America against the international collectivization of Musloids and Commieloids. We can't do that while allowing foreign corporatists to buy up our politicians.
Maybe start by ending taxation of domestic corporate production. I don't know the solution to corporate, union, mob, and commie money being used to buy up politicians. A start would be to end the direct election of senators and revert to the original Constitution. Maybe add a progressive consumption tax, that would treat political contributions as taxable forms of consumption.

Anonymous said...

Charlie Manson taught there's nothing that is wrong. Most people think Charlie is generally reviled, but Progs only pretend to revile him. Like they pretend to revile Rev. Wright. Or like Obama pretends Bill Ayers was just some guy he occasionally met on the street. What a freaking liar! Progs cannot directly revile Manson's teachings without discrediting their own. In truth, most Progs have absorbed most of Charlies's fundamental teachings. He is where Progism leads: on the bus, over the cliff, down the bottomless hole. Weathermen, Panthers, Urban Slaves, Black Muslims, La Raza, Nambla, Code Pink, CPUSA, Acorn, Rainbow Coalition of deviants-perverts-felons hollering hate against whitey-Christianity-decency. What America does not need is Barry or Charlie teaching us more about their "normless norms."

Anonymous said...

The challenge comes from an alliance of elitist greed (Rinos) with ignorant jealousy (Dinos), and it is not being met by responsible empathy. Responsible empathy declines to reward greed and jealousy. Political correctness is irresponsible empathy because it tolerates and rewards what most nice people do not really want. The thinking, responsible class is not represented because it has been intimidated to accept that resisting the alliance of greed and jealousy would be "racist."

Anonymous said...

Political correctness is a way of tying your arms behind your back in order to ensure that you are made the dhimmi of elite zealous collectivists, whether secular or religious. It is the stance of a naif or a traitor. The collectivizing enemy only pretends to be politically correct. In fact, the choomdom of collectivizing Progs is filled with racist-bigot-phobes: racists against whitey; bigots against Christians: and phones against families. They wear the paraphenalia of their little racist groups they bring together in common natred against whitey as proudly as any Nazi ever wore his uniform. From the Nazis, they learned that most people could be intimidated from calling them out for their racism. Before it is too late, Progs must be called out for the racist, bigoted, phobic, fascist, doped-up gang-bangers that they are. While Conservatives are playing nice, Progs are being enticed to "put on their marching shoes." The hatred of Progs for responsible workers, mainstream Christians, and traditional families is boiling in most Prog venues (inner cities and college campuses). It's time to stop pretending that we don't know where the real racist-bigot-phobes live. And where are their leaders? Well, they are the people who know how to profit by hedging and astroturfing people as cattle. You find them in crony corporations, captive colleges, and Congress. They are the people who complain that the Tea Party os an obstacle to "getting things done."

Anonymous said...

Under Obama, America is said not a Christian nation, not a republican nation, and now, not an exceptional nation. Rather, we are in a position of needing other nations to help bring down our presidential imposter, this Manchurian. Moreover, until an American culture is reassimilated and the Oprahesque, elite-effete-prof, salad-bowl, multi-culti, political philosophy is stuffed where it belongs, America cannot be trusted with world leadership. The danger is far too high that every other four years we will elect an absolute goofup, all in the name of diversity.

Anonymous said...

Why in the world should any Conservative with two brain cells to rub together wish to cooperate with people in Congress who are hell bent on usurping authority that is not given to them in the Constitution, in order to burden producing Americans with yet more unconstitutional regulations? Where in the Constitution is authority given to Congress to: saddle us with Obamacare, deliberately fail to deport illegal aliens, impose a carbon credit bank, stand in the way of ensuring legal voting, award affirmative benefits based on race, apply tax revenue to support homosexual relationships in the military, oversee instruction in public schools on homosexual parenting, saddle Nasa with muslim outreach, and use the justice department to incite minorities to force criminal actions without probable cause against people perceived to be white for daring to defend themselves? It takes a MSM idiot to believe Congress should be funding and implementing encouragements to such bs. Of course it is Congress' job to STOP this kind of off the tracks racism, bigotry, and idiocy by Obama and his captive media! What group that is attracted to Obama's coalition is not so racist, bigoted, or lawless as not to need to be stopped?

Anonymous said...

Mirage over a holocaust. There is as much principled substance to the Rainbow Coalition that elected Obama's hopey-changey agenda as there is in a rainbow over a holocaust -- the reality is tyranny, while the hope is all mirage. A mirage that diverts our attention, while our industries are destroyed and our pockets are picked. Imagine if Obama's face, voice, and message were delivered as they truly are, rather than as they are twerked behind miley faces.

Anonymous said...

There's more to be done. I also have lineage. Lift their sights. Maybe help with a network of flash bikers, like the d.c. Bikers. Maybe some retired Code Red White and Blue, instead of Code Pink. For too long, Conservers of Liberty have cowered from being branded as "racists." Embrace every decent person who trusts in a higher power and believes in work and individual responsibility as a "Whitey" --- regardless of color or sex. Shame and brand the real racists for what they are. These people who adopt gang paraphernalia and then strut their hatred of Whitey, i.e., all things American or Judeo-christian --- they are the Racists and Bigots! They wear their effrontery as their uniform. Mark them with it. Brand and shame them with it. They own racism, bigotry, dopery, and toddler-y. Hook up networks to infiltrate their media, their blogs, their teachers Turn their puke back on them. Do not support candidates who accept their puke or cower before it.

Anonymous said...

Long before she was surpassed by Bar-rock, Hilary was well on her way to learning how to unite all minority racists and bigots who want never to have to grow up and take responsibility for themselves, who look for someone to blame and extort. She will be formidable, now that she has been further schooled in the art of being the biggest bull goose racist in the adolescent nuthouse. This is because more than 50 percent of the practical electorate (living, dead, and illegal) consists of racist bigots who are more than willing to believe they are entitled to take whitey's stuff. The hustlers who fronted Obama will take their lists, techniques, and hustles over to Hilary. Even before she starts campaigning, she can count on majority votes from blacks, hispanics, hispanic Catholics, single women, dopers, sex perverts, government employees, collectivist minded Muslims, collectivist minded commies, teachers, and felons. She and most of her followers are among the biggest RACISTS AND BIGOTS you can find. Many will affirmatively vote for her just because she is female. That is affirmative Bigotry. Many will vote for her because they don't like whitey (people who work and want government to leave them alone). That is Racist. Many will vote for her because they want government to become their new mommy and daddy. That is Infantile. Indeed, many want to shove responsibility for raising their children onto the government, so they can get back to grooving. So there you have it: The biggest Racist, Bigot, and Infant will have street cred among the Prog Salad Bown Alliance of Racists, Bigots, and Infants. IOW, the biggest racists, bigots and infants around will be calling every Whitey they can find a racist, bigot, and phobe.

Notice how often the people among Progs who join gangs define themselves by gang paraphernalia against whitey. Notice how these people, who figure they're entitled to take reparations from others, just happen to be the first ones to holler Racissssist. They ARE the racists! They own racism! Oprah helped them perfect it.

Anonymous said...

Obama is the Chief Choomer. We live at a time when a consortium of choomers has happened upon a temporary key to power. Gay, unstable, live for the day, head in the clouds, boom-box gratification rules the roost against ordinary Americans (who are hated for their success, especially when it comes at a cost of dreary work and everyday responsibility). You've heard of a murder of crows. We have a choom of Progs. This doesn't happen very often. Probably because cleaning out the stink of it is a Herculean, nay, a Seinfeldian, task. We have the stink of ObamaChoom.

Obama was never a leader of white men. He never learned how to lead them, and he never tried. He led white college tykes, their prof-ies, their girlie camp followers, and assorted minorities wearing signs saying, Feel sorry for me. As to the mind set that built America ... He wrote that off.

Anonymous said...

I think a local government should be allowed to ban or accept the hijab in its public schools and governmental offices. I don't think banning it violates the free exercise clause, and I don't think allowing it constitutes an establishment of religion. I think most such issues should be resolved by the majority interest, through their appropriate rule makers, who are subject to recall if they outrage the populace. We need to increase the range of individual freedom, and roll back government that intrudes too much against the assimilated majority. We went so far into using government to tolerate and defend individual rights that we forgot about cultural assimilation. We have accorded so many judge decreed rights to a coalition of depraved losers that the idea of an American culture is coming unglued.

Anonymous said...

It's a complex concern with substantial rippling effects. I value the Judeo-Christian heritage, but the great truths I see in it tend to be more figurative than literal. Even so, that heritage provides an assimilating frame of reference, much as is the function of a common language. Lawmakers prioritize their factors. If religious literalism were the only factor, touted as a right rather than a request, I would agree that there is no right to force an establishment of salmon worship. There may not be a bright line answer to the various concerns that are implicated. Which is why I think we need to try to avoid characterizing every question of spiritual values as one of constitutional right or prohibition. Unfortunately, once a society becomes as litigious and divided as ours is, that can be hard to do. We may reach a point where the strongest and most violent clans simply begin deploying all means to achieve their ends. It is far from guaranteed that those of Judeo-Christian heritage will rise to that challenge. Indeed, their heritage may become more irrelevant the more other groups are able to exclude Judeo-Christian values and icons from the public square.

Anonymous said...

The whole point of republican governance is to provide means for citizens to incent the kind of INEQUALITIES that are calculated to sustain the republic. Such as: defend the borders and bring up generations and assimilate families thought reasonably competent to participate responsibly in the governance of the republic. The Founders' main idea was not legally forced equalities in results, but reasonable equalities in opportunities. Legally forced equality in results may be a lot of things, and, In social matters, it may be movement Libertarianism, but it is not classically Liberal. Most of today's Libertarians are movement Libertarians, bent on using government to force equalities in results among social aspects that can never be quantitatively equal (but that may be thought qualitatively equal in idealizations for pursuits of opportunity).

Anonymous said...

It's one thing to profess libertarianism in respect of a right to responsibly choose your moral values. It's another thing to advocate for government to try to force an unobtainable equality in taxation and revenue disbursement concerning all social values. When a "libertarian" advocates for that kind of governance, he is a LINO, i.e., a "libertarian" of convenience. He is hardly different from any other person who simply votes his interests and calls it "principled." A principled republican stance would weigh what is needed to sustain a people who are apt to sustain a republic.

An American Conservative believes liberally in liberty. A movement Lib believes in government to force the collective to change to his liking. Obama is a despotic movement Lib, not a classic Liberal. Among those of years of life's experiences, there may be a principled difference among Libs between movement Liberals and Libertarians. Among millennials, I doubt it.

Anonymous said...

The time was thought auspicious for a takeover under sponsorship of the Muslim Brotherhood. They have Obama's real loyalty. Black Liberation Theology was just convenient "Christian" cover for political purposes. At least, until it became necessary to muzzle Rev. Wright. Everytime we get the real goods on Obama's friends and benefactors, they have to be exiled umder the bus. That's Obama's improvement on the Trotsky problem. Each time Obama feels he has secured enough cover, he pulls the slip up to reveal a little more. First, it was bigoted to refer to him as Hussein. Then it was not. First, he pretended to appeal to competent members of Middle Class America (Whitey). Then, he announced he does not need us. First, he lectured us on a wrong step in failing to interpret the Constitution as guaranteeing affirmative rights. Soon, he will announce that the Constitution has evolved to be subservient to the UN. Which is subservient to a fluxing syndicate of cynical, crony corruptocrats -- with branch offices in Chicago.